Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
6 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-10-31
2021-05-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Lung cancer is the most common malignancy and the leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. Approximately 220,000 new cases of lung cancer are diagnosed in the U.S. every year. Unfortunately, lung cancers are often diagnosed at later stages than breast cancer, due in part to little/no effective screening for lung cancer. As with breast cancer, patients are commonly treated with chemotherapeutic agents, but treatment regimens can take several weeks to months to elicit clinically detectable anti-tumor effects. A biomarker to assess early tumor response to therapy would benefit this patient population.
The contents of dying tumor cells can be detected in the bloodstream, and this may be enhanced by the leaky vasculature of solid tumors. Protein biomarkers of tumor cell death are difficult to detect due to the complex nature of plasma and the lack of technical sensitivity. In contrast, DNA is easier to detect through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Indeed, circulating tumor DNA has been detected in plasma from patients with osteosarcoma, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer. Until recently, it was impractical to develop an assay to routinely quantify circulating tumor DNA due to heterogeneity between patients and tumors. Advances in genomic technology now permit sequencing a tumor genome to identify patient-specific genomic aberrations. Major genomic alterations (i.e., insertions, amplifications, deletions, inversions, translocations) can be readily detected using PCR primers which will recognize tumor DNA but not normal DNA.
While this strategy may be generally applicable to diverse types of solid tumors, two issues are apparent in breast cancer. Firstly, the incidence of chromosomal rearrangements varies widely. Whole-genome sequencing of 15 breast tumors revealed a range of 1-231 major genomic alterations (mean= 68), where 2 tumors had 1 alteration, and 9 tumors had \> 20 alterations. Single-base point mutations are more common but difficult to reliably detect using PCR. Therefore, the investigators must consider that a small subset of patients may have a limited number of genomic alterations available for this assay. Secondly, intratumoral heterogeneity may mean that some genomic alterations are not present in every tumor cell. Such heterogeneity has been inferred from FISH and immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies for many years, and is now being verified at the genomic level. The investigators must consider that only a subpopulation of tumor cells may be sensitive to cytotoxic therapy, so changes in the levels of circulating tumor DNA may only be reflected with analysis of genomic alterations specific to the sensitive cells.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study of AMNN107 in the Treatment of Metastatic and/or Inoperable Melanoma Harboring a c-Kit Mutation
NCT01028222
Taxotere/Temodar/Cisplatin Study in Melanoma Patients
NCT00527761
Effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin: Tinzaparin in Lung Tumours (TILT)
NCT00475098
A Study of Tasisulam-sodium Versus Paclitaxel as Treatment for Metastatic Melanoma
NCT01006252
Comparison of Safety and Clinical Benefit of Injections Subcutaneously Talazoparib Versus Oral Talazoparib in Patients With Solid Tumors
NCT03426254
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Ability to give informed consent
Archived tumor tissue must be available for genetic analysis.
Patients with early-stage breast cancer
Histologic documentation of invasive breast cancer by core needle or incisional biopsy.
The invasive cancer must be either:
* triple-negative with both estrogen and progesterone receptor staining present in fewer than 10% of invasive cancer cells by IHC, and HER2-negative defined as IHC 0-1+, or with a FISH ratio of \<1.8 if IHC is 2+ or if IHC has not been done.
or
\*HER2-positive with IHC 3+ or a FISH ratio of \>2.2.
Clinical Stage II-III invasive breast cancer with the intent to treat with:
* pretreatment mammography, ultrasound, and breast MRI for staging
* pretreatment axillary staging
* neoadjuvant treatment with DNA-damaging chemotherapy (with or without HER2- directed therapy)
* post-chemotherapy breast MRI
* surgical resection of the primary tumor with an axillary dissection for one or more positive nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Patients with multicentric or bilateral disease are eligible if the target lesion(s) meet the other eligibility criteria.
No prior chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, or radiotherapy with therapeutic intent for treatment of a prior malignancy is allowed.
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer Histologic documentation or history of invasive breast cancer by core needle or incisional biopsy, or by surgical resection.
ER/PR/HER2 status may be determined using any breast tumor specimen acquired at any point during a given patient's disease history (i.e., archived tumor). The invasive cancer must be either:
\*triple-negative with both estrogen and progesterone receptor staining present in fewer than 10% of invasive cancer cells by IHC, and HER2-negative defined as IHC 0-1+, or with a FISH ratio of \<1.8 if IHC is 2+ or if IHC has not been done.
or
\*HER2-positive with IHC 3+ or a FISH ratio of \>2.2.
Clinical Stage III-IV invasive breast cancer not amenable to curative surgical resection, with intent to treat with:
* if tumor is triple-negative, treatment with DNA-damaging chemotherapy as per standard of care in the first-line setting for advanced/metastatic disease.
* if tumor is HER2+, treatment with DNA-damaging chemotherapy, HER2-directed therapy, or a combination as per standard of care in any setting for advanced/metastatic disease.
* CT of chest, abdomen, and pelvis and bone scan or PET-CT for staging to assess response (by RECIST) approximately every 8 weeks or as clinically indicated with the primary course of DNA-damaging chemotherapy. The bone scan will not need to be repeated if the baseline bone scan is negative.
Patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Histologic documentation of NSCLC by core needle biopsy or a fine needle aspirate.
Clinical Stage II or III lung cancer with the intent to treat with:
* pretreatment chest CT and or PET/CT
* induction (neoadjuvant) therapy with DNA-damaging chemotherapy
* post-chemotherapy lung chest CT and or PET/CT
* surgical resection of the primary tumor(s) after induction (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy with therapeutic intent for treatment of a prior malignancy is allowed.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gary Schwartz
Associate Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gary N Schwartz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
D12127
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.