Trial Outcomes & Findings for Cosmetic Result/Toxicity in Post-Mastectomy Immediate Reconstruction Expander+RT (NCT NCT01664091)
NCT ID: NCT01664091
Last Updated: 2019-08-26
Results Overview
Success rate was defined as the percentage of participants experiencing all of the following: 1) completion of PMRT and placement of the permanent implant and/or flap reconstruction; 2) no major complications (infection requiring hospitalization, major revisions, early/severe capsular contracture, or pain requiring implant removal); and 3) a physician-reported 'excellent' or 'good' cosmetic result (not 'fair' or 'poor') at 2 years following PMRT (requiring a stable reconstruction with good symmetry and contour relative to the contralateral breast).
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
2 years
2019-08-26
Participant Flow
Participants enrolled from September 2009 through September 2012.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
TE-ADM With PMRT
Participants received immediate breast reconstruction using a sub-muscular tissue expander (TE) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling placed during the same surgery. This was followed by post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) no sooner than a minimum of 6 weeks and optimally 6 months, if adjuvant chemotherapy was required. The prescribed chest-wall dose was 50 -50.4 gray (Gy) in 25-28 fractions given once daily over 5-7 weeks with a 0.5-centimeter (cm) bolus to the scar every other day. Permanent reconstruction was performed at least 6 months after completion of PMRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
32
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
TE-ADM With PMRT
Participants received immediate breast reconstruction using a sub-muscular tissue expander (TE) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling placed during the same surgery. This was followed by post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) no sooner than a minimum of 6 weeks and optimally 6 months, if adjuvant chemotherapy was required. The prescribed chest-wall dose was 50 -50.4 gray (Gy) in 25-28 fractions given once daily over 5-7 weeks with a 0.5-centimeter (cm) bolus to the scar every other day. Permanent reconstruction was performed at least 6 months after completion of PMRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Disease Progression
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Cosmetic Result/Toxicity in Post-Mastectomy Immediate Reconstruction Expander+RT
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tissue Expander and Acellular Dermal Matrix
n=32 Participants
immediate reconstruction with a TE and ADM followed by PMRT
radiation: The prescribed chest-wall dose will be 50 - 50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions, given once daily over 5-7 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
42.3 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Breast Cancer Laterality
Left
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Breast Cancer Laterality
Right
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Mastectomy (unilateral, bilateral)
Unilateral
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Mastectomy (unilateral, bilateral)
Bilateral
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Lymph Nodes Excised
|
11 lymph nodes
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Lymph Nodes Involved
|
2 lymph nodes
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: The analysis population is comprised of the evaluable subset of participants with complete 2 year follow-up data.
Success rate was defined as the percentage of participants experiencing all of the following: 1) completion of PMRT and placement of the permanent implant and/or flap reconstruction; 2) no major complications (infection requiring hospitalization, major revisions, early/severe capsular contracture, or pain requiring implant removal); and 3) a physician-reported 'excellent' or 'good' cosmetic result (not 'fair' or 'poor') at 2 years following PMRT (requiring a stable reconstruction with good symmetry and contour relative to the contralateral breast).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TE-ADM With PMRT
n=26 Participants
Participants received immediate breast reconstruction using a sub-muscular tissue expander (TE) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling placed during the same surgery. This was followed by post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) no sooner than a minimum of 6 weeks and optimally 6 months, if adjuvant chemotherapy was required. The prescribed chest-wall dose was 50 -50.4 gray (Gy) in 25-28 fractions given once daily over 5-7 weeks with a 0.5-centimeter (cm) bolus to the scar every other day. Permanent reconstruction was performed at least 5 months after completion of PMRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Success Rate
|
65.4 percentage of participants
Interval 44.3 to 82.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Lung dose-volume was measured at the end of radiation therapy which was up to 11 weeks from enrollment in this study cohort.Population: The analysis population is comprised of all enrolled participants.
Lung dose-volumes were assessed as a percentage of the ipsilateral lung irradiated via dose-volume histograms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TE-ADM With PMRT
n=32 Participants
Participants received immediate breast reconstruction using a sub-muscular tissue expander (TE) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling placed during the same surgery. This was followed by post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) no sooner than a minimum of 6 weeks and optimally 6 months, if adjuvant chemotherapy was required. The prescribed chest-wall dose was 50 -50.4 gray (Gy) in 25-28 fractions given once daily over 5-7 weeks with a 0.5-centimeter (cm) bolus to the scar every other day. Permanent reconstruction was performed at least 5 months after completion of PMRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Lung Dose-Volume
|
28.7 percentage radiation dose to lung
Interval 6.8 to 38.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: The analysis population is comprised of the evaluable subset of participants with complete 2 year follow-up data.
