Trial Outcomes & Findings for Remote Monitoring in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (NCT NCT01678560)
NCT ID: NCT01678560
Last Updated: 2019-12-11
Results Overview
Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence defined as mean PAP use being \> 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights.
TERMINATED
NA
52 participants
First 3 months
2019-12-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Usual Care
These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
Monitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits
|
Wireless Care
These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data.
Frequent remote monitoring
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
26
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
22
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Usual Care
These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
Monitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits
|
Wireless Care
These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data.
Frequent remote monitoring
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
4
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Remote Monitoring in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=26 Participants
These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
Monitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits
|
Wireless Care
n=26 Participants
These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data.
Frequent remote monitoring
|
Total
n=52 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: First 3 monthsPositive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence defined as mean PAP use being \> 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=22 Participants
These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
Monitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits
|
Wireless Care
n=20 Participants
These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data.
Frequent remote monitoring
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months
|
10 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-12 MonthsDemonstrated Periodic Adherence After 3 Months of Treatment During 4-12 months defined as mean PAP use being \> 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=22 Participants
These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
Monitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits
|
Wireless Care
n=20 Participants
These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data.
Frequent remote monitoring
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence After 3 Months
|
10 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: 1 subject from the Wireless group was assigned to Provent treatment. 1 subject from the Usual group was assigned to Dental device treatment. Both subjects stopped using PAP and PAP monitoring and were considered not receiving effective PAP treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Both subjects were lost in follow-up for our research study.
Evaluate whether patients are effectively being treated with PAP or with alternate means of treatment for OSA (obstructive sleep apnea) at the end of 12 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=22 Participants
These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
Monitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits
|
Wireless Care
n=20 Participants
These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data.
Frequent remote monitoring
|
|---|---|---|
|
Receiving Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
|
10 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPAP treatment Adherence in the first 3 months of treatment (according to the CMS - Centers for Medicare \& Medicaid Services - criteria) was compared to the PAP treatment Adherence in the next 9 months of treatment to verify the predictability of initial adherence or non-adherence for the future adherence or non-adherence (during the year) to PAP treatment. Adherence/non-adherence was analyzed based on the PAP usage reports (downloads) from the supplied PAP device, based on the yearly, quarterly and monthly portions of the reports. Patient data representing initial adherence or non-adherence and adherence or non-adherence during the year to PAP treatment was collected across both Usual care and Wireless Care Arms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=19 Participants
These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
Monitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits
|
Wireless Care
n=23 Participants
These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data.
Frequent remote monitoring
|
|---|---|---|
|
PAP Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months of Treatment Compared to the PAP Treatment Adherence in the Next 9 Months of Treatment
Adherent in the next 9 months
|
13 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
PAP Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months of Treatment Compared to the PAP Treatment Adherence in the Next 9 Months of Treatment
Non-Adherent in the next 9 months
|
6 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: 1 year/12 monthsPAP adherence in subjects who had more than 20 respiratory events per hour during the initial sleep study was compared with the PAP adherence in subjects who had less than 20 respiratory events per hour during the initial sleep study.Patient data representing subjects who had more than 20 respiratory events per hour during the initial sleep study and subjects who had less than 20 respiratory events per hour during the initial sleep study was collected across both Usual care and Wireless Care Arms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=23 Participants
These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
Monitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits
|
Wireless Care
n=19 Participants
These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data.
Frequent remote monitoring
|
|---|---|---|
|
Adherence and AHI
Adherent in 12 months
|
19 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Adherence and AHI
ANon-Adherent in 12 months
|
4 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Usual Care
Wireless Care
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=26 participants at risk
These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
Monitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits
|
Wireless Care
n=26 participants at risk
These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data.
Frequent remote monitoring
|
|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Acute Inpatient Psychiatric hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/26 • Adverse event data were collected over a period of time of subjects' participation in the study - 1 year or until a subject was withdrawn or terminated from the study
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event, used to collect adverse event information, does not differ from the clinicaltrials.gov Definitions. Data was collected during the subject's follow-up and from the medical chart review.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected over a period of time of subjects' participation in the study - 1 year or until a subject was withdrawn or terminated from the study
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event, used to collect adverse event information, does not differ from the clinicaltrials.gov Definitions. Data was collected during the subject's follow-up and from the medical chart review.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Wolf -Parkinson-White syndrome. Hospitalization
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected over a period of time of subjects' participation in the study - 1 year or until a subject was withdrawn or terminated from the study
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event, used to collect adverse event information, does not differ from the clinicaltrials.gov Definitions. Data was collected during the subject's follow-up and from the medical chart review.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Adverse event data were collected over a period of time of subjects' participation in the study - 1 year or until a subject was withdrawn or terminated from the study
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event, used to collect adverse event information, does not differ from the clinicaltrials.gov Definitions. Data was collected during the subject's follow-up and from the medical chart review.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hospitalisation due to Dyspnea and Chest Pain on exertion
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected over a period of time of subjects' participation in the study - 1 year or until a subject was withdrawn or terminated from the study
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event, used to collect adverse event information, does not differ from the clinicaltrials.gov Definitions. Data was collected during the subject's follow-up and from the medical chart review.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Adverse event data were collected over a period of time of subjects' participation in the study - 1 year or until a subject was withdrawn or terminated from the study
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event, used to collect adverse event information, does not differ from the clinicaltrials.gov Definitions. Data was collected during the subject's follow-up and from the medical chart review.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hospitalization of encephalopathic patient transitioned to comfort care
|
0.00%
0/26 • Adverse event data were collected over a period of time of subjects' participation in the study - 1 year or until a subject was withdrawn or terminated from the study
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event, used to collect adverse event information, does not differ from the clinicaltrials.gov Definitions. Data was collected during the subject's follow-up and from the medical chart review.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected over a period of time of subjects' participation in the study - 1 year or until a subject was withdrawn or terminated from the study
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event, used to collect adverse event information, does not differ from the clinicaltrials.gov Definitions. Data was collected during the subject's follow-up and from the medical chart review.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalization Elective Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected over a period of time of subjects' participation in the study - 1 year or until a subject was withdrawn or terminated from the study
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event, used to collect adverse event information, does not differ from the clinicaltrials.gov Definitions. Data was collected during the subject's follow-up and from the medical chart review.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Adverse event data were collected over a period of time of subjects' participation in the study - 1 year or until a subject was withdrawn or terminated from the study
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event, used to collect adverse event information, does not differ from the clinicaltrials.gov Definitions. Data was collected during the subject's follow-up and from the medical chart review.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalization for Elective Laminectomy - Fusion
|
0.00%
0/26 • Adverse event data were collected over a period of time of subjects' participation in the study - 1 year or until a subject was withdrawn or terminated from the study
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event, used to collect adverse event information, does not differ from the clinicaltrials.gov Definitions. Data was collected during the subject's follow-up and from the medical chart review.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected over a period of time of subjects' participation in the study - 1 year or until a subject was withdrawn or terminated from the study
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event, used to collect adverse event information, does not differ from the clinicaltrials.gov Definitions. Data was collected during the subject's follow-up and from the medical chart review.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place