Trial Outcomes & Findings for Laser Ablation After Stereotactic Radiosurgery (NCT NCT01651078)
NCT ID: NCT01651078
Last Updated: 2024-04-15
Results Overview
To describe local (CNS) progression-free survival rate in patients with failed radiosurgery for brain metastases treated with the NeuroBlate System. Sites were requested to submit imaging to a centralized core laboratory for analysis. A total of 27 patients had images submitted--27/42 (64%) of patients submitted follow-up images at 12-weeks and 16/42 (38%) patients submitted follow-up imaging at 26 weeks. Due to the low submission of follow-up images at 26-weeks, 12-weeks and last follow-up are reported.
COMPLETED
44 participants
Images were collected at 12 and 26 weeks post index procedure.
2024-04-15
Participant Flow
Forty-four (44) patients were enrolled between October 2012 and December 2015 across six centers in the United States (per the protocol, LAASR enrolled all patients who were scheduled to undergo a NeuroBlate procedure). Forty-two (42) patients underwent the procedure and were followed under the protocol as the "NeuroBlate Procedure" treatment arm.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
NeuroBlate Procedure
Patients with radiographic evidence of lesion regrowth following prior treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (regardless of the process being suspected recurrent or progressive brain metastasis versus radiation necrosis) and who underwent the NeuroBlate procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
42
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
26
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Laser Ablation After Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Main Cohort
n=42 Participants
Patients with radiographic evidence of lesion regrowth following prior treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (regardless of the process being suspected recurrent or progressive brain metastasis versus radiation necrosis) and who already scheduled for NeuroBlate procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
42 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Biopsy-confirmed radiation necrosis or metastatic brain tumor
|
39 patients
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Images were collected at 12 and 26 weeks post index procedure.Population: Sites were requested to submit imaging to a centralized core laboratory for analysis. A total of 27 patients had images submitted--27/42 (64%) of patients submitted follow-up images at 12-weeks and 16/42 (38%) patients submitted follow-up imaging at 26 weeks.
To describe local (CNS) progression-free survival rate in patients with failed radiosurgery for brain metastases treated with the NeuroBlate System. Sites were requested to submit imaging to a centralized core laboratory for analysis. A total of 27 patients had images submitted--27/42 (64%) of patients submitted follow-up images at 12-weeks and 16/42 (38%) patients submitted follow-up imaging at 26 weeks. Due to the low submission of follow-up images at 26-weeks, 12-weeks and last follow-up are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
NeuroBlate Procedure
n=27 Participants
Patients with radiographic evidence of lesion regrowth following prior treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (regardless of the process being suspected recurrent or progressive brain metastasis versus radiation necrosis) and who already scheduled for NeuroBlate procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
12-weeks
|
74 percentage of patients
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Last Follow-up
|
74 percentage of patients
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 12 and 26 weeks post index procedurePopulation: Due to study attrition, the full cohort was unavailable for analysis.
FACT-Br questionnaire sub-scores (Physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, brain cancer subscale) are summed together, leading to a FACT-Br total score on a scale from 0-200; larger scores indicate better overall quality of life. This outcome measured the FACT-Br score change from Baseline at both 12 and 26 weeks post NeuroBlate procedure (values at 12 and 26 weeks, respectively, minus value at baseline). Version 4 of the Fact-BR scoring guidelines were used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
NeuroBlate Procedure
n=42 Participants
Patients with radiographic evidence of lesion regrowth following prior treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (regardless of the process being suspected recurrent or progressive brain metastasis versus radiation necrosis) and who already scheduled for NeuroBlate procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life (Change in The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) Score.
Change in 12-week FACT-Br from Baseline
|
3.8 change in FACT-Br score
Interval -71.8 to 40.0
|
|
Quality of Life (Change in The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) Score.
Change in 26-week FACT-Br from Baseline
|
7.0 change in FACT-Br score
Interval -34.7 to 34.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 and 26 weeks post index procedureTo describe/estimate the overall survival after the NeuroBlate Procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
NeuroBlate Procedure
n=42 Participants
Patients with radiographic evidence of lesion regrowth following prior treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (regardless of the process being suspected recurrent or progressive brain metastasis versus radiation necrosis) and who already scheduled for NeuroBlate procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
12-week Kaplan-Meier survival
|
86.5 percentage of patients
|
|
Overall Survival
26-week Kaplan-Meier survival
|
72.2 percentage of patients
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All adverse events reported through 26 weeks post index procedureTo continue to monitor factors impacting the safe and efficacious use of NeuroBlate
Outcome measures
| Measure |
NeuroBlate Procedure
n=42 Participants
Patients with radiographic evidence of lesion regrowth following prior treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (regardless of the process being suspected recurrent or progressive brain metastasis versus radiation necrosis) and who already scheduled for NeuroBlate procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With Laser Ablation Related Adverse Events
Serious events associated with NeuroBlate
|
0 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Laser Ablation Related Adverse Events
Non-serious events associated with NeuroBlate
|
5 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Laser Ablation Related Adverse Events
No NeuroBlate-related adverse event
|
37 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Main Cohort
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Main Cohort
n=42 participants at risk
Patients with radiographic evidence of lesion regrowth following prior treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (regardless of the process being suspected recurrent or progressive brain metastasis versus radiation necrosis) and who already scheduled for NeuroBlate procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Pulmonary or other air embolism
|
4.8%
2/42 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from the time of patient consent (prior to the surgical procedure) to study withdraw/completion, up to 26 weeks.
Events adjudicated as surgery- or LITT- associated are described in the adverse events section.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizures
|
4.8%
2/42 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from the time of patient consent (prior to the surgical procedure) to study withdraw/completion, up to 26 weeks.
Events adjudicated as surgery- or LITT- associated are described in the adverse events section.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hypotension
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time of patient consent (prior to the surgical procedure) to study withdraw/completion, up to 26 weeks.
Events adjudicated as surgery- or LITT- associated are described in the adverse events section.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Nissa Mollema (Clinical Operations Manager)
Monteris Medical
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place