Trial Outcomes & Findings for A National Multi-center Randomized, Open Label Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus With EC-MPS Compared to Standard Treatment Combination Tacrolimus and EC-MPS in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients (NCT NCT01625377)

NCT ID: NCT01625377

Last Updated: 2016-04-27

Results Overview

Change in renal function was measured by change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). GFR calculated using the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease (aMDRD) formula. GFR in mL/min/1.73m\^2 for men of non-black ethnicity: 186 \* \[C/88\]\^-1.154 \* \[A\]\^-0.023\*G\*R ; C = serum creatinine (in μmol/L); A = Age (in years). G = 0.742 when the patient is a women; Otherwise G=1 R= 1.21 when the patient was of black ethnicity; Otherwise R = 1 Baseline was Day 28 visit.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

188 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, Week 24

Results posted on

2016-04-27

Participant Flow

Total 188 patients were randomized

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Tacrolimus
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Overall Study
STARTED
95
93
Overall Study
Safety Set of Population
94
90
Overall Study
Intent to Treat Population
93
90
Overall Study
COMPLETED
88
71
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
7
22

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Tacrolimus
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Overall Study
Death
1
1
Overall Study
Administrative Problem
1
1
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
0
3
Overall Study
Adverse Event
3
16
Overall Study
Graft loss
1
0
Overall Study
Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect
0
1
Overall Study
Abnormal laboratory values
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

A National Multi-center Randomized, Open Label Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus With EC-MPS Compared to Standard Treatment Combination Tacrolimus and EC-MPS in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=95 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=93 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Total
n=188 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
55.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.24 • n=5 Participants
56.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.59 • n=7 Participants
56.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.41 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
81 Participants
n=5 Participants
79 Participants
n=7 Participants
160 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: The Intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom a creatinine value a Day 28 and a posterior value were available. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) is used as imputation of missing data.

Change in renal function was measured by change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). GFR calculated using the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease (aMDRD) formula. GFR in mL/min/1.73m\^2 for men of non-black ethnicity: 186 \* \[C/88\]\^-1.154 \* \[A\]\^-0.023\*G\*R ; C = serum creatinine (in μmol/L); A = Age (in years). G = 0.742 when the patient is a women; Otherwise G=1 R= 1.21 when the patient was of black ethnicity; Otherwise R = 1 Baseline was Day 28 visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=93 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Renal Function
-13.29 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Error 2.75
1.05 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Error 2.81

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12 and week 24

Population: The Intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom a creatinine value at Day 28 and a posterior value were available.

Incidence of treatment failures, assessed with composite criterion including treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR) with a rejection activity index (RAI) according to Banff classification \>3, graft loss or death at 6 months. Biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy. The Banff Rejection Activity Index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation; bile duct inflammation damage; and portal inflammation; the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI) ranging from 0 to 9. An overall score of 0-3 is considered indeterminate, score of 4-5 is mild acute, score of 6-7 is moderate acute , and score of 8-9 is severe acute. Only the episode with the highest total RAI score for each participant was counted. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was registered again on the waiting list, or the day he/she received a new graft.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=93 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Number of Patients With Treatment Failures
week 12, Treatment failures - NO
91 Patients
88 Patients
Number of Patients With Treatment Failures
week 12, Treatment failures - YES
2 Patients
2 Patients
Number of Patients With Treatment Failures
week 24, Treatment failures - NO
89 Patients
81 Patients
Number of Patients With Treatment Failures
week 24, Treatment failures - YES
4 Patients
9 Patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 12 week and 24 week

Population: The Intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom a creatinine value at Day 28 and a posterior value were available.

Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=93 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Number of Patients With Treated or Not Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
Week 24, Treated BPAR
2 Patients
8 Patients
Number of Patients With Treated or Not Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
Week 12, Treated BPAR
2 Patients
2 Patients
Number of Patients With Treated or Not Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
Week 12, Not treated BPAR
0 Patients
0 Patients
Number of Patients With Treated or Not Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
Week 24, Not Treated BPAR
0 Patients
1 Patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 12 week and 24 week

Population: The Intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom a creatinine value at day 28 and a posterior value were available.

Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy. The severity of BPAR was categorized as : Mild (Banff grade I, RAI = 4 and 5) Moderate (Banff grade II, RAI = 6 and 7) Severe (Banff grade III, RAI = 8 and 9) Banff Rejection Activity Index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation; bile duct inflammation damage; and portal inflammation; the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI) ranging from 0 to 9. An overall score of 0-3 is considered indeterminate, score of 4-5 is mild acute, score of 6-7 is moderate acute , and score of 8-9 is severe acute. Only the episode with the highest total RAI score for each participant was counted.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=93 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Number of Patients Reported With Different Categories of Severity of BPAR According to Banff Classification
Week 12: Mild
1 Patients
1 Patients
Number of Patients Reported With Different Categories of Severity of BPAR According to Banff Classification
Week 12: Moderate
1 Patients
1 Patients
Number of Patients Reported With Different Categories of Severity of BPAR According to Banff Classification
Week 12: Severe
0 Patients
0 Patients
Number of Patients Reported With Different Categories of Severity of BPAR According to Banff Classification
Week 24: Mild
1 Patients
5 Patients
Number of Patients Reported With Different Categories of Severity of BPAR According to Banff Classification
Week 24: Moderate
1 Patients
3 Patients
Number of Patients Reported With Different Categories of Severity of BPAR According to Banff Classification
Week 24: Sever
0 Patients
0 Patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At 24 weeks

Population: The Intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom a creatinine value at day 28 and a posterior value were available.

Biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy. The Banff Rejection Activity Index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation; bile duct inflammation damage; and portal inflammation; the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI) ranging from 0 to 9. An overall score of 0-3 is considered indeterminate, score of 4-5 is mild acute, score of 6-7 is moderate acute , and score of 8-9 is severe acute. Only the episode with the highest total RAI score for each participant was counted. The patients with treated or untreated BPAR having RAI score \> 3 were reported in this end point.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=93 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Number of Patients With Treated or Untreated BPAR With RAI Score Greater Than 3
Not Treated BPAR: RAI score >3
0 Patients
0 Patients
Number of Patients With Treated or Untreated BPAR With RAI Score Greater Than 3
Not Treated BPAR: Missing RAI score
0 Patients
1 Patients
Number of Patients With Treated or Untreated BPAR With RAI Score Greater Than 3
Treated BPAR: RAI score >3
2 Patients
8 Patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at week 24

Population: The Intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom a creatinine value at day 28 and a posterior value were available.

The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was registered again on the waiting list, or the day he/she received a new graft.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=93 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Number of Patients With Death or Graft Loss
Graft Loss
1 Patients
0 Patients
Number of Patients With Death or Graft Loss
Death
1 Patients
1 Patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: The Intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom a creatinine value at D28 and a posterior value were available. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) is used as imputation of missing data.

Change in serum creatinine concentrations from baseline (randomization) to week 24 post-randomization was one of the efficacy assessments of renal function. Baseline was Day 28 visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=93 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Serum Creatinine
7.2 µmol/L
Standard Deviation 36.0
-1.3 µmol/L
Standard Deviation 38.53

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, week 24

Population: The Intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom urine protein and creatinine value at day 28 and a posterior value were available. LOCF applied.

Change in urine protein/creatinine ratio from baseline (randomization) to week 24 post-randomization was one of the efficacy assessments of renal function. Baseline was Day 28 visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=64 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=61 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio
-2.3 mg/mmol
Standard Deviation 27.89
21.9 mg/mmol
Standard Deviation 92.00

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: The Intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom a creatinine value at D28 and a posterior value were available. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) is used as imputation of missing data.

Creatinine clearance by the Cockcroft-Gault formula is computed in mL/min/1.73m\^2 from the creatinine clearance in mL/min by multiplying it by 1.73 and dividing it by the body surface area Baseline was Day 28 visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=93 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Creatinine Clearance Estimated Using the Adjusted Cockcroft-Gault Formula
-9.0 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 30.63
0.7 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 25.65

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: The Intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom a creatinine value at D28 and a posterior value were available. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) is used as imputation of missing data.

Change in glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the MDRD abbreviated formula. GFR in mL/min/1.73m\^2 for men of non-black ethnicity: 186 \* \[C/88\]\^-1.154 \* \[A\]\^-0.023\*G\*R ; C = serum creatinine (in μmol/L); A = Age (in years). G = 0.742 when the patient is a women; Otherwise G=1 R= 1.21 when the patient was of black ethnicity; Otherwise R = 1 Baseline was Day 28 visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=93 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimated by Abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula
-11.8 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 34.01
0.1 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 32.59

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: The Intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom a creatinine value at D28 and a posterior value were available. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) is used as imputation of missing data.

GFR estimated by using the Chronic kidney disease- epidemiology (CKD-EPI) formula: eGFR (mL/min/1.73m\^2) = 141 \* min(C/K,1)\^ α \* max(C/K,1)\^-1.209 \* 0.993\^A \* 1.1018 (if male) \* 1.159 (if black) where C = serum creatinine (in mg/dL) ; A = Age (in years); K = 0.7 for women and 0.9 for men; α = -0.329 for women and -0.411 for men. Baseline was Day 28 visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=93 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimated by CKD-EPI Formula
-6.9 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 20.11
2.4 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Deviation 22.18

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Week 24

Population: ITT population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom a creatinine value at D28 and a posterior value were available.

Kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (K/DOQI) classification is based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR), abbreviated MDRD formula (mL/min/1.73m\^2) : Stage 1 : GFR \>= 90; Stage 2 = GFR was between 60-89; Stage 3 = GFR was between 30-59 ; Stage 4 = GFR was between 15-29; Stage 5 = GFR was \< 15 (or dialysis)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=86 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=74 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Number of Patients in Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Diseases According to the K/DOQI Classification System
Stage 1
24 Patients
27.89
41 Patients
92.00
Number of Patients in Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Diseases According to the K/DOQI Classification System
Stage 2
34 Patients
29 Patients
Number of Patients in Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Diseases According to the K/DOQI Classification System
Stage 3
28 Patients
4 Patients
Number of Patients in Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Diseases According to the K/DOQI Classification System
Stage 4
0 Patients
0 Patients
Number of Patients in Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Diseases According to the K/DOQI Classification System
Stage 5
0 Patients
0 Patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 24 weeks

Population: The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.

