A Study of CNTO 136 (Sirukumab), a Human Anti-IL-6 Monoclonal Antibody, Administered Subcutaneously, in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Anti-TNF-Alpha Therapy (SIRROUND-T)

NCT ID: NCT01606761

Last Updated: 2018-03-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

878 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-06

Study Completion Date

2016-01-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of sirukumab as measured by the reduction of the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with active RA who are unresponsive or intolerant to treatment with anti-TNF-alpha agents.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients will be randomly assigned to treatment groups, and they and study personnel will not know the identity of the treatments given. Some patients will receive a placebo, which resembles a medication, but does not contain an active substance. This helps to determine if the study agent is effective. Patients will receive placebo or sirukumab by injection under the skin. The expected duration of the study is 68 weeks, which includes 52 weeks of treatment. Participants who complete participation in the study will be eligible for inclusion into the long term extension study if enrollment at a participating site is available to them. If they do not participate in the long-term study, they will continue into the safety follow-up for approximately 16 weeks. The placebo-controlled portion of the study is through Week 24, when placebo patients will cross over to one of two sirukumab dose regimens. Patient safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Patients will receive placebo every 2 weeks from Week 0 through Week 22, followed by a subcutaneous (SC) sirukumab dose regimen every 2 weeks through Week 52.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Form=solution for injection, route=subcutaneous use; every 2 weeks from Week 0 through Week 22.

Sirukumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Type=exact, unit=mg, number=50 or 100, form=solution for injection, route=subcutaneous use; every 2 weeks for 100 mg and every 4 weeks for 50 mg, Week 23 through Week 52.

Group 2

Patients will receive sirukumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks through Week 52.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sirukumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Type=exact, unit=mg, number=100, form=solution for injection, route=subcutaneous use; Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks through Week 52.

Group 3

Patients will receive sirukumab 50 mg SC at Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks through Week 52. Between sirukumab injections, placebo SC administrations will be made at Weeks 2, 6, and every 4 weeks through Week 52.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Form=solution for injection, route=subcutaneous use; Weeks 2, 6, and every 4 weeks through Week 52.

Sirukumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Type=exact, unit=mg, number=50, form=solution for injection, route=subcutaneous use; Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks through Week 52.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo

Form=solution for injection, route=subcutaneous use; every 2 weeks from Week 0 through Week 22.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Form=solution for injection, route=subcutaneous use; Weeks 2, 6, and every 4 weeks through Week 52.

Intervention Type DRUG

Sirukumab

Type=exact, unit=mg, number=50 or 100, form=solution for injection, route=subcutaneous use; every 2 weeks for 100 mg and every 4 weeks for 50 mg, Week 23 through Week 52.

Intervention Type DRUG

Sirukumab

Type=exact, unit=mg, number=100, form=solution for injection, route=subcutaneous use; Weeks 0, 2, and every 2 weeks through Week 52.

Intervention Type DRUG

Sirukumab

Type=exact, unit=mg, number=50, form=solution for injection, route=subcutaneous use; Weeks 0, 4, and every 4 weeks through Week 52.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Have a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for at least 3 months before screening
* Have moderately to severely active RA with at least 4 of 68 tender joints and 4 of 66 swollen joints, at screening and at baseline
* Have had anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha therapy and were unresponsive by 1 of the following 2 reasons: Lack of benefit to at least 1 anti-TNF-alpha biologic therapy, as assessed by the treating physician, after at least 12 weeks of etanercept, yisaipu, adalimumab, golimumab, or certolizumab pegol therapy and/or at least a 14-week dosage regimen (ie, at least 4 doses) of infliximab; Intolerance to at least 2 anti-TNF-alpha biologic therapies, as assessed by the treating physician, to etanercept, yisaipu, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol, or infliximab or have documented intolerance to an anti-TNF-alpha agent as described above that precludes further administration of anti-TNF-alpha agents
* If using oral corticosteroids, must be on a stable dose equivalent to less than or equal to 10 mg/day of prednisone for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent. If currently not using corticosteroids, must not have received oral corticosteroids for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent
* If using non nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) or other analgesics for RA, must be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent
* If using non-biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, or bucillamine, must be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent and should have no serious toxic side effects attributable to the DMARD
* C-reactive protein (CRP) 8.00 mg/L or more or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 28 mm/hr or more at screening

Exclusion Criteria

* Has received infliximab, infliximab biosimilar, or golimumab intravenous (IV) within 8 weeks of the first study agent administration
* Has received subcutaneously (SC) golimumab, adalimumab, or certolizumab pegol within 6 weeks of the first study agent administration
* Has received etanercept or yisaipu within 4 weeks of the first study agent administration
* Has a history of intolerance to tocilizumab that precluded further treatment with it, or inadequate response to 3 months of tocilizumab (anti-IL-6 receptor) therapy. Has used tocilizumab within 8 weeks of the first study agent administration
* Has used B-cell-depleting therapy (eg, rituximab) within 7 months of first study agent administration or have evidence during screening of abnormally low B-cell level caused by previous B-cell depletion therapy
* Has used anakinra within 1 week of first study agent administration
* Has used abatacept or any other biologic therapy for the treatment of RA within 8 weeks of the first study agent administration
* Has received intra-articular (IA), intramuscular (IM), or IV corticosteroids for RA, including adrenocorticotrophic hormone during the 4 weeks prior to first study agent administration
* Has received leflunomide within 24 months before the first study agent administration and has not undergone a drug elimination procedure, unless the M1 metabolite is measured and is undetectable
* Has a history of cyclophosphamide or cytotoxic agent use
* Has received cyclosporine A, azathioprine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, oral or parenteral gold, or D-penicillamine within 4 weeks of the first study agent administration
* Has received an investigational drug (including investigational vaccines) or used an investigational medical device within 3 months or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, before the first study agent administration
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Covina, California, United States

Site Status

El Cajon, California, United States

Site Status

Hemet, California, United States

Site Status

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

La Palma, California, United States

Site Status

Placentia, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Upland, California, United States

Site Status

Victorville, California, United States

Site Status

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Hamden, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Brandon, Florida, United States

Site Status

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lake Mary, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Zephyrhills, Florida, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Monroe, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Cumberland, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Eagan, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Flowood, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Freehold, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

Plainview, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Edmond, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Erie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

East Greenwich, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Carrollton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Cypress, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Katy, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Mesquite, Texas, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Texas, United States

Site Status

Victoria, Texas, United States

Site Status

Kennewick, Washington, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Beckley, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, , Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

Campbelltown, , Australia

Site Status

Victoria Park, , Australia

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Burlington, , Canada

Site Status

St. John's, , Canada

Site Status

Toronto, , Canada

Site Status

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Erfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Gÿttingen N/A, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel Kronshagen, , Germany

Site Status

Schwerin, , Germany

Site Status

Vogelsang-Gommern, , Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Zerbst, , Germany

Site Status

Ayauta, , Japan

Site Status

Bunkyō City, , Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Fukuyama, , Japan

Site Status

Higashihiroshima, , Japan

Site Status

Hiroshima, , Japan

Site Status

Izumo, , Japan

Site Status

Kagoshima, , Japan

Site Status

Katō, , Japan

Site Status

Kawagoe, , Japan

Site Status

Kita-Gun, , Japan

Site Status

Kumamoto, , Japan

Site Status

Kurume, , Japan

Site Status

Matsuyama, , Japan

Site Status

Miyazaki, , Japan

Site Status

Nagano, , Japan

Site Status

Nagasaki, , Japan

Site Status

Nagoya, , Japan

Site Status

Nishimuro-Gun, , Japan

Site Status

Nishinomiya, , Japan

Site Status

Okayama, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Sapporo, , Japan

Site Status

Sasebo, , Japan

Site Status

Shibata, , Japan

Site Status

Shimonoseki, , Japan

Site Status

Shimotsuke, , Japan

Site Status

Shinjuku-Ku, , Japan

Site Status

Sumida-Ku, , Japan

Site Status

Takaoka,Toyama, , Japan

Site Status

Takasaki, , Japan

Site Status

Tokorozawa, , Japan

Site Status

Tokushima, , Japan

Site Status

Tomakomai, , Japan

Site Status

Tomishiro, , Japan

Site Status

Tonami, , Japan

Site Status

Tsu, , Japan

Site Status

Ureshino, , Japan

Site Status

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Mérida, , Mexico

Site Status

San Luis Potosí City, , Mexico

Site Status

Sneek, , Netherlands

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Wellington, , New Zealand

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Ustroń, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Orenburg, , Russia

Site Status

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Ulyanovsk, , Russia

Site Status

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Daejeon, , South Korea

Site Status

Gwangju, , South Korea

Site Status

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Jeonju, , South Korea

Site Status

Seongnam-si, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Suwon, , South Korea

Site Status

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Bilbao, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Mérida, , Spain

Site Status

San Cristóbal de La Laguna, , Spain

Site Status

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Barnsley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Middlesbrough, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Wigan, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Canada Croatia France Germany Japan Lithuania Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Russia South Korea Spain Taiwan United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aletaha D, Bingham CO 3rd, Tanaka Y, Agarwal P, Kurrasch R, Tak PP, Popik S. Efficacy and safety of sirukumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-TNF therapy (SIRROUND-T): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2017 Mar 25;389(10075):1206-1217. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30401-4. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28215362 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CNTO136ARA3003

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2010-022243-38

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1135-6365

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR100864

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.