Cosmesis was measured by means of strict photographic analysis using five views (frontal, right and left lateral, and right and left quarter views) and independent assessment of the results by a plastic surgeon or radiation oncologist who has not treated the patient. Cosmetic score was defined in 4 categories: Excellent = treated breast looks essentially the same as the opposite breast; Good = minimal but identifiable result of treatment; Fair = significant effects of radiation therapy noted; Poor = severe normal tissue sequelae.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TE-ADM With PMRT
n=24 Participants
Participants received immediate breast reconstruction using a sub-muscular tissue expander (TE) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling placed during the same surgery. This was followed by post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) no sooner than a minimum of 6 weeks and optimally 6 months, if adjuvant chemotherapy was required. The prescribed chest-wall dose was 50 -50.4 gray (Gy) in 25-28 fractions given once daily over 5-7 weeks with a 0.5-centimeter (cm) bolus to the scar every other day. Permanent reconstruction was performed at least 5 months after completion of PMRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Cosmetic Score
Good
|
17 Participants
|
|
Cosmetic Score
Fair
|
5 Participants
|
|
Cosmetic Score
Poor
|
0 Participants
|
|
Cosmetic Score
Excellent
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed up to 2 years post PMRTPopulation: The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
An independent assessment of contracture was conducted by a plastic surgeon or radiation oncologist who had not treated the participant. Photographic analysis incorporated five views (frontal, right and left lateral, and right and left quarter views). Baker classification was used to score the extent of contracture: Class IA-absolutely natural, cannot tell breast was reconstructed; Class IB-soft, but the implant is detectable by physical examination or inspection because of mastectomy; Class II-mildly firm reconstructed breast with an implant that may be visible and detectable by physical examination; Class III-moderately firm reconstructed breast with readily detectable implant, but the result may still be acceptable; or Class IV-severe capsular contracture with an unacceptable aesthetic outcome and/or significant patient symptoms requiring surgical intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TE-ADM With PMRT
n=31 Participants
Participants received immediate breast reconstruction using a sub-muscular tissue expander (TE) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling placed during the same surgery. This was followed by post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) no sooner than a minimum of 6 weeks and optimally 6 months, if adjuvant chemotherapy was required. The prescribed chest-wall dose was 50 -50.4 gray (Gy) in 25-28 fractions given once daily over 5-7 weeks with a 0.5-centimeter (cm) bolus to the scar every other day. Permanent reconstruction was performed at least 5 months after completion of PMRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Baker Classification Peak Score
IA
|
0 Participants
|
|
Baker Classification Peak Score
IB
|
1 Participants
|
|
Baker Classification Peak Score
II
|
15 Participants
|
|
Baker Classification Peak Score
III
|
14 Participants
|
|
Baker Classification Peak Score
IV
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 YearsPopulation: The analysis population is comprised of the evaluable subset of participants with complete 2 year follow-up data.
An independent assessment of contracture was conducted by a plastic surgeon or radiation oncologist who had not treated the participant. Photographic analysis incorporated five views (frontal, right and left lateral, and right and left quarter views). Baker classification was used to score the extent of contracture: Class IA-absolutely natural, cannot tell breast was reconstructed; Class IB-soft, but the implant is detectable by physical examination or inspection because of mastectomy; Class II-mildly firm reconstructed breast with an implant that may be visible and detectable by physical examination; Class III-moderately firm reconstructed breast with readily detectable implant, but the result may still be acceptable; or Class IV-severe capsular contracture with an unacceptable aesthetic outcome and/or significant patient symptoms requiring surgical intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TE-ADM With PMRT
n=22 Participants
Participants received immediate breast reconstruction using a sub-muscular tissue expander (TE) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling placed during the same surgery. This was followed by post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) no sooner than a minimum of 6 weeks and optimally 6 months, if adjuvant chemotherapy was required. The prescribed chest-wall dose was 50 -50.4 gray (Gy) in 25-28 fractions given once daily over 5-7 weeks with a 0.5-centimeter (cm) bolus to the scar every other day. Permanent reconstruction was performed at least 5 months after completion of PMRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Baker Classification 2-Year Score
IA
|
0 Participants
|
|
Baker Classification 2-Year Score
IB
|
8 Participants
|
|
Baker Classification 2-Year Score
II
|
7 Participants
|
|
Baker Classification 2-Year Score
III
|
7 Participants
|
|
Baker Classification 2-Year Score
IV
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
TE-ADM With PMRT
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
TE-ADM With PMRT
n=31 participants at risk
Participants received immediate breast reconstruction using a sub-muscular tissue expander (TE) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling placed during the same surgery. This was followed by post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) no sooner than a minimum of 6 weeks and optimally 6 months, if adjuvant chemotherapy was required. The prescribed chest-wall dose was 50 -50.4 gray (Gy) in 25-28 fractions given once daily over 5-7 weeks with a 0.5-centimeter (cm) bolus to the scar every other day. Permanent reconstruction was performed at least 6 months after completion of PMRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Delayed Healing Wound
|
3.2%
1/31 • Specific adverse events (AEs) as listed were evaluated and reported on the follow-up and cosmetic evaluation case report form at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months post RT. AEs were graded according to 5 classifications: mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe and severe. Serious AEs were defined as AEs with a classification of moderate-severe or severe and other AEs with a classification of mild, mild-moderate or moderate.
The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
3.2%
1/31 • Specific adverse events (AEs) as listed were evaluated and reported on the follow-up and cosmetic evaluation case report form at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months post RT. AEs were graded according to 5 classifications: mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe and severe. Serious AEs were defined as AEs with a classification of moderate-severe or severe and other AEs with a classification of mild, mild-moderate or moderate.
The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Deflation
|
3.2%
1/31 • Specific adverse events (AEs) as listed were evaluated and reported on the follow-up and cosmetic evaluation case report form at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months post RT. AEs were graded according to 5 classifications: mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe and severe. Serious AEs were defined as AEs with a classification of moderate-severe or severe and other AEs with a classification of mild, mild-moderate or moderate.
The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Asymmetry
|
3.2%
1/31 • Specific adverse events (AEs) as listed were evaluated and reported on the follow-up and cosmetic evaluation case report form at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months post RT. AEs were graded according to 5 classifications: mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe and severe. Serious AEs were defined as AEs with a classification of moderate-severe or severe and other AEs with a classification of mild, mild-moderate or moderate.
The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
TE-ADM With PMRT
n=31 participants at risk
Participants received immediate breast reconstruction using a sub-muscular tissue expander (TE) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling placed during the same surgery. This was followed by post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) no sooner than a minimum of 6 weeks and optimally 6 months, if adjuvant chemotherapy was required. The prescribed chest-wall dose was 50 -50.4 gray (Gy) in 25-28 fractions given once daily over 5-7 weeks with a 0.5-centimeter (cm) bolus to the scar every other day. Permanent reconstruction was performed at least 6 months after completion of PMRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Delayed Healing
|
3.2%
1/31 • Specific adverse events (AEs) as listed were evaluated and reported on the follow-up and cosmetic evaluation case report form at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months post RT. AEs were graded according to 5 classifications: mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe and severe. Serious AEs were defined as AEs with a classification of moderate-severe or severe and other AEs with a classification of mild, mild-moderate or moderate.
The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Ischemia
|
6.5%
2/31 • Specific adverse events (AEs) as listed were evaluated and reported on the follow-up and cosmetic evaluation case report form at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months post RT. AEs were graded according to 5 classifications: mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe and severe. Serious AEs were defined as AEs with a classification of moderate-severe or severe and other AEs with a classification of mild, mild-moderate or moderate.
The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
3.2%
1/31 • Specific adverse events (AEs) as listed were evaluated and reported on the follow-up and cosmetic evaluation case report form at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months post RT. AEs were graded according to 5 classifications: mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe and severe. Serious AEs were defined as AEs with a classification of moderate-severe or severe and other AEs with a classification of mild, mild-moderate or moderate.
The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Chronic Drainage
|
6.5%
2/31 • Specific adverse events (AEs) as listed were evaluated and reported on the follow-up and cosmetic evaluation case report form at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months post RT. AEs were graded according to 5 classifications: mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe and severe. Serious AEs were defined as AEs with a classification of moderate-severe or severe and other AEs with a classification of mild, mild-moderate or moderate.
The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain/costochondritis
|
61.3%
19/31 • Specific adverse events (AEs) as listed were evaluated and reported on the follow-up and cosmetic evaluation case report form at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months post RT. AEs were graded according to 5 classifications: mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe and severe. Serious AEs were defined as AEs with a classification of moderate-severe or severe and other AEs with a classification of mild, mild-moderate or moderate.
The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Asymmetry
|
83.9%
26/31 • Specific adverse events (AEs) as listed were evaluated and reported on the follow-up and cosmetic evaluation case report form at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months post RT. AEs were graded according to 5 classifications: mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe and severe. Serious AEs were defined as AEs with a classification of moderate-severe or severe and other AEs with a classification of mild, mild-moderate or moderate.
The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperpigmentation
|
48.4%
15/31 • Specific adverse events (AEs) as listed were evaluated and reported on the follow-up and cosmetic evaluation case report form at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months post RT. AEs were graded according to 5 classifications: mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe and severe. Serious AEs were defined as AEs with a classification of moderate-severe or severe and other AEs with a classification of mild, mild-moderate or moderate.
The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Deflation
|
9.7%
3/31 • Specific adverse events (AEs) as listed were evaluated and reported on the follow-up and cosmetic evaluation case report form at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months post RT. AEs were graded according to 5 classifications: mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe and severe. Serious AEs were defined as AEs with a classification of moderate-severe or severe and other AEs with a classification of mild, mild-moderate or moderate.
The analysis population excludes 1 participant lost-to follow-up who left the country immediately following PMRT.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place