Efficacy and Safety of Several Doses of Viaskin Peanut in Adults and Children With Peanut Allergy

NCT ID: NCT01675882

Last Updated: 2021-10-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

221 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objectives of this dose-finding study for the treatment of peanut allergy are:

* To determine the efficacy of 3 doses of Viaskin Peanut (50 mcg ,100 mcg and 250 mcg peanut protein per patch) to significantly desensitize peanut-allergic subjects to peanut after 12 months of treatment.
* To evaluate the safety of a long-term treatment with Viaskin Peanut.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Peanut allergy is a common allergy in the United States, with a prevalence in the general population as high as 1%. Peanut allergy management is based on strict peanut avoidance and injectable epinephrine after the allergic systemic reactions have started. Specific Immunotherapy methods currently available have shown some limitations in their use because of safety issues. Hence, there is an important unmet medical need for efficient and safe treatment of peanut allergy.

DBV Technologies has developed an epicutaneous delivery system, called Viaskin, a method based on delivering precise quantity of the allergen on the upper layers of the skin. Avoiding contact between the allergen and the bloodstream should confer to epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) a higher level of safety as systemic reactions should be circumvented

The VIPES study is a 12-month double-blind, placebo-controlled,randomized trial to study the efficacy and safety of Viaskin Peanut in subjects from 6 to 55 years old with a history of immediate hypersensitive reaction to peanut protein.

The trial will be conducted at sites with investigators and staff trained and experienced in the diagnosis and the management of peanut allergy and anaphylaxis, and who are capable of performing a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) in adult and/or pediatric subjects. Three doses of peanut proteins, i.e. 50 mcg, 100 mcg and 250 mcg will be evaluated for the study. Following the confirmation of peanut allergy at screening, subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio into four different treatment groups, including 50 mcg, 100 mcg and 250 mcg peanut protein or placebo. Treatment will be comprised of daily applications of Viaskin Peanut or placebo patch for 12 months. Each subject will undergo two DBPCFCs: one at screening and one at Month 12. A follow up visit will be performed 2 weeks after completion of treatment and the last DBPCFC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peanut Allergy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Food allergy Immediate hypersensitivity Whole peanut extract Allergenic product Specific Immunotherapy Epicutaneous Immunotherapy (EPIT)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Viaskin Peanut 50 mcg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Viaskin Peanut 50 mcg

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 50 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract

Viaskin Peanut 100 mcg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Viaskin Peanut 100 mcg

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 100 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract

Viaskin Peanut 250 mcg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Viaskin Peanut 250 mcg

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 250 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract

Viaskin Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Viaskin Placebo

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing a matching placebo formulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Viaskin Peanut 50 mcg

Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 50 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Viaskin Peanut 100 mcg

Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 100 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Viaskin Peanut 250 mcg

Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 250 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Viaskin Placebo

Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing a matching placebo formulation

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Peanut-allergic subjects between 6 and 55 years of age, with a well-documented medical history of systemic reactions after ingestion of peanut and currently following a strict peanut-free diet.
* Peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) level (Phadia CAP-system) \> 0.7 kU/L and a positive skin prick test to peanut with a largest wheal diameter ≥ 8 mm
* Positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at ≤ 300 mg of peanut proteins: the eliciting dose of peanut proteins during the DBPCFC is capped at 300 mg, i.e. subjects must react to peanut before reaching or at the dose of 300 mg peanut proteins.
* Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential. Females of childbearing age must use effective methods of contraception to prevent pregnancy and agree to continue to practice an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of participation in the study. Sexual abstinence will be accepted as an effective method of contraception for girls below 15 years of age.
* Ability to perform spirometry maneuvers in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guidelines (2005) for subjects 9 years of age and above Subjects below 9 years of age can perform peak expiratory flow (PEF) instead.
* Willing to comply with all study requirements during their participation in the study.
* Provide signed informed consent and assent as appropriate.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with a history of severe anaphylaxis to peanut with the following symptoms: hypotension, hypoxia, neurological compromise (collapse, loss of consciousness or incontinence).
* Pregnancy or lactation.
* FEV1 \<80% of the predicted value at screening for subjects 9 years of age and above. PEF \< 80% of predicted for subjects below 9 years of age.
* Subjects who did not react at or below the dose of 300 mg of peanut proteins during the DBPCFC at screening.
* Known allergy or known hypersensitivity to placebo excipients either of the Viaskin patches or of the food challenge formulas.
* Subjects reacting objectively to the placebo formula at screening.
* Severe reaction during the screening food challenge, defined as need for intubation, hypotension persisting after epinephrine administration, or the need for more than two doses of epinephrine.
* Inability to discontinue short-acting antihistamines for three days or long-acting antihistamines for five to seven days (depending on half-life) prior to skin prick testing or food challenges.
* Subjects treated with systemic long-acting corticosteroids (depot corticosteroids) within 12 weeks prior to the screening visit and/or systemic short-acting corticosteroid within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit or any systemic corticosteroid at screening.
* Subjects with asthma defined as follows:

