Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of Prohance® With Gadovist®/Gadavist™ in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Brain (NCT NCT01613417)
NCT ID: NCT01613417
Last Updated: 2015-07-01
Results Overview
Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
229 participants
Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
2015-07-01
Participant Flow
A total of 229 patients were recruited from September 2012 through November 2013 at 19 clinical trial sites. Off-site assessment of the images was performed between 21 January and 3 April 2014 by 3 board-certified neuroradiologists blinded as to which contrast agent was used, patient clinical information, and the results of other imaging studies.
229 patients were enrolled and signed informed consent. Each enrolled patient was randomized and dosed with at least one contrast agent.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sequence 1 (ProHance Then Gadovist/Gadavist)
Patients randomized to receive ProHance first
|
Sequence 2 (Gadovist/Gadavist Then ProHance)
Patients randomized to receive Gadovist/Gadavist first
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Injection
STARTED
|
113
|
116
|
|
First Injection
COMPLETED
|
113
|
116
|
|
First Injection
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Washout (no Second Injection/MRI)
STARTED
|
113
|
116
|
|
Washout (no Second Injection/MRI)
COMPLETED
|
100
|
109
|
|
Washout (no Second Injection/MRI)
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
7
|
|
Second Injection
STARTED
|
100
|
109
|
|
Second Injection
COMPLETED
|
100
|
109
|
|
Second Injection
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Sequence 1 (ProHance Then Gadovist/Gadavist)
Patients randomized to receive ProHance first
|
Sequence 2 (Gadovist/Gadavist Then ProHance)
Patients randomized to receive Gadovist/Gadavist first
|
|---|---|---|
|
Washout (no Second Injection/MRI)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
13
|
7
|
Baseline Characteristics
Comparison of Prohance® With Gadovist®/Gadavist™ in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Brain
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
ProHance Then Gadovist/Gadavist
n=93 Participants
Per Protocol=patients who completed both exams, had global paired image data available, and had no major protocol violations
|
Gadovist/Gadavist Then ProHance
n=105 Participants
Per Protocol=patients who completed both exams, had global paired image data available, and had no major protocol violations
|
Total
n=198 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
140 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.27 • n=5 Participants
|
55.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.29 • n=7 Participants
|
55.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.31 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
108 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
102 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
190 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
46 participants
n=5 Participants
|
46 participants
n=7 Participants
|
92 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Europe
|
39 participants
n=5 Participants
|
51 participants
n=7 Participants
|
90 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 daysPopulation: Per Protocol=patients who completed both exams, had global paired image data available, and had no major protocol violations
Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reader 1
n=198 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 1
|
Reader 2
n=194 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 2
|
Reader 3
n=196 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 3
|
Reader 2 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - ProHance
MRI after ProHance 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Global Diagnostic Preference Between the Two Exams
ProHance Preferred
|
14 participant exams
|
7 participant exams
|
1 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Global Diagnostic Preference Between the Two Exams
Contrast Agents Equal
|
171 participant exams
|
180 participant exams
|
195 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Global Diagnostic Preference Between the Two Exams
Gadovist/Gadavist Preferred
|
13 participant exams
|
7 participant exams
|
0 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 daysAssessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reader 1
n=198 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 1
|
Reader 2
n=194 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 2
|
Reader 3
n=196 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 3
|
Reader 2 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - ProHance
MRI after ProHance 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lesion Border Delineation
ProHance Better
|
8 participant exams
|
2 participant exams
|
1 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Lesion Border Delineation
No Difference between Prohance and Gadovist/Gadavi
|
181 participant exams
|
189 participant exams
|
195 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Lesion Border Delineation
Gadovist/Gadavist Better
|
9 participant exams
|
3 participant exams
|
0 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 daysAssessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reader 1
n=198 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 1
|
Reader 2
n=194 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 2
|
Reader 3
n=196 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 3
|
Reader 2 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - ProHance
MRI after ProHance 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lesion Internal Morphology
ProHance better
|
2 participant exams
|
2 participant exams
|
1 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Lesion Internal Morphology
No Difference Between ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavi
|
195 participant exams
|
188 participant exams
|
195 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Lesion Internal Morphology
Gadovist/Gadavist betterB
|
1 participant exams
|
4 participant exams
|
0 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 daysAssessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reader 1
n=198 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 1
|
Reader 2
n=194 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 2
|
Reader 3
n=196 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 3
|
Reader 2 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - ProHance
MRI after ProHance 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Extent of Disease
ProHance Better
|
1 participant exams
|
2 participant exams
|
1 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Extent of Disease
No Difference between ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavi
|
196 participant exams
|
190 participant exams
|
195 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Extent of Disease
Gadovist/Gadavist Better
|
1 participant exams
|
2 participant exams
|
0 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 daysAssessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reader 1
n=198 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 1
|
Reader 2
n=194 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 2
|
Reader 3
n=196 Patient Exams
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 3
|
Reader 2 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - ProHance
MRI after ProHance 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lesion Contrast Enhancement
ProHance Better
|
14 participant exams
|
10 participant exams
|
2 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Lesion Contrast Enhancement
No Difference between ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavi
