Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study Of PF-00547659 In Patients With Moderate To Severe Ulcerative Colitis (NCT NCT01620255)
NCT ID: NCT01620255
Last Updated: 2021-06-11
Results Overview
Clinical remission was defined as a Total Mayo Score of less than or equal (\<=) 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and rectal bleed subscore of 0 or 1. The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis (UC). Scoring ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, each graded 0 to 3 with higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopic readings from the local and the central reader were considered for analysis. The central reading was used as the primary analysis and the local readings were used for the sensitivity analyses.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
357 participants
Week 12
2021-06-11
Participant Flow
Two (2) subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead and were counted under that group. The numbers Started reflect the number of participants who received treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 centimeters (cm) apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
73
|
71
|
70
|
73
|
70
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
73
|
71
|
70
|
73
|
70
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
69
|
65
|
68
|
70
|
64
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
6
|
2
|
3
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 centimeters (cm) apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Participant underwent fecal transplant
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Non-compliance
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
4
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawn at discretion of investigator
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study Of PF-00547659 In Patients With Moderate To Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=73 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Total
n=357 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
38.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=93 Participants
|
41.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 • n=4 Participants
|
42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7 • n=27 Participants
|
37.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 • n=483 Participants
|
41.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 • n=36 Participants
|
40.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 • n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
29 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
149 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
44 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
208 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: The primary analysis population was based on a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment. Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
Clinical remission was defined as a Total Mayo Score of less than or equal (\<=) 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and rectal bleed subscore of 0 or 1. The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis (UC). Scoring ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, each graded 0 to 3 with higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopic readings from the local and the central reader were considered for analysis. The central reading was used as the primary analysis and the local readings were used for the sensitivity analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=72 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12
Centrally read
|
16.7 percentage of participants
Interval 9.9 to 25.4
|
15.5 percentage of participants
Interval 9.5 to 23.6
|
2.7 percentage of participants
Interval 0.7 to 7.6
|
11.3 percentage of participants
Interval 5.7 to 18.8
|
5.7 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 12.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12
Locally read
|
23.6 percentage of participants
Interval 15.6 to 33.1
|
18.3 percentage of participants
Interval 11.9 to 27.1
|
5.5 percentage of participants
Interval 2.4 to 12.0
|
14.1 percentage of participants
Interval 7.8 to 22.0
|
12.9 percentage of participants
Interval 7.3 to 21.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: The primary analysis population was based on an mITT analysis set, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment. n=number of participants evaluable for the specified category.
Clinical response was defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 3 points in Total Mayo Score with at least a 30 percent (%) change, accompanied by at least 1 point decrease or absolute score of 0 or 1 in rectal bleeding subscore. The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. Scoring ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, each graded 0 to 3 with higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopic readings from the local and the central reader were considered for analysis. The central reading was used as the primary analysis and the local readings were used for the sensitivity analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=72 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 12
Centrally read (n=73,71,72,71,70)
|
54.2 percentage of participants
Interval 44.2 to 64.2
|
45.1 percentage of participants
Interval 35.0 to 55.3
|
28.8 percentage of participants
Interval 20.2 to 37.8
|
38.0 percentage of participants
Interval 28.4 to 47.6
|
50.0 percentage of participants
Interval 39.6 to 60.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 12
Locally read (n=73,70,72,70,70)
|
54.2 percentage of participants
Interval 44.2 to 64.2
|
48.6 percentage of participants
Interval 38.2 to 59.0
|
32.9 percentage of participants
Interval 24.2 to 42.3
|
38.6 percentage of participants
Interval 28.8 to 48.1
|
51.4 percentage of participants
Interval 41.0 to 61.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: The primary analysis population was based on an mITT analysis set, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment.
Mucosal healing was defined as absolute Mayo subscore for endoscopy of 0 or 1. The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. Scoring ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, each graded 0 to 3 with higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopic readings from the local and the central reader were considered for analysis. The central reading was used as the primary analysis and the local readings were used for the sensitivity analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=72 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 12
Centrally read
|
27.8 percentage of participants
Interval 19.5 to 37.1
|
25.4 percentage of participants
Interval 17.1 to 35.0
|
8.2 percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 15.4
|
15.5 percentage of participants
Interval 9.5 to 23.6
|
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 22.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 12
Locally read
|
37.5 percentage of participants
Interval 28.0 to 47.2
|
35.2 percentage of participants
Interval 25.8 to 44.7
|
21.9 percentage of participants
Interval 14.9 to 31.4
|
22.5 percentage of participants
Interval 15.4 to 31.6
|
28.6 percentage of participants
Interval 20.2 to 38.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: As this endpoint was incorrectly stated in the protocol, no analyses were done and no data are presented.
An absolute Partial Mayo Score of \<=2 corresponds to remission. However, this endpoint was incorrectly stated in the protocol and instead of "absolute Partial Mayo Score \<=2", it was stated as "change from baseline in Partial Mayo Score \<=2".
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: The primary analysis population was based on an mITT analysis set, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment. n=number of evaluable participants in that specified category.
The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. Scoring ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, each graded 0 to 3 with higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopic readings from the local and the central reader were considered for analysis. The central reading was used as the primary analysis and the local readings were used for the sensitivity analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=72 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Week 12
Locally read change (n=67,62,70,66,64)
|
-3.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.70 • Interval -3.866 to -2.775
|
-2.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.92 • Interval -3.357 to -2.236
|
-1.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.55 • Interval -2.28 to -1.171
|
-2.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.05 • Interval -3.241 to -2.084
|
-3.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.07 • Interval -3.583 to -2.442
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Week 12
Locally read baseline (n=73,70,72,70,70)
|
8.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
8.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.99
|
8.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
8.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.59
|
8.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Week 12
Centrally read baseline (n=73,71,72,71,70)
|
8.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
8.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.94
|
8.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
8.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
8.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Week 12
Centrally read change (n=67,63,69,67,63)
|
-2.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.49 • Interval -3.57 to -2.55
|
-2.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.74 • Interval -3.162 to -2.131
|
-1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.42 • Interval -2.043 to -1.014
|
-2.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.78 • Interval -2.944 to -1.881
|
-2.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.78 • Interval -3.337 to -2.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks (W) 4, 8, and 12Population: The primary analysis population was based on an mITT analysis set, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment. n=number of evaluable participants at that specific time point for that endpoint.
The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. Scoring ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA, findings on flexible sigmoidoscopy), each graded 0 to 3 with higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopic readings from the local and the central reader were considered for analysis. The central reading was used as the primary analysis and the local readings were used for the sensitivity analyses. Changes from baseline in the subscore of less than (\<) 0, 0, and \>0 corresponded to improvement (imp), no change (NC), and worsening (wors) in that specific subscore.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=72 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Imp in Stool frequency, W4 (n=67,64,71,69,65)
|
36.62 percentage of participants
Interval -3.57 to -2.55
|
30.43 percentage of participants
Interval -3.162 to -2.131
|
26.87 percentage of participants
Interval -2.043 to -1.014
|
46.88 percentage of participants
Interval -2.944 to -1.881
|
43.08 percentage of participants
Interval -3.337 to -2.27
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NC in Stool frequency, W4 (n=67,64,71,69,65)
|
60.56 percentage of participants
Interval -3.866 to -2.775
|
63.77 percentage of participants
Interval -3.357 to -2.236
|
59.70 percentage of participants
Interval -2.28 to -1.171
|
42.19 percentage of participants
Interval -3.241 to -2.084
|
52.31 percentage of participants
Interval -3.583 to -2.442
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Wors in Stool frequency, W4 (n=67,64,71,69,65)
|
2.82 percentage of participants
|
5.80 percentage of participants
|
13.43 percentage of participants
|
