Trial Outcomes & Findings for Reader Study to Demonstrate That Use of ClearRead Confirm is Superior to the Use Standard AP/PA X-ray Image (NCT NCT01655329)
NCT ID: NCT01655329
Last Updated: 2014-07-10
Results Overview
Time for completion of tasks of identifying the tips of tubes, lines, and wires. Outlying values are excluded from the calculation of the mean values and standard errors. Outlying values were defined as those more than three standard deviations from the mean time.
COMPLETED
10 participants
8 hours
2014-07-10
Participant Flow
Ten Board Certified radiologists practicing in community (non-university) practice were recruited from the Washington, DC, - Baltimore, MD, Metropolitan region. Recruitment was by email and phone calls to prior participants in our studies and to other radiologists that they referred us to. Recruitment April, 2012 through September, 2012
54 cases were used to train the radiologists on the use of the data recording computer and to make them familiar with the appearance of the processed chest radiographs. These cases were not used in the test of reader performance.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Chest Radiographs
The radiologists will be viewing two groups of chest images. The first group are standard chest radiographs. The second group are the processed images. These radiographs were randomly placed into two groups. The radiologists were randomly placed in two groups. Each of these two groups interpreted half of the standard chest radiograph without processing and half with the special processing. The other group of radiologists interpreted the other half of the normal and the other half of the processed images. The radiologists reviewed each radiograph using one or the alternate presentation
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Reader Study to Demonstrate That Use of ClearRead Confirm is Superior to the Use Standard AP/PA X-ray Image
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Radiologists
n=10 Participants
Board Certified Radiologists
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
female
|
3 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
male
|
7 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
10 participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 hoursPopulation: Each radiologist interpreted only half (158) chest radiographs. All of the radiographs were interpreted by a combination of the 10 radiologist participants.
Time for completion of tasks of identifying the tips of tubes, lines, and wires. Outlying values are excluded from the calculation of the mean values and standard errors. Outlying values were defined as those more than three standard deviations from the mean time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Chest Radiographs
n=334 chest radiographs
The radiologists will be viewing two groups of chest images. The first group are standard chest radiographs. The second group are the processed images. These radiographs were randomly placed into two groups. The radiologists were randomly placed in two groups. Each of these two groups interpreted half of the standard chest radiograph without processing and half with the special processing. The other group of radiologists interpreted the other half of the normal and the other half of the processed images.
|
Modified Chest Radiographs
n=334 chest radiographs
This group of chest radiographs will be presented with the modified image. The modified image is intended to increase the visibility of tubes, lines and wires on chest radiographs. Each radiologist interpreted half the images as conventional images and half as processed images.
|
Venous Catheters
Venous catheters easier to see on modified image
|
Cardiac Related Wires
Cardiac related wires are easier to see on the standard image
|
Overall Image Quality
Overall image quality is superior on the standard image
|
Image Quality Radioopaque Regions
Image quality in the opaque image areas is superior on the confirm image
|
Confidence on Line Placement
The modified image increased my confidence with respect to line placement
|
Need for Window/Level Manipulation
The standard image required less window/level manipulation
|
Confidence on Tube Placement
The confirm image increases my confidence with respect to tube placement.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time for Completion of Tasks
|
27.68 seconds
Standard Error 3.32 • Interval 21.04 to 34.24
|
22.90 seconds
Standard Error 3.32 • Interval 16.34 to 29.46
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 hoursMeasurement of accuracy in determining the location of the tips of nasogastric tubes (NG) (various types of nasogastric tubes combined) and of the tips of venous catheters (various types of venous catheters combined), compared to the determination of the expert panel. Measure is the distance from the median location determined by five experts in chest radiology.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Chest Radiographs
n=10 Participants
The radiologists will be viewing two groups of chest images. The first group are standard chest radiographs. The second group are the processed images. These radiographs were randomly placed into two groups. The radiologists were randomly placed in two groups. Each of these two groups interpreted half of the standard chest radiograph without processing and half with the special processing. The other group of radiologists interpreted the other half of the normal and the other half of the processed images.
|
Modified Chest Radiographs
n=10 Participants
This group of chest radiographs will be presented with the modified image. The modified image is intended to increase the visibility of tubes, lines and wires on chest radiographs. Each radiologist interpreted half the images as conventional images and half as processed images.
|
Venous Catheters
Venous catheters easier to see on modified image
|
Cardiac Related Wires
Cardiac related wires are easier to see on the standard image
|
Overall Image Quality
Overall image quality is superior on the standard image
|
Image Quality Radioopaque Regions
Image quality in the opaque image areas is superior on the confirm image
|
Confidence on Line Placement
The modified image increased my confidence with respect to line placement
|
Need for Window/Level Manipulation
The standard image required less window/level manipulation
|
Confidence on Tube Placement
The confirm image increases my confidence with respect to tube placement.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accuracy in Detecting the Tips of Tubes, Lines, and Wires.
Venous catheters distance in centimeters
|
3.49 centimeters
Standard Error 0.52
|
3.14 centimeters
Standard Error 0.52
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Accuracy in Detecting the Tips of Tubes, Lines, and Wires.
NG tubes distance in centimeters vs experts
|
3.62 centimeters
Standard Error 0.79
|
3.96 centimeters
Standard Error 0.78
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 10 minutesPopulation: All 10 radiologist participants participated
Following the viewing of the test radiographs, the radiologists were asked a series of questions of overall preference. On this scale, 1 indicates strong disagreement, 5 indicates strongly agree. Ten statements were used. Note that a low value for the standard image is equivalent to a high value for the modified image.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Chest Radiographs
n=10 Participants
The radiologists will be viewing two groups of chest images. The first group are standard chest radiographs. The second group are the processed images. These radiographs were randomly placed into two groups. The radiologists were randomly placed in two groups. Each of these two groups interpreted half of the standard chest radiograph without processing and half with the special processing. The other group of radiologists interpreted the other half of the normal and the other half of the processed images.
|
Modified Chest Radiographs
n=10 Participants
This group of chest radiographs will be presented with the modified image. The modified image is intended to increase the visibility of tubes, lines and wires on chest radiographs. Each radiologist interpreted half the images as conventional images and half as processed images.
|
Venous Catheters
n=10 Participants
Venous catheters easier to see on modified image
|
Cardiac Related Wires
n=10 Participants
Cardiac related wires are easier to see on the standard image
|
Overall Image Quality
n=10 Participants
Overall image quality is superior on the standard image
|
Image Quality Radioopaque Regions
n=10 Participants
Image quality in the opaque image areas is superior on the confirm image
|
Confidence on Line Placement
n=10 Participants
The modified image increased my confidence with respect to line placement
|
Need for Window/Level Manipulation
n=10 Participants
The standard image required less window/level manipulation
|
Confidence on Tube Placement
n=10 Participants
The confirm image increases my confidence with respect to tube placement.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Likert-Like
|
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
2.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
4.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
2.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
2.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
2.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
4.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
Adverse Events
Radiologists
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60