Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses After Influenza Vaccination in Patients With Postcancer Fatigue and in Patients With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT01651754

Last Updated: 2012-07-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Postcancer fatigue (PCF) is a frequently occurring, severe and invalidating problem, impairing quality of life. Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) also suffer from severe fatigue symptoms. Although it is possible to effectively treat CFS, the nature of the underlying physiology remains unclear. The presence of an underlying immunological problem has been suggested as an explanation for PCF and CFS. The aim of this study is to compare the humoral and cellular immune responses upon influenza vaccination in PCF patients, CFS patients, non-fatigued cancer survivors, and healthy controls.

PCF (n=20) and CFS patients (n=20) will be vaccinated against influenza. Age and gender matched non-fatigued cancer survivors (n=20) and healthy controls (n=20) will be included for comparison. Antibody responses will be measured at baseline and at day 21 by a hemagglutination inhibition test. T cell responses will be measured at baseline and at day 7 by lymphocyte proliferation, activation, and cytokine secretion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background PCF is a frequently occurring, severe, and invalidating problem in cancer survivors, impairing quality of life. The prevalence of PCF observed in longitudinal follow-up studies ranged from 19-39%. Cognitive behavior therapy, especially designed for PCF, seemed to be an effective treatment option for PCF. However, although it is now possible to effectively treat PCF, the nature of the underlying physiology of PCF remains unclear.

Hypotheses about mechanisms explaining cancer-related fatigue have already been described, including dysregulation of brain serotonin, dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responsiveness, disruption of the circadian rhythm, alterations in muscle and ATP metabolism, and activation of the vagal afferent nerve. Furthermore, the presence of an underlying immunological problem has been suggested as an explanation for PCF.

Another group of patients suffering from severe fatigue symptoms are patients with CFS. The estimated worldwide prevalence of CFS is 0.4-1%. In the Netherlands, about 100.000 patients are suffering from chronic fatigue, of which 30.000 to 40.000 suffer from CFS. In contrast to fatigue in patients with PCF, in patients with CFS no clear precipitating factor could be identified. Also for patients with CFS, a cognitive behavior therapy is designed, which is proven to be effective, but the pathophysiological mechanism of CFS remains unclear.

Hypotheses explaining the pathophysiological mechanism of CFS include morphological and metabolic alterations in the brain, diminished central activation of muscles, altered central nervous system functioning, a neuroendocrine disturbance, or cognitive impairment. Furthermore, the presence of an underlying immunological problem has been suggested as an explanation for CFS.

If an underlying immunological problem is present, PCF and CFS patients might have an altered response to vaccination.

Aim Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the humoral and cellular immune responses upon vaccination, using seasonal influenza vaccination as a model of a vaccination, in PCF and CFS patients, non-fatigued cancer survivors, and healthy controls.

Research questions

1. Is the humoral and/or cellular immune response after influenza vaccination different between fatigued patients (PCF and CFS) and non-fatigued individuals?
2. Is the humoral and/or cellular immune response after influenza vaccination different between PCF and CFS patients? Design The immune responses upon influenza vaccination will be assessed in 20 PCF patients and in 20 CFS patients. As a control group for PCF patients, 20 non-fatigued cancer survivors will be included. Additionally, 20 healthy controls will participate in this study as a control group without a cancer history and without fatigue symptoms. These four groups will be age- and sex-matched.

At baseline, participants will complete the Checklist Individual Strength, a questionnaire about the current use of medicines, and a questionnaire about their vaccination history. All participants will be intramuscularly vaccinated with a single dose of the seasonal influenza vaccine. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells will be collected at baseline (day 1) and 7 days after vaccination (day 8), and serum will be collected at baseline and 21 days after vaccination (day 22). Half a year after vaccination, all participants will be contacted to check whether a possible infection by influenza had taken place in the meantime or not.

The humoral immune responses on influenza vaccination will measured at day 1 and day 22 in serum by the haemagglutination-inhibition antibody test. The cellular immune responses will be measured at day 1 and day 8 by T lymphocyte proliferation, activation, and cytokine secretion.

Relevance of this study To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to explore both the humoral and cellular immune responses after influenza vaccination in both PCF and CFS patients. By means of this study, we would like to improve the understanding of the underlying physiology of PCF and CFS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postcancer Fatigue Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Seasonal influenza vaccination

Group Type OTHER

Seasonal influenza vaccination

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

single dose of influenza vaccination

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Seasonal influenza vaccination

single dose of influenza vaccination

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 and 60 years old
* Severely fatigued (CIS-fatigue score ≥ 35) or non-fatigued (CIS-fatigue \< 27)
* Treated for a malignant, solid tumor
* Completion of treatment for cancer minimal 1 year ago
* Disease-free, as defined by the absence of somatic disease activity parameters
* Severe, persistent or continuously returning complaints of fatigue, which do not improve noteworthy after rest and which are not the consequence of continuous exertion
* The fatigue resulted into a substantial decrease in former levels of professional, social and/or personal functioning
* The complaints cannot be explained by a physical cause
* The complaints persist for at least 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

* \- Psychological or psychiatric treatment
* Physical comorbidity that could explain the fatigue
* Treatment with anti-depressive drugs, anti-epileptic drugs, or benzodiazepines
* A known immune deficiency
* Treatment with corticosteroids during the last 2 weeks
* Symptoms of influenza
* Allergy for chicken protein
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

H.W.M. van Laarhoven, Md

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Medical Centre Nijmegen st Radboud

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Centre Nijmegen st Radboud

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UMCNONCO201009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id