10.94 percentage of participants
|
4.62 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Imp in Stool frequency, W8 (n=71,63,71,69,68)
|
43.66 percentage of participants
|
49.28 percentage of participants
|
28.17 percentage of participants
|
49.21 percentage of participants
|
51.47 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NC in Stool frequency, W8 (n=71,63,71,69,68)
|
53.52 percentage of participants
|
46.38 percentage of participants
|
60.56 percentage of participants
|
42.86 percentage of participants
|
48.53 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Wors in Stool frequency, W8 (n=71,63,71,69,68)
|
2.82 percentage of participants
|
4.35 percentage of participants
|
11.27 percentage of participants
|
7.94 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Imp in Stool frequency, W12 (n=67,63,71,68,64)
|
56.34 percentage of participants
|
45.59 percentage of participants
|
35.82 percentage of participants
|
49.21 percentage of participants
|
56.25 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NC in Stool frequency, W12 (n=67,63,71,68,64)
|
38.03 percentage of participants
|
48.53 percentage of participants
|
52.24 percentage of participants
|
41.27 percentage of participants
|
37.50 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Wors in Stool frequency, W12 (n=67,63,71,68,64)
|
5.63 percentage of participants
|
5.88 percentage of participants
|
11.94 percentage of participants
|
9.52 percentage of participants
|
6.25 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Imp in Rectal Bleeding, W4 (n=67,64,71,69,65)
|
42.25 percentage of participants
|
42.03 percentage of participants
|
22.39 percentage of participants
|
48.44 percentage of participants
|
49.23 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NC in Rectal Bleeding, W4 (n=67,64,71,69,65)
|
57.75 percentage of participants
|
53.62 percentage of participants
|
62.69 percentage of participants
|
42.19 percentage of participants
|
44.62 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Wors in Rectal Bleeding, W4 (n=67,64,71,69,65)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
4.35 percentage of participants
|
14.93 percentage of participants
|
9.38 percentage of participants
|
6.15 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Imp in Rectal Bleeding, W8 (n=71,63,71,69,68)
|
40.85 percentage of participants
|
46.38 percentage of participants
|
33.80 percentage of participants
|
50.79 percentage of participants
|
64.71 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NC in Rectal Bleeding, W8 (n=71,63,71,69,68)
|
50.70 percentage of participants
|
44.93 percentage of participants
|
54.93 percentage of participants
|
36.51 percentage of participants
|
33.82 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Wors in Rectal Bleeding, W8 (n=71,63,71,69,68)
|
8.45 percentage of participants
|
8.70 percentage of participants
|
11.27 percentage of participants
|
12.70 percentage of participants
|
1.47 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Imp in Rectal Bleeding, W12 (n=67,63,71,68,64)
|
50.70 percentage of participants
|
47.06 percentage of participants
|
37.31 percentage of participants
|
53.97 percentage of participants
|
60.94 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NC in Rectal Bleeding, W12 (n=67,63,71,68,64)
|
42.25 percentage of participants
|
45.59 percentage of participants
|
50.75 percentage of participants
|
34.92 percentage of participants
|
35.94 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Wors in Rectal Bleeding, W12 (n=67,63,71,68,64)
|
7.04 percentage of participants
|
7.35 percentage of participants
|
11.94 percentage of participants
|
11.11 percentage of participants
|
3.13 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Imp in PGA, W4 (n=67,64,71,69,65)
|
56.34 percentage of participants
|
56.52 percentage of participants
|
47.76 percentage of participants
|
57.81 percentage of participants
|
60.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NC in PGA, W4 (n=67,64,71,69,65)
|
39.44 percentage of participants
|
42.03 percentage of participants
|
49.25 percentage of participants
|
34.38 percentage of participants
|
35.38 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Wors in PGA, W4 (n=67,64,71,69,65)
|
4.23 percentage of participants
|
1.45 percentage of participants
|
2.99 percentage of participants
|
7.81 percentage of participants
|
4.62 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Imp in PGA, W8 (n=71,63,71,69,68)
|
66.20 percentage of participants
|
62.32 percentage of participants
|
59.15 percentage of participants
|
61.90 percentage of participants
|
67.65 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NC in PGA, W8 (n=71,63,71,69,68)
|
30.99 percentage of participants
|
37.68 percentage of participants
|
33.80 percentage of participants
|
30.16 percentage of participants
|
30.88 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Wors in PGA, W8 (n=71,63,71,69,68)
|
2.82 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
7.04 percentage of participants
|
7.94 percentage of participants
|
1.47 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Imp in PGA, W12 (n=67,63,71,68,64)
|
64.79 percentage of participants
|
55.88 percentage of participants
|
50.75 percentage of participants
|
61.90 percentage of participants
|
57.81 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NC in PGA, W12 (n=67,63,71,68,64)
|
32.39 percentage of participants
|
39.71 percentage of participants
|
43.28 percentage of participants
|
31.75 percentage of participants
|
32.81 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscores - Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Wors in PGA, W12 (n=67,63,71,68,64)
|
2.82 percentage of participants
|
4.41 percentage of participants
|
5.97 percentage of participants
|
6.35 percentage of participants
|
9.38 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: The primary analysis population was based on an mITT analysis set, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment. n=number of evaluable participants at Week 12.
The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. Scoring ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA, findings on flexible sigmoidoscopy), each graded 0 to 3 with higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopic readings from the local and the central reader were considered for analysis. The central reading was used as the primary analysis and the local readings were used for the sensitivity analyses. Changes from baseline in the subscore of \<0, 0, and \>0 corresponded to improvement (imp), no change (NC), and worsening (wors) in that specific subscore.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=72 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscore - Findings on Flexible Sigmoidoscopy - at Week 12
Imp (n=67,63,69,67,63)
|
47.83 percentage of participants
Interval -3.57 to -2.55
|
47.76 percentage of participants
Interval -3.162 to -2.131
|
25.37 percentage of participants
Interval -2.043 to -1.014
|
28.57 percentage of participants
Interval -2.944 to -1.881
|
39.68 percentage of participants
Interval -3.337 to -2.27
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscore - Findings on Flexible Sigmoidoscopy - at Week 12
NC (n=67,63,69,67,63)
|
49.28 percentage of participants
Interval -3.866 to -2.775
|
46.27 percentage of participants
Interval -3.357 to -2.236
|
61.19 percentage of participants
Interval -2.28 to -1.171
|
60.32 percentage of participants
Interval -3.241 to -2.084
|
57.14 percentage of participants
Interval -3.583 to -2.442
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Individual Mayo Subscore - Findings on Flexible Sigmoidoscopy - at Week 12
Wors (n=67,63,69,67,63)
|
2.90 percentage of participants
|
5.97 percentage of participants
|
13.43 percentage of participants
|
11.11 percentage of participants
|
3.17 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: The primary analysis population was based on an mITT analysis set, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment. n=number of evaluable participants at that specific time point.
Fecal calprotectin was one of the pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers of the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=72 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Week 4 (n=62,57,68,67,60)
|
-23.50 percent change
Interval -44.27 to 5.0
|
-46.22 percent change
Interval -61.46 to -24.95
|
-25.62 percent change
Interval -43.49 to -2.09
|
-40.21 percent change
Interval -55.56 to -19.54
|
-39.27 percent change
Interval -56.74 to -14.75
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Week 8 (n=67,57,67,63,65)
|
-44.77 percent change
Interval -60.49 to -22.8
|
-57.20 percent change
Interval -69.74 to -39.45
|
-21.68 percent change
Interval -39.62 to 1.6
|
-44.49 percent change
Interval -60.05 to -22.88
|
-49.54 percent change
Interval -65.08 to -27.07
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Week 12 (n=61,55,64,64,59)
|
-58.41 percent change
Interval -72.26 to -37.65
|
-56.72 percent change
Interval -71.67 to -33.88
|
-22.59 percent change
Interval -42.68 to 4.54
|
-56.34 percent change
Interval -69.39 to -37.72
|
-64.52 percent change
Interval -76.92 to -45.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: The primary analysis population was based on an mITT analysis set, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment. n=number of evaluable participants at that specific time point.
hsCRP was one of the PD biomarkers of the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=72 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Week 12 (n=67,62,68,71,64)
|
-20.40 percent change
Interval -38.61 to 3.22
|
-15.96 percent change
Interval -33.12 to 5.6
|
14.85 percent change
Interval -11.16 to 48.48
|
4.51 percent change
Interval -18.02 to 33.25
|
2.31 percent change
Interval -18.48 to 28.42
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Week 4 (n=67,64,69,71,65)
|
-26.90 percent change
Interval -39.41 to -11.82
|
-35.21 percent change
Interval -49.1 to -17.55
|
-11.60 percent change
Interval -25.69 to 5.17
|
-19.17 percent change
Interval -34.22 to -0.67
|
-17.70 percent change
Interval -30.08 to -3.13
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Week 8 (n=71,63,69,71,68)
|
-31.43 percent change
Interval -44.11 to -15.88
|
-43.15 percent change
Interval -54.57 to -28.86
|
-2.42 percent change
Interval -22.75 to 23.25
|
-6.00 percent change
Interval -23.09 to 14.89
|
-22.70 percent change
Interval -36.72 to -5.59
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: The primary analysis population was based on an mITT analysis set, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment. n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.
IBDQ: Psychometrically validated patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument for measuring disease-specific quality of life (QOL) in participants with inflammatory bowel disease. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). Total score is the sum of each item score, ranged from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better QOL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QOL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=72 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score at Week 12
Baseline (BL)(n=69,68,65,71,66)
|
133.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.79 • Interval -3.57 to -2.55
|
128.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.42 • Interval -3.162 to -2.131
|
128.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.69 • Interval -2.043 to -1.014
|
122.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.82 • Interval -2.944 to -1.881
|
132.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.84 • Interval -3.337 to -2.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score at Week 12
Change at W12 (n=62,55,61,64,54)
|
32.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.10 • Interval -3.866 to -2.775
|
32.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.70 • Interval -3.357 to -2.236
|
19.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.08 • Interval -2.28 to -1.171
|
20.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.24 • Interval -3.241 to -2.084
|
36.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.45 • Interval -3.583 to -2.442
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (BL), Week 12Population: The primary analysis population was based on an mITT analysis set, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment. n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point for that specific domain.
IBDQ: Psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring disease-specific QOL in participants with inflammatory bowel disease. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). Total score is the sum of each item score, ranged from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better QOL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QOL. There are 4 individual domains under the IBDQ: bowel function (fx)/symptoms (score range of 10-70), systemic symptoms (score range of 5-35), emotional status/fx (score range of 12-84), and social fx (score range of 5-35). As with total score, higher scores indicate better QOL in that domain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=72 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Domain Scores at Week 12
BL, bowel fx (n=69,68,65,71,66)
|
41.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.60 • Interval -3.57 to -2.55
|
38.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.95 • Interval -3.162 to -2.131
|
38.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.96 • Interval -2.043 to -1.014
|
37.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.23 • Interval -2.944 to -1.881
|
41.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.37 • Interval -3.337 to -2.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Domain Scores at Week 12
Change at W12, bowel fx (n=62,55,61,64,54)
|
11.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.05 • Interval -3.866 to -2.775
|
11.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.07 • Interval -3.357 to -2.236
|
7.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.93 • Interval -2.28 to -1.171
|
6.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.51 • Interval -3.241 to -2.084
|
12.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.45 • Interval -3.583 to -2.442
|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Domain Scores at Week 12
BL, emotional fx (n=69,68,65,71,66)
|
51.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.70
|
50.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.73
|
50.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.60
|
48.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.39
|
51.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Domain Scores at Week 12
Change at W12, emotional fx (n=62,55,61,64,54)
|
10.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.85
|
10.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.04
|
5.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.91
|
6.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.22
|
12.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Domain Scores at Week 12
BL, systemic symptoms (SS)(n=69,68,65,71,66)
|
19.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.98
|
18.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.42
|
18.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.62
|
18.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.81
|
19.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Domain Scores at Week 12
Change at W12, SS (n=62,55,61,64,54)
|
4.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.91
|
4.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.49
|
3.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.67
|
3.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.95
|
4.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Domain Scores at Week 12
BL, social fx (n=69,68,65,71,66)
|
20.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.37
|
20.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.99
|
20.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.87
|
18.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.07
|
20.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Domain Scores at Week 12
Change at W12, social fx (n=62,55,61,64,54)
|
5.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.51
|
5.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.90
|
3.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.27
|
3.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.33
|
6.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: The primary analysis population was based on an mITT analysis set, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment.
IBDQ: Psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring disease-specific QOL in participants with inflammatory bowel disease. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). Total score is sum of each item score, ranged from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better QOL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QOL. A score of \>=170 corresponds to clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=64 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=57 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=54 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score of More Than or Equal to (>=) 170 at Week 12
|
55.6 percentage of participants
Interval 45.0 to 66.3
|
46.9 percentage of participants
Interval 36.1 to 57.5
|
36.9 percentage of participants
Interval 27.4 to 47.5
|
36.8 percentage of participants
Interval 26.9 to 47.9
|
48.1 percentage of participants
Interval 36.3 to 59.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening through to end of treatment period, up to 12 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. TEAEs are defined as newly occurring AEs or those worsening after first dose. AEs comprised both SAEs and non-SAEs. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=73 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Withdrawals Due to TEAEs During the Treatment Period (Weeks 0-12)
With TEAEs
|
36 participants
|
43 participants
|
39 participants
|
41 participants
|
43 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Withdrawals Due to TEAEs During the Treatment Period (Weeks 0-12)
With SAEs
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
4 participants
|
11 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Withdrawals Due to TEAEs During the Treatment Period (Weeks 0-12)
Withdrawals due to TEAEs
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
5 participants
|
1 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 0 (baseline), 2, 4,8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36; Early WithdrawalPopulation: Participants who received active treatment (PF-00547659) were included in this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=67 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=68 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=67 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=62 Participants
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Serum PF-00547659 Concentration Achieved
|
2062 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 1395.5
|
6576 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 2146.0
|
—
|
929.4 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 1977.8
|
21470 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 4788.4
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
PF-00547659 75 mg
PF-00547659 225 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=73 participants at risk
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 participants at risk
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=70 participants at risk
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=73 participants at risk
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 participants at risk
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal artery embolism
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fistula
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
8.5%
6/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
2.7%
2/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.7%
2/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Anal abscess
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile infection
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenocarcinoma of colon
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tension headache
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Colectomy total
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=73 participants at risk
Participants received placebo in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered placebo SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 7.5 mg
n=71 participants at risk
Participants received PF-00547659 7.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 7.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 22.5 mg
n=70 participants at risk
Participants received PF-00547659 22.5 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 22.5 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 75 mg
n=73 participants at risk
Participants received PF-00547659 75 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 75 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
PF-00547659 225 mg
n=70 participants at risk
Participants received PF-00547659 225 milligrams (mg) in the form of 3 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Days 1, 28, and 56, following the completion of most study procedures. Participants were administered PF-00547659 225 mg SC in the anterolateral right or left thighs. Injections were administered at least 3 cm apart to the same thigh beginning from the outermost section of the thigh OR 2 injections in 1 thigh about 3 cm apart and 1 in the other thigh.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
2.9%
2/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
5.5%
4/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
2.9%
2/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
2.7%
2/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
8.5%
6/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
4.3%
3/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
2.7%
2/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.1%
3/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
8.5%
6/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
5.7%
4/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
4.1%
3/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
5.7%
4/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
2.9%
2/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
4.1%
3/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
4.3%
3/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
6.8%
5/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
5.7%
4/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
8.2%
6/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
10.0%
7/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
5.5%
4/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
11.4%
8/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.5%
4/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
0.00%
0/70 • Screening till Week 36 or Early Withdrawal, whichever was later.
Two subjects initially randomized to the 22.5 mg group were mistakenly administered the 75 mg dose instead.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER