Determining the Optimal Adenosine Provocation Test

NCT ID: NCT01610921

Last Updated: 2014-07-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

11 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2014-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Asthma is a frequently occurring inflammatory lung disease that affects the whole bronchial tree including the small airways (\<2mm). Since the introduction of the solution hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) technology it is possible to generate medication with small particles of approximately 1-2 μm, and therefore to reach the small airways. However, at this moment the investigators have no reliable instruments to identify the asthmatic subjects who particularly benefit from treatment with inhaled small particles. Recently the investigators research group investigated whether provocation with small and large particles AMP is able to identify responders and non-responders to treatment with small and large particles of inhaled corticosteroids. This provocation technique gave promising results but needs further optimization.

The aim of this study is to determine the optimal particle size of dry powder adenosine to assess small airway involvement in asthma. Secondary, to provide insight in the associations between the standard test, executed with nebulized AMP, and the new test, executed with dry powder Adenosine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a cross-over study. The study population consists of 10 non-smoking asthma patients in the age of 18-65 years who have a PC20 metacholine value ≤4.9mg/ml.

Participating subjects perform 6 provocation tests in randomized order: one test with nebulized methacholine, one test with nebulized AMP, four times dry powder adenosine provocation test. (small particles with inhaled with a slow flow, small particles inhaled with a fast flow, large particles inhaled with a slow flow, large particles inhaled with a fast flow)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

bronchial provocationtest

Provocation tests with adenosine dry powder and nebulized AMP (adenosine-5'monophosphate). The AMP provocation test is a standard test and consists of 14 doubling concentrations in a range of 0.04mg/ml to 320mg/ml. The aerosols will be inhaled during tidal breathing for 2 minutes. The dry powder adenosine also consists of 14 doubling steps with doses in a range of 0.01mg to 20mg.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bronchial provocation test

Intervention Type OTHER

Provocation tests with adenosine dry powder and nebulized AMP (adenosine-5'monophosphate). The AMP provocation test is a standard test and consists of 14 doubling concentrations in a range of 0.04mg/ml to 320mg/ml. The aerosols will be inhaled during tidal breathing for 2 minutes. The dry powder adenosine also consists of 14 doubling steps with doses in a range of 0.01mg to 20mg.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bronchial provocation test

Provocation tests with adenosine dry powder and nebulized AMP (adenosine-5'monophosphate). The AMP provocation test is a standard test and consists of 14 doubling concentrations in a range of 0.04mg/ml to 320mg/ml. The aerosols will be inhaled during tidal breathing for 2 minutes. The dry powder adenosine also consists of 14 doubling steps with doses in a range of 0.01mg to 20mg.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

bronchial challenge test AMP test adenosine bronchial provocation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A doctor's diagnosis of asthma
* Age: 18-65 years
* PC20 AMP \< 320 mg/ml
* Non-smoker
* Steroid naive or steroids have been stopped 4 weeks before entry into the baseline period

Exclusion Criteria

* Recent exacerbation asthma (\<2 months) or upper respiration tract infection (\<2 weeks)
* Severe airway obstruction at baseline, FEV1pred\< 50% or \< 1.2L
* Diagnosis of COPD or any other pulmonary disease that could influence the study results as judged by the investigator
* Pregnancy or lactating women. (i.e. women of childbearing potential who do not use adequate anticonception as judged by the investigator).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Medical Center Groningen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

E. van der Wiel

E. van der Wiel, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nick ten Hacken, MD, Phd

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University Medical Center Groningen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, Provincie Groningen, Netherlands

Site Status

University Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL 37702.042.12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.