Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Split Influenza Virus Vaccine in Different Age Groups

NCT ID: NCT01654809

Last Updated: 2012-10-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

900 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-31

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to observe the adverse reaction ratio and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody positive rate, Geometric mean titer (GMT) of three brands split influenza virus vaccine in different population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Observational Objectives:

To describe the safety of evaluated vaccine, given in the two-dose schedule in accordance with the Package Insert, in children aged ≥ 6 months to ≤ 36 months,6th to 12th birthday and ≥ 60th birthday.

To describe the immunogenicity of evaluated vaccine, given in the two-dose schedule in accordance with the Package Insert, in children aged ≥ 6 months to ≤ 36 months, 6th to 12th birthday and ≥ 60rd birthday.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Influenza

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

evaluated vaccine

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

evaluated vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

imported compared vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

domestic compared vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

imported compared vaccine

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

evaluated vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

imported compared vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

domestic compared vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

domestic compared vaccine

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

evaluated vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

imported compared vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

domestic compared vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

evaluated vaccine

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

imported compared vaccine

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

domestic compared vaccine

0.25 mL, Intramuscular (infant/children dose) 0.5 mL, Intramuscular (adult dose)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* participants were enrolled (toddlers: 6 months to 3 years; school-aged children: 6 to 12 years and older adults: ≥60 years)
* Eligible participants were generally healthy or had stable chronic medical conditions (for older adults only)

Exclusion Criteria

* History of allergic reaction to any component of the study vaccines or previous influenza vaccine
* History of systemic hypersensitivity to hens' eggs
* History of Guillain Barré syndrome following administration of any influenza vaccine
* Any immunodeficient or immunocompromised conditions
* Receipt of cytotoxic or immunosuppressive drugs within the past 6 months
* Receipt of blood-derived product within the past 3 months
* Receipt of any vaccine within one month prior to study entry with exception of paediatric routine vaccination
* Receipt of non-study 2010-2011 seasonal TIV
* Participation in any other study with a non-approved drug during the study
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nianmin Shi, Master

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Beijing Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sanhe Centre for Disease Control and Prevention

Langfang, Hebei, China

Site Status

Jiuyuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BJCDPC-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id