NewPreBP: Project Newborn -Preparation for Birth and Parenthood
NCT ID: NCT01672437
Last Updated: 2017-09-18
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
1766 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2012-11-30
Study Completion Date
2015-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The Danish regions aim to implement antenatal education in small groups for all expectant parents. The effects of general antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both, remain largely unknown. Also it is unknown if antenatal education in small groups is superior to antenatal lectures which is currently standard care.
The aim of the trial is to evaluate if antenatal birth and parent preparation in small groups can increase parenting resources thereby easing birth and creating a smoother and less stressful transition to parenthood among the participants, compared to those allocated to standard care. This in turn is hypothesized to improve health and thriving among newborn families and affect their use of healthcare services. A thorough process evaluation will be conducted highlighting enabling factors and barriers to the implementation. Finally cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted.
Individually randomised trial sited at Hvidovre Hospital, a large birth clinic in the Copenhagen Capital Region of Denmark.
Participants: 1756 pregnant women ≥ 18 years old, recruited before 20+0 weeks gestation, due to give birth at Hvidovre Hospital. Being legally able and willing to provide signed consent, and being fluent in Danish.
Women are randomised to receive:
1. A research-based birth and parenting program. The intervention consists of 4 sessions in small groups that last for 2,5 hours per session at 25, 33 and 35 weeks of gestation, and a post-natal session 5 weeks after expected due date.
2. Standard care (control group). The pregnant woman and her partner are offered two antenatal lectures in an auditorium.
The allocation of participants to the intervention will be 1:1 to the intervention and the control group.
Data will be collected via questionnaires at baseline, 37 weeks gestation, 9 weeks post-partum, 6 months post-partum and 1 year post-partum, via the hospital obstetric database, and via the national registers. Analyses will be intention to treat. Subgroup analysis will be conducted in relation to personal and demographic characteristics. Process evaluation will be conducted using questionnaires and qualitative interviews. The incremental societal cost of the intervention will be computed and compared to the measured outcomes in a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Outcomes: Stress, parenting alliance, depressive symptoms, wellbeing obstetric intervention, use of health care services, self-efficacy, divorce.
The aim of the trial is to evaluate if antenatal birth and parent preparation in small groups can increase parenting resources thereby easing birth and creating a smoother and less stressful transition to parenthood among the participants, compared to those allocated to standard care. This in turn is hypothesized to improve health and thriving among newborn families and affect their use of healthcare services. A thorough process evaluation will be conducted highlighting enabling factors and barriers to the implementation. Finally cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted.
Individually randomised trial sited at Hvidovre Hospital, a large birth clinic in the Copenhagen Capital Region of Denmark.
Participants: 1756 pregnant women ≥ 18 years old, recruited before 20+0 weeks gestation, due to give birth at Hvidovre Hospital. Being legally able and willing to provide signed consent, and being fluent in Danish.
Women are randomised to receive:
1. A research-based birth and parenting program. The intervention consists of 4 sessions in small groups that last for 2,5 hours per session at 25, 33 and 35 weeks of gestation, and a post-natal session 5 weeks after expected due date.
2. Standard care (control group). The pregnant woman and her partner are offered two antenatal lectures in an auditorium.
The allocation of participants to the intervention will be 1:1 to the intervention and the control group.
Data will be collected via questionnaires at baseline, 37 weeks gestation, 9 weeks post-partum, 6 months post-partum and 1 year post-partum, via the hospital obstetric database, and via the national registers. Analyses will be intention to treat. Subgroup analysis will be conducted in relation to personal and demographic characteristics. Process evaluation will be conducted using questionnaires and qualitative interviews. The incremental societal cost of the intervention will be computed and compared to the measured outcomes in a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Outcomes: Stress, parenting alliance, depressive symptoms, wellbeing obstetric intervention, use of health care services, self-efficacy, divorce.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Antenatal education Today Danish antenatal classes are primarily offered in auditoriums as lectures with a minimum of interaction with the audience. The Danish regions currently aim in time to implement antenatal birth and parent preparation classes in small groups for all expectant parents. However, it is unknown if 1) antenatal preparation in small groups is superior to standard care; 2) what elements the preparation should encompass to meet the needs of expectant parents today; and 3) what the cost-effectiveness of antenatal preparation in small groups is compared to large-scale preparation in auditoriums.
Trial objectives and purpose The primary aim is to compare parenting resources, health and thriving, and use of healthcare services in newborn families enrolled in a research-based standardised antenatal birth and parenting program in small groups with those allocated to standard care.
