Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
185 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-07-31
2018-05-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Violence in intimate partnerships constitutes a serious problem worldwide and there is reason to believe that cognitive behavior therapy has some effect on the reduction of violent behavior. However, there are currently too few randomized controlled studies to conclude about the effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for this client group.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The Brøset anger management model
Group treatment
The Brøset anger management model
manualised structured cognitive treatment program 15 weeks (30 hours)
ordinary group treatment
Group treatment
Ordinary group treatment
group treatment 8 weeks (16 hours)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The Brøset anger management model
manualised structured cognitive treatment program 15 weeks (30 hours)
Ordinary group treatment
group treatment 8 weeks (16 hours)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* is in a partner relationship at inclusion. Partner relationship is defined by having an intimate partner at present, or being in regular contact with a former intimate partner so that violence is possible (e.g. they have children)
* admits being violent to his partner (physical, mental and/or sexual)
Exclusion Criteria
* alcohol- or drug addiction to a level that hinders group participation free from intoxication.
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Olavs Hospital
OTHER
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tom Palmstierna, MD PhD prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Olavs University Hospital, Division of Psychiatry, Centre for research and education in forensic psychiatry Brøset
Trondheim, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nesset MB, Lara-Cabrera ML, Bjorngaard JH, Whittington R, Palmstierna T. Cognitive behavioural group therapy versus mindfulness-based stress reduction group therapy for intimate partner violence: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02582-4.
Nesset MB, Bjorngaard JH, Whittington R, Palmstierna T. Does cognitive behavioural therapy or mindfulness-based therapy improve mental health and emotion regulation among men who perpetrate intimate partner violence? A randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103795. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103795. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012/683
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id