|
170 participant exams
|
174 participant exams
|
193 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Lesion Contrast Enhancement
Gadovist/Gadavist Better
|
14 participant exams
|
10 participant exams
|
1 participant exams
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5-10 minutes PostdosePopulation: Per-protocol population
Mean of difference in signal intensity postdose (ProHance - Gadovist/Gadavist)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reader 1
n=194 Lesions
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 1
|
Reader 2
n=137 Lesions
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 2
|
Reader 3
n=162 Lesions
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 3
|
Reader 2 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - ProHance
MRI after ProHance 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lesion to Background Ratio on Post T1-weighed Spin Echo Images
|
-0.02 signal intensity
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
-0.16 signal intensity
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-0.01 signal intensity
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5-10 minutes PostdosePopulation: Per-protocol population
Mean difference in percentage signal intensity enhancement on postdose T1-weighted SE/FSE images (ProHance - Gadovist/Gadavist)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reader 1
n=191 Lesions
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 1
|
Reader 2
n=133 Lesions
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 2
|
Reader 3
n=159 Lesions
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 3
|
Reader 2 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - ProHance
MRI after ProHance 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - Gadovist/Gadavist
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Signal Intensity Enhancement on Postdose Images
|
1.06 percentage signal intensity enhancement
Standard Deviation 28.61
|
-2.09 percentage signal intensity enhancement
Standard Deviation 29.06
|
-1.59 percentage signal intensity enhancement
Standard Deviation 29.16
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5-10 minutes PostdosePopulation: Per protocol patients with histologically confirmed lesions
Lesion detection rate by contrast agent and reader
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reader 1
n=139 Participants
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 1
|
Reader 2
n=139 Participants
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 2
|
Reader 3
n=139 Participants
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 3
|
Reader 2 - Gadovist/Gadavist
n=139 Participants
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - ProHance
n=139 Participants
MRI after ProHance 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - Gadovist/Gadavist
n=139 Participants
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lesion Detection
True Positive (Patients)
|
133 participant exams
|
135 participant exams
|
137 participant exams
|
136 participant exams
|
136 participant exams
|
132 participant exams
|
|
Lesion Detection
False Negative (Pa
|
6 participant exams
|
4 participant exams
|
2 participant exams
|
3 participant exams
|
3 participant exams
|
7 participant exams
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5-10 minutes PostdosePopulation: Subjects with histologically confirmed lesions
Blinded reader assessment of accuracy of tumor characterization (benign/malignant) - patient level assessment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reader 1
n=128 Participants
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 1
|
Reader 2
n=128 Participants
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 2
|
Reader 3
n=128 Participants
Paired exams reviewed by Reader 3
|
Reader 2 - Gadovist/Gadavist
n=128 Participants
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - ProHance
n=128 Participants
MRI after ProHance 0.1 mmol/kg
|
Reader 3 - Gadovist/Gadavist
n=128 Participants
MRI after Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accuracy for Tumor Characterization
Patients with Tumors Correctly Categorized
|
94 participants
|
96 participants
|
106 participants
|
101 participants
|
93 participants
|
83 participants
|
|
Accuracy for Tumor Characterization
Patients with Tumors Incorrectly Categorized
|
34 participants
|
32 participants
|
22 participants
|
27 participants
|
35 participants
|
45 participants
|
Adverse Events
Safety Population (ProHance)
Safety Population (Gadovist/Gadavist)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Safety Population (ProHance)
n=222 participants at risk
All enrolled patients who received a randomized injection of ProHance
|
Safety Population (Gadovist/Gadavist)
n=216 participants at risk
All enrolled patients who received a randomized injection of Gadovist/Gadavist
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.45%
1/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.00%
0/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
1.8%
4/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.46%
1/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.45%
1/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.46%
1/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.46%
1/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
General disorders
Feeling hot
|
0.45%
1/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.00%
0/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
0.00%
0/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.46%
1/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.45%
1/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.46%
1/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
1.8%
4/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.46%
1/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.90%
2/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.46%
1/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
0.45%
1/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.00%
0/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.45%
1/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.00%
0/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paresthesia
|
0.00%
0/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.46%
1/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.46%
1/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mood altered
|
0.00%
0/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.46%
1/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.90%
2/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.00%
0/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
0.45%
1/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.00%
0/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Orophanyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.46%
1/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.45%
1/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.00%
0/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.45%
1/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.00%
0/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.45%
1/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.00%
0/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vascular rupture
|
0.45%
1/222 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
0.00%
0/216 • Up to 24 hours after contrast media injection
All adverse events collected were categorized using MedDRA 16.1 and tabulated
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Study results may be presented at scientific symposia or published in a peer-review journal after review by sponsor in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the applicable publication or financial agreement
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER