Double Cord Versus Haploidentical (BMT CTN 1101)

NCT ID: NCT01597778

Last Updated: 2021-12-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

368 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Study Completion Date

2020-09-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT)are one treatment option for people with leukemia or lymphoma. Family members,unrelated donors or banked umbilical cordblood units with similar tissue type can be used for HCT. This study will compare the effectiveness of two new types of bone marrow transplants in people with leukemia or lymphoma: one that uses bone marrow donated from family members with only partially matched bone marrow; and, one that uses two partially matched cord blood units.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) has allowed older and less clinically fit patients to receive potentially curative treatment with allogeneic HCT for high risk or advanced hematological malignancies. Patients lacking an HLA-matched sibling may receive a graft from a suitably HLA-matched unrelated donor. However, up to a third of patients will not have an HLA-matched sibling or a suitably matched adult unrelated donor (i.e., no more than a mismatch at a single locus). Even when a suitably matched unrelated donor is identified, data from the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) indicate that a median of four months is required to complete searches that result in transplantation; thus, some number of patients succumb to their disease while awaiting identification and evaluation of a suitably matched adult unrelated donor.

Single or dual center studies have shown that partially HLA-mismatched related bone marrow (haplo-BM) and unrelated double umbilical cord blood (dUCB) are valuable sources of donor cells for RIC HCT, thus extending this treatment modality to patients who lack other donors. In order to study the reproducibility, and thus, the wider applicability of these two alternative donor strategies, The Blood and Marrow Transplantation Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) conducted two parallel multicenter prospective Phase II clinical trials. These two studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of related haplo-BM (BMT CTN 0603) and dUCB (BMT CTN 0604) transplantation after RIC. Both of these alternative donor approaches produced early results similar to that reported with unrelated donor, and even HLA-matched sibling, HCT. These data demonstrate not only the efficacy of both of these approaches, but also that both can be safely exported from the single center setting. Both haplo-BM and dUCB grafts can be obtained rapidly for greater than 90% of patients lacking an HLA-matched donor. This study will test the hypothesis that progression free survival at two years after RIC haplo-BM transplantation is similar to the progression free survival after RIC dUCB transplantation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Burkitt's Lymphoma Follicular Lymphoma Hodgkin Lymphoma Mantle Cell Lymphoma Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Haplo identical transplant Cord blood transplant Reduced intensity conditioning regimen Lymphoma Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplant

Participants will receive haploidentical bone marrow transplant using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplant

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

The conditioning regimen consists of:

Fludarabine (Flu)30 mg/m2 IV Days -6, -5, -4, -3, -2 Cyclophosphamide (Cy) 14.5 mg/kg IV Days -6, -5 Total body irradiation (TBI) 200cGy Day -1

The GVHD prophylaxis regimen consists of:

Cy 50 mg/kg IV Days 3, 4 Tacrolimus (IV or PO) beginning Day 5 Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg po three times a day, maximum dose 1 g po TID beginning Day 5 until Day 35

Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant

Participants will receive a double umbilical cord blood transplant using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

The preparative regimen consists of:

Fludarabine 40 mg/m2 IV Days -6, -5, -4,-3, -2 Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg IV Day -6 Total Body Irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy Day -1 for patients who have received cytotoxic chemotherapy within the 3 months of enrollment or an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment or 300 cGy Day -1 for patients who have not received cytotoxic chemotherapy within the 3 months of enrollment and who have not received an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment.

The GVHD prophylaxis regimen consists of:

Cyclosporine beginning Day -3 with dose adjusted to maintain a trough level of 200-400 ng/mL.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg po three times a day, maximum dose 1 g po TID beginning Day -3 until Day 35

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplant

The conditioning regimen consists of:

Fludarabine (Flu)30 mg/m2 IV Days -6, -5, -4, -3, -2 Cyclophosphamide (Cy) 14.5 mg/kg IV Days -6, -5 Total body irradiation (TBI) 200cGy Day -1

The GVHD prophylaxis regimen consists of:

Cy 50 mg/kg IV Days 3, 4 Tacrolimus (IV or PO) beginning Day 5 Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg po three times a day, maximum dose 1 g po TID beginning Day 5 until Day 35

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant

The preparative regimen consists of:

Fludarabine 40 mg/m2 IV Days -6, -5, -4,-3, -2 Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg IV Day -6 Total Body Irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy Day -1 for patients who have received cytotoxic chemotherapy within the 3 months of enrollment or an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment or 300 cGy Day -1 for patients who have not received cytotoxic chemotherapy within the 3 months of enrollment and who have not received an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment.

The GVHD prophylaxis regimen consists of:

Cyclosporine beginning Day -3 with dose adjusted to maintain a trough level of 200-400 ng/mL.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg po three times a day, maximum dose 1 g po TID beginning Day -3 until Day 35

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients 18 to 70 years old
* Patients must have available both: a)One or more potential related mismatched donors (biologic parent(s) or siblings (full or half) or children). At least low resolution DNA based human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing at HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 for potential haploidentical sibling donors is required. b)At least two potential umbilical cord blood units identified. Each unit must have a minimum of 1.5 x 10\^7/kg pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose. For non-red blood cell depleted units, the minimum pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose of each unit must be at least 2.0 x 10\^7/kg. Units must be HLA matched at a minimum of 4/6 to the recipient at HLA-A, HLA-B (at low resolution using DNA based typing) and HLA-DRB1 (at high resolution using DNA based typing). Confirmatory typing is not required for randomization.
* Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1) that is NOT considered favorable-risk as defined by the presence of at least one of the following: Adverse cytogenetics such as t(9;22), t(1;19), t(4;11), other Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL) rearrangements; White blood cell counts of greater than 30,000/mcL (B-ALL) or greater than 100,000/mcL (T-ALL)at diagnosis; Recipient age older than 30 years at diagnosis; Time to CR greater than 4 weeks
* Acute Myelogeneous Leukemia (AML) in CR1 that is NOT considered as favorable-risk. Favorable risk is defined as having one of the following: t(8.21) without CKIT mutation, inv(16) without CKIT mutation or t(16;16), normal karyotype with mutated NPM1 and not FLT-ITD, normal karyotype with double mutated CEBPA, Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in first molecular remission at end of consolidation
* Acute Leukemias in 2nd or subsequent CR
* Biphenotypic/Undifferentiated/Prolymphocytic Leukemias in first or subsequent CR, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma in first or subsequent CR
* Burkitt's lymphoma: second or subsequent CR
* Lymphoma fulfilling the following criteria: Chemotherapy-sensitive (at least stable disease lymphomas that have failed at least 1 prior regimen of multi-agent chemotherapy and are INELIGIBLE for an autologous transplant. Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are not eligible regardless of disease status.
* Performance status: Karnofsky score greater than or equal to 70%.


* Patients with Adequate Physical Function as Measured by: a. Cardiac: Left ventricular ejection fraction at rest must be greater than or equal to 40%, or shortening fraction less than 25%; b. Hepatic: Bilirubin less than or equal to 2.5 mg/dL, except for patients with Gilbert's syndrome or hemolysis. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and Alkaline Phosphatase less than 5 x upper limit of normal; c. Renal: Serum creatinine within normal range, or if serum creatinine outside normal range, then renal function (measured or estimated creatinine clearance or GFR)greater than 40 mL/min/1.73m\^; d. Pulmonary: Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (corrected for hemoglobin), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than 50% predicted;

1. Patients must have available two UCB units fulfilling the following criteria:

1. Each unit must have a minimum of 1.5 x 10\^7/kg pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose. For non-red blood cell depleted units, the minimum pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose of each unit must be at least 2.0 x10\^7/kg.
2. Units must be HLA matched at a minimum of 4/6 to the recipient at HLA -A, HLA-B (at low resolution using DNA based typing), and HLA -DRB1 (at high resolution using DNA based typing).
3. Additional graft selection criteria specified in section 2.5
2. Patients must have received at least one cycle of the cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens (or regimen of similar intensity) listed in Appendix D within 3 months of enrollment (measured from the start date of chemotherapy) OR have had an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment OR receive 300 cGy as part of the preparative regimen

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with suitably matched related or unrelated donor, as defined per institutional practice.
* Recipients of prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are ineligible if disease recurrence occurred less than 6 months from their autologous stem cell transplant.
* Current uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection (currently taking medication with evidence of progression of clinical symptoms or radiologic findings).
* Prior allogeneic HCT.
* Patients with history of primary idiopathic myelofibrosis or any severe marrow fibrosis.
* Planned use of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) therapy.
* Anti-donor HLA antibodies.


* Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
* Evidence of HIV infection or known HIV positive serology.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Marrow Donor Program

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical College of Wisconsin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mary Horowitz, MD, MS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Medical College of Wisconsin

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Arizona Cancer Center

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

City of Hope National Medical Center

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

University of California at Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford Hospital and Clinics

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

University of Florida College of Medicine (Shands)

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Florida Hospital Cancer Institute

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

BMT Program at Northside Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Hospital

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

DFCI Massachustts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

DFCI Brigham & Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Medical Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Karmanos Cancer Institute/BMT

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Univeristy of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Roswell Park Cancer Center

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Mt. Sinai Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester Medical Center

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook University Medical Center

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina Hospital at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Jewish Hospital BMT Program

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio State / Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Oklahoma Medical Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Penn State College of Medicine - The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Univesity of Texas, MD Anderson CRC

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Transplant Institute

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Virginia Commonwealth University

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

West Virginia University

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Eapen M, O'Donnell P, Brunstein CG, Wu J, Barowski K, Mendizabal A, Fuchs EJ. Mismatched related and unrelated donors for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults with hematologic malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Oct;20(10):1485-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 May 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24862638 (View on PubMed)

Roth JA, Bensink ME, O'Donnell PV, Fuchs EJ, Eapen M, Ramsey SD. Design of a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized trial of transplantation using umbilical cord blood versus HLA-haploidentical related bone marrow in advanced hematologic cancer. J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Mar;3(2):135-44. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.95.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24645687 (View on PubMed)

Ramsey SD, Bansal A, Li L, O'Donnell PV, Fuchs EJ, Brunstein CG, Eapen M, Thao V, Roth JA, Steuten LMG. Cost-Effectiveness of Unrelated Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation versus HLA-Haploidentical Related Bone Marrow Transplantation: Evidence from BMT CTN 1101. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Jul;29(7):464.e1-464.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.017. Epub 2023 Apr 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37120135 (View on PubMed)

El Jurdi N, Martens MJ, Brunstein CG, O'Donnell P, Lee SJ, D'Souza A, Logan B, Hong S, Singh AK, Sandhu K, Shapiro RM, Horowitz MM, Hamilton BK. Health-Related Quality of Life in Double Umbilical Cord Blood versus Haploidentical Marrow Transplantation: A Quality of Life Analysis Report of BMT CTN 1101. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Jul;29(7):467.e1-467.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.009. Epub 2023 Apr 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37088401 (View on PubMed)

Brunstein CG, DeFor TE, Fuchs EJ, Karanes C, McGuirk JP, Rezvani AR, Eapen M, O'Donnell PV, Weisdorf DJ; Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network. Engraftment of Double Cord Blood Transplantation after Nonmyeloablative Conditioning with Escalated Total Body Irradiation Dosing to Facilitate Engraftment in Immunocompetent Patients. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Oct;27(10):879.e1-879.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34273598 (View on PubMed)

Fuchs EJ, O'Donnell PV, Eapen M, Logan B, Antin JH, Dawson P, Devine S, Horowitz MM, Horwitz ME, Karanes C, Leifer E, Magenau JM, McGuirk JP, Morris LE, Rezvani AR, Jones RJ, Brunstein CG. Double unrelated umbilical cord blood vs HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation: the BMT CTN 1101 trial. Blood. 2021 Jan 21;137(3):420-428. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007535.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33475736 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2U10HL069294-11

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

5U24CA076518

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

BMTCTN1101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id