Revlimid® as Consolidation Treatment Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
NCT ID: NCT01600053
Last Updated: 2016-12-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
11 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-11-30
2014-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The National California Institute Working Group and newly updated International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Working Group definition of a complete response (CR) in CLL is quite permissive and allows for the persistence of 30% of residual lymphocytes in the marrow. These response criteria were initially developed at a time treatment options for CLL patients were limited and relatively few CRs were obtained. However, therapeutic advances including monoclonal antibodies and stem cell transplant have reduced residual CLL cells to a greater extent than previously possible and necessitated updating of current response criteria to include MRD evaluation and the development of highly sensitive assays that can measure MRD such as multiparametric 4-color flow cytometry, allele-specific PCR, and more convenient investigational assays such as peripheral blood levels of CLLU-1. Regardless, the majority of complete responses achieved following any initial therapy still have detectable residual disease.
Importantly, CLL patients who lack minimal residual disease following treatment consistently demonstrate prolonged progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those with persistent MRD. As such, the development of therapeutic strategies that have the potential to eradicate disease after therapy are highly desired. Such consolidation therapies have potential to improve the depth of a remission, prolong PFS, and potentially overall survival in CLL patients. The investigators propose that Revlimid might be one such therapy that can be used as consolidation to eradicate residual disease or improve remissions in patients who have received therapy and that this might lead to a prolonged disease free duration. The investigators hypothesize that Revlimid will be safe and well tolerated in this setting.
The investigators further hypothesize that Revlimid consolidation might be effective in CLL patients at risk of early relapse such as those patients with leukemia cells that use unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable regions. The investigators found that the relative CLLU1 expression level on blood samples mirrored the residual level of CLL cells as determined by 4-color flow cytometry on cells from the aspirated marrow. The investigators hypothesize that monitoring for expression of CLLU1 might provide a reliable means with which to evaluate residual disease in the context of Revlimid consolidation therapy. Previous single agent Revlimid studies have suggested that Revlimid treatment of CLL patients may positively impact immune parameters increasing the relative composition of T-lymphocytes, modulation of cytokines, and can lead to improvement immunoglobulin levels and or the development of leukemia specific antibodies, the investigators hypothesize that similar changes in immune parameters may occur in the context of Revlimid consolidation therapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lenalidomide
Lenalidomide will be taken orally days 1-21 for up to six 28-day cycles
Lenalidomide
Lenalidomide will be taken orally days 1-21 for up to six 28-day cycles (6 cycles = 1 course of Revlimid consolidation). Revlimid will be initiated at 5mg and can be dose escalated at the start of each cycle based on individual patient tolerability to a maximum of 25 mg. The total number of treatment cycles cannot exceed 12 cycles or two courses of six cycles each.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lenalidomide
Lenalidomide will be taken orally days 1-21 for up to six 28-day cycles (6 cycles = 1 course of Revlimid consolidation). Revlimid will be initiated at 5mg and can be dose escalated at the start of each cycle based on individual patient tolerability to a maximum of 25 mg. The total number of treatment cycles cannot exceed 12 cycles or two courses of six cycles each.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Previously treated patients of any age with a diagnosis of CLL with documented residual disease following therapy, but not meeting an indication for treatment based on current guidelines
* At least 2 months following previous CLL directed therapy
* ECOG performance status of less than or equal to 2 at study entry
* Laboratory test results within these ranges:
* Platelet count greater than or equal to 50 x 109/L
* CrCl \>.60 ml/min
* Total bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL
* AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) less than or equal to 2 x ULN
* Females of childbearing must adhere to strict guidelines and have negative pregnancy test prior to enrollment
* Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form.
* Age greater than or equal to 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form.
* Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
* Disease free of prior malignancies for greater than or equal to 2 years with exception of currently treated basal cell, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in situ" of the cervix or breast.
* All study participants must be registered into the mandatory RevAssist® program, and be willing and able to comply with the requirements of RevAssist®.
* Able to take aspirin (81 or 325 mg) daily as prophylactic anticoagulation (patients intolerant to aspirin may use warfarin or low molecular weight heparin).
Exclusion Criteria
* Known HIV positive patients.
* Patients with uncontrolled Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA) or autoimmune thrombocytopenia (ITP)
* Patients with active fungal, bacterial, and/or viral infection
* Patients with known hypersensitivity to Revlimid or thalidomide
* Concurrent use of other anti-cancer agents or treatments
* Patients with history of deep venous thrombus or pulmonary embolism
* Patients who are at increased risk of thrombosis during treatment with Revlimid including those taking concurrent erythropoietin, darbepoetin or high-dose corticosteroids
* Inability to provide informed consent.
* Concurrent malignancy (excluding basal and squamous cell skin cancers).
* Pregnant or breast-feeding females. (Lactating females must agree not to breast feed while taking Revlimid).
* Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
* Use of any other experimental drug or therapy within 28 days of baseline.
* The development of erythema nodosum if characterized by a desquamating rash while taking thalidomide or similar drugs.
* Patients with a history of embolic events (e.g. TIA) from arrhythmia or peripheral arterial disease or of recent MI whether or not treated with anti-platelet drug.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Celgene Corporation
INDUSTRY
Thomas Kipps
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thomas Kipps
Interim Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thomas J. Kipps, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Moores UCSD Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
101955
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id