Safety and Efficacy Study of Pegylated Interferon Lambda With and Without Daclatasvir, Compared to Pegylated Interferon Alfa, Plus Ribavirin in Subjects With Hepatitis C Genotype 2 and 3

NCT ID: NCT01616524

Last Updated: 2015-10-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

880 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if 24 weeks of treatment with Pegylated Interferon Lambda plus Ribavirin and 12 weeks of treatment with Pegylated Interferon Lambda plus Ribavirin and Daclatasvir will be safe and effective for treatment of hepatitis C compared to 24 weeks of treatment with Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a plus Ribavirin

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: pegIFNλ + Ribavirin + Placebo matching Daclatasvir

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pegylated interferon lambda (pegIFNλ)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Syringe, Subcutaneous, 180 μg, Once weekly, 24 weeks

Ribavirin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 400 mg, Twice daily, 24 weeks

Placebo matching Daclatasvir

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, Once daily, 12 weeks

Arm 2: pegIFNλ + Ribavirin + Daclatasvir

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pegylated interferon lambda (pegIFNλ)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Syringe, Subcutaneous, 180 μg, Once weekly, 12 weeks

Ribavirin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 400 mg, Twice daily, 12 weeks

Daclatasvir

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 60 mg, Once daily, 12 weeks

Arm 3: pegIFNα-2a + Ribavirin + Placebo matching Daclatasvir

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (pegIFNα-2a)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Syringe, Subcutaneous, 180 μg, Once weekly, 24 weeks

Ribavirin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 400 mg, Twice daily, 24 weeks

Placebo matching Daclatasvir

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, Once daily, 12 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pegylated interferon lambda (pegIFNλ)

Syringe, Subcutaneous, 180 μg, Once weekly, 24 weeks

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Pegylated interferon lambda (pegIFNλ)

Syringe, Subcutaneous, 180 μg, Once weekly, 12 weeks

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (pegIFNα-2a)

Syringe, Subcutaneous, 180 μg, Once weekly, 24 weeks

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Ribavirin

Tablets, Oral, 400 mg, Twice daily, 24 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Ribavirin

Tablets, Oral, 400 mg, Twice daily, 12 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Daclatasvir

Tablets, Oral, 60 mg, Once daily, 12 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo matching Daclatasvir

Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, Once daily, 12 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BMS-914143 BMS-914143 Pegasys Ribasphere Ribasphere BMS-790052

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Chronic hepatitis C, Genotype 2 or 3
* Naïve to prior anti-HCV therapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Infected with HCV other than Genotype 2 or 3
* Positive Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or Human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1)/HIV-2 antibody at screening
* Evidence of liver disease other than HCV
* Active substance abuse
* Evidence of decompensated cirrhosis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic Arizona

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Precision Research Institute, Llc

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Medical Associates Research Group

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

University Of California, San Francisco/Sf General Hospital

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Yale University School Of Medicine

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Orlando Immunology Center

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando Infectious Disease Center

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gastrointestinal Specialists Of Georgia

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

The Queen'S Liver Center

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Carolinas Medical Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Consultants For Clinical Research

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Healthcare Research Consultants

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

University Of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Ctr For Liver Diseases

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Texas Clinical Research Institute, Llc

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

St. Luke'S Episcopal Hospital - Baylor College Of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Research Centers Of America

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Autonoma, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Prov de Santa Fe, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Concord, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Westmead Nsw, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Greenslopes, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Herston, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Clayton Vic, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Parville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Local Institution

Hus, , Finland

Site Status

Local Institution

Clichy, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Nice, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Local Institution

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Local Institution

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Local Institution

Tai Po, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Local Institution

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Novara, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Tsuchiura-shi, Ibaraki, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Takamatsu, Kagawa-ken, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Okayama, Okayama-ken, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Saga, Saga-ken, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Iruma-gun, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Saitama, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Musashino-shi, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Wakayama, Wakayama, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Distrito Federal, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Local Institution

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Irkutsk, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Krasnoyarsk, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Local Institution

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Local Institution

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Local Institution

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Gyeongsangnam-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Local Institution

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Local Institution

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Local Institution

Yunlin, , Taiwan

Site Status

Local Institution

Hull, Humberside, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Belgium Chile Finland France Greece Hong Kong Italy Japan Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Russia Singapore South Korea Taiwan United Kingdom

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-004885-14

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AI452-017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.