Trial Outcomes & Findings for Confirmatory Study of OPC-12759 Ophthalmic Solution (NCT NCT01660256)
NCT ID: NCT01660256
Last Updated: 2021-05-05
Results Overview
FCS indicates the damage to the corneal epithelium. Per the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop report, the cornea was divided into 5 fractions, each of which was given a staining score from 0 to 3, and the total score was calculated (0-15). 0 is better. Changes of the FCS score from baseline to the last dose (last observation carried forward \[LOCF\]) were compared between 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution and placebo by the t-test.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
209 participants
Baseline, Week 4
2021-05-05
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
OPC-12759 Solution
One drop of 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
One drop of 0% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
OPC-12759 Suspension
One drop of 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
84
|
83
|
42
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
79
|
83
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
0
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
OPC-12759 Solution
One drop of 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
One drop of 0% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
OPC-12759 Suspension
One drop of 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Confirmatory Study of OPC-12759 Ophthalmic Solution
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
OPC-12759 Solution
n=84 Participants
One drop of 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=83 Participants
One drop of 0% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
OPC-12759 Suspension
n=42 Participants
One drop of 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
Total
n=209 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.6 • n=5 Participants
|
56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6 • n=7 Participants
|
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8 • n=5 Participants
|
56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
176 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Japan
|
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
209 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4Population: Full analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once after randomized assignment to a treatment group.
FCS indicates the damage to the corneal epithelium. Per the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop report, the cornea was divided into 5 fractions, each of which was given a staining score from 0 to 3, and the total score was calculated (0-15). 0 is better. Changes of the FCS score from baseline to the last dose (last observation carried forward \[LOCF\]) were compared between 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution and placebo by the t-test.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OPC-12759 Solution
n=84 Participants
One drop of 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=83 Participants
One drop of 0% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
OPC-12759 Suspension
n=42 Participants
One drop of 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fluorescein Corneal Staining (FCS) Score From Baseline
|
-3.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
|
-2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
-2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4Population: Full analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once after randomized assignment to a treatment group.
LGCS indicates the damage to the conjunctival epithelium. Per the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop report, the conjunctiva was divided into 6 fractions, each of which was given a staining score from 0 to 3, and the total score was calculated (0-18). 0 is better. The scores and change from baseline at each examination (including LOCF) were compared between 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution and placebo ophthalmic solution.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OPC-12759 Solution
n=84 Participants
One drop of 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=83 Participants
One drop of 0% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
OPC-12759 Suspension
n=42 Participants
One drop of 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Lissamine Green Conjunctival Staining (LGCS) Score From Baseline
|
-3.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
-1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
-3.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
Adverse Events
OPC-12759 Solution
Placebo
OPC-12759 Suspension
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
OPC-12759 Solution
n=84 participants at risk
One drop of 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=83 participants at risk
One drop of 0% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
OPC-12759 Suspension
n=42 participants at risk
One drop of 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension was instilled into each eye 4 times a day for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Abnormal sensation in eye
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye irritation
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular discomfort
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ulcerative keratitis
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Periproctitis
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Adenoviral conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hordeolum
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
6.0%
5/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Investigations
Blood urea increased
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Investigations
Glucose urine present
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Investigations
Protein urine present
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenoma benign
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
15.5%
13/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
11.9%
5/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract inflammation
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Treatment period (4 weeks)
Only adverse events that occurred after the start of study treatment were evaluated. Safety analysis set consisted of all subjects who had received the investigational product at least once.
|
Additional Information
Director of Clinical Trials
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., LTD.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place