Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study on Spermatogenesis in Male Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Valganciclovir (Valcyte®) Versus Untreated Matched Controls (NCT NCT01663740)
NCT ID: NCT01663740
Last Updated: 2018-08-31
Results Overview
Sperm density was calculated based on the average of two semen samples. Change was calculated as the sperm density measured at post-baseline visit (EOT) minus (-) the sperm density measured at baseline for each participant. A negative change from baseline indicated a lower sperm density (worsening).
COMPLETED
PHASE4
59 participants
Baseline, EOT (Week 28)
2018-08-31
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
Participants with donor positive (D+)/recipient negative (R-) cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
Participants with donor negative (D-)/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
38
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
22
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
16
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
Participants with donor positive (D+)/recipient negative (R-) cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
Participants with donor negative (D-)/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
9
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Inclusion/Exclusion not met
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
No end of study status
|
3
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=37 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=21 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Total
n=58 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
35.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.96 • n=37 Participants
|
32.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.81 • n=21 Participants
|
34.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.36 • n=58 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
37 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
|
Seminal Volume
|
2.4 milliliters (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.51 • n=30 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
2.0 milliliters (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.37 • n=20 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
2.2 milliliters (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.46 • n=50 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
|
Sperm Density
|
21.0 millions of sperm/milliliter (mil/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.33 • n=30 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
23.2 millions of sperm/milliliter (mil/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.90 • n=20 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
21.9 millions of sperm/milliliter (mil/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.77 • n=50 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Normal Sperm Cells
|
11.4 percentage of normal sperm cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.44 • n=27 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
33.5 percentage of normal sperm cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39.03 • n=18 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
20.3 percentage of normal sperm cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.15 • n=45 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
|
Total Motility of Sperm
|
25.8 percent motility
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.46 • n=30 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
36.3 percent motility
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.24 • n=20 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
30.0 percent motility
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.42 • n=50 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
|
Terminal Uridine Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) Score
|
14.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.80 • n=28 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
12.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.60 • n=18 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
13.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.03 • n=46 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
|
Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Level
|
10.8 units per liter (U/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.77 • n=29 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
8.6 units per liter (U/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.61 • n=20 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
9.9 units per liter (U/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.72 • n=49 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
|
Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Level
|
6.4 milliunits per milliliter (mU/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.61 • n=29 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
6.8 milliunits per milliliter (mU/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.86 • n=20 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
6.6 milliunits per milliliter (mU/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.76 • n=49 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
|
Prolactin Level
|
175.4 mU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 73.51 • n=29 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
164.5 mU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.22 • n=20 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
170.9 mU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 63.46 • n=49 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
|
Testosterone Level
|
14.2 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.83 • n=29 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
11.3 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.54 • n=20 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
13.0 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.84 • n=49 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
|
Inhibin B Level
|
103.4 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 55.82 • n=27 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
149.1 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 98.45 • n=19 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
122.3 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 78.70 • n=46 Participants • Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this analysis.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Sperm density was calculated based on the average of two semen samples. Change was calculated as the sperm density measured at post-baseline visit (EOT) minus (-) the sperm density measured at baseline for each participant. A negative change from baseline indicated a lower sperm density (worsening).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=24 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=14 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Sperm Density From Baseline to the End of Treatment (EOT)
|
-9.770 mil/mL
Standard Error 9.0518
|
30.396 mil/mL
Standard Error 11.3044
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.
Sperm DNA fragmentation change (chromatin damage) was evaluated based on TUNEL score. Change was calculated as the TUNEL score measured at post-baseline visit (EOT and FU) minus the TUNEL score measured at baseline for each participant. A negative change from baseline indicated a lower TUNEL score. TUNEL score represents percentage of sperm with fragmented DNA; total score ranged from 0 percent (%) to 100%, higher score represents more fragmentation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=22 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=14 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Terminal Uridine Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) Score From Baseline to EOT and End of Follow-up (FU)
Change at EOT
|
-3.595 percent score
Standard Error 1.7720
|
-5.354 percent score
Standard Error 2.0680
|
|
Change in Terminal Uridine Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) Score From Baseline to EOT and End of Follow-up (FU)
Change at end of FU
|
-4.516 percent score
Standard Error 1.9542
|
-3.465 percent score
Standard Error 2.5475
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Sperm DNA fragmentation change (chromatin damage) was evaluated based on TUNEL score. Change was calculated as the TUNEL score measured at FU minus the TUNEL score measured at EOT for each participant. A negative change from EOT indicated a lower TUNEL score. TUNEL score represents percentage of sperm with fragmented DNA; total score ranged from 0% to 100%, higher score represents more fragmentation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=16 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=9 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in TUNEL Score From EOT to End of FU
|
4.447 percent score
Standard Error 2.0671
|
1.578 percent score
Standard Error 2.5315
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.
Seminal volume was calculated based on the average of two semen samples. Change was calculated as the seminal volume measured at post-baseline visit (EOT and FU) - the seminal volume measured at baseline for each participant. A negative change from baseline indicated a lower seminal volume (worsening).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=25 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=14 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Seminal Volume From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at EOT
|
-0.193 mL
Standard Error 0.2324
|
-0.347 mL
Standard Error 0.2967
|
|
Change in Seminal Volume From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at end of FU
|
-0.289 mL
Standard Error 0.2066
|
-0.161 mL
Standard Error 0.2685
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Seminal volume was calculated based on the average of two semen samples. Change was calculated as the seminal volume measured at FU - the seminal volume measured at EOT for each participant. A negative change from EOT indicated a lower seminal volume (worsening).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=20 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=9 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Seminal Volume From EOT to End FU
|
-0.103 mL
Standard Error 0.2187
|
0.024 mL
Standard Error 0.3067
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Sperm density was calculated based on the average of two semen samples. Change was calculated as the sperm density measured at FU - the sperm density measured at EOT for each participant. A negative change from EOT indicated a lower sperm density (worsening).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=19 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=9 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Sperm Density From EOT to End of FU
|
57.149 mil/mL
Standard Error 17.7736
|
5.882 mil/mL
Standard Error 27.4837
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Sperm density was calculated based on the average of two semen samples. Change was calculated as the sperm density measured at post-baseline visit (FU) - the sperm density measured at baseline for each participant. A negative change from baseline indicated a lower sperm density (worsening).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=20 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=10 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Sperm Density From Baseline to End of FU
|
39.671 mil/mL
Standard Error 11.6679
|
49.866 mil/mL
Standard Error 15.8282
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.
Sperm motility was calculated based on the average of two semen samples. Percent was determined by the calculation of motile sperm/total sperm count. Change was calculated as the sperm motility measured at post-baseline visit (EOT and FU) - the sperm motility measured at baseline for each participant. A negative change from baseline indicated a lower sperm motility (worsening).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=24 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=14 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Total Motility of Sperm From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at EOT
|
3.839 percent motility
Standard Error 5.4259
|
25.667 percent motility
Standard Error 6.9723
|
|
Change in Total Motility of Sperm From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at FU
|
24.736 percent motility
Standard Error 4.7920
|
34.538 percent motility
Standard Error 6.6024
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Sperm motility was calculated based on the average of two semen samples. Percent was determined by the calculation of motile sperm/total sperm count. Change was calculated as the sperm motility measured at FU - the sperm motility measured at EOT for each participant. A negative change from EOT indicated a lower sperm motility (worsening).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=19 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=9 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Total Motility of Sperm From EOT to End of FU
|
8.953 percent motility
Standard Error 6.3968
|
20.635 percent motility
Standard Error 9.0663
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.
Sperm morphology was evaluated based on the average of two semen samples. Change was calculated as the sperm morphology measured at post-baseline visit (EOT and FU) - the sperm morphology measured at baseline for each participant. A positive change from baseline indicated an improved sperm morphology.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=21 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Sperm Morphology Evaluated as Percentage of Normal Sperm Cells From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at end of FU
|
5.128 percentage of normal sperm cells
Standard Error 2.8907
|
6.982 percentage of normal sperm cells
Standard Error 4.2060
|
|
Change in Sperm Morphology Evaluated as Percentage of Normal Sperm Cells From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at EOT
|
3.720 percentage of normal sperm cells
Standard Error 4.0233
|
9.461 percentage of normal sperm cells
Standard Error 5.2737
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Sperm morphology was evaluated based on the average of two semen samples. Change was calculated as the sperm morphology measured at FU - the sperm morphology measured at EOT for each participant. A positive change from EOT indicated an improved sperm morphology.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=17 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=7 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Sperm Morphology Evaluated as Percentage of Normal Sperm Cells From EOT to End of FU
|
-0.714 percentage of normal sperm cells
Standard Error 4.3420
|
2.236 percentage of normal sperm cells
Standard Error 5.8507
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.
