Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
171 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-01-31
2018-08-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Regional Ventilation Using 19F MRI of Inert Perfluorinated Gases Mixed With Oxygen
NCT01710449
Hyperpolarized 129Xe MR Imaging of Lung Function in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects With Pulmonary Disease
NCT04624490
Imaging Lung Function Using Oxygen Enhanced MRI
NCT01731015
Comparison of 133Xe Scintigraphy With 19F MRI
NCT03532334
Imaging Measures of Respiratory Health Registry
NCT05102825
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
COPD is defined by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) as a disease state characterized by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. There is clear recognition that COPD includes both emphysema and small airway disease; however, there is little appreciation of how to identify COPD early - before there is significant airflow obstruction and clinical impairment.
It has long been appreciated that better characterization of pulmonary disease requires assessing the lung regionally. To this end computed tomography (CT) is gaining prominence by distinguishing airways-predominant vs. emphysema-predominant COPD. CT can also add functional information regarding perfusion or ventilation, but concern is increasing regarding radiation dose and increased cancer risk. The introduction of 3-Helium (3He) MRI enables longitudinal and sensitive imaging of ventilation, while adding contrast like the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to reveal emphysema. Unfortunately the world supply of 3He is miniscule, and 3He ADC has failed to measure disease progression. Thus, attention has turned to 129-Xenon (129Xe) MRI and the Duke group has now shown clinical 129Xe MRI with similar quality to 3He, including ADC contrast. Ultimately, however, the dissemination of the hyperpolarization technology required to acquire these scans remains problematic and acts as a hindrance in using it in clinical trials. Consequently another imaging biomarker is required, and hence perfluoropropane/oxygen mixtures are being considered.
To treat patients, or to develop new therapies for a disease, requires the ability to phenotype the condition, monitor progression/response, and to do so non-invasively and longitudinally. Improved measurements will be critical to drive progress in treating chronic diseases such as COPD that affect over 15 million US patients, but progress slowly and respond to therapy slowly. Clinical trials of treatments of lung airway disease often require very large numbers of subjects due to the limited sensitivity of global ventilation assessment or other clinical measures (e.g. number of exacerbations per year).
The question of regional ventilation in disorders such as COPD is becoming increasingly important. An editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) addressed the concerns of using changes in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) as an endpoint in treatment trials. The comments were related to the Understanding Potential Long-Term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium trial (tiotropium vs. placebo (UPLIFT). In this study, reported in the same issue, patients using standard respiratory medications (except inhaled anticholinergic drugs) were randomized to their existing treatment with either tiotropium or placebo and followed for a 4-year period. While the treatment group using tiotropium had improvements in lung function, quality of life (QOL) and fewer exacerbations in the 4-year study, there was no significant change in the rate of decline in FEV1 either before of after bronchodilator administration. In a separate study called Towards a Revolution in COPD Health (TORCH), trial patients were randomized to a combination treatment (fluticasone and salmeterol), each of the agents alone or placebo. TORCH patients were followed for a 3-year period where the primary outcome was death from any cause. The reduction in mortality did not reach statistical validity although there were benefits in secondary outcomes (e.g. frequency of exacerbations, spirometric values). The difference in FEV1 for the dual agent arm versus placebo was 0.092 liters (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.075 - 0.108, p\<0.001) although the mean baseline FEV1 for the treated and placebo group was 1.24 and 1.26 liters respectively yielding a 7% difference in the FEV1, a difference not generally considered clinically relevant. The dominant question in the editorial and one facing studies of COPD is the heterogeneity of the disorder and the current lack of a good diagnostic tool for stratification/screening of potential subjects for a treatment study. Potentially radiographic or non-radiographic imaging may become a tool to assist in such screenings or even serve as an endpoint. Avoiding such failures requires developing measurements with greater sensitivity and specificity.
Clearly, COPD is a major health issue in this country and current treatment strategies are limited. The limits of global pulmonary function testing are recognized as a stumbling block in the development and evaluation of new therapeutic tools for these diseases. These new imaging biomarkers (PFx's) for evaluation of regional ventilation should be an important step in decreasing the impact of these diseases in the US and perhaps worldwide.
The central hypothesis and current observation is that PFx gases, when used as contrast agents, provide functional images of the lung airways including important regional ventilation information such as ventilation defect severity and gas trapping. We will test the central hypothesis and accomplish the overall objective by addressing the following specific aims:
Primary Study Aims/Secondary Aims Aim 1: Determine quantitative measures of lung ventilation performance in terms of direct measures of gas trapping measured during washout of the perfluorinated gas mixture.
Sub-aim 1.1: Compare gas trapping from AIM 1 with air trapping by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) using conventional analysis procedures.
Sub-aim 1.2: We will accomplish this aim (as well as Aim 2) in a well-characterized cohort of subjects with COPD and subjects with normal global pulmonary function tests (non-, ex- and current smokers). This cohort will provide the basis for the cross sectional evaluation of the imaging markers in all aims with respect to disease severity (e.g. GOLD status) and risk factors (e.g. smoking)
Aim 2: Determine ventilation defect severity by comparing regional gas signal during wash-in of the perfluorinated gas mixture to steady state in the same cohort.
The outcomes of the work proposed in the aims is expected to demonstrate a novel quantitative approach for ventilation defect and gas trapping evaluation of regional lung function in humans that would be easily deployed for multi-center studies. It should also provide a set of biomarkers that could better inform evaluation of new treatments.
In each of these 250 subjects, after obtaining informed consent, an array of clinical, physiologic, imaging, and disease impact data will be collected on dedicated computerized case report forms. The goal is to categorize the disease from structural, functional, and clinical perspectives. The specific data to be collected have been shown in multiple studies to be useful in describing clinical phenotypes and helped characterize subjects. They can predict functional status and can also demonstrate and predict responders to various therapeutic interventions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Normal Subjects
Subjects with Normal Lung Function by Pulmonary Function Tests (e.g. Spirometry) with or without smoking as a risk factor (non-smokers, ex-smokers, current smokers)
Perfluorinated Gas/Oxygen Mixture
19-Fluorine (19F) MRI of the lungs with 21%/79% Oxygen/Perfluorinated Gas, ≤ 25 liters, gas, single visit, \< 1 hour
High Resolution CT of the Chest
High Resolution CT of the Chest, single visit
Subjects with COPD
Subjects diagnosed with COPD by GOLD criteria.
Perfluorinated Gas/Oxygen Mixture
19-Fluorine (19F) MRI of the lungs with 21%/79% Oxygen/Perfluorinated Gas, ≤ 25 liters, gas, single visit, \< 1 hour
High Resolution CT of the Chest
High Resolution CT of the Chest, single visit
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Perfluorinated Gas/Oxygen Mixture
19-Fluorine (19F) MRI of the lungs with 21%/79% Oxygen/Perfluorinated Gas, ≤ 25 liters, gas, single visit, \< 1 hour
High Resolution CT of the Chest
High Resolution CT of the Chest, single visit
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Willing and able to give informed consent and adhere to visit/protocol schedules. (Consent must be given before any study procedures are performed.)
* Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test. This will be confirmed before participation in this investigational protocol.
* Clinical diagnosis of COPD confirmed by spirometry demonstrating FEV1/FVC \< 0.70
* Outpatients of either gender, age \> 18.
* Willing and able to give informed consent and adhere to visit/protocol schedules. (Consent must be given before any study procedures are performed.)
* Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test. This will be confirmed before participation in this investigational protocol.
* Normal pulmonary function testing (PFT) determined by spirometry.
Exclusion Criteria
forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) \< 0.70 and Mild (GOLD I): FEV1 \>80% predicted Moderate (GOLD II): FEV1 50-80% predicted Severe (GOLD III): FEV1 30-50% predicted Very Severe (GOLD IV): FEV1 \<30% predicted
* Recent exacerbation (within 30 days) defined by the need for antibiotics and/or systemic steroids
* Abuse of alcohol or illicit substances
* Medical conditions, which, in the opinion of the investigator, will significantly affect five-year survival.
* Medical or psychological conditions which, in the opinion of the investigator, might create undue risk to the subject or interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the protocol requirements
* Conditions that will prohibit MRI scanning (metal in eye, claustrophobia, inability to lie supine, renal insufficiency with epidermal growth factor receptor (eGFR) \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Continued therapy with the patient's prescribed COPD regimen will be permitted. Similarly, all other prescribed medications will be allowed.
Normal Subjects: All subjects will be adults (age \>18) with normal pulmonary function tests (spirometrically confirmed) recruited from the greater Durham, North Carolina community. We anticipate 52% female and 14% minority based on community demographics (see below). No subject will be excluded from the study on the basis of gender or ethnicity. Female subjects of childbearing potential will undergo pregnancy testing at study entry, and before each procedure. Informed consent will be obtained before a subject begins any study.
* Abuse of alcohol or illicit substances
* Conditions that will prohibit MRI scanning (metal in eye, claustrophobia, inability to lie supine)
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hal C Charles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hal C Charles
Associate Professor of Radiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cecil Charles, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke Image Analysis Laboratory
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00037791
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.