Patient Response to Spinal Manipulation

NCT ID: NCT01670292

Last Updated: 2017-12-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

82 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a biomechanical study which is Project 1 in the Developmental Center for Clinical and Translational Research in Chiropractic (DCRC I) (NIH/NCCAM grant 1 U19 AT004663-01; principal investigator Christine Goertz, DC, PhD). This study is designed to monitor both physiological and patient self-report outcome variables. In addition, as there is little quantitative information on Spinal Manipulation Technique procedures reported in clinical trials, the study is designed to collect preliminary kinetic measures of the spinal manipulation technique delivery (i.e. force-time profiles).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants with narrowly defined chronic low back pain will be included in this study. Each participant will be treated 12 times over the course of 6 weeks. The following data will be collected: participant characteristics that may predict outcome or be modifiers of force used by provider (gender, age, height, weight, and Body Mass Index); spinal segment load during the pre-load and thrusting phases (force and moment in the pre-load phase, peak load, and loading rate); physiological measures (posterior-anterior global stiffness and flexion-relaxation); patient-centered outcomes of back pain and function; and adverse events.

Study participants (n= 80) will be recruited from the Quad Cities metro area. A team of experienced chiropractic clinicians working at the Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research will treat study participants. Each of the study participants will receive 2 High Velocity Low Amplitude Spinal Manipulation treatment visits per week over a 6 week period. The physiological assessments will be performed immediately before and after Spinal Manipulation delivery during treatment visits 1, 5 \& 12 (6 sets of assessments in total). During these same treatment visits, we will also capture the kinetic measures during Spinal Manipulation delivery for spinal segment load analysis. Participant patient-centered outcomes will be measured at baseline 1, and treatment visits 6 and 13. For simplicity, data collection time points will be named as baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 6 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental: HVLA-SM

Experimental High Velocity Low Amplitude Spinal Manipulation

Group Type OTHER

HVLA-SM

Intervention Type OTHER

High Velocity Low Amplitude Spinal Manipulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HVLA-SM

High Velocity Low Amplitude Spinal Manipulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* NRS score, AVERAGE within the past 24 hours
* Must be ≥4 at the phone screen or baseline 1 visit
* Must be ≥2 at phone screen, baseline 1 and baseline 2 visits
* Roland Morris Disability ≥6
* Age 21-65
* Signed informed consent document
* Chronic (12+ weeks) low back pain

Exclusion Criteria

* Compliance concerns
* No manipulable lesion in L1-L5 or SI joints
* The absence of typical palpatory characteristics as well as the absence of a global assessment that would indicate that spinal manipulation is likely to generate a positive therapeutic effect, even without the presence of standard palpatory findings
* Ongoing treatment for low back pain by outside provider
* Comorbid conditions
* Serious concomitant illness
* Inflammatory or destructive spinal tissue change
* Ankylosing Spondylytis
* Fibromyalgia
* Rheumatoid Arthritis
* Confirmed or suspected disc herniation with neurological signs
* Neuromuscular disease (e.g. Parkinson's, Muscular Dystrophy, Cerebral Palsy, or Myasthenia gravis
* Spinal surgery \<6 months
* Suspicion of drug or alcohol dependence or abuse
* Uncontrolled hypertension
* Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease
* Undetermined, infections or visceral source of low back pain
* Other comorbid conditions prohibiting treatment and/or testing
* Safety concerns
* Bleeding disorders
* Contraindications to High Velocity Low Amplitude Spinal Manipulation
* Inability to tolerate or obtain positon for flexion-relaxation test without condition aggravation
* Inability to tolerate or perform/receive any study procedure without condition aggravation
* Quebec Task Force (QTF) criterion 4-11:
* QTF 4: Pain + radiation to upper/lower limb with neurologic signs
* QTF 5: Presumptive compression of a spinal nerve root on a simple roentgenogram
* QTF 6: Compression of a spinal nerve root confirmed by specific imaging techniques
* QTF 7: Spinal Stenosis
* QTF 8: Postsurgical status, 1-6 months after intervention
* QTF 9: Postsurgical status, \>6 months after intervention
* QTF 10: Chronic pain syndrome
* QTF 11: Other diagnoses
* Pregnancy
* Pacemaker or defibrillator
* Inability to read or verbally comprehend English
* Joint replacement
* Use of spinal manipulation within past 4 weeks
* Sensitivity to adhesive
* Diagnostic procedures other than x-ray/UA necessary
* BDI-II ≥29
* Retention of legal advice and open or pending case related to low back pain
* BMI ≥40
* Unwilling to have low back and wrist shaved
* Moving from Quad Cities area within next 8 weeks
* Unwilling to postpone treatments for low back pain from another provider
* Seeking or receiving compensation for any disability
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Iowa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Palmer College of Chiropractic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ting Xia, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Palmer College of Chiropractic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Palmer College of Chiropractic

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Xia T, Wilder DG, Gudavalli MR, DeVocht JW, Vining RD, Pohlman KA, Kawchuk GN, Long CR, Goertz CM. Study protocol for patient response to spinal manipulation - a prospective observational clinical trial on physiological and patient-centered outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Aug 8;14:292. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-292.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25106673 (View on PubMed)

Minkalis AL, Vining RD. What is the pain source? A case report of a patient with low back pain and bilateral hip osteonecrosis. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2015 Sep;59(3):300-10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26500365 (View on PubMed)

Xia T, Long CR, Vining RD, Gudavalli MR, DeVocht JW, Kawchuk GN, Wilder DG, Goertz CM. Association of lumbar spine stiffness and flexion-relaxation phenomenon with patient-reported outcomes in adults with chronic low back pain - a single-arm clinical trial investigating the effects of thrust spinal manipulation. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Jun 9;17(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1821-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28599647 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139615/

Study protocol for patient response to spinal manipulation - a prospective observational clinical trial on physiological and patient-centered outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593036/

What is the pain source? A case report of a patient with low back pain and bilateral hip osteonecrosis.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U19AT004663

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

PRiSM Study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id