Testosterone level was calculated based on the average of two samples. Change was calculated as the testosterone level measured at post-baseline visit (EOT and FU) - the testosterone level measured at baseline for each participant. A negative change from baseline indicated a lower testosterone level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=26 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=14 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Total Testosterone Level From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at EOT
|
0.762 nmol/L
Standard Error 1.0203
|
2.623 nmol/L
Standard Error 1.3586
|
|
Change in Total Testosterone Level From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at end of FU
|
0.395 nmol/L
Standard Error 1.0260
|
1.509 nmol/L
Standard Error 1.3074
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Testosterone level was calculated based on the average of two samples. Change was calculated as the testosterone level measured at FU - the testosterone level measured at EOT for each participant. A negative change from EOT indicated a lower testosterone level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=19 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=11 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Total Testosterone Level From EOT to End of FU
|
-0.936 nmol/L
Standard Error 0.9950
|
-0.984 nmol/L
Standard Error 1.2012
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.
LH level was calculated based on the average of two samples. Change was calculated as the LH level measured at post-baseline visit (EOT and FU) - the LH level measured at baseline for each participant. A negative change from baseline indicated a lower LH level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=26 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=13 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in LH Level From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at EOT
|
-0.281 mU/mL
Standard Error 0.3743
|
-0.357 mU/mL
Standard Error 0.5190
|
|
Change in LH Level From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at end of FU
|
-1.857 mU/mL
Standard Error 0.2787
|
-0.642 mU/mL
Standard Error 0.3635
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
LH level was calculated based on the average of two samples. Change was calculated as the LH level measured at FU - the LH level measured at EOT for each participant. A negative change from EOT indicated a lower LH level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=20 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=11 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in LH Level From EOT to End of FU
|
-1.482 mU/mL
Standard Error 0.2607
|
-0.417 mU/mL
Standard Error 0.3207
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.
FSH level was calculated based on the average of two samples. Change was calculated as the FSH level measured at post-baseline visit (EOT and FU) - the FSH level measured at baseline for each participant. A negative change from baseline indicated a lower FSH level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=26 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=13 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in FSH Level From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at EOT
|
1.521 U/L
Standard Error 1.0033
|
-1.020 U/L
Standard Error 1.4072
|
|
Change in FSH Level From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at end of FU
|
-2.905 U/L
Standard Error 0.4113
|
-1.922 U/L
Standard Error 0.5369
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
FSH level was calculated based on the average of two samples. Change was calculated as the FSH level measured at FU - the FSH level measured at EOT for each participant. A negative change from EOT indicated a lower FSH level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=20 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=11 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in FSH Level From EOT to End of FU
|
-3.462 U/L
Standard Error 0.5036
|
-1.988 U/L
Standard Error 0.6141
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.
Prolactin level was calculated based on the average of two samples. Change was calculated as the prolactin level measured at post-baseline visit (EOT and FU) - the prolactin level measured at baseline for each participant. A negative change from baseline indicated a lower prolactin level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=25 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=13 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Prolactin Level From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at EOT
|
15.590 mU/mL
Standard Error 14.4761
|
15.693 mU/mL
Standard Error 19.2663
|
|
Change in Prolactin Level From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at end of FU
|
9.829 mU/mL
Standard Error 13.1691
|
-5.443 mU/mL
Standard Error 16.7203
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Prolactin level was calculated based on the average of two samples. Change was calculated as the prolactin level measured at FU - the prolactin level measured at EOT for each participant. A negative change from EOT indicated a lower prolactin level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=19 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=11 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Prolactin Level From EOT to End of FU
|
-7.429 mU/mL
Standard Error 10.9988
|
-16.169 mU/mL
Standard Error 13.5322
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.
