Trial Outcomes & Findings for Multiple Dose Study Of PF-05231023 In Adult Subjects Who Have Poor Lipid Control With And Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT01673178)
NCT ID: NCT01673178
Last Updated: 2015-02-16
Results Overview
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent events were between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
107 participants
Baseline up to 28 days after last dose
2015-02-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
22
|
21
|
21
|
22
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
19
|
19
|
18
|
14
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
8
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Multiple Dose Study Of PF-05231023 In Adult Subjects Who Have Poor Lipid Control With And Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=22 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
Total
n=107 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
52.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=5 Participants
|
54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=7 Participants
|
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
53.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 • n=4 Participants
|
53.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=21 Participants
|
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 • n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to 28 days after last dosePopulation: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent events were between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=22 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs
|
11 participants
|
15 participants
|
10 participants
|
13 participants
|
12 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Criteria for laboratory test abnormality: Hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood corpuscles \[RBC\] count: less than \[\<\]0.8\*lower limit of normal \[LLN\], platelets: \<0.5\*LLN/greater than \[\>\]1.75\*upper limit of normal \[ULN\], leukocytes: \<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN, lymphocytes, total neutrophils: \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN, basophils, eosinophil: \<0.8\*LLN, monocytes: \>1.2\*ULN); Liver Function (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase: \>0.3\*ULN, total protein, albumin: \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN); total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin: \>1.5\*ULN; Renal Function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine: \>1.3\*ULN, uric acid: \>1.2\*ULN); Electrolytes (sodium: \<0.95\*LLN or \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, bicarbonate: \<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN; creatine kinase: \>2.0\*ULN; glucose fasting: \<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN, urine white blood corpuscles \[WBC\] and RBC: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20/High Power Field \[HPF\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
|
18 participants
|
17 participants
|
17 participants
|
12 participants
|
15 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Criteria for clinically significant vital signs abnormalities included supine/sitting pulse rate of \<40 beats per minute (bpm) or \>120 bpm, supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) of \<90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), \>=30 mmHg maximum increase and decrease from baseline in same posture, supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of \<50 mmHg; \>=20 mmHg maximum increase and decrease from baseline in same posture.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=22 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Supine SBP: <90 mmHg
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Supine DBP: <50 mmHg
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Maximum Increase in Supine SBP: >=30 mmHg
|
1 participants
|
5 participants
|
4 participants
|
6 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Maximum Increase in Supine DBP: >=20 mmHg
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Maximum Decrease in Supine SBP: >=30 mmHg
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Maximum Decrease in Supine DBP: >=20 mmHg
|
5 participants
|
1 participants
|
4 participants
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Supine Pulse Rate: <40 bpm
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Supine Pulse Rate: >120 bpm
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Clinically significant ECG findings included PR interval \>=300 milliseconds (msec) or \>=25 percent (%) increase from baseline (if baseline PR interval \>200 msec) or \>=50% increase (if baseline PR interval less than or equal to \[\<=\] 200 msec); QRS interval \>=140 msec or \>=50% increase from baseline; QT interval \>=500 msec, corrected QT interval based on Fridericia's formula (QTcF) 450 to \<480 msec, 480 to \<500 msec, \>=500 msec or \>=30 msec but \<60 msec increase from baseline or \>=60 msec increase from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=22 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings
Maximum QRS complex increase from baseline:>=50%
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings
Maximum PR interval increase : 25% or 50%
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings
Maximum QRS complex: >=140 msec
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings
Maximum PR interval: >=300 msec
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings
Maximum QTcF interval increase: >= 30 to <60 msec
|
7 participants
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings
Maximum QT interval: >=500 msec
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings
Maximum QTcF interval: 450-<480 msec
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings
Maximum QTcF interval: 480-<500 msec
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings
Maximum QTcF interval: >=500 msec
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings
Maximum QTCF interval increase: >=60 msec
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 49Population: Physical examination data reported in this study was for identification of adverse events and were reported as an adverse event in the adverse event section.
Physical examination included general examination and examination of head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, throat, neck, abdomen, skin, heart, lungs, lymph nodes, and gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal and neurological system.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Results are reported in micro international units per milliliter (mcIU/mL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=22 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) Level at Baseline
|
1.57 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
2.14 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
1.96 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.88 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
2.06 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) Level at Day 1
|
1.96 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
2.19 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
2.40 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
2.26 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
4.21 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 6.67
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 25Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=15 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) Level at Day 25
|
2.70 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 3.68
|
2.13 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
2.43 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
2.52 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
4.06 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 5.69
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 39Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=14 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) Level at Day 39
|
3.69 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 8.11
|
2.08 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.54
|
2.17 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
2.50 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
3.10 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 3.28
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=14 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) Level at Day 49
|
3.42 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 7.45
|
1.98 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
2.43 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.78
|
2.55 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
3.10 mcIU/mL
Standard Deviation 2.03
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=22 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Phosphate Level at Baseline
|
4.1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Interval 3.0 to 5.1
|
3.8 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Interval 3.1 to 5.0
|
3.9 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Interval 3.0 to 5.3
|
4.0 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Interval 3.0 to 5.2
|
4.0 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Interval 2.9 to 4.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 8Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=17 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Phosphate Level at Day 8
|
-0.2 mg/dL
Interval -1.4 to 0.8
|
-0.4 mg/dL
Interval -1.4 to 0.6
|
0.1 mg/dL
Interval -0.8 to 0.6
|
0.0 mg/dL
Interval -1.0 to 0.8
|
-0.3 mg/dL
Interval -1.0 to 1.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=16 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=17 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Phosphate Level at Day 15
|
-0.2 mg/dL
Interval -1.2 to 0.8
|
-0.2 mg/dL
Interval -2.3 to 0.7
|
0.2 mg/dL
Interval -1.6 to 1.3
|
-0.1 mg/dL
Interval -0.9 to 0.9
|
-0.2 mg/dL
Interval -0.8 to 0.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 25Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=17 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=15 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Phosphate Level at Day 25
|
-0.1 mg/dL
Interval -1.1 to 0.8
|
-0.2 mg/dL
Interval -1.1 to 0.5
|
0.2 mg/dL
Interval -0.6 to 1.1
|
0.1 mg/dL
Interval -0.6 to 0.8
|
0.0 mg/dL
Interval -0.7 to 0.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=17 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=14 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Phosphate Level at Day 49
|
-0.40 mg/dL
Interval -1.5 to 0.3
|
-0.40 mg/dL
Interval -1.4 to 1.0
|
-0.20 mg/dL
Interval -1.2 to 1.2
|
-0.30 mg/dL
Interval -1.1 to 0.7
|
-0.10 mg/dL
Interval -0.9 to 0.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=22 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) Level at Baseline
|
73 units per liter (U/L)
Interval 26.0 to 471.0
|
94 units per liter (U/L)
Interval 42.0 to 493.0
|
94 units per liter (U/L)
Interval 38.0 to 399.0
|
103 units per liter (U/L)
Interval 45.0 to 699.0
|
108 units per liter (U/L)
Interval 44.0 to 173.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 8Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=17 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) Level at Day 8
|
10 U/L
Interval -260.0 to 143.0
|
32 U/L
Interval -21.0 to 850.0
|
13 U/L
Interval -70.0 to 245.0
|
25 U/L
Interval -175.0 to 92.0
|
13 U/L
Interval -27.0 to 7614.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=16 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=16 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) Level at Day 15
|
28 U/L
Interval -34.0 to 852.0
|
20 U/L
Interval -34.0 to 629.0
|
7 U/L
Interval -97.0 to 243.0
|
22 U/L
Interval -113.0 to 238.0
|
18 U/L
Interval -62.0 to 248.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 25Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=16 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=15 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) Level at Day 25
|
-5 U/L
Interval -246.0 to 32.0
|
-6 U/L
Interval -38.0 to 48.0
|
-15 U/L
Interval -110.0 to 19.0
|
-8 U/L
Interval -54.0 to 771.0
|
-3 U/L
Interval -90.0 to 39.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=17 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=14 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) Level at Day 49
|
21 U/L
Interval -141.0 to 2214.0
|
40 U/L
Interval -30.0 to 494.0
|
27 U/L
Interval -85.0 to 292.0
|
43 U/L
Interval -16.0 to 216.0
|
10 U/L
Interval -62.0 to 139.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Serum N-terminal Propeptides of Type 1 Collagen (PINP) and C-Telopeptide Cross-Linking of Type 1 Collagen (CTX) Levels at Baseline
