Safety and Efficacy Study of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Painful Acute Osteoporotic Spine Fractures

NCT ID: NCT01677806

Last Updated: 2014-09-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

140 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is now a therapeutic option for individuals for whom medical management has not been successful or for those who are at risk for developing complications due to long-term immobilization. Recently, three randomized controlled trials (RCT) concerning PVP have been published with conflicting results. Two RCTs with a sham control intervention failed to show an advantage of vertebroplasty over placebo for participants with acute, subacute, and chronic fractures or severe pain. In the third RCT, PVP compared to optimal conservative treatment showed significant immediate postoperative pain relief in the vertebroplasty group, but not at 3 and 12 months. To examine these issues, this study is initiated to compare PVP with conservative therapy in patients with osteoporotic VCFs. Moreover, this study addresses concerns about the possibility that PVP increases the incidence of new compression fractures in adjacent vertebrae.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVCFs) are common in the elderly population, with an estimated 1.4 million new fractures occurring every year worldwide. Patients may present with pain and frequently require hospital admission for analgesia, bed rest, and physical support (bracing). While their back pain may last for 6-12 weeks, complications such as pneumonia, decubitus ulcers, venous thromboembolism, and even death may occur. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is now a therapeutic option for individuals for whom medical management has not been successful or for those who are at risk for developing complications due to long-term immobilization. Recently, three randomized controlled trials (RCT) concerning PVP have been published with conflicting results. So this study is to compare PVP with conservative therapy in patients with osteoporotic VCFs. Moreover, this study addresses concerns about the possibility that PVP increases the incidence of new compression fractures in adjacent vertebrae.

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT), Participants in this study will be allocated randomly to PVP or conservative treatment.All Participants will be asked to fill out standard questionnaires to provide clinical information at baseline (the day of randomization), and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the treatment. Cross-over will not be offered before 12 months after randomization. All standard questionnaires (except the 1-day questionnaire) consist of the VAS score, Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO), EQ-5D, and Roland-Morris Disability (RMD) Questionnaire. Furthermore,additional questions about pain treatment, hospital stay, outpatient visits,medical aids, and medical costs will be completed with the help of a nurse practitioner.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Osteoporotic Spinal Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous vertebroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Percutaneous vertebroplasty Placement of PMMA into vertebral compression fracture

Conservative therapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conservative therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Conservative therapy mainly consists of optimal pain medication. Pain management is titrated according to patients' needs, including analgesia, bed rest, and physical support (bracing).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty

Percutaneous vertebroplasty Placement of PMMA into vertebral compression fracture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conservative therapy

Conservative therapy mainly consists of optimal pain medication. Pain management is titrated according to patients' needs, including analgesia, bed rest, and physical support (bracing).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 50 Years and older
* have a confirmed diagnosis of osteoporosis or osteopenia.
* acute, painful OVCFs from T4-L5
* clinical onset \< 6 weeks
* vertebral compression fracture on spine radiograph (minimum 15% height loss)
* Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] score ≥ 4 for pain

Exclusion Criteria

* severe cardio-pulmonary condition
* untreatable coagulopathy
* active local or systemic infection
* current malignancy, or radicular or caudal compression syndrome
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shanghai 6th People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanghai 10th People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

China Medical University, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beijing Friendship Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jinan Military General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gang Sun;Chungen Wu;Maoquan Li;Bo Feng; Hai Tang;ZL Deng

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gang Sun, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Jinan Military General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Jinan Military General Hospital

Jinan, Shandong, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JNMGH20120821

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Periprosthetic Plate Over Humeral Nail
NCT06812195 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA