Trial Outcomes & Findings for Endoscopic Suturing for Primary Obesity Treatment (NCT NCT01662024)
NCT ID: NCT01662024
Last Updated: 2017-03-30
Results Overview
Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period. Postoperative adverse events were defined as occurring during the first three days after the procedure. Delayed adverse events were defined as occurring on the fourth post-procedure day or afterwards.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
12 months
2017-03-30
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure
Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach.
Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures. Dietitian visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to assess for the development of eating disorders. Clinical visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to obtain size and weight data. Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure
Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach.
Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures. Dietitian visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to assess for the development of eating disorders. Clinical visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to obtain size and weight data. Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Pregnancy
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Endoscopic Suturing for Primary Obesity Treatment
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure
n=20 Participants
Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach.
Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
36.7 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Initial Weight (kg)
|
90.4 kg
n=5 Participants
|
|
Initial BMI (kg/m^2)
|
33.4 kg/m^2
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPerioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period. Postoperative adverse events were defined as occurring during the first three days after the procedure. Delayed adverse events were defined as occurring on the fourth post-procedure day or afterwards.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure
n=20 Participants
Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach.
Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures. Dietitian visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to assess for the development of eating disorders. Clinical visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to obtain size and weight data. Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Peri-operative Adverse Events
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Post-operative Adverse Events
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Delayed Adverse Events
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
No Adverse Events
|
13 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0 - Procedure DayTechnical success was defined by placement of at least 8 running sutures and 4 interrupted sutures in the gastric body with exclusion of the lateral stomach.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure
n=20 Participants
Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach.
Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures. Dietitian visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to assess for the development of eating disorders. Clinical visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to obtain size and weight data. Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period.
|
|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Technical Feasibility of the Procedure
Running Sutures
|
10.4 Sutures
Interval 9.9 to 10.9
|
|
Evaluation of Technical Feasibility of the Procedure
Total Stitches
|
54.4 Sutures
Interval 51.9 to 56.9
|
|
Evaluation of Technical Feasibility of the Procedure
Interrupted Sutures
|
4 Sutures
Interval 4.0 to 4.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsData for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline: Percent excess weight loss
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure
n=15 Participants
Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach.
Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures. Dietitian visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to assess for the development of eating disorders. Clinical visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to obtain size and weight data. Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Excess Weight Loss
|
70.8 Percentage of excess weight lost
Interval 62.8 to 78.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Endoscopies were performed at 12 months but it was difficult to count the number of plications still intact as originally planned.
Data will be collected on the durability of the plications by evaluating the remaining plications at the 12 month endoscopy, compared to the number of plications placed at the time of procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure
Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach.
Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures. Dietitian visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to assess for the development of eating disorders. Clinical visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to obtain size and weight data. Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period.
|
|---|---|
|
Durability
|
0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsData for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline: Percentage of Total body weight loss
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure
n=15 Participants
Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach.
Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures. Dietitian visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to assess for the development of eating disorders. Clinical visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to obtain size and weight data. Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Total Body Weight Loss
|
18.1 Percentage of total weight lost
Interval 15.8 to 20.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsData for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline: BMI Loss (kg/m\^2)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure
n=15 Participants
Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach.
Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures. Dietitian visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to assess for the development of eating disorders. Clinical visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to obtain size and weight data. Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period.
|
|---|---|
|
BMI Loss (kg/m^2)
|
6.1 kg/m^2
Interval 5.3 to 6.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsData for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline: Waist Circumference Loss (cm)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure
n=15 Participants
Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach.
Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures. Dietitian visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to assess for the development of eating disorders. Clinical visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to obtain size and weight data. Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period.
|
|---|---|
|
Waist Circumference Loss (cm)
|
16 cm
Interval 13.6 to 18.4
|
Adverse Events
Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure
n=20 participants at risk
Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach.
Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Perioperative Abdominal Pain
|
10.0%
2/20 • 12 month period of adverse event data collection.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Perioperative Nausea/Vomiting
|
15.0%
3/20 • 12 month period of adverse event data collection.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Post-operative Abdominal Pain
|
5.0%
1/20 • 12 month period of adverse event data collection.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Post-operative Nausea
|
5.0%
1/20 • 12 month period of adverse event data collection.
|
Additional Information
Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place