Development of the program: We have developed a comprehensive, theoretically founded parenting program in collaboration with midwives, health care visitors, a psychologist and family therapist, parents, and leading national and international researchers and clinicians in this field.
Process evaluation: Focus group interviews with service providers, group facilitators and participants will be carried out. Program fidelity e.g. whether the protocol is followed in program delivery, and how much of the intended program the participants are receiving, as well as program reach e.g. what proportions of the intended groups are participating in the program, has an impact on the effect of an intervention. We will evaluate whether the protocol is followed in program delivery and how much of the intended program the participants are receiving. Participants will be asked to fill in an electronic questionnaire on-site at the end of each session. The questionnaire will highlight whether the intended subjects of the session have been covered as well as to what extent the participants found the information given useful. Group facilitators will be asked to fill in a similar questionnaire with the opportunity to explain why certain topics may have been omitted.
Non respondent/non-participation: What proportions of the intended groups are participating in the program will be explored by examining demographic characteristics of those who declined to participate in the trial via the national registers, as well as examining characteristics of those who accepted and then did or did not show up for the sessions.
Cost-effectiveness analysis: Finally the incremental societal cost of the intervention will be calculated and compared to the measured outcomes in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Direct health care costs as well as productivity costs in terms of labour market participation and sickness absence. For this we will use data from the obstetric database at Hvidovre Hospital, national registers and questionnaires.
Trial design Individually randomised trial sited at a large birth clinic in the Copenhagen Capital Region, Hvidovre Hospital.
Trial intervention
The intervention will have two arms:
1. A research-based parenting program described in more detail below.
2. Standard care (control group). The pregnant woman and her partner are offered two antenatal lectures on birth and breastfeeding in an auditorium.
The intervention arm: Groups of approximately 6-7 couples (or mothers) will meet three times during pregnancy and 1 time 5 weeks after expected due date, for the duration of 2.5 hours per session. (The aim is to create groups of 6-7 couples; however, due to fluctuations in uptake groups of 4-9 couples will be deemed acceptable). The sessions will include information and discussions about emotions and expectations related to birth and parenting, identification of social network resources, couple communication, breastfeeding, parent-child attachment, directions on taking care of a newborn, and recognising common signs of mood disorders and how to react. A website with parenting information and exercises will be created and parents will be encouraged to use this material alongside the sessions. In addition to gaining knowledge about issues related to birth and parenting, and creating an environment where parents can discuss their feelings and concerns, the program aims at enhancing expectant parents' awareness of their own resources and problem-solving strategies. Furthermore the way the groups are composited will enable participants to establish relations with other expectant parents in their local area. All sessions will be led by a midwife. The postnatal session will be conducted in collaboration with a health visitor, to increase knowledge on available resources in the local communities Informed consent All participants considered for this trial will be provided with written and oral information on this trial so that participants can make an informed decision about their participation in this trial. A project phone line will be established where participants can contact a project member throughout the trial if she has further questions, or wishes to withdraw her consent for participation in the trial.
Data collection Data will be collected from both parents using web-based questionnaires at: baseline (approximately 18 weeks gestation) (Tp0), 37 weeks gestation (Tp1), 9 weeks after expected due date (Tp2), 6 months after expected due date (Tp3), 1 year after expected due date (Tp4). Participants will be contacted via e-mail, when due to answer a questionnaire. Two reminders will be sent via additional e-mails, the first after a week and the second after 14 days. Data will also be obtained from the hospital obstetric database and the national registers.
Concomitant medication/treatment All participants are free to make use of concomitant antenatal/postnatal services and parent groups. As use of other services and parent groups may influence the outcomes that we are interested in, use and services will be examined, documented and given careful consideration in the analyses.
Explorative outcomes
In addition to primary and secondary outcomes, there are following explorative outcomes:
Post-natal depressive symptomatology and anxiety - questionnaire data, EPDS (tp0,1,2) Breastfeeding - questionnaire data (tp0,1,2,3) Use of healthcare services i.e.: for the parents obstetric intervention i.e. augmentation of labour, vacuum extraction, caesarean rate - data from the hospital obstetric database (tp2), and contact to healthcare professionals for depressive symptomatology and unscheduled postnatal visits- questionnaire data (tp2,3).
