Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Acceptability of Low-Residue Diet Package (Enimaclin®) as Diet Control Before Colonoscopy (NCT NCT01665157)

NCT ID: NCT01665157

Last Updated: 2014-04-02

Results Overview

Ottawa preparation scale: Colon is defined into 3 segments: Right(cecum, ascending), mid(transverse, descending), rectosigmoid. Each is scored from 0 to 4, 0 is best and 4 is worst. Fluid quantity of whole is scored as 0, small; 1, moderate; 2 large amount. The scale will be summation of the clearness of 3 segments of colon and overall fluid quantity. It ranged from 0 to 14, 0 is the most clean colon and 14 is the most dirty one. Segment score will be analyzed separately as continuous variable.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

180 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

1 day

Results posted on

2014-04-02

Participant Flow

Recruitment period: 14 months Recruitment location: GI outpatient clinic

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG
Low-residue diet package (Enimaclin) with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG
Self-controlled diet with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Low-residue Diet Package and 1.5L PEG-ELS
Low-residue diet package(Enimaclin) with low volume 1.5L PEG-ELS
Overall Study
STARTED
60
60
60
Overall Study
COMPLETED
60
60
60
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Efficacy and Acceptability of Low-Residue Diet Package (Enimaclin®) as Diet Control Before Colonoscopy

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Low-residue Diet Package (Enimaclin®) and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package with normal amount of 2L PEG-ELS
Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Self-controlled diet with normal amount of 2L PEG-ELS
Low-residue Diet (Enimaclin®) Package and 1.5L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package with normal amount of 1.5L PEG-ELS
Total
n=180 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
157 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Continuous
52.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=5 Participants
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=7 Participants
53.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.0 • n=5 Participants
52.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
81 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
99 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
60 participants
n=5 Participants
60 participants
n=7 Participants
60 participants
n=5 Participants
180 participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 day

Ottawa preparation scale: Colon is defined into 3 segments: Right(cecum, ascending), mid(transverse, descending), rectosigmoid. Each is scored from 0 to 4, 0 is best and 4 is worst. Fluid quantity of whole is scored as 0, small; 1, moderate; 2 large amount. The scale will be summation of the clearness of 3 segments of colon and overall fluid quantity. It ranged from 0 to 14, 0 is the most clean colon and 14 is the most dirty one. Segment score will be analyzed separately as continuous variable.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package (Enimaclin) with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Self-controlled diet with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package(Enimaclin) with low volume 1.5L PEG-ELS
Overall Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy by Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale
2.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.15
3.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.08
2.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.79

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 day

The overall proportion of participants scored as Excellent or Good by Aronchick scale. Description of Aronchick scale:It categorized colon cleansing into 5 level: Excellent, good, fair, poor, inadequate. It is categorical and cannot be summed. We will present

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package (Enimaclin) with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Self-controlled diet with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package(Enimaclin) with low volume 1.5L PEG-ELS
Overall Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy by Aronchick Scale
91.7 percentage of participants
76.7 percentage of participants
78.3 percentage of participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 day

The total volume of PEG-ELS (Liter) that ingested or could be ingested by examinee before colonoscopy

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package (Enimaclin) with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Self-controlled diet with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package(Enimaclin) with low volume 1.5L PEG-ELS
Total Volume of Purgatives That Ingested
1.96 Liter
Standard Deviation 0.16
1.98 Liter
Standard Deviation 0.12
1.61 Liter
Standard Deviation 0.27

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 day

Segmental score of Ottawa bowel preparation scale was analyzed. The proportion of "right segment" preparation failure, defined as segmental score as "3 poor" or "4 inadequate", was presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package (Enimaclin) with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Self-controlled diet with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package(Enimaclin) with low volume 1.5L PEG-ELS
Segmental Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy (Right Segment Preparation Failure)
1.7 percentage of participants
15.0 percentage of participants
6.7 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 day

It represent the proportion of participants who wanted to choose the same protocol as they received in this trial.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package (Enimaclin) with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Self-controlled diet with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package(Enimaclin) with low volume 1.5L PEG-ELS
Willingness to Choose the Same Protocol After Different Low Residual Diet and PEG-ELS Protocol
93.3 percentage of participants
90.0 percentage of participants
95.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 day

It represented the percentage of participants who is satisfied with the protocol.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package (Enimaclin) with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Self-controlled diet with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package(Enimaclin) with low volume 1.5L PEG-ELS
Satisfaction of Different Low Residual Diet and Bowel Preparation Protocol
73.3 Percentage of participants
36.7 Percentage of participants
76.7 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 day

It represented the percentage of participants who thinks the protocol is easy to use.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package (Enimaclin) with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG
n=60 Participants
Self-controlled diet with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG
n=60 Participants
Low-residue diet package(Enimaclin) with low volume 1.5L PEG-ELS
Convenience of Different Low Residual Diet and Bowel Preparation Protocol
88.3 percentage of participants
76.7 percentage of participants
93.3 percentage of participants

Adverse Events

Low-residue Diet Package

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Self-controlled Diet

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG-ELS

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Low-residue Diet Package
n=60 participants at risk
Low-residue diet package (Enimaclin) with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Self-controlled Diet
n=60 participants at risk
Self-controlled diet with normal amount 2L PEG-ELS
Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG-ELS
n=60 participants at risk
Low-residue diet package(Enimaclin) with low volume 1.5L PEG-ELS
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.00%
0/60
1.7%
1/60 • Number of events 1
0.00%
0/60

Additional Information

Han-Mo Chiu, M.D., Ph.D.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place