Baseline was Day 28 visit. This endpoint reports patients with total adverse events (any), serious adverse events, death and premature discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=94 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 Participants
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Number of Patients With Any Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, Death and Premature Discontinuation
Any Adverse events
85 Patients
81 Patients
Number of Patients With Any Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, Death and Premature Discontinuation
Serious Adverse events
28 Patients
42 Patients
Number of Patients With Any Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, Death and Premature Discontinuation
Death
1 Patients
2 Patients
Number of Patients With Any Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, Death and Premature Discontinuation
At least one AE led to premature discontinuation
4 Patients
18 Patients

Adverse Events

Tacrolimus

Serious events: 28 serious events
Other events: 68 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Everolimus (RAD001)

Serious events: 42 serious events
Other events: 64 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=94 participants at risk
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 participants at risk
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Infections and infestations
Campylobacter infection
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Nodular regenerative hyperplasia
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Immune system disorders
Liver transplant rejection
3.2%
3/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
5.6%
5/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Immune system disorders
Transplant rejection
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
2.2%
2/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Abdominal wall abscess
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Abscess oral
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Agranulocytosis
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
2.2%
2/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombotic microangiopathy
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
2.1%
2/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
4.3%
4/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
General disorders
Device dislocation
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
General disorders
Fatigue
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
2.2%
2/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
General disorders
Generalised oedema
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
General disorders
Hyperthermia
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
General disorders
Pyrexia
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
General disorders
Sudden death
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
General disorders
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct stenosis
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Biloma
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangiolitis
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
2.1%
2/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholestasis
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic artery stenosis
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic vein stenosis
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic vein thrombosis
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis cholestatic
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatocellular injury
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
2.2%
2/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatorenal syndrome
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Liver disorder
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Cholangitis suppurative
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile colitis
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Cytomegalovirus infection
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Hepatic infection
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Infectious pleural effusion
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Liver abscess
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Oral infection
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Pneumococcal infection
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
5.6%
5/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Septic arthritis staphylococcal
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis aspergillus
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Soft tissue infection
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Anastomotic stenosis
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Biliary anastomosis complication
4.3%
4/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
5.6%
5/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Liver graft loss
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural bile leak
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal fracture
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular pseudoaneurysm
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound evisceration
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Investigations
Weight decreased
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
2.2%
2/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Chondrocalcinosis
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoporotic fracture
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
4.3%
4/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
3.3%
3/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
2.1%
2/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
2.2%
2/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asphyxia
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung disorder
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
2.2%
2/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
2.2%
2/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Purpura
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Social circumstances
Physical disability
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Surgical and medical procedures
Diabetes mellitus management
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Surgical and medical procedures
Drain removal
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Surgical and medical procedures
Umbilical hernia repair
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
0.00%
0/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
Arterial stenosis
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
2.2%
2/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
1.1%
1/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
Lymphoedema
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
2.2%
2/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Tacrolimus
n=94 participants at risk
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids
Everolimus (RAD001)
n=90 participants at risk
From transplantation to randomization: Basiliximab (20mg) at Day 0 and Day 4 + tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from Day 3-Day 5 + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. From randomization to month 6 : everolimus (recommended starting dose of 2 mg/day, then adjusted to achieve the target 6 ≤ C0 ≤ 10 ng/mL, until W24) + mycophenolic acid 1440 mg/d ± oral corticosteroids. The dose of tacrolimus was reduced by 50% twice: at the introduction of everolimus and at week 8 post-transplantation. Tacrolimus had to be finally discontinued in week 12 post-transplantation (by week 16 at the latest).
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
7.4%
7/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
13.3%
12/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
8.5%
8/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
11.1%
10/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
6.4%
6/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
4.4%
4/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
14.9%
14/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
10.0%
9/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
5.6%
5/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
10.6%
10/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
8.9%
8/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
5.3%
5/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
3.3%
3/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Aphthous stomatitis
0.00%
0/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
8.9%
8/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
17.0%
16/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
6.7%
6/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
6.4%
6/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
7.8%
7/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholestasis
12.8%
12/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
26.7%
24/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatocellular injury
4.3%
4/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
17.8%
16/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
6.4%
6/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
5.6%
5/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dyslipidaemia
1.1%
1/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
7.8%
7/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
5.3%
5/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
6.7%
6/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
3.2%
3/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
7.8%
7/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
2.1%
2/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
12.2%
11/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
11.7%
11/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
3.3%
3/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
12.8%
12/94
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.
7.8%
7/90
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment post-randomization and for whom there was a post-treatment safety assessment.

Additional Information

Study Director

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Phone: 862-778-8300

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER