Echocardiographic Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness After a Mini-fluid Challenge in Non-ventilated Patients With Shock

NCT ID: NCT01590511

Last Updated: 2015-12-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

71 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of this study is to show that the variation of the subaortic velocity time integral after a mini test by filling 100 cc of normal saline over 1 minute (ΔITV100) is predictive of response to filling (defined as an increase in aortic velocity time integral measured by transthoracic ultrasound over 15% after administration of 500 cc of normal saline over 15 minutes) in non-ventilated shock patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The secondary objectives of this study include:

* To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the variation of the velocity time integral after administration of 100 cc of normal saline over 1 minute (ΔITV100) to predict the response to the filling.
* To study the inter-observer variation of ΔITV100 measurement.
* To compare ΔITV100 to other clinical and radiological parameters for predicting response to filling (initial value of the subaortic velocity time integral, variation in mitral E wave, E / A, respiratory variation of the diameter of the inferior vena cava, marbling clinical evolution score.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shock Circulatory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The study population

Patients in the emergency room or intensive care in acute circulatory failure without ventilatory support.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
* The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
* Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 90 mmHg
* Signs of inadequate cardiac output: urine output \<0.5 ml / kg / h for more than two hours, hyperlactataemia
* Requires amines to maintain an SBP ≥ 90 mmHg or inability to lower amines or requires an increase in amines

Exclusion Criteria

* The patient is participating in another study
* The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
* The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
* The patient (or his/her person-of-trust) refuses to sign the consent
* It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
* The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
* The patients has a contraindication for a treatment necessary for this study
* Cardiogenic shock
* Acute pulmonary edema
* Moribund patient
* Non echogenic patient
* Patient with cardiac arrhythmia
* Patients for whom the passive leg raising test is contraindicated (hyper intra-abdominal pressure, pelvic or lower limb trauma)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Xavier Bobbia, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-A00500-43

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LOCAL/2012/XB-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id