PINP
|
46.3 nanogram per milliliter (NG/ML)
Standard Deviation 15.6
|
41.7 nanogram per milliliter (NG/ML)
Standard Deviation 17.0
|
44.7 nanogram per milliliter (NG/ML)
Standard Deviation 19.4
|
45.0 nanogram per milliliter (NG/ML)
Standard Deviation 19.8
|
44.6 nanogram per milliliter (NG/ML)
Standard Deviation 17.6
|
|
Serum N-terminal Propeptides of Type 1 Collagen (PINP) and C-Telopeptide Cross-Linking of Type 1 Collagen (CTX) Levels at Baseline
CTX
|
0.35 nanogram per milliliter (NG/ML)
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.33 nanogram per milliliter (NG/ML)
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
0.35 nanogram per milliliter (NG/ML)
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.38 nanogram per milliliter (NG/ML)
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
0.37 nanogram per milliliter (NG/ML)
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 25Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=15 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum N-terminal Propeptides of Type 1 Collagen (PINP) and C-Telopeptide Cross-Linking of Type 1 Collagen (CTX) Levels at Day 25
PINP
|
-0.8 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.5
|
-14.5 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.0
|
-13.4 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.3
|
-17.6 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
-19.8 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.2
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum N-terminal Propeptides of Type 1 Collagen (PINP) and C-Telopeptide Cross-Linking of Type 1 Collagen (CTX) Levels at Day 25
CTX
|
5.2 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.5
|
2.3 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.7
|
8.0 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.6
|
7.3 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.7
|
7.9 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 39Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=14 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum N-terminal Propeptides of Type 1 Collagen (PINP) and C-Telopeptide Cross-Linking of Type 1 Collagen (CTX) Levels at Day 39
PINP
|
-2.8 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.6
|
-9.8 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
-6.6 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.6
|
-10.3 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
-11.0 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.5
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum N-terminal Propeptides of Type 1 Collagen (PINP) and C-Telopeptide Cross-Linking of Type 1 Collagen (CTX) Levels at Day 39
CTX
|
-7.3 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.7
|
-4.2 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.1
|
-3.5 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.2
|
-13.1 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.2
|
-3.0 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who receive at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=14 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline Serum N-terminal Propeptides of Type 1 Collagen (PINP) and C-Telopeptide Cross-Linking of Type 1 Collagen (CTX) Levels at Day 49
PINP
|
-3.0 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.4
|
-9.4 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.9
|
-1.3 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.3
|
-4.6 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.0
|
-7.4 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.3
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline Serum N-terminal Propeptides of Type 1 Collagen (PINP) and C-Telopeptide Cross-Linking of Type 1 Collagen (CTX) Levels at Day 49
CTX
|
1.5 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.8
|
7.5 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.9
|
-3.9 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.8
|
-16.6 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.3
|
-5.3 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood Osteocalcin and Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Baseline
Blood Osteocalcin
|
18.8 microgram per liter (mcg/l)
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
19.2 microgram per liter (mcg/l)
Standard Deviation 5.9
|
18.5 microgram per liter (mcg/l)
Standard Deviation 6.3
|
20.2 microgram per liter (mcg/l)
Standard Deviation 8.2
|
19.9 microgram per liter (mcg/l)
Standard Deviation 7.0
|
|
Blood Osteocalcin and Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Baseline
Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase
|
13.0 microgram per liter (mcg/l)
Standard Deviation 5.7
|
11.7 microgram per liter (mcg/l)
Standard Deviation 3.9
|
11.2 microgram per liter (mcg/l)
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
10.0 microgram per liter (mcg/l)
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
11.2 microgram per liter (mcg/l)
Standard Deviation 4.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 25Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=15 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Blood Osteocalcin and Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Day 25
Blood Osteocalcin
|
-2.4 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.2
|
-12.2 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.6
|
-6.4 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.0
|
-7.1 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
-4.8 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.2
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Blood Osteocalcin and Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Day 25
Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase
|
-4.3 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.5
|
-6.6 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.0
|
-0.4 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.4
|
-5.1 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.2
|
-7.1 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 39Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=14 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Blood Osteocalcin and Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Day 39
Blood Osteocalcin
|
-1.8 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
-10.7 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.1
|
-11.6 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
