Trial Outcomes & Findings for Reader Study to Demonstrate That Use of ClearRead Confirm is Superior to the Use Standard AP/PA X-ray Image (NCT NCT01655329)

NCT ID: NCT01655329

Last Updated: 2014-07-10

Results Overview

Time for completion of tasks of identifying the tips of tubes, lines, and wires. Outlying values are excluded from the calculation of the mean values and standard errors. Outlying values were defined as those more than three standard deviations from the mean time.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

10 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

8 hours

Results posted on

2014-07-10

Participant Flow

Ten Board Certified radiologists practicing in community (non-university) practice were recruited from the Washington, DC, - Baltimore, MD, Metropolitan region. Recruitment was by email and phone calls to prior participants in our studies and to other radiologists that they referred us to. Recruitment April, 2012 through September, 2012

54 cases were used to train the radiologists on the use of the data recording computer and to make them familiar with the appearance of the processed chest radiographs. These cases were not used in the test of reader performance.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Chest Radiographs
The radiologists will be viewing two groups of chest images. The first group are standard chest radiographs. The second group are the processed images. These radiographs were randomly placed into two groups. The radiologists were randomly placed in two groups. Each of these two groups interpreted half of the standard chest radiograph without processing and half with the special processing. The other group of radiologists interpreted the other half of the normal and the other half of the processed images. The radiologists reviewed each radiograph using one or the alternate presentation
Overall Study
STARTED
10
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Reader Study to Demonstrate That Use of ClearRead Confirm is Superior to the Use Standard AP/PA X-ray Image

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Radiologists
n=10 Participants
Board Certified Radiologists
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
female
3 participants
n=93 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
male
7 participants
n=93 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants
n=93 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 8 hours

Population: Each radiologist interpreted only half (158) chest radiographs. All of the radiographs were interpreted by a combination of the 10 radiologist participants.

Time for completion of tasks of identifying the tips of tubes, lines, and wires. Outlying values are excluded from the calculation of the mean values and standard errors. Outlying values were defined as those more than three standard deviations from the mean time.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Standard Chest Radiographs
n=334 chest radiographs
The radiologists will be viewing two groups of chest images. The first group are standard chest radiographs. The second group are the processed images. These radiographs were randomly placed into two groups. The radiologists were randomly placed in two groups. Each of these two groups interpreted half of the standard chest radiograph without processing and half with the special processing. The other group of radiologists interpreted the other half of the normal and the other half of the processed images.
Modified Chest Radiographs
n=334 chest radiographs
This group of chest radiographs will be presented with the modified image. The modified image is intended to increase the visibility of tubes, lines and wires on chest radiographs. Each radiologist interpreted half the images as conventional images and half as processed images.
Venous Catheters
Venous catheters easier to see on modified image
Cardiac Related Wires
Cardiac related wires are easier to see on the standard image
Overall Image Quality
Overall image quality is superior on the standard image
Image Quality Radioopaque Regions
Image quality in the opaque image areas is superior on the confirm image
Confidence on Line Placement
The modified image increased my confidence with respect to line placement
Need for Window/Level Manipulation
The standard image required less window/level manipulation
Confidence on Tube Placement
The confirm image increases my confidence with respect to tube placement.
Time for Completion of Tasks
27.68 seconds
Standard Error 3.32 • Interval 21.04 to 34.24
22.90 seconds
Standard Error 3.32 • Interval 16.34 to 29.46

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 8 hours

Measurement of accuracy in determining the location of the tips of nasogastric tubes (NG) (various types of nasogastric tubes combined) and of the tips of venous catheters (various types of venous catheters combined), compared to the determination of the expert panel. Measure is the distance from the median location determined by five experts in chest radiology.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Standard Chest Radiographs
n=10 Participants
The radiologists will be viewing two groups of chest images. The first group are standard chest radiographs. The second group are the processed images. These radiographs were randomly placed into two groups. The radiologists were randomly placed in two groups. Each of these two groups interpreted half of the standard chest radiograph without processing and half with the special processing. The other group of radiologists interpreted the other half of the normal and the other half of the processed images.
Modified Chest Radiographs
n=10 Participants
This group of chest radiographs will be presented with the modified image. The modified image is intended to increase the visibility of tubes, lines and wires on chest radiographs. Each radiologist interpreted half the images as conventional images and half as processed images.
Venous Catheters
Venous catheters easier to see on modified image
Cardiac Related Wires
Cardiac related wires are easier to see on the standard image
Overall Image Quality
Overall image quality is superior on the standard image
Image Quality Radioopaque Regions
Image quality in the opaque image areas is superior on the confirm image
Confidence on Line Placement
The modified image increased my confidence with respect to line placement
Need for Window/Level Manipulation
The standard image required less window/level manipulation
Confidence on Tube Placement
The confirm image increases my confidence with respect to tube placement.
Accuracy in Detecting the Tips of Tubes, Lines, and Wires.
Venous catheters distance in centimeters
3.49 centimeters
Standard Error 0.52
3.14 centimeters
Standard Error 0.52
Accuracy in Detecting the Tips of Tubes, Lines, and Wires.
NG tubes distance in centimeters vs experts
3.62 centimeters
Standard Error 0.79
3.96 centimeters
Standard Error 0.78

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 10 minutes

Population: All 10 radiologist participants participated

Following the viewing of the test radiographs, the radiologists were asked a series of questions of overall preference. On this scale, 1 indicates strong disagreement, 5 indicates strongly agree. Ten statements were used. Note that a low value for the standard image is equivalent to a high value for the modified image.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Standard Chest Radiographs
n=10 Participants
The radiologists will be viewing two groups of chest images. The first group are standard chest radiographs. The second group are the processed images. These radiographs were randomly placed into two groups. The radiologists were randomly placed in two groups. Each of these two groups interpreted half of the standard chest radiograph without processing and half with the special processing. The other group of radiologists interpreted the other half of the normal and the other half of the processed images.
Modified Chest Radiographs
n=10 Participants
This group of chest radiographs will be presented with the modified image. The modified image is intended to increase the visibility of tubes, lines and wires on chest radiographs. Each radiologist interpreted half the images as conventional images and half as processed images.
Venous Catheters
n=10 Participants
Venous catheters easier to see on modified image
Cardiac Related Wires
n=10 Participants
Cardiac related wires are easier to see on the standard image
Overall Image Quality
n=10 Participants
Overall image quality is superior on the standard image
Image Quality Radioopaque Regions
n=10 Participants
Image quality in the opaque image areas is superior on the confirm image
Confidence on Line Placement
n=10 Participants
The modified image increased my confidence with respect to line placement
Need for Window/Level Manipulation
n=10 Participants
The standard image required less window/level manipulation
Confidence on Tube Placement
n=10 Participants
The confirm image increases my confidence with respect to tube placement.
Likert-Like
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
2.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
4.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
2.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
2.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
2.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
4.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70

Adverse Events

Radiologists

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Matthew T. Freedman

Georgetown University Medical Center

Phone: 4105429680

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60