Inhibin B level was calculated based on the average of two samples. Change was calculated as the inhibin B level measured at post-baseline visit (EOT and FU) - the inhibin B level measured at baseline for each participant. A negative change from baseline indicated a lower inhibin B level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=22 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Inhibin B Level From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at EOT
|
5.075 pg/mL
Standard Error 7.3778
|
-3.067 pg/mL
Standard Error 9.5924
|
|
Change in Inhibin B Level From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Change at end of FU
|
51.416 pg/mL
Standard Error 10.8658
|
10.734 pg/mL
Standard Error 13.9963
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Inhibin B level was calculated based on the average of two samples. Change was calculated as the inhibin B level measured at FU - the inhibin B level measured at EOT for each participant. A negative change from EOT indicated a lower inhibin B level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=18 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=9 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Inhibin B Level From EOT to End of FU
|
40.329 pg/mL
Standard Error 13.8221
|
14.448 pg/mL
Standard Error 17.8932
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.
Abnormal sperm density was considered as sperm density less than (\<) 20 mil/mL. Change in abnormal to abnormal sperm density and normal to abnormal sperm density from baseline to EOT and end of FU was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=24 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=14 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Sperm Density (<20 Mil/mL) From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Abnormal to abnormal: EOT
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
35.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Sperm Density (<20 Mil/mL) From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Abnormal to abnormal: FU
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Sperm Density (<20 Mil/mL) From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Normal to abnormal: EOT
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Sperm Density (<20 Mil/mL) From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
Normal to abnormal: FU
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Abnormal sperm density was considered as sperm density \<20 mil/mL. Change in abnormal to abnormal sperm density and normal to abnormal sperm density from EOT to end of FU was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=19 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=9 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Sperm Density (<20 Mil/mL) From EOT to End of FU
Abnormal to abnormal
|
26.3 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Sperm Density (<20 Mil/mL) From EOT to End of FU
Normal to abnormal
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.
Sperm DNA fragmentation change (chromatin damage) was evaluated based on TUNEL score. Participants who had a lower TUNEL score compared to the previous time point were considered as improved.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=22 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=14 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improved TUNEL Score From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
EOT
|
72.7 percentage of participants
|
71.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improved TUNEL Score From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
FU
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
60.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Sperm DNA fragmentation change (chromatin damage) was evaluated based on TUNEL score. Participants who had a lower TUNEL score compared to the previous time point were considered as improved.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=16 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=9 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improved TUNEL Score From EOT to End of FU
|
43.8 percentage of participants
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed indicates number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.
Participants who had higher sperm density compared with the previous visit were considered as improved.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=24 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=14 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improved Sperm Density From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
EOT
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
64.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improved Sperm Density From Baseline to EOT and End of FU
FU
|
90.0 percentage of participants
|
80.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (Week 28), end of FU (Week 52)Population: Safety population. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants who had higher sperm density compared with the previous visit were considered as improved.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=19 Participants
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=9 Participants
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improved Sperm Density From EOT to End of FU
|
78.9 percentage of participants
|
88.9 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=31 participants at risk
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=21 participants at risk
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Perinephric collection
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Fetal death
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Diabetic foot
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Social circumstances
Treatment noncompliance
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foreign body
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Transplant rejection
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Kidney transplant rejection
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Atypical pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Tubulointerstitial nephritis
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal hemorrhage
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Retroperitoneal hematoma
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort A: Partcipants Who Received Valganciclovir
n=31 participants at risk
Participants with D+/R- CMV serology, who received valganciclovir prophylaxis according to the local prescribing information, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
Cohort B: Untreated Participants
n=21 participants at risk
Participants with D-/R- CMV serology, who did not receive prophylaxis, were observed for spermatogenesis up to 52 weeks post-transplant.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Groin pain
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Transplant rejection
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Scrotal swelling
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Wound drainage
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
22.6%
7/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
23.8%
5/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
19.4%
6/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Polycythaemia
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site pain
|
12.9%
4/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
57.1%
12/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site haemorrhage
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Perinephric collection
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Toxicity to various agents
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
22.6%
7/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
23.8%
5/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
16.1%
5/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
12.9%
4/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
12.9%
4/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Odynophagia
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
19.4%
6/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
16.1%
5/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Investigations
Immunosuppressant drug level increased
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
25.8%
8/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
22.6%
7/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
16.1%
5/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dyslipidaemia
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypervolaemia
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
12.9%
4/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
23.8%
5/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
12.9%
4/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Escherichia infection
|
0.00%
0/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
16.1%
5/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
12.9%
4/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
6.5%
2/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
3.2%
1/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
9.7%
3/31 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to end of study (Week 52)
Participants who received at least one dose of valganciclovir in Cohort A and all transplanted participants of Cohort B were included for adverse events analysis.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER