Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study FFR116364, a Placebo-controlled Study of GW685698X in Paediatric Subjects With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (NCT NCT01630135)
NCT ID: NCT01630135
Last Updated: 2017-01-11
Results Overview
The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the informed consent form (ICF) or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For the entire assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean score for the entire treatment period minus the score at Baseline.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
261 participants
Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks)
2017-01-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
131
|
130
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
131
|
128
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol-defined Stopping Criteria Met
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study FFR116364, a Placebo-controlled Study of GW685698X in Paediatric Subjects With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Total
n=261 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
10.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.32 • n=5 Participants
|
10.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.22 • n=7 Participants
|
10.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.26 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Female
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
97 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Male
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
164 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Japanese Heritage
|
131 participants
n=5 Participants
|
130 participants
n=7 Participants
|
261 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants meeting the primary criteria for enrollment, without any major good clinical practice (GCP) deviation, who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment and had diary assessment for 3TNSS after receiving a dose of study medication
The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the informed consent form (ICF) or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For the entire assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean score for the entire treatment period minus the score at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the 3 Total Nasal Symptom Score (3TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period
|
-0.89 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-1.98 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 1 and Week 2Population: FAS. Change from Baseline was analyzed for only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period. The analysis was based on ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.
The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For Week 1 and Week 2, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean score at Week 1 and Week 2 minus the score at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at Week 1 and Week 2
Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-0.70 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-1.60 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at Week 1 and Week 2
Week 2, n=131, 128
|
-1.10 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-2.38 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.
The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Percent change from Baseline=(mean score at the post-Baseline assessment minus the score at Baseline) divided by the Baseline value \* 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in 3TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Entire treatment period, n=131, 130
|
-17.74 Percent change
Standard Error 2.36
|
-39.76 Percent change
Standard Error 2.38
|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in 3TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-13.89 Percent change
Standard Error 2.44
|
-31.96 Percent change
Standard Error 2.46
|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in 3TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 2, n=131, 128
|
-21.95 Percent change
Standard Error 2.70
|
-47.89 Percent change
Standard Error 2.70
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Days 1 through 14Population: FAS. Change from Baseline was analyzed for only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated study day (Days 1 through 14). The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.
The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean score at the indicated day minus the score at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 13, n=122, 123
|
-1.20 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.47 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 1, n=130, 130
|
-0.52 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-0.71 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 2, n=131, 130
|
-0.41 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-1.33 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 3, n=131, 130
|
-0.61 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-1.53 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 4, n=131, 130
|
-0.77 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-1.69 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 5, n=131, 130
|
-0.77 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-1.89 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 6, n=131, 130
|
-0.97 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-1.95 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 7, n=131, 130
|
-0.87 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.05 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 8, n=131, 128
|
-1.05 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.14 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 9, n=131, 128
|
-1.07 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.29 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 10, n=131, 128
|
-1.01 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.32 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 11, n=131, 128
|
-1.19 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.36 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 12, n=131, 128
|
-1.21 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-2.54 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days
Day 14, n=105, 115
|
-0.93 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.65 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.
The 4TNSS is the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and nasal itching. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 4TNSS is 0 to 12. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average of the 4TNSS in the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). A mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the 4 Total Nasal Symptom Score (4TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130
|
-1.01 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-2.40 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the 4 Total Nasal Symptom Score (4TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-0.74 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-1.94 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the 4 Total Nasal Symptom Score (4TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 2, n= 131, 128
|
-1.29 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.89 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.
The 4TNSS is the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and nasal itching. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 4TNSS is 0 to 12. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 4TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Percent change from Baseline=(mean score at the post-Baseline assessment minus the score at Baseline) divided by the Baseline value \* 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the 4TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130
|
-16.09 Percent change
Standard Error 2.44
|
-40.42 Percent change
Standard Error 2.46
|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the 4TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-11.54 Percent change
Standard Error 2.52
|
-32.55 Percent change
Standard Error 2.54
|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the 4TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 2, n= 131, 128
|
-20.92 Percent change
Standard Error 2.78
|
-48.58 Percent change
Standard Error 2.78
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.
Four individual symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and nasal itching) were scored on a scale from 0 to 3 using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average of the symptom scores in the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). A mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2
Rhinorrhea, ETP, n=131, 130
|
-0.31 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.69 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2
Rhinorrhea, Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-0.23 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.55 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2
Rhinorrhea, Week 2, n=131, 128
|
-0.40 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.85 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2
Nasal congestion, ETP, n=131, 130
|
-0.36 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.70 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2
Nasal congestion, Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-0.29 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.56 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2
Nasal congestion, Week 2, n=131, 128
|
-0.43 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.84 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2
Sneezing, ETP, n=131, 130
|
-0.21 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.60 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2
Sneezing, Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-0.16 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.50 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2
Sneezing, Week 2, n= 131, 128
|
-0.27 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.71 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2
Nasal itching, ETP, n=131, 130
|
-0.12 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.41 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2
Nasal itching, Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-0.04 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.33 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2
Nasal itching, Week 2, n= 131, 128
|
-0.19 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.49 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.
Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the participant's diary. The TOSS is the sum of all three symtpom scores and ranges from 0 to 9. The mean of the Baseline period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 2, n= 131, 128
|
-0.39 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
-0.61 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130
|
-0.32 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-0.46 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-0.22 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-0.31 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Population: FAS. Only those participants with BL TOSS \>0 who were available for assessment at both BL and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. Analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, BL, Age, and Sex.
Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the participant's diary. The TOSS is the sum of all three symtpom scores and ranges from 0 to 9. The mean of the Baseline period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=92 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=99 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Entire Treatment Period, n=99, 92
|
-0.47 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.77 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 1, n=99, 92
|
-0.35 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.56 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 2, n= 99, 90
|
-0.56 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-0.99 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.
Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's (par.) parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the par. themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the par.'s diary. The TOSS is the sum of all 3 symptom scores and ranges from 0 to 9. The mean of the BL period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each par. was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Percent change from BL=(mean score at post-BL assessment minus score at BL) divided by the BL value \* 100. Par. with a BL TOSS of 0 were not analyzed because percent change from BL could not be calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=92 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=99 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Entire Treatment Period, n=99, 92
|
1.57 Percent change
Standard Error 11.64
|
-20.97 Percent change
Standard Error 11.39
|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 1, n=99, 92
|
5.37 Percent change
Standard Error 11.14
|
-9.20 Percent change
Standard Error 10.90
|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 2, n= 99, 90
|
-1.70 Percent change
Standard Error 13.69
|
-33.52 Percent change
Standard Error 13.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Population: FAS. Only those participants with BL TOSS \>0 who were available for assessment at both BL and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. Analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, BL, Age, and Sex.
Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's (par.) parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the par. themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the par.'s diary. The TOSS is the sum of all 3 symptom scores and ranges from 0 to 9. The mean of the BL period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each par. was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Percent change from BL=(mean score at post-BL assessment minus score at BL) divided by the BL value \* 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=92 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=99 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Entire Treatment Period, n=99, 92
|
1.57 Percent change
Standard Error 11.64
|
-20.97 Percent change
Standard Error 11.39
|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 1, n=99, 92
|
5.37 Percent change
Standard Error 11.14
|
-9.20 Percent change
Standard Error 10.90
|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 2, n=99, 90
|
-1.70 Percent change
Standard Error 13.69
|
-33.52 Percent change
Standard Error 13.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.
Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the participant's diary. The mean of the Baseline period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Eye itching, Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130
|
-0.18 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.24 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Eye itching, Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-0.13 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.15 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Eye itching Week 2, n=131, 128
|
-0.23 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.34 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Tearing, Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130
|
-0.05 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.10 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Tearing, Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-0.03 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.09 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Tearing, Week 2, n=131, 128
|
-0.07 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.11 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Redness, Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130
|
-0.09 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.11 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Redness, Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-0.07 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.07 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Redness, Week 2, n=130, 128
|
-0.10 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.16 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.
The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored the participant's troubles with daily life once daily using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Few troubles; 2, Intermediate between 3 and 1; or 3, Painful and complicating daily life. The mean of the Baseline period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Score of Troubles With Daily Life Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130
|
-0.13 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.43 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Score of Troubles With Daily Life Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 1, n=131, 130
|
-0.10 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.33 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Score of Troubles With Daily Life Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2
Week 2, n=131, 128
|
-0.16 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.53 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/Early Withdrawal (EW)Population: FAS. Participants who were withdrawn before Visit 3 (Week 1) were not included in the analysis for Week 1.
Rhinoscopy was assessed by the investigator by scoring swelling of inferior turbinate mucosa (SOITM) scored as 0 (none), 1 (possible to see center of the middle turbinate), 2 (between 3 and 1), or 3 (impossible to see middle turbinate); color of inferior turbinate mucosa (COITM) scored as 0 (normal), 1 (pink), 2 (red), or 3 (pale); quantity of nasal discharge (QTND) scored as 0 (none), 1 (small amount adhered), 2 (between 3 and 1), or 3 (filled); and quality of nasal discharge (QLND) scored as 0 (none), 1 (pyoid), 2 (viscous), or 3 (watery).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
SOITM, Week 1, Score 2, n=131, 128
|
44 participants
|
53 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
SOITM, Week 1, Score 3, n=131, 128
|
24 participants
|
24 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
SOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 0, n=131, 130
|
19 participants
|
19 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
SOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 1, n=131, 130
|
45 participants
|
62 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
SOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 2, n=131, 130
|
42 participants
|
37 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QLND, Baseline, Score 0, n=131, 130
|
6 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QLND, Baseline, Score 1, n=131, 130
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
SOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 3, n=131, 130
|
24 participants
|
13 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
COITM, Baseline, Score 0, n=131, 130
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
COITM, Baseline, Score 1, n=131, 130
|
31 participants
|
13 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
COITM, Baseline, Score 2, n=131, 130
|
29 participants
|
28 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
COITM, Baseline, Score 3, n=131, 130
|
68 participants
|
88 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
COITM, Week 1, Score 0, n= 131, 128
|
2 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
COITM, Week 1, Score 1, n= 131, 128
|
43 participants
|
45 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
COITM, Week 1, Score 2, n= 131, 128
|
27 participants
|
23 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
COITM, Week 1, Score 3, n= 131, 128
|
56 participants
|
58 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
COITM, Week 2/EW, Score 0, n=131, 130
|
10 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
COITM, Week 2/EW, Score 1, n=131, 130
|
51 participants
|
68 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
COITM, Week 2/EW, Score 2, n=131, 130
|
20 participants
|
17 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
COITM, Week 2/EW, Score 3, n=131, 130
|
49 participants
|
39 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QTND, Baseline, Score 0, n=131, 130
|
6 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QTND, Baseline, Score 1, n=131, 130
|
53 participants
|
52 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QTND, Baseline, Score 2, n=131, 130
|
63 participants
|
60 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QTND, Baseline, Score 3, n=131, 130
|
8 participants
|
11 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QTND, Week 1, Score 0, n= 131, 128
|
18 participants
|
38 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QTND, Week 1, Score 1, n= 131, 128
|
62 participants
|
57 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QTND, Week 1, Score 2, n= 131, 128
|
42 participants
|
32 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QTND, Week 1, Score 3, n= 131, 128
|
6 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QTND, Week 2/EW, Score 0, n=131, 130
|
37 participants
|
63 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QTND, Week 2/EW, Score 1, n=131, 130
|
57 participants
|
49 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QTND, Week 2/EW, Score 2, n=131, 130
|
31 participants
|
18 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QTND, Week 2/EW, Score 3, n=131, 130
|
5 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
SOITM, Baseline, Score 0, n=131, 130
|
7 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
SOITM, Baseline, Score 1, n=131, 130
|
32 participants
|
24 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
SOITM, Baseline, Score 2, n=131, 130
|
55 participants
|
54 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
SOITM, Baseline, Score 3, n=131, 130
|
36 participants
|
51 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
SOITM, Week 1, Score 0, n=131, 128
|
5 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
SOITM, Week 1, Score 1, n=131, 128
|
55 participants
|
45 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QLND, Baseline, Score 2, n=131, 130
|
27 participants
|
29 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QLND, Baseline, Score 3, n=131, 130
|
97 participants
|
93 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QLND, Week 1, Score 0, n= 131, 128
|
18 participants
|
39 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QLND, Week 1, Score 1, n= 131, 128
|
5 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QLND, Week 1, Score 2, n= 131, 128
|
27 participants
|
24 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QLND, Week 1, Score 3, n= 131, 128
|
78 participants
|
66 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QLND, Week 2/EW, Score 0, n=131, 130
|
33 participants
|
62 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QLND, Week 2/EW, Score 1, n=131, 130
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QLND, Week 2/EW, Score 2, n=131, 130
|
29 participants
|
26 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW
QLND, Week 2/EW, Score 3, n=131, 130
|
65 participants
|
40 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2/EWPopulation: FAS
The investigator evaluated the participant's overall response to therapy (defined as improvement in the symptoms of allergic rhinitis) compared with Visit 2 (start of the treatment period), using the following 7-point categorical scale: 1=significantly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=mildly improved, 4=no change, 5=mildly worse, 6=moderately worse, and 7=significantly worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Investigator
Significantly improved
|
12 participants
|
32 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Investigator
Moderately improved
|
25 participants
|
38 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Investigator
Mildly improved
|
31 participants
|
36 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Investigator
No change
|
54 participants
|
22 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Investigator
Mildly worse
|
5 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Investigator
Moderately worse
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Investigator
Significantly worse
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2/EWPopulation: FAS
The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself evaluated the participant's overall response to therapy (defined as improvement in the symptoms of allergic rhinitis) compared with Visit 2 (start of the treatment period), using the following 7-point categorical scale: 1=significantly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=mildly improved, 4=no change, 5=mildly worse, 6=moderately worse, and 7=significantly worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 Participants
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the Participant
Significantly improved
|
2 participants
|
28 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the Participant
Moderately improved
|
26 participants
|
51 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the Participant
Mildly improved
|
48 participants
|
34 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the Participant
No change
|
51 participants
|
18 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the Participant
Mildly worse
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the Participant
Moderately worse
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the Participant
Significantly worse
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
Adverse Events
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
n=131 participants at risk
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=130 participants at risk
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
4.6%
6/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
3/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute sinusitis
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis bacterial
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hand-foot-and-mouth disease
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Impetigo
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media acute
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia mycoplasmal
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Streptococcal infection
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
1.5%
2/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
3/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal discomfort
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hand fracture
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Heat illness
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Scratch
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
1.5%
2/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
1.5%
2/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium increased
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Investigations
Eosinophil count increased
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis allergic
|
1.5%
2/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular hyperaemia
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
1.5%
2/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Orthostatic intolerance
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Heat rash
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear discomfort
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Tooth extraction
|
0.76%
1/131 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Participants were analyzed from the start of study treatment until the follow up contact (up to 3 weeks).
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, according to the actual treatment received.
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER