Efficacy and Safety of Ularitide for the Treatment of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

NCT ID: NCT01661634

Last Updated: 2018-10-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2157 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-07-31

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a continuous intravenous (IV) ularitide infusion on the clinical status and outcome of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of the TRUE-AHF study is to evaluate the effect of a 48-h continuous IV infusion of ularitide (15 ng/kg/min) versus placebo on the clinical status of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).

The study drug will be administered in addition to the standard treatment. The nature of standard therapy will be carried out according to the clinical judgment of the Investigator and may include vasodilator, inotropic, and diuretic drugs, as clinically indicated.

There are two co-primary endpoints for this study. Co-primary endpoint 1 will be a hierarchical clinical composite variable that includes a patient-centered assessment of clinical progress, an assessment of lack of improvement or worsening of HF requiring a pre-specified intervention, and death.

The endpoint is intended to mimic the assessment that would be carried out by a physician caring for the patient. If, during the 48 h infusion, a patient's clinical course deteriorates because he/she dies, fails to improve or develops worsening HF requiring a pre-specified intervention or if the patient considers his/her general clinical status as moderately or markedly worse, the patient will be considered to be "worse". If the patient considers his/her general clinical status as moderately or markedly improved and if such improvement is sustained without fulfilling the criteria for "worse" throughout the 48-h infusion (from 0 h to 48 h), the patient will be considered to be "improved". If the patient is neither improved nor worse, the patient's clinical status will be considered to be "unchanged".

Co-primary efficacy endpoint 2 evaluates freedom from cardiovascular mortality during follow up after randomization, for the entire duration of the trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ularitide

Ularitide, lyophilizate for i.v. infusion, 15 ng/kg BW/min, for 48 hours

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ularitide

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo lyophilizate for i.v. infusion

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ularitide

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Males and females aged 18 to 85 years.
2. Unplanned hospitalization or emergency department visit for ADHF. Acute HF is defined as including all of the following:

* Dyspnea at rest in a recumbent sitting position (30 to 45 degrees), which has worsened within the past week;
* Radiological evidence of HF on a chest X-ray (if an appropriate chest;
* computerized tomography scan is done; the X-ray need not be performed);
* Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) \>500 pg/mL or NT-pro BNP \>2000 pg/mL.
3. Ability to start infusion of the study drug within 12 h after initial clinical assessment.
4. Ability to reliably carry out self-assessment of symptoms.
5. Systolic blood pressure ≥116 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg at the time of randomization.
6. Persisting dyspnea at rest despite standard background therapy for ADHF (as determined by the Investigator) which must include IV furosemide (or equivalent diuretic) at ≥40 mg (or its equivalent) at any time after start of emergency services (ambulance, emergency department, or hospital). At the time of randomization, the patient must still be symptomatic. In addition, the patient should not have received an IV bolus of a diuretic for at least 2 h prior to randomization, and the infusion rates of all ongoing IV infusions of medications to treat HF must not have been increased or decreased for at least 2 h prior to randomization.
7. Ability to understand the purpose and risks of the study and provide signed and dated informed consent and authorization to use protected health information (in accordance with national and local privacy regulations).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Known active myocarditis, obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, restrictive cardiomyopathy, constrictive pericarditis, uncorrected clinically significant primary valvular disease.
2. Treatment with dobutamine at a dose \>5 μg/kg/min or use of drugs for support of BP at the time of randomization.
3. Treatment with levosimendan, milrinone, or any other phosphodiesterase inhibitor within 7 days before randomization.
4. Treatment with nesiritide within 30 days before randomization.
5. Creatinine clearance \<25 mL/min/1.73m² (as measured by the MDRD formula) at the time of screening.
6. Planned coronary revascularization procedure (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting) within 5 days of randomization.
7. Clinical diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome meeting any 2 of the following 3 criteria:

1. Prolonged chest pain at rest, or an accelerated pattern of angina
2. Electrocardiogram changes indicative of ischemia or myocardial injury defined as: a new ST elevation at the J point of two anatomically contiguous leads with the cut-off points: ≥0.2 mV in men ≥40 years (\>0.25 mV in men \<40 years) or ≥0.15 mV in women in leads V2-V3 and/or ≥0.1 mV in other leads; or ST depression and T wave changes. New horizontal or down sloping ST depression ≥0.05 mV in two contiguous leads; and/or new T inversion ≥0.3 mV in two contiguous leads.
3. Serum troponin \>3 times upper limit of normal.
8. Clinically suspected acute mechanical cause of ADHF (e.g., papillary muscular rupture). The diagnosis need not be confirmed by imaging or cardiac catheterization.
9. Anemia (hemoglobin \<9 g/dL or a hematocrit \<25%).
10. Known vasculitis, active infective endocarditis, or suspected infections, e.g., pneumonia, acute hepatitis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, or sepsis.
11. Body temperature ≥38°C just prior to randomization.
12. Acute or chronic respiratory disorder (e.g., severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) or primary pulmonary hypertension sufficient to cause dyspnea at rest, which may interfere with the ability to interpret dyspnea assessments or hemodynamic measurements.
13. Terminal illness other than congestive HF with expected survival \<180 days.
14. Any previous exposure to ularitide.
15. Known allergy to natriuretic peptides.
16. Participation in an investigational clinical drug study within 30 days prior to randomization.
17. Current drug abuse or chronic alcoholism sufficient to impair participation and compliance to the study protocol.
18. Women who are breast-feeding.
19. Women of child-bearing potential (i.e., pre-menopausal women) without documentation of a negative urine/blood pregnancy assay within 12 h prior to randomization.
20. Any condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, makes the patient unsuitable for study participation.
21. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity.
22. Patients requiring mechanical circulatory support.
23. Patients with severe hepatic impairment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Quintiles, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cardiorentis