Family medicine use - questionnaire data (tp2,3) and register data (tp4) Smoking - questionnaire data (tp1,2,3,4) Satisfaction with relationship and family break-ups - questionnaire data (tp 0,1,2,3,4), and data from the national registers on divorce and break-ups (tp4): mental well-being (tp1,2,3,4)
In this trial the intermediate outcomes of interest are:
Parenting resources: trust in own ability to cope with: 1) birth (tp1), 2) discharge (tp1) 3) parenting (tp1,2,4) breastfeeding (tp0,1); couple communication (tp0,1,2,3,4); social support/network (tp0,1,2,3,4) Statistical plan and data analysis Sample size and power estimations We are planning a trial of independent experimental and control participant with 1 control per experimental participant. 2011 data from the HH Obstetric Database (unpublished data) indicate that epidural use among pregnant women is 31%. If the true epidural use for experimental participants is 25%, we will need to include 1,175 experimental participants and 1,175 control participants be able to reject the null hypothesis that the epidural use for experimental and control participants are equal with probability (power) 90%. The Type I error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 5% Amendment 17th February 2014: Due to slow recruitment, we reduce the power from 90% to 80%, thus reducing the sample size from 2,350 participants to 1,756 participants.
Power estimation for the secondary outcome Perceived Stress Scale We are planning a trial with 1175 experimental participants and 1175 control participants. In a previous study the Perceived Stress Scale response within each participant group was normally distributed with standard deviation 6 (18). If the true difference in the experimental and control means is 1, we will be able to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the experimental and control groups are equal with probability (power) 98.1%. The type 1 error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.5.
Power estimation for the secondary outcome Swedish Parenthood Stress Questionnaire In a previous study the Swedish Parenthood Stress Questionnaire response within each subject group was normally distributed with standard deviation 0.5 (19). If the true difference in the experimental and control means is 0.1, we will be able to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the experimental and control groups are equal with probability (power) 99.8%. The type 1 error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.5.
Power estimation for the secondary outcome Parenting Alliance Measure In a previous study the Parenting Alliance Measure response within each subject group was normally distributed with standard deviation 20. If the true difference in the experimental and control means is 4, we will be able to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the experimental and control groups are equal with probability (power) 98.7%. The type 1 error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 5%.
Statistical methods Reporting will follow the guidelines of the CONSORT-statement. Statistical analyses will be intention to treat as well as per protocol. The level of significance will be 0.05.
The analysis of the primary binary outcome will be done using logistic regression.
The results of this analysis will be subjected to a worst case and a best case scenario analysis of the potential impact of missing values. In the analysis of the two secondary outcome measures a mixed model with repeated measures will be used. The fixed effects will include a linear and a quadratic time component and their corresponding interactions with the intervention indicator. An unstructured covariance matrix will be used initially. If convergence cannot be obtained the spatial power law covariance structure will be tried and then the compound symmetric model.
Using the general linear univariate model it will be tested if the mean values differ between the two intervention groups at time 1 (9 weeks following birth).
If the assumptions of the above analyses cannot be fulfilled with reasonable approximation the groups will only be compared at time 1 using a nonparametric test (Mann Whitney).
The unadjusted analyses are the primary analyses. If possible all analyses will be repeated adjusted for the protocol specified stratification variable and the baseline value.
Three explorative subgroup analyses may be conducted in each case provided the subgroup interacts significantly with the intervention.
Dealing with multiplicity, gate keeping will be used to adjust the observed p values for primary and secondary outcomes. Both observed and adjusted p values will be reported.
Direct access to source data/documentation
The trial will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki in its latest form as well as national laws and regulations. The investigators permit audits and inspection by providing direct access to source data/documentation. The trial will be monitored by an unrelated research group at the National Institute of Public Health. eCRFs will be checked, and as minimum the following will be monitored locally:
All patients for existence (If the CPR number is correct), All patients for documented informed consent
Trial objectives and purpose The primary aim is to compare parenting resources, health and thriving, and use of healthcare services in newborn families enrolled in a research-based standardised antenatal birth and parenting program in small groups with those allocated to standard care.
Development of the program: We have developed a comprehensive, theoretically founded parenting program in collaboration with midwives, health care visitors, a psychologist and family therapist, parents, and leading national and international researchers and clinicians in this field.
Process evaluation: Focus group interviews with service providers, group facilitators and participants will be carried out. Program fidelity e.g. whether the protocol is followed in program delivery, and how much of the intended program the participants are receiving, as well as program reach e.g. what proportions of the intended groups are participating in the program, has an impact on the effect of an intervention. We will evaluate whether the protocol is followed in program delivery and how much of the intended program the participants are receiving. Participants will be asked to fill in an electronic questionnaire on-site at the end of each session. The questionnaire will highlight whether the intended subjects of the session have been covered as well as to what extent the participants found the information given useful. Group facilitators will be asked to fill in a similar questionnaire with the opportunity to explain why certain topics may have been omitted.
Non respondent/non-participation: What proportions of the intended groups are participating in the program will be explored by examining demographic characteristics of those who declined to participate in the trial via the national registers, as well as examining characteristics of those who accepted and then did or did not show up for the sessions.
Cost-effectiveness analysis: Finally the incremental societal cost of the intervention will be calculated and compared to the measured outcomes in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Direct health care costs as well as productivity costs in terms of labour market participation and sickness absence. For this we will use data from the obstetric database at Hvidovre Hospital, national registers and questionnaires.
Trial design Individually randomised trial sited at a large birth clinic in the Copenhagen Capital Region, Hvidovre Hospital.
Trial intervention
The intervention will have two arms:
1. A research-based parenting program described in more detail below.
2. Standard care (control group). The pregnant woman and her partner are offered two antenatal lectures on birth and breastfeeding in an auditorium.
The intervention arm: Groups of approximately 6-7 couples (or mothers) will meet three times during pregnancy and 1 time 5 weeks after expected due date, for the duration of 2.5 hours per session. (The aim is to create groups of 6-7 couples; however, due to fluctuations in uptake groups of 4-9 couples will be deemed acceptable). The sessions will include information and discussions about emotions and expectations related to birth and parenting, identification of social network resources, couple communication, breastfeeding, parent-child attachment, directions on taking care of a newborn, and recognising common signs of mood disorders and how to react. A website with parenting information and exercises will be created and parents will be encouraged to use this material alongside the sessions. In addition to gaining knowledge about issues related to birth and parenting, and creating an environment where parents can discuss their feelings and concerns, the program aims at enhancing expectant parents' awareness of their own resources and problem-solving strategies. Furthermore the way the groups are composited will enable participants to establish relations with other expectant parents in their local area. All sessions will be led by a midwife. The postnatal session will be conducted in collaboration with a health visitor, to increase knowledge on available resources in the local communities Informed consent All participants considered for this trial will be provided with written and oral information on this trial so that participants can make an informed decision about their participation in this trial. A project phone line will be established where participants can contact a project member throughout the trial if she has further questions, or wishes to withdraw her consent for participation in the trial.
Data collection Data will be collected from both parents using web-based questionnaires at: baseline (approximately 18 weeks gestation) (Tp0), 37 weeks gestation (Tp1), 9 weeks after expected due date (Tp2), 6 months after expected due date (Tp3), 1 year after expected due date (Tp4). Participants will be contacted via e-mail, when due to answer a questionnaire. Two reminders will be sent via additional e-mails, the first after a week and the second after 14 days. Data will also be obtained from the hospital obstetric database and the national registers.
Concomitant medication/treatment All participants are free to make use of concomitant antenatal/postnatal services and parent groups. As use of other services and parent groups may influence the outcomes that we are interested in, use and services will be examined, documented and given careful consideration in the analyses.
Explorative outcomes
In addition to primary and secondary outcomes, there are following explorative outcomes:
Post-natal depressive symptomatology and anxiety - questionnaire data, EPDS (tp0,1,2) Breastfeeding - questionnaire data (tp0,1,2,3) Use of healthcare services i.e.: for the parents obstetric intervention i.e. augmentation of labour, vacuum extraction, caesarean rate - data from the hospital obstetric database (tp2), and contact to healthcare professionals for depressive symptomatology and unscheduled postnatal visits- questionnaire data (tp2,3).
Family medicine use - questionnaire data (tp2,3) and register data (tp4) Smoking - questionnaire data (tp1,2,3,4) Satisfaction with relationship and family break-ups - questionnaire data (tp 0,1,2,3,4), and data from the national registers on divorce and break-ups (tp4): mental well-being (tp1,2,3,4)
In this trial the intermediate outcomes of interest are:
Parenting resources: trust in own ability to cope with: 1) birth (tp1), 2) discharge (tp1) 3) parenting (tp1,2,4) breastfeeding (tp0,1); couple communication (tp0,1,2,3,4); social support/network (tp0,1,2,3,4) Statistical plan and data analysis Sample size and power estimations We are planning a trial of independent experimental and control participant with 1 control per experimental participant. 2011 data from the HH Obstetric Database (unpublished data) indicate that epidural use among pregnant women is 31%. If the true epidural use for experimental participants is 25%, we will need to include 1,175 experimental participants and 1,175 control participants be able to reject the null hypothesis that the epidural use for experimental and control participants are equal with probability (power) 90%. The Type I error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 5% Amendment 17th February 2014: Due to slow recruitment, we reduce the power from 90% to 80%, thus reducing the sample size from 2,350 participants to 1,756 participants.
Power estimation for the secondary outcome Perceived Stress Scale We are planning a trial with 1175 experimental participants and 1175 control participants. In a previous study the Perceived Stress Scale response within each participant group was normally distributed with standard deviation 6 (18). If the true difference in the experimental and control means is 1, we will be able to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the experimental and control groups are equal with probability (power) 98.1%. The type 1 error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.5.
Power estimation for the secondary outcome Swedish Parenthood Stress Questionnaire In a previous study the Swedish Parenthood Stress Questionnaire response within each subject group was normally distributed with standard deviation 0.5 (19). If the true difference in the experimental and control means is 0.1, we will be able to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the experimental and control groups are equal with probability (power) 99.8%. The type 1 error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.5.
Power estimation for the secondary outcome Parenting Alliance Measure In a previous study the Parenting Alliance Measure response within each subject group was normally distributed with standard deviation 20. If the true difference in the experimental and control means is 4, we will be able to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the experimental and control groups are equal with probability (power) 98.7%. The type 1 error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 5%.
Statistical methods Reporting will follow the guidelines of the CONSORT-statement. Statistical analyses will be intention to treat as well as per protocol. The level of significance will be 0.05.
The analysis of the primary binary outcome will be done using logistic regression.
The results of this analysis will be subjected to a worst case and a best case scenario analysis of the potential impact of missing values. In the analysis of the two secondary outcome measures a mixed model with repeated measures will be used. The fixed effects will include a linear and a quadratic time component and their corresponding interactions with the intervention indicator. An unstructured covariance matrix will be used initially. If convergence cannot be obtained the spatial power law covariance structure will be tried and then the compound symmetric model.
Using the general linear univariate model it will be tested if the mean values differ between the two intervention groups at time 1 (9 weeks following birth).
If the assumptions of the above analyses cannot be fulfilled with reasonable approximation the groups will only be compared at time 1 using a nonparametric test (Mann Whitney).
The unadjusted analyses are the primary analyses. If possible all analyses will be repeated adjusted for the protocol specified stratification variable and the baseline value.
Three explorative subgroup analyses may be conducted in each case provided the subgroup interacts significantly with the intervention.
Dealing with multiplicity, gate keeping will be used to adjust the observed p values for primary and secondary outcomes. Both observed and adjusted p values will be reported.
Direct access to source data/documentation
The trial will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki in its latest form as well as national laws and regulations. The investigators permit audits and inspection by providing direct access to source data/documentation. The trial will be monitored by an unrelated research group at the National Institute of Public Health. eCRFs will be checked, and as minimum the following will be monitored locally:
All patients for existence (If the CPR number is correct), All patients for documented informed consent
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Stress
Depression
Communication
Self-efficacy
Coping
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Primary Study Purpose
PREVENTION
Blinding Strategy
SINGLE
Outcome Assessors
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Birth and parent preparation
The following subjects will be covered in the sessions:
Session 1 (25 weeks gestation):
* Common challenges in the transition to parenthood and in the relationship
* Couple communication
Session 2 (33 weeks gestation):
* Expectations in relation to birth
* The normal course of labour
* Obstetric intervention
* Pain relief,coping strategies
* Partner support
Session 3 (35 weeks gestation):
* Feeding a newborn
* Interpreting the newborn's signs, symptoms and behaviour
* Taking care of a newborn
* Mood swings, postnatal depressive symptomatology
Session 4 (5 weeks post-partum):
* Birth experiences
* Mood swings, postnatal depressive symptomatology
* The first time at home with a newborn
* Couplehood - partner support, communication, division of household tasks
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Birth and parent preparation
Intervention Type
OTHER
4 sessions of birth and parent preparation in small groups of 6-8 couples. 3 sessions during pregnancy, 1 session following birth.
control group
The control group are offered two lectures in an auditorium during pregnancy - one on breastfeeding and one on labour. This is standard care.
Group Type
NO_INTERVENTION
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Birth and parent preparation
4 sessions of birth and parent preparation in small groups of 6-8 couples. 3 sessions during pregnancy, 1 session following birth.
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Expectant pregnant women (and partners)
* ≥ 18 years old
* Due to give birth at Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark
* Able to speak and understand Danish
* Being legally able and willing to provide signed consent
* ≥ 18 years old
* Due to give birth at Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark
* Able to speak and understand Danish
* Being legally able and willing to provide signed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Not providing signed informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Danish Cancer Society
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Vibeke Koushede
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Vibeke Koushede
Principal Investigator
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pernille Due, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Southern Denmark
Vibeke Koushede, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Southern Denmark
Christian Gluud, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research
Morten Grønbæk, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Southern Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hvidovre Hospital
Hvidovre, , Denmark
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Denmark
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barlow J, Parsons J. Group-based parent-training programmes for improving emotional and behavioural adjustment in 0-3 year old children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD003680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003680.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Abidin RR. The Determinants of Parenting Behavior. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1992 Dec;21(4):407-12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cowan CP, Cowan PA. When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2000.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Assel MA, Landry SH, Swank PR, Steelman L, Miller-Loncar C, Smith KE. How do mothers' childrearing histories, stress and parenting affect children's behavioural outcomes? Child Care Health Dev. 2002 Sep;28(5):359-68. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2002.00285.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Benzies KM, Harrison MJ, Magill-Evans J. Parenting stress, marital quality, and child behavior problems at age 7 years. Public Health Nurs. 2004 Mar-Apr;21(2):111-21. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.021204.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Deater-Deckard K. Parenting stress and child adjustment: Some old hypotheses and new questions. Clinical Psychology-Science and Practice 1998;5(3):314-32
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nystrom K, Ohrling K. Parenthood experiences during the child's first year: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2004 May;46(3):319-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.02991.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Schor EL; American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on the Family. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family. Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Deater-Deckard K, Pinkerton R, Scarr S. Child care quality and children's behavioral adjustment: a four-year longitudinal study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1996 Nov;37(8):937-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01491.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
National Board of Health D. Status on regional and municipal offers in relation to pregnancy and delivery with focus on delivery and early discharge ( In Danish: Status for regionernes og kommunernes tilbud til gravide og fødende med fokus på ambulante fødsler og tidlige udskrivelser). Copenhagen: National Board of Health, Denmark; 2011. Report No.: j.nr. 7-205-03-31/1/chb.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gagnon AJ. Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth/parenthood. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(4):CD002869. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002869.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dunkley J. Health promotion in midwifery practise: a resource for health professionals. Edinburgh: Bailliere Tindall; 2000.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Biro MA. What has public health got to do with midwifery? Midwives' role in securing better health outcomes for mothers and babies. Women Birth. 2011 Mar;24(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Brot C, Poulsen A. Recommendations in relation to antenatal care 2009 (In Danish: Anbefalinger for svangreomsorgen 2009). Copenhagen: National Board of Health, Denmark; 2009.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Haggman-Laitila A, Pietila AM. Perceived benefits on family health of small groups for families with children. Public Health Nurs. 2007 May-Jun;24(3):205-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2007.00627.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Barlow J, Coren E. Parent-training programmes for improving maternal psychosocial health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD002020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020.pub2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sanders MR. Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. J Fam Psychol. 2008 Aug;22(4):506-17. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.506.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nutbeam D, Kickbusch I. Advancing health literacy: a global challenge for the 21st century. Health Promotion International 2000 Sep;15(3):183-4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Illeris K, Jarvis P, Kegan R, Engeström Y, Elkjaer B, Mezirow J, et al. Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists...in their own words. New York: Routledge; 2009.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bartholomew L.K, Parcel G.S, Kok G, Gottlieb N.H, Fernández M.E. Planning Health Promotion Programs - An intervention mapping approach. 3 rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2011.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Whittakar KA, Cowley S. An effective programme is not enough: a review of factors associated with poor attendance and engagement with parenting support programmes. Children and Society 2010.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Milgrom J, Schembri C, Ericksen J, Ross J, Gemmill AW. Towards parenthood: an antenatal intervention to reduce depression, anxiety and parenting difficulties. J Affect Disord. 2011 May;130(3):385-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.045. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ostberg M, Hagekull B, Wettergren S. A measure of parental stress in mothers with small children: dimensionality, stability and validity. Scand J Psychol. 1997 Sep;38(3):199-208. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00028.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Brixval CS, Thygesen LC, Axelsen SF, Gluud C, Winkel P, Lindschou J, Weber T, Due P, Koushede V. Effect of antenatal education in small classes versus standard auditorium-based lectures on use of pain relief during labour and of obstetric interventions: results from the randomised NEWBORN trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 10;6(6):e010761. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010761.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Nyfødt -DP -269
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id