Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Trial of BKM120 (a PI3K Inhibitor) in Patients With Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (NCT NCT01629615)
NCT ID: NCT01629615
Last Updated: 2020-10-28
Results Overview
Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as the percentage of participants achieving complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for 4 months or longer based on RECIST 1.1 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR is the complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions (smallest sum LD reference), new lesions, and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Stable disease (SD) is defined as any condition not meeting the above criteria.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
50 participants
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment then every 3 months up to 2 years. Participants in this study cohort were followed for response on average approximately 2 months.
2020-10-28
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
BKM120
BKM120: BKM120 oral capsules. 100 mg daily in cycles of 28 days, until disease progression
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
50
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
50
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Trial of BKM120 (a PI3K Inhibitor) in Patients With Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
BKM120
n=50 Participants
BKM120: BKM120 oral capsules. 100 mg daily in cycles of 28 days, until disease progression
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53 years
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
50 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
37 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
27 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
23 participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment then every 3 months up to 2 years. Participants in this study cohort were followed for response on average approximately 2 months.Population: Intent-to-treat population was all recruited population that receives the study treatment
Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as the percentage of participants achieving complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for 4 months or longer based on RECIST 1.1 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR is the complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions (smallest sum LD reference), new lesions, and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Stable disease (SD) is defined as any condition not meeting the above criteria.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BKM120
n=50 Participants
BKM120: BKM120 oral capsules. 100 mg daily in cycles of 28 days, until disease progression
|
|---|---|
|
Rate of Clinical Benefit
Complete response
|
0 Participants
|
|
Rate of Clinical Benefit
Partial response
|
0 Participants
|
|
Rate of Clinical Benefit
Stable disease > 4 months
|
6 Participants
|
|
Rate of Clinical Benefit
Stable disease < 4 months
|
11 Participants
|
|
Rate of Clinical Benefit
Progressive disease
|
20 Participants
|
|
Rate of Clinical Benefit
No evaluable
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment then every 3 months up to 2 years. Participants in this study cohort were followed for PFS on average approximately 2 months.Population: Progression-free survival was analyzed in the intent-to-treat population, defined as all recruited population that receives the study treatment.
Progression-free survival (PFS) based on the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) or death. Participants alive without PD are censored at the date of last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1 criteria: PD is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BKM120
n=50 Participants
BKM120: BKM120 oral capsules. 100 mg daily in cycles of 28 days, until disease progression
|
|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival
|
1.8 Months
Interval 1.6 to 2.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: Overall survival was analyzed in the Intent-to-treat population, defined as all recruited population that receives the study treatment
Overall survival was defined as the time from date of study enrollment until death from any cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BKM120
n=50 Participants
BKM120: BKM120 oral capsules. 100 mg daily in cycles of 28 days, until disease progression
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
|
11.2 Months
Interval 6.2 to 25.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.Population: The safety population was defined as all the patients who received at least one dose of the study drug
Maximum grade toxicity by type was first calculated. Serious AEs were defined as events with treatment-attribution of possibly, probably or definitely and grade 3 or higher per Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BKM120
n=50 Participants
BKM120: BKM120 oral capsules. 100 mg daily in cycles of 28 days, until disease progression
|
|---|---|
|
Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events
Serious Adverse events
|
17 Participants
|
|
Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events
Other Adverse events
|
44 Participants
|
Adverse Events
BKM120
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
BKM120
n=50 participants at risk
BKM120: BKM120 oral capsules. 100 mg daily in cycles of 28 days, until disease progression
|
|---|---|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
8.0%
4/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Papulopustular rash
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
10.0%
5/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
8.0%
4/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Alkalosis
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorders - Other
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash acneiform
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders - Other
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
BKM120
n=50 participants at risk
BKM120: BKM120 oral capsules. 100 mg daily in cycles of 28 days, until disease progression
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood and lymphatic system disorders - Other
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Eye disorders
Watering eyes
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye disorders - Other
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Bloating
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
10.0%
5/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
18.0%
9/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mucositis oral
|
10.0%
5/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
32.0%
16/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal hemorrhage
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorders - Other
|
10.0%
5/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
48.0%
24/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
General disorders and administration site conditions - Other
|
6.0%
3/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic failure
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Allergic reaction
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Papulopustular rash
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory infection
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infections and infestations - Other
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fracture
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
16.0%
8/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Alkaline phosphatase increased
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
12.0%
6/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Weight loss
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Investigations - Other, specify
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
28.0%
14/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
32.0%
16/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesemia
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder - Other
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.0%
3/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
6.0%
3/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
16.0%
8/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
14.0%
7/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
10.0%
5/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Libido increased
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychiatric disorders - Other
|
14.0%
7/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Cystitis noninfective
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast pain
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
8.0%
4/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Voice alteration
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Photosensitivity
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
6.0%
3/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash acneiform
|
10.0%
5/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
6.0%
3/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders - Other
|
4.0%
2/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Lymphedema
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles and every cycle thereafter. Participants in this study cohort were followed for AEs on average approximately 2 months.
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring by investigators and recording all adverse events, serious adverse events, and the regular monitoring of laboratory evaluations, physical examination, weight, vital signs, and ECG. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place