Ultrasound Guided Blockade of the Lumbar Plexus - the Supra Sacral Parallel Shift
NCT ID: NCT01669018
Last Updated: 2013-01-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The most recognized technique with ultrasound guidance (Karmakars technique) is technically demanding and based on injection of local anesthetic relatively close to the exit of the spinal nerves from the spine. The risk is spread of local anesthetic to the spinal canal prompting a risk of low blood pressure. This may be fatal in high risk patients.
The investigators have developed a simple technique based on injection away from the spinal canal. The investigators expect minimal risk of spread of local anesthetic to the spinal canal with this technique.
This randomized, double blinded trial compares the new technique to the established technique of ultrasound guided blockade of the lumbar plexus.
The hypothesis is that the new technique has a higher success rate with reduced effect on blood pressure for ultrasound guided lumbar plexus block compared to the established technique.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lumbar ultrasound trident (LUT)
Lumbar plexus block using LUT technique
Lumbar plexus block using LUT technique
Lumbar plexus block guided by ultrasound and nerve stimulation with the patient in the lateral position and the probe in the parasagittal plane inserting the block needle between the transverse processes of L3 and L4 until an appropriate neuromuscular response is produced.
Supra Sacral Parallel Shift (SSPS)
Lumbar plexus block using SSPS technique
Lumbar plexus block using SSPS technique
Lumbar plexus block guided by ultrasound and loss of resistance (LOR) with the patient in the lateral position and the probe in the parasagittal plane inserting the block needle between the transverse process of L5 and the sacral bone until an appropriate LOR is produced.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lumbar plexus block using LUT technique
Lumbar plexus block guided by ultrasound and nerve stimulation with the patient in the lateral position and the probe in the parasagittal plane inserting the block needle between the transverse processes of L3 and L4 until an appropriate neuromuscular response is produced.
Lumbar plexus block using SSPS technique
Lumbar plexus block guided by ultrasound and loss of resistance (LOR) with the patient in the lateral position and the probe in the parasagittal plane inserting the block needle between the transverse process of L5 and the sacral bone until an appropriate LOR is produced.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA I (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification)
Exclusion Criteria
* volunteers who do not understand and speak danish
* daily use of analgesics
* allergy to local analgesics or contrast agents
* abuse of medicine or alcohol
* volunteers with technical impediments of the planned interventions
18 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thomas F. Bendtsen
Consultant anesthetist, associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Else Tønnesen, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Faculty of Health, Aarhus University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SSPS-1-10-72-366-12
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id