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Milton Packer, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Christopher O'Connor, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

William F. Peacock, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Trumbull, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Alexandria, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middletown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Midlothian, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Salem, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Ciudad Autonoma, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Coronel Suárez, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina

Site Status

San Vicente, Córdoba Province, Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, Argentina

Site Status

Corrientes, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Aalst, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Frýdek-Místek, , Czechia

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Znojmo, , Czechia

Site Status

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Espoo, , Finland

Site Status

Besançon, Doubs, France

Site Status

Toulouse, Haute Garonne, France

Site Status

Paris, Paris, France

Site Status

Bayonne, Pyrenees Atlantiques, France

Site Status

Bron, Rhone, France

Site Status

Poitiers, Vienne, France

Site Status

Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Bad Nauheim, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Groß-Umstadt, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Langen, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Site Status

Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany

Site Status

Jena, Thuringia, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Afula, , Israel

Site Status

Ashkelon, , Israel

Site Status

Hadera, , Israel

Site Status

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Nahariya, , Israel

Site Status

Nazareth, , Israel

Site Status

Safed, , Israel

Site Status

San Fermo della Battaglia, Como, Italy

Site Status

Legnano, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Rozzano, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Alessandria, , Italy

Site Status

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Como, , Italy

Site Status

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Novara, , Italy

Site Status

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Varese, , Italy

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Beverwijk, , Netherlands

Site Status

Ede, , Netherlands

Site Status

Gorinchem, , Netherlands

Site Status

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiderdorp, , Netherlands

Site Status

Sneek, , Netherlands

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Kamenitz, , Serbia

Site Status

Niš, , Serbia

Site Status

Niška Banja, , Serbia

Site Status

Zemun, , Serbia

Site Status

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain

Site Status

Aranjuez, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Lugano, , Switzerland

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Eskişehir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Kocaeli, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Sivas, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Belgium Brazil Canada Czechia Estonia Finland France Germany Hungary Israel Italy Latvia Lithuania Netherlands Poland Romania Serbia Spain Switzerland Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mitrovic V, Luss H, Nitsche K, Forssmann K, Maronde E, Fricke K, Forssmann WG, Meyer M. Effects of the renal natriuretic peptide urodilatin (ularitide) in patients with decompensated chronic heart failure: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose trial. Am Heart J. 2005 Dec;150(6):1239. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.01.022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16338265 (View on PubMed)

Mitrovic V, Seferovic PM, Simeunovic D, Ristic AD, Miric M, Moiseyev VS, Kobalava Z, Nitsche K, Forssmann WG, Luss H, Meyer M. Haemodynamic and clinical effects of ularitide in decompensated heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2006 Dec;27(23):2823-32. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl337. Epub 2006 Oct 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17074775 (View on PubMed)

Packer M, O'Connor C, McMurray JJV, Wittes J, Abraham WT, Anker SD, Dickstein K, Filippatos G, Holcomb R, Krum H, Maggioni AP, Mebazaa A, Peacock WF, Petrie MC, Ponikowski P, Ruschitzka F, van Veldhuisen DJ, Kowarski LS, Schactman M, Holzmeister J; TRUE-AHF Investigators. Effect of Ularitide on Cardiovascular Mortality in Acute Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 18;376(20):1956-1964. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601895. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28402745 (View on PubMed)

Packer M, Holcomb R, Abraham WT, Anker S, Dickstein K, Filippatos G, Krum H, Maggioni AP, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, O'Connor C, Peacock F, Ponikowski P, Ruschitzka F, van Veldhuisen DJ, Holzmeister J; TRUE-AHF Investigators and Committees. Rationale for and design of the TRUE-AHF trial: the effects of ularitide on the short-term clinical course and long-term mortality of patients with acute heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 May;19(5):673-681. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.698. Epub 2016 Nov 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27862700 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-024249-59

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ULA01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intravenous Allopurinol in Heart Failure
NCT00181155 COMPLETED PHASE2
IC14 for Treatment of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
NCT06556810 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Peritoneal Ultrafiltration in Cardio Renal Syndrome.
NCT03994874 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2