Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
82 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-09-30
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study participants (n= 80) will be recruited from the Quad Cities metro area. A team of experienced chiropractic clinicians working at the Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research will treat study participants. Each of the study participants will receive 2 High Velocity Low Amplitude Spinal Manipulation treatment visits per week over a 6 week period. The physiological assessments will be performed immediately before and after Spinal Manipulation delivery during treatment visits 1, 5 \& 12 (6 sets of assessments in total). During these same treatment visits, we will also capture the kinetic measures during Spinal Manipulation delivery for spinal segment load analysis. Participant patient-centered outcomes will be measured at baseline 1, and treatment visits 6 and 13. For simplicity, data collection time points will be named as baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 6 weeks.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental: HVLA-SM
Experimental High Velocity Low Amplitude Spinal Manipulation
HVLA-SM
High Velocity Low Amplitude Spinal Manipulation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HVLA-SM
High Velocity Low Amplitude Spinal Manipulation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must be ≥4 at the phone screen or baseline 1 visit
* Must be ≥2 at phone screen, baseline 1 and baseline 2 visits
* Roland Morris Disability ≥6
* Age 21-65
* Signed informed consent document
* Chronic (12+ weeks) low back pain
Exclusion Criteria
* No manipulable lesion in L1-L5 or SI joints
* The absence of typical palpatory characteristics as well as the absence of a global assessment that would indicate that spinal manipulation is likely to generate a positive therapeutic effect, even without the presence of standard palpatory findings
* Ongoing treatment for low back pain by outside provider
* Comorbid conditions
* Serious concomitant illness
* Inflammatory or destructive spinal tissue change
* Ankylosing Spondylytis
* Fibromyalgia
* Rheumatoid Arthritis
* Confirmed or suspected disc herniation with neurological signs
* Neuromuscular disease (e.g. Parkinson's, Muscular Dystrophy, Cerebral Palsy, or Myasthenia gravis
* Spinal surgery \<6 months
* Suspicion of drug or alcohol dependence or abuse
* Uncontrolled hypertension
* Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease
* Undetermined, infections or visceral source of low back pain
* Other comorbid conditions prohibiting treatment and/or testing
* Safety concerns
* Bleeding disorders
* Contraindications to High Velocity Low Amplitude Spinal Manipulation
* Inability to tolerate or obtain positon for flexion-relaxation test without condition aggravation
* Inability to tolerate or perform/receive any study procedure without condition aggravation
* Quebec Task Force (QTF) criterion 4-11:
* QTF 4: Pain + radiation to upper/lower limb with neurologic signs
* QTF 5: Presumptive compression of a spinal nerve root on a simple roentgenogram
* QTF 6: Compression of a spinal nerve root confirmed by specific imaging techniques
* QTF 7: Spinal Stenosis
* QTF 8: Postsurgical status, 1-6 months after intervention
* QTF 9: Postsurgical status, \>6 months after intervention
* QTF 10: Chronic pain syndrome
* QTF 11: Other diagnoses
* Pregnancy
* Pacemaker or defibrillator
* Inability to read or verbally comprehend English
* Joint replacement
* Use of spinal manipulation within past 4 weeks
* Sensitivity to adhesive
* Diagnostic procedures other than x-ray/UA necessary
* BDI-II ≥29
* Retention of legal advice and open or pending case related to low back pain
* BMI ≥40
* Unwilling to have low back and wrist shaved
* Moving from Quad Cities area within next 8 weeks
* Unwilling to postpone treatments for low back pain from another provider
* Seeking or receiving compensation for any disability
21 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Iowa
OTHER
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
NIH
Palmer College of Chiropractic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ting Xia, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Palmer College of Chiropractic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Palmer College of Chiropractic
Davenport, Iowa, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Xia T, Wilder DG, Gudavalli MR, DeVocht JW, Vining RD, Pohlman KA, Kawchuk GN, Long CR, Goertz CM. Study protocol for patient response to spinal manipulation - a prospective observational clinical trial on physiological and patient-centered outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Aug 8;14:292. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-292.
Minkalis AL, Vining RD. What is the pain source? A case report of a patient with low back pain and bilateral hip osteonecrosis. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2015 Sep;59(3):300-10.
Xia T, Long CR, Vining RD, Gudavalli MR, DeVocht JW, Kawchuk GN, Wilder DG, Goertz CM. Association of lumbar spine stiffness and flexion-relaxation phenomenon with patient-reported outcomes in adults with chronic low back pain - a single-arm clinical trial investigating the effects of thrust spinal manipulation. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Jun 9;17(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1821-1.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Study protocol for patient response to spinal manipulation - a prospective observational clinical trial on physiological and patient-centered outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain
What is the pain source? A case report of a patient with low back pain and bilateral hip osteonecrosis.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRiSM Study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id