Design and Validation of a Simulation-based Training Curriculum for Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01610466

Last Updated: 2015-11-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-07-31

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Laparoscopic bariatric surgery is an advanced laparoscopic procedure with a potential for significant morbidity and mortality along the early part of a surgeon's learning curve. Simulation-based training has been shown to improve a surgeon's technical performance and shorten the learning curves in the operating room. Despite these benefits, there is no evidence-based ex-vivo training curriculum for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. The purpose of this study is to design and validate such a curriculum. This curriculum will include cognitive training, technical laparoscopic skills training (laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy) and non-technical skills training in a simulated environment. The investigators will assess the effectiveness of the proposed curriculum by conducting a randomized single blinded controlled trial. Cognitive knowledge (multiple choice test), technical skills (performance of a procedure in the operating room) and non-technical skills (performance in a simulated crisis scenario in a simulated environment) will be compared between curriculum trained and conventionally trained groups. The investigators hypothesize that curriculum trained group will have superior knowledge, technical skill and non-technical skills compared to conventionally trained group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVE: To design and validate a proficiency-based ex-vivo training curriculum for laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery is an advanced laparoscopic procedure with a potential for significant morbidity and mortality along the early part of a surgeon's learning curve. Simulation-based training has been shown to improve a surgeon's technical performance and shorten the learning curves in the operating room. Despite these benefits, specific simulation-based training curricula have not been widely adopted in residency training programs. This is likely a result of the lack of valid simulation-based training curricula for minimally invasive operations. Presently, there is no evidence-based ex-vivo training curriculum for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. The purpose of this project is to develop and validate such a curriculum.

HYPOTHESIS: Completion of the proposed training curriculum is expected to result in superior cognitive knowledge, superior technical skills in the operating room, and superior performance in a simulated crisis scenario when compared to standard residency training.

METHODS: The evidence-based training curriculum will be made up of cognitive, technical, and non-technical components. The cognitive component will deliver procedure-specific knowledge, while the technical component will provide training in basic and procedure-specific laparoscopic skills. Non-technical component will address additional components of surgical competency including situation awareness, decision making, task management, leadership, communication and teamwork. Technical skills will be learned on a bench-top cadaveric porcine models. Training will follow a distributed practice schedule until preset proficiency benchmarks are achieved. The proposed training curriculum will be validated in a single-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing procedure-specific knowledge, technical performance in the operating room, and non-technical skills in a simulated crisis scenario for 12 surgical residents in the curricular training group and 12 residents in the standard residency training group. Cognitive knowledge will be assessed with a multiple choice examination. Technical performance will be assessed with previously validated procedure-specific and global rating scales. Non-technical skills will be assessed using a previously validated NOTECHS scale.

CONCLUSIONS: The design and implementation of the proposed training curriculum has the potential to affect surgical training programs on a national and international level by standardizing the proficiency of surgical trainees prior to the start of operating room training. This standardization is expected to shorten the learning curves and improve patient safety in the operating room.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Curriculum training group

Surgical residents in the curriculum training group will complete the entire curriculum. They will participate in a cognitive component, which will consist of self-directed readings and a faculty-led seminar. Participants will also train to proficiency in laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy and gastrojejunostomy using a laparoscopic box trainer with cadaveric porcine bowels. Finally, for the non-technical skills component participants will participate in an introductory lecture on non-technical skills in surgery, as well as a practice crisis scenario with a debriefing session.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic bariatric surgery ex-vivo training curriculum

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The training curriculum will consist of a cognitive, technical and non-technical components. Cognitive component will consist of self-directed readings and a faculty-led seminar. Technical component will consist of training to proficiency on cadaveric porcine laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy and gastrojejunostomy models. Non-technical component will consist of an introductory lecture on non-technical skills in surgery and a simulated crisis scenario with a debriefing session.

Conventional training group

Participants in the conventional training group will proceed through surgical residency training in the usual fashion.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic bariatric surgery ex-vivo training curriculum

The training curriculum will consist of a cognitive, technical and non-technical components. Cognitive component will consist of self-directed readings and a faculty-led seminar. Technical component will consist of training to proficiency on cadaveric porcine laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy and gastrojejunostomy models. Non-technical component will consist of an introductory lecture on non-technical skills in surgery and a simulated crisis scenario with a debriefing session.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Resident in general surgery at the University of Toronto
* Post - graduate year (PGY) 3 or 4
* Performed less than 10 laparoscopic bariatric operations independently

Exclusion Criteria

* Residents in other surgical programs at University of Toronto
* Residents in general surgery at the University of Toronto in PGY1, 2, 5 or attending surgeons
* Residents who have performed great than 10 laparoscopic bariatric operations independently
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Unity Health Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Teodor Grantcharov

Associate Professor, Department of Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Teodor P Grantcharov, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Unity Health Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Simulation-based training and learning curves in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Br J Surg. 2012 Jul;99(7):887-95. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8748. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22511220 (View on PubMed)

Rehrig ST, Powers K, Jones DB. Integrating simulation in surgery as a teaching tool and credentialing standard. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Feb;12(2):222-33. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0250-8. Epub 2007 Nov 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18004630 (View on PubMed)

Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Darzi A. Framework for systematic training and assessment of technical skills. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Apr;204(4):697-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.016. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17382230 (View on PubMed)

Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):518-25; discussion 525-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000136941.46529.56.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15319723 (View on PubMed)

Aggarwal R, Boza C, Hance J, Leong J, Lacy A, Darzi A. Skills acquisition for laparoscopic gastric bypass in the training laboratory: an innovative approach. Obes Surg. 2007 Jan;17(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9001-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17355764 (View on PubMed)

Catchpole K, Mishra A, Handa A, McCulloch P. Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles. Ann Surg. 2008 Apr;247(4):699-706. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181642ec8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18362635 (View on PubMed)

Sevdalis N, Davis R, Koutantji M, Undre S, Darzi A, Vincent CA. Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams. Am J Surg. 2008 Aug;196(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.070. Epub 2008 Jun 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18558392 (View on PubMed)

Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Stefanidis D, Touchard CL, Scott DJ. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jul;201(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15978440 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SMH 11-202

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id