Fetal HIV Transmission Risk and Duration of Membrane Rupture
NCT ID: NCT01616823
Last Updated: 2019-02-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
210 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-01-31
2010-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
HIV Testing in Pregnant Women: Evaluating an Opt-Out Testing Strategy
NCT00393302
A Study of HIV Levels During Pregnancy and After Childbirth
NCT00041964
Development of Resistance Mutations in Pregnant HIV-positive (+) Women Following Perinatal Antiretroviral Therapy in Israel
NCT00197366
Viral and Antiretroviral Dynamics in HIV-1 Mother-to-Child Transmission Fluids
NCT03284645
HIV Exposure in Utero and Metabolic Disease Risk in HIV-Negative Young Adults
NCT04132830
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
When maternal viral load is detectable, The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and other governing bodies recommend that elective cesarean section be performed for delivery as there is a 12-fold increased risk of perinatal transmission. However, the evidence suggests that for women at very low risk of transmission, such as those with an undetectable viral load and on HAART, the benefit of transmission reduction provided by cesarean section may be negligible.
The question of length of time of rupture of membranes prior to delivery and transmission risk has been a source of controversy, especially in the context of women on suppressive therapy (HAART) with an undetectable viral load. Traditional thinking has stated that the length of time of rupture of membranes should not be longer than 4 hours, as the benefit of cesarean section is lost after this time. However, this thinking is based on data where maternal viral loads were not known and only intrapartum IV ZDV was used. Many practitioners believe that in women with undetectable viral loads, virally suppressed on HAART, the safest route of delivery is vaginal, irrespective of length of time of rupture of membranes.
This is a retrospective cohort study which plans to examine the mode of delivery and median length of time of rupture of membranes for HIV positive women in two downtown academic institutions in Toronto.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HIV Positive Women
HIV positive women in two downtown Toronto, Ontario academic-affiliated hospitals
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Unity Health Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark Yudin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Unity Health Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10-232
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.