-14.7 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.6
|
-13.4 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.3
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Blood Osteocalcin and Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Day 39
Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase
|
-5.0 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.7
|
-5.1 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
3.0 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.9
|
-13.0 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.0
|
-8.1 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=14 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Blood Osteocalcin and Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Day 49
Blood Osteocalcin
|
-4.5 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.9
|
-10.7 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.5
|
-5.1 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.1
|
-11.0 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.3
|
-4.8 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.3
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Blood Osteocalcin and Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Day 49
Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase
|
-3.8 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.6
|
-3.9 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.4
|
-0.9 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.2
|
-9.6 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.6
|
0.7 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase Isoform 5b (TRAP 5b) Levels at Baseline
|
2.97 units per liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
2.72 units per liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
3.10 units per liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
2.78 units per liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
3.08 units per liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 25Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=15 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase Isoform 5b (TRAP 5b) Levels at Day 25
|
1.3 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.4
|
-1.7 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
1.9 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.0
|
-0.4 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.6
|
-1.4 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 39Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=17 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=14 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase Isoform 5b (TRAP 5b) Levels at Day 39
|
0.5 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.7
|
-0.4 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.6
|
0.2 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
-2.9 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.9
|
3.7 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=17 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=14 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase Isoform 5b (TRAP 5b) Levels at Day 49
|
-2.4 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.2
|
3.1 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.0
|
-0.8 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.0
|
-0.1 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.3
|
-1.1 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "n" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time-points for each arm, respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=22 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Average Urinary Calcium and Phosphate Levels Over 24 Hours at Baseline
Urine Calcium (n=20, 20, 20, 20, 21)
|
296.4 milligram per 24 hours (mg/24hr)
Standard Deviation 143.4
|
202.1 milligram per 24 hours (mg/24hr)
Standard Deviation 104.5
|
224.3 milligram per 24 hours (mg/24hr)
Standard Deviation 122.2
|
205.3 milligram per 24 hours (mg/24hr)
Standard Deviation 100.1
|
207.4 milligram per 24 hours (mg/24hr)
Standard Deviation 112.9
|
|
Average Urinary Calcium and Phosphate Levels Over 24 Hours at Baseline
Urine Phosphate (n=21, 20, 20, 21, 21)
|
922.1 milligram per 24 hours (mg/24hr)
Standard Deviation 430.3
|
673.2 milligram per 24 hours (mg/24hr)
Standard Deviation 228.3
|
859.1 milligram per 24 hours (mg/24hr)
Standard Deviation 318.7
|
795.4 milligram per 24 hours (mg/24hr)
Standard Deviation 294.4
|
755.3 milligram per 24 hours (mg/24hr)
Standard Deviation 292.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 24Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "n" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time-points for each arm, respectively
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=22 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Urinary Calcium and Phosphate Levels Over 24 Hours at Day 24
Urine Phosphate (n=18, 16, 16, 15, 18)
|
18.8 mg/24 hours
Standard Deviation 276.0
|
225.8 mg/24 hours
Standard Deviation 283.4
|
241.6 mg/24 hours
Standard Deviation 436.0
|
244.1 mg/24 hours
Standard Deviation 363.4
|
484.4 mg/24 hours
Standard Deviation 514.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Urinary Calcium and Phosphate Levels Over 24 Hours at Day 24
Urine Calcium (n=17, 17, 16, 15, 19)
|
-29.3 mg/24 hours
Standard Deviation 106.3
|
-9.1 mg/24 hours
Standard Deviation 69.6
|
38.0 mg/24 hours
Standard Deviation 131.9
|
8.2 mg/24 hours
Standard Deviation 69.0
|
5.1 mg/24 hours
Standard Deviation 89.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: Safety Analysis Set included all participants who receive at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "n" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time-points for each arm, respectively
Anti-PF-05231023 antibodies and neutralizing antibodies were analyzed only for participants who received PF-05231023 as per planned analysis. One sample at Day 1 was inadvertently tested for neutralizing antibody even though the corresponding anti-PF-05231023 antibody was negative.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=22 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-PF-05231023 Antibodies and Neutralizing Antibodies at Day 1
Anti-PF- 05231023 Antibodies (n=21, 21, 22, 21)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-PF-05231023 Antibodies and Neutralizing Antibodies at Day 1
Neutralizing Antibodies (n=0, 0, 0, 1)
|
NA participants
Data was not analyzed as none of the participant in this arm was evaluable for neutralizing antibody.
|
NA participants
Data was not analyzed as none of the participant in this arm was evaluable for neutralizing antibody.
|
NA participants
Data was not analyzed as none of the participant in this arm was evaluable for neutralizing antibody.
|
0 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 39Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "n" signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified antibodies for each arm, respectively and "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Anti-PF-05231023 antibodies and neutralizing antibodies were analyzed only for participants who received PF-05231023 as per planned analysis. One sample at Day 39 was inadvertently tested for neutralizing antibody even though the corresponding anti-PF-05231023 antibody was negative.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=14 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-PF-05231023 Antibodies and Neutralizing Antibodies at Day 39
Anti-PF- 05231023 Antibodies (n=19, 18, 14, 19)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-PF-05231023 Antibodies and Neutralizing Antibodies at Day 39
Neutralizing Antibodies (n=0, 0, 1, 1)
|
NA participants
Data was not analyzed as none of the participant in this arm was evaluable for neutralizing antibody.
|
NA participants
Data was not analyzed as none of the participant in this arm was evaluable for neutralizing antibody.
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here "n" signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified antibodies for each arm, respectively and "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=14 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-PF-05231023 Antibodies and Neutralizing Antibodies at Day 49
Neutralizing Antibodies (n=0, 2, 0, 1)
|
NA participants
Data was not analyzed as none of the participant in this arm was evaluable for neutralizing antibody.
|
1 participants
|
NA participants
Data was not analyzed as none of the participant in this arm was evaluable for neutralizing antibody.
|
0 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-PF-05231023 Antibodies and Neutralizing Antibodies at Day 49
Anti-PF- 05231023 Antibodies (n=19, 18, 14, 19)
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 9.5, 11.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 1, Day 4, 0 hours (pre-dose) on Day 8Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
AUCtau was calculated for the intact C-terminus and N-terminus PF-05231023 from the concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental method. Only participants who received PF-05231023 were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=17 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=20 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of PF-05231023 After Single Dose
PF-05231023 C-Terminus
|
108100 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 41048
|
206200 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 107110
|
376600 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 134870
|
475600 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 99316
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of PF-05231023 After Single Dose
PF-05231023 N-Terminus
|
376100 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 111420
|
693400 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 214250
|
1508000 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 253030
|
2004000 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 405880
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 9.5, 11.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 1, Day 4, 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 8Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.
Tmax was calculated for the intact C-terminus and N-terminus PF-05231023 from the concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental method. Only participants who received PF-05231023 were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-05231023 After Single Dose
PF-05231023 C-Terminus
|
0.5 hours
Interval 0.5 to 1.0
|
0.5 hours
Interval 0.5 to 11.5
|
0.5 hours
Interval 0.5 to 3.4
|
0.5 hours
Interval 0.5 to 1.03
|
—
|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-05231023 After Single Dose
PF-05231023 N-Terminus
|
1.0 hours
Interval 0.5 to 5.6
|
1.0 hours
Interval 0.5 to 11.5
|
1.0 hours
Interval 0.5 to 9.5
|
1.0 hours
Interval 0.5 to 3.5
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 9.5, 11.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 1, Day 4, 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 8Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.
Cmax was calculated for the intact C-terminus and N-terminus PF-05231023 from the concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental method. Only participants who received PF-05231023 were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=21 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-05231023 After Single Dose
PF-05231023 C-Terminus
|
7983 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2000
|
15250 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 3672
|
32980 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 7944
|
48320 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 8376
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-05231023 After Single Dose
PF-05231023 N-Terminus
|
8881 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1743
|
16800 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 4740
|
31750 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 5134
|
44470 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 8516
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 22, Day 24, 25, 29Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
AUCtau was calculated for the intact C-terminus and N-terminus PF-05231023 from the concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental method. Only participants who received PF-05231023 were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=15 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of PF-05231023 After Last Dose
PF-05231023 C-Terminus
|
76520 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 26169
|
136200 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 34051
|
301200 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 71897
|
424700 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 97424
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of PF-05231023 After Last Dose
PF-05231023 N-Terminus
|
467700 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 136600
|
855500 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 269920
|
1860000 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 434690
|
2326000 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 433010
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 22, Day 24, 25, 29, 39, 49Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Tmax was calculated for the intact C-terminus and N-terminus PF-05231023 from the concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental method. Only participants who received PF-05231023 were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=16 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-05231023 After Last Dose
PF-05231023 C-Terminus
|
0.55 hours
Interval 0.5 to 1.02
|
0.53 hours
Interval 0.45 to 1.0
|
0.79 hours
Interval 0.48 to 3.5
|
1.00 hours
Interval 0.5 to 1.0
|
—
|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-05231023 After Last Dose
PF-05231023 N-Terminus
|
1.00 hours
Interval 0.5 to 4.55
|
1.00 hours
Interval 0.48 to 4.5
|
1.00 hours
Interval 0.5 to 4.5
|
1.00 hours
Interval 0.5 to 4.52
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 22, Day 24, 25, 29, 39, 49Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Cmax was calculated for the intact C-terminus and N-terminus PF-05231023 from the concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental method. Only participants who received PF-05231023 were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=16 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-05231023 After Last Dose
PF-05231023 C-Terminus
|
7697 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1622
|
14450 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3428
|
29610 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5300
|
42260 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 7419
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-05231023 After Last Dose
PF-05231023 N-Terminus
|
9981 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3406
|
16900 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3279
|
33140 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 9119
|
48090 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 17688
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion ), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 9.5, 11.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 1; Day 4, 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 8; 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 22; Day 24, 25, 29Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Rac was obtained from AUCtau after last dose (Day 22) divided by AUCtau after single dose (Day 1). Rac was calculated for the intact C-terminus and N-terminus PF-05231023 from the concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental method. Only participants who received PF-05231023 were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=15 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accumulation Ratio for Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (Rac) of PF-05231023
PF-05231023 C-Terminus
|
0.70 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
0.65 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
0.79 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
0.90 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
—
|
|
Accumulation Ratio for Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (Rac) of PF-05231023
PF-05231023 N-Terminus
|
1.24 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
1.28 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
1.25 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
1.16 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose),0.5(end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 9.5, 11.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 1; Day 4, 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 8; 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 22; Day 24,25,29,39,49Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Rac was obtained from AUCtau after last dose (Day 22) divided by AUCtau after single dose (Day 1). Rac was calculated for the intact C-terminus and N-terminus PF-05231023 from the concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental method. Only participants who received PF-05231023 were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=16 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accumulation Ratio for Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Rac,Cmax) of PF-05231023
PF-05231023 C-Terminus
|
0.93 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
0.96 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
0.89 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
0.89 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
—
|
|
Accumulation Ratio for Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Rac,Cmax) of PF-05231023
PF-05231023 N-Terminus
|
1.13 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
1.04 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
1.04 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
1.10 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 22, Day 24, 25, 29, 39, 49Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Cmin was calculated for the intact C-terminus and N-terminus PF-05231023 from the concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental method. Only participants who received PF-05231023 were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=16 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Minimum Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Cmin) of PF-05231023 After Last Dose
PF-05231023 C-Terminus
|
0.0001000 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.00000
|
0.0001000 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.00000
|
0.0001000 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.00000
|
0.0001866 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3.2348
|
—
|
|
Minimum Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Cmin) of PF-05231023 After Last Dose
PF-05231023 N-Terminus
|
768.3 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 405.33
|
1213 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 585.54
|
3293 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1287.0
|
4182 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1646.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 22, Day 24, 25, 29, 39, 49Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Cav was calculated for the intact C-terminus and N-terminus PF-05231023 from the concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental method. Only participants who received PF-05231023 were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=15 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Average Plasma Concentration (Cav ) of PF-05231023 After the Last Dose
PF-05231023 C-Terminus
|
455.8 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 156.12
|
810.7 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 203.85
|
1793 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 426.65
|
2529 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 581.04
|
—
|
|
Average Plasma Concentration (Cav ) of PF-05231023 After the Last Dose
PF-05231023 N-Terminus
|
2783 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 812.93
|
5091 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1605.8
|
11060 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2593.9
|
13840 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2574.9
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 22, Day 24, 25, 29, 39, 49Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Half-Life was calculated for the intact C-terminus and N-terminus PF-05231023 from the concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental method. Only participants who received PF-05231023 were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=15 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of PF-05231023
PF-05231023 C-Terminus
|
7.6 hours
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
7.4 hours
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
7.4 hours
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
8.6 hours
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
—
|
|
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of PF-05231023
PF-05231023 N-Terminus
|
121.6 hours
Standard Deviation 16.5
|
119.3 hours
Standard Deviation 24.5
|
114.8 hours
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
114.6 hours
Standard Deviation 12.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5 (end of infusion), 1, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours after start of infusion on Day 22, Day 24, 25, 29, 39, 49Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body. CL was calculated for the intact C-terminus and N-terminus PF-05231023 from the concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental method. Only participants who received PF-05231023 were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=18 Participants
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=15 Participants
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=19 Participants
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apparent Clearance (CL) of PF-05231023
PF-05231023 C-Terminus
|
0.33 liter/hour (L/hr)
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.37 liter/hour (L/hr)
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.33 liter/hour (L/hr)
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.35 liter/hour (L/hr)
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
—
|
|
Apparent Clearance (CL) of PF-05231023
PF-05231023 N-Terminus
|
0.05 liter/hour (L/hr)
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
0.06 liter/hour (L/hr)
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
0.05 liter/hour (L/hr)
Standard Deviation 0.01
|
0.06 liter/hour (L/hr)
Standard Deviation 0.01
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
PF-05231023 25 mg
PF-05231023 50 mg
PF-05231023 100 mg
PF-05231023 150 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 participants at risk
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 participants at risk
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 participants at risk
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=22 participants at risk
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 participants at risk
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast mass
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=22 participants at risk
Placebo matched to PF-05231023 intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 25 mg
n=21 participants at risk
PF-05231023 25 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 50 mg
n=21 participants at risk
PF-05231023 50 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 100 mg
n=22 participants at risk
PF-05231023 100 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
PF-05231023 150 mg
n=21 participants at risk
PF-05231023 150 mg intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once weekly up to Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular hyperaemia
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
13.6%
3/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
38.1%
8/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Frequent bowel movements
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
13.6%
3/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.1%
2/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Feeling cold
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Generalised oedema
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Hunger
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site haematoma
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Vessel puncture site haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vulvovaginal mycotic infection
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tooth fracture
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure diastolic increased
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood thyroid stimulating hormone increased
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram ST segment abnormal
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram T wave abnormal
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count increased
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Increased appetite
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bursitis
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle tightness
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
9.1%
2/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Burning sensation
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Libido decreased
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus congestion
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Wheezing
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Night sweats
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash erythematous
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash papular
|
4.5%
1/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Phlebitis
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/22
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER