Different End Points for Bronchial Hyperactivity (BHR) Tests.

NCT ID: NCT01654588

Last Updated: 2014-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

501 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Bronchial challenge tests (BCT) are being used to diagnose bronchial hyperactivity (BHR) and quantify its severity.In older children and adults, BCT is done using spirometry to measure the value of 20% fall in FEV1 as an indicator for positive reactivity.

However, in young children and infants that cannot perform spirometry, other measurements are used as indicators for BHR. Traditionally, in these populations, appearance of wheezing on auscultation is used as the indicator for BHR. More recently, other measures like 50% increase in respiratory rate or 5% decreases in oxygen saturation are mentioned as possible options to determine positive BHR. Nevertheless, as these measurements probably measure different parameters they could vary in time of appearance.

The investigators also noted that in older children who perform spirometry, the order of appearance of these different physiologic measures is not constant.

Decrease in O2 saturation, appearance of wheezing and increase in respiratory rate (RR) do not all appear at the same time and not in the same order of events.

Some children are noted to have a decrease in FEV1 without wheezing - those children can be difficult to diagnose as asthmatics in the primary care setting where asthma is being diagnosed on clinical grounds alone: wheezing and response to bronchodilators. Children who do not wheeze are difficult to diagnose and therefore, are not getting the appropriate treatment.

Nevertheless, the data in current literature is very scant or not existing regarding these issues. Thus the investigators designed a study to prospectively try to answer the questions: do clinically significant differences exist in the concentration of the metacholine and / or adenosine at the time time of appearances of these parameters, what comes first, and if so, how does it affect the diagnosis and the severity assessment of HRA in different age groups?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Bronchial challenge tests (BCT) are being used to diagnose bronchial hyperactivity (BHR) and quantify its severity.

In older children and adults, BCT is done using spirometry to measure the value of 20% fall in FEV1 as an indicator for positive reactivity. However, in young children and infants that cannot perform spirometry, other measurements are used as indicators for BHR. Traditionally, in these populations, appearance of wheezing on auscultation is used as the indicator for BHR. More recently, other measures like 50% increase in respiratory rate or 5% decreases in oxygen saturation are mentioned as possible options to determine positive BHR. Nevertheless, as these measurements probably measure different parameters they could vary in time of appearance.

The investigators also noted that in older children who perform spirometry, the order of appearance of these different physiologic measures is not constant.

Decrease in O2 saturation, appearance of wheezing and increase in respiratory rate (RR) do not all appear at the same time and not in the same order of events.

Some children are noted to have a decrease in FEV1 without wheezing - those children can be difficult to diagnose as asthmatics in the primary care setting where asthma is being diagnosed on clinical grounds alone: wheezing and response to bronchodilators. Children who do not wheeze are difficult to diagnose and therefore, are not getting the appropriate treatment.

Nevertheless, the data in current literature is very scant or not existing regarding these issues. Thus the investigators designed a study to prospectively try to answer the questions: do clinically significant differences exist in the time of appearances of these parameters and if so, how does it affect the diagnosis and the severity assessment of HRA in different age groups? in this study we measure the metacholine and / or adenosine concentration at the time when the following parameters appear (what comes first): 20% fall in FEV1, 5% fall in oxygen saturation, 50% rise in respiratory rate, wheezing heard by the investigators using stethoscope.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bronchial Hyperreactivity

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

BRONCHIAL CHALLANGE TEST, ASTHMA, METACHLINE, ADENOSINE

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients referred for HRA trigger testing

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Month

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wolfson Medical Center

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Avigdor Mandelberg

Director, Pediatric Pulmonry Unit

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Avigdor Madnelberg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel

Avigdor Mandelberg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tha Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Edith Wlofson Medical Center

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ater D, Amirav I, Attias M, Nakash E, Newhouse MT, Mandelberg A. Evaluation of clinically and physiologically atypical asthma: If it doesn't wheeze it may still be asthma. J Asthma. 2019 Jan;56(1):21-26. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1424194. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29393720 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AD-S

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id