1. uncontrolled persistent asthma by National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Asthma guidelines (2007) or by Global Initiative for Asthma (2011) or being treated with combination therapy of medium dose inhaled corticosteroid with a long acting inhaled β2-agonists;
2. at least two systemic corticosteroid courses for asthma in the past year or one oral corticosteroid course for asthma in the past three months;
3. prior intubation for asthma in the past two years.
* Subjects on β-blocking agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers or tricyclic antidepressant therapy.
* Subjects undergoing any type of immunotherapy to any food within one year prior to the screening visit.
* Subjects presently on aeroallergen immunotherapy and unwilling or unable to discontinue.
* Subjects currently treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs or anti-IgE drugs (such as omalizumab) or any biologic immunomodulatory therapy within one year prior to the screening visit.
* Allergy or known history of reaction to Tegaderm®.
* Subjects suffering from generalized dermatologic diseases (e.g. severe atopic dermatitis, uncontrolled generalized eczema, keratosis pilaris, ichthyosis vulgaris) with no intact skin zones to apply the patches.
* Any disorder in which epinephrine is contraindicated such as coronary artery disease, uncontrolled hypertension, or serious ventricular arrhythmias.
* Participation in another clinical intervention study in the three months prior to the screening visit.
* Subjects on any experimental drugs or treatments.
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

DBV Technologies

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, Rady Childrens Hospital

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University School of Medicine

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Boston Childrens' Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Children's Medical Center Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

ASTHMA, Inc.

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Cheema Research Inc.

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Allergy Asthma Research Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Gordon Sussman Clinical Research

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Centre de Recherche Appliquée en Asthme et Allergie de Québec

Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hôpital Pellegrin

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul

Lille, , France

Site Status

GCS des hôpitaux pédiatriques

Nice, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Necker

Paris, , France

Site Status

Nouvel Hôpital Civil

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Hôpitaux De Brabois

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Erasmus MC

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

UMC Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Szpital Uniwersytecki nr2

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Szpital Kliniczny UM

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada France Netherlands Poland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lewis MO, Brown-Whitehorn TF, Cianferoni A, Rooney C, Spergel JM. Peanut-allergic patient experiences after epicutaneous immunotherapy: peanut consumption and impact on QoL. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Jul;123(1):101-103. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 10. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30978404 (View on PubMed)

Sampson HA, Shreffler WG, Yang WH, Sussman GL, Brown-Whitehorn TF, Nadeau KC, Cheema AS, Leonard SA, Pongracic JA, Sauvage-Delebarre C, Assa'ad AH, de Blay F, Bird JA, Tilles SA, Boralevi F, Bourrier T, Hebert J, Green TD, Gerth van Wijk R, Knulst AC, Kanny G, Schneider LC, Kowalski ML, Dupont C. Effect of Varying Doses of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy vs Placebo on Reaction to Peanut Protein Exposure Among Patients With Peanut Sensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Nov 14;318(18):1798-1809. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16591.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29136445 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-002550-32

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

VIPES

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id