Trial Outcomes & Findings for Long Term Split Belt Treadmill Training for Stroke Recovery (NCT NCT01646216)

NCT ID: NCT01646216

Last Updated: 2019-01-14

Results Overview

Subjects will either walk on a special mat that records their step lengths, or will wear special markers on the feet and body to record their step lengths.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

34 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

After training (week 14), and 3 months after training

Results posted on

2019-01-14

Participant Flow

All subjects recruited were 6 months or more post stroke. During 2012-2016 recruitment was done by the following means: Subjects were referred by local physicians and recruited from databases of previous studies. Flyers were disseminated locally. Presentations were made at local stroke support groups.

Subjects were enrolled and randomly assigned to either Split or Tied treadmill training groups.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Split-belt Treadmill Exercise
Split-belt treadmill training Split belt treadmill: A split belt treadmill is like a typical treadmill that is seen in the gym, except that this treadmill has two belts that move instead of just one. One leg goes on one belt and the other leg uses the other belt. The belt speeds can be set to move at the same speed, making this treadmill similar to any regular treadmill, but, belt speeds can also be set so that one belt moves a little faster than the other. The belts are never set at a running or jogging speed, only a self-paced walking speed regardless of whether the belts are both going the same or slightly different speeds.
Tied-belt Treadmill Exercise
Tied-belt treadmill training The treadmill is run like a typical treadmill that is seen in the gym except that this treadmill has two belts that move instead of just one. One leg goes on one belt and the other leg uses the other belt. The belt speeds are set to move at the same speed, making this treadmill training group similar to any regular treadmill.
Overall Study
STARTED
17
17
Overall Study
COMPLETED
6
4
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
11
13

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Split-belt Treadmill Exercise
Split-belt treadmill training Split belt treadmill: A split belt treadmill is like a typical treadmill that is seen in the gym, except that this treadmill has two belts that move instead of just one. One leg goes on one belt and the other leg uses the other belt. The belt speeds can be set to move at the same speed, making this treadmill similar to any regular treadmill, but, belt speeds can also be set so that one belt moves a little faster than the other. The belts are never set at a running or jogging speed, only a self-paced walking speed regardless of whether the belts are both going the same or slightly different speeds.
Tied-belt Treadmill Exercise
Tied-belt treadmill training The treadmill is run like a typical treadmill that is seen in the gym except that this treadmill has two belts that move instead of just one. One leg goes on one belt and the other leg uses the other belt. The belt speeds are set to move at the same speed, making this treadmill training group similar to any regular treadmill.
Overall Study
Baseline step length difference (<5cm)
10
10
Overall Study
Did not complete training
0
2
Overall Study
Investigator decision
1
1

Baseline Characteristics

Long Term Split Belt Treadmill Training for Stroke Recovery

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Split-belt Treadmill Exercise
n=6 Participants
Split-belt treadmill training Split belt treadmill: A split belt treadmill is like a typical treadmill that is seen in the gym, except that this treadmill has two belts that move instead of just one. One leg goes on one belt and the other leg uses the other belt. The belt speeds can be set to move at the same speed, making this treadmill similar to any regular treadmill, but, belt speeds can also be set so that one belt moves a little faster than the other. The belts are never set at a running or jogging speed, only a self-paced walking speed regardless of whether the belts are both going the same or slightly different speeds.
Tied-belt Treadmill Exercise
n=4 Participants
Tied-belt treadmill training The treadmill is run like a typical treadmill that is seen in the gym except that this treadmill has two belts that move instead of just one. One leg goes on one belt and the other leg uses the other belt. The belt speeds are set to move at the same speed, making this treadmill training group similar to any regular treadmill.
Total
n=10 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=5 Participants
59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=7 Participants
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants
n=5 Participants
4 participants
n=7 Participants
10 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: After training (week 14), and 3 months after training

Population: Subjects were grouped by baseline walking speed into three levels of disability: mild, moderate, and severe.

Subjects will either walk on a special mat that records their step lengths, or will wear special markers on the feet and body to record their step lengths.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Split-belt, Mild Disability
n=2 Participants
Subjects trained on split belt treadmill. Subjects in the mild disability group had baseline walking speeds greater than 0.8 m/s. There were two subjects in this group.
Split-belt, Moderate Disability
n=2 Participants
Subjects trained on split belt treadmill. Subjects in the moderate disability group had baseline walking speeds of 0.4 m/s to 0.8 m/s. There were two subjects in this group.
Split-belt Severe Disability
n=2 Participants
Subjects trained on split belt treadmill. Subjects in the severe disability group had baseline walking speeds less than 0.4 m/s. There were two subjects in this group.
Tied-belt, Severe Disability
n=3 Participants
Subjects trained on tied belt treadmill. Subjects in the severe disability group had baseline walking speeds less than 0.4 m/s. There were three subjects in this group.
Tied-belt Mild Disability
n=1 Participants
Subjects trained on tied belt treadmill. Subjects in the mild disability group had baseline walking speeds greater than 0.8 m/s. There was one subject in this group.
Change in Baseline Step Length Symmetry. That is, Whether the Steps With Right and Left Legs Are the Same Length.
Post training
0.001 ratio
Interval 0.001 to 0.001
-0.078 ratio
Interval -0.101 to -0.055
-0.045 ratio
Interval -0.057 to -0.033
0.144 ratio
Interval -0.765 to 0.233
-0.034 ratio
Interval -0.034 to -0.034
Change in Baseline Step Length Symmetry. That is, Whether the Steps With Right and Left Legs Are the Same Length.
Follow up
0.010 ratio
Interval 0.007 to 0.013
-0.075 ratio
Interval -0.091 to -0.058
-0.124 ratio
Interval -0.221 to -0.028
-0.096 ratio
Interval -0.412 to 0.125
-0.027 ratio
Interval -0.027 to -0.027

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Post training (week 14), and 3 months follow up

Population: One subject in the Split-belt Severe Disability" Arm/Group did not complete the assessment during the change at follow up visit. Two subjects in the Tied-belt, Severe Disability Arm/Group were not able to complete the assessments at post training or follow up.

This is the change in metabolic power that is required of a subject to walk at their self selected walking speed on the treadmill. Metabolic power was measured at baseline, post training, and three months after training. We report the difference between post training and baseline and three months and baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Split-belt, Mild Disability
n=2 Participants
Subjects trained on split belt treadmill. Subjects in the mild disability group had baseline walking speeds greater than 0.8 m/s. There were two subjects in this group.
Split-belt, Moderate Disability
n=2 Participants
Subjects trained on split belt treadmill. Subjects in the moderate disability group had baseline walking speeds of 0.4 m/s to 0.8 m/s. There were two subjects in this group.
Split-belt Severe Disability
n=2 Participants
Subjects trained on split belt treadmill. Subjects in the severe disability group had baseline walking speeds less than 0.4 m/s. There were two subjects in this group.
Tied-belt, Severe Disability
n=3 Participants
Subjects trained on tied belt treadmill. Subjects in the severe disability group had baseline walking speeds less than 0.4 m/s. There were three subjects in this group.
Tied-belt Mild Disability
n=1 Participants
Subjects trained on tied belt treadmill. Subjects in the mild disability group had baseline walking speeds greater than 0.8 m/s. There was one subject in this group.
Change in Baseline Oxygen Intake
Change at post training
0.82 ml/kg/min
Interval 0.13 to 1.5
-.61 ml/kg/min
Interval -0.79 to -0.43
0.65 ml/kg/min
Interval -0.59 to 1.89
4.616 ml/kg/min
Two subjects were not able to complete this assessment.
-2.272 ml/kg/min
There is only one subject in this group.
Change in Baseline Oxygen Intake
Change at follow up
0.86 ml/kg/min
Interval 0.26 to 1.46
-0.84 ml/kg/min
Interval -0.9 to -0.79
-0.85 ml/kg/min
Interval -0.85 to
One subject was not able to complete this assessment.
4.009 ml/kg/min
Two subjects were not able to complete this assessment.
-2.675 ml/kg/min
There is only one subject in this group.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, post training, and 3 month follow up.

Population: All subjects for whom walk speed was recorded at baseline, post training, and follow up.

Subjects walked on an electronic walkway and walking speed was calculated by total distance divided by total time.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Split-belt, Mild Disability
n=2 Participants
Subjects trained on split belt treadmill. Subjects in the mild disability group had baseline walking speeds greater than 0.8 m/s. There were two subjects in this group.
Split-belt, Moderate Disability
n=2 Participants
Subjects trained on split belt treadmill. Subjects in the moderate disability group had baseline walking speeds of 0.4 m/s to 0.8 m/s. There were two subjects in this group.
Split-belt Severe Disability
n=2 Participants
Subjects trained on split belt treadmill. Subjects in the severe disability group had baseline walking speeds less than 0.4 m/s. There were two subjects in this group.
Tied-belt, Severe Disability
n=3 Participants
Subjects trained on tied belt treadmill. Subjects in the severe disability group had baseline walking speeds less than 0.4 m/s. There were three subjects in this group.
Tied-belt Mild Disability
n=1 Participants
Subjects trained on tied belt treadmill. Subjects in the mild disability group had baseline walking speeds greater than 0.8 m/s. There was one subject in this group.
Walking Speed
Baseline
1.22 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0
0.5 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.11 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0.02
0.12 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0.06
1.08 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0
Walking Speed
Post training
1.17 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0.02
0.55 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.16 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0.01
0.18 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0.02
1.10 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0
Walking Speed
Follow-up (3 months)
1.15 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0.02
0.63 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0.26
0.15 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0.02
0.16 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0.05
1.22 meters per second (m/s)
Standard Deviation 0

Adverse Events

Split-belt Treadmill Exercise

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Tied-belt Treadmill Exercise

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Anthony Gonzalez

Kennedy Krieger Institute

Phone: 4439080074

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place