Trial Outcomes & Findings for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes (NCT NCT01586065)
NCT ID: NCT01586065
Last Updated: 2023-06-28
Results Overview
Principal study outcome was comparing insulin doses using pre- and post-meal sensor versus plasma glucose values. All insulin dose calculations over a 24-hour period were made using sensor glucose concentrations; these doses were compared to the those calculated as if plasma glucose were to be used instead for dose calculations.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
24 hrs
2023-06-28
Participant Flow
Type 1 diabetes, HbA1c ≥9% on insulin pumps
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CGM in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled T1D
Adolescents with type 1 diabetes, HbA1c ≥9% on insulin pumps were admitted to the clinical research center and a continuous glucose sensor was inserted. Sensor glucose (SG) values were compared to plasma glucose measured at least hourly using Yellow Springs Instrument's (YSI) glucose analyzer. SG rather than YSI was used for treatment decisions unless YSI was \<70 mg/dL or specific criteria indicating SG and YSI were very discordant were met.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CGM Use in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled T1D
n=10 Participants
Adolescents with poorly controlled T1D were admitted to CRC and CGM was placed. The safety of using real-time sensor glucose (SG) data for treatment decisions in adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes was assessed.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
16.3 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hrsPopulation: Ten adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes on insulin pumps were admitted to the clinical research center and a continuous glucose sensor was inserted. Insulin dose calculations based on sensor glucose were compared to calculations made as if based on plasma glucose. 23 paired sensor/plasma glucose values for corrections were analyzed.
Principal study outcome was comparing insulin doses using pre- and post-meal sensor versus plasma glucose values. All insulin dose calculations over a 24-hour period were made using sensor glucose concentrations; these doses were compared to the those calculated as if plasma glucose were to be used instead for dose calculations.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Correction Doses Determined Using Sensor Glucose Readings
n=15 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
The insulin doses in this arm were based on calculations using the sensor glucose value.
|
Insulin Correction Doses Determined Using YSI Glucose Readings
n=8 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
The insulin doses in this arm were based on calculations using the YSI glucose value.
|
All Correction Doses Administered
n=23 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
Insulin correction doses determined using either the sensor or plasma glucose readings
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of High Glucose Correction Doses Administered.
Difference between SG and YSI dose calculated (SG-YSI dose) = -1 unit
|
5 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
5 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
10 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
|
Number of High Glucose Correction Doses Administered.
Difference between SG and YSI dose calculated (SG-YSI dose) = 0 units
|
7 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
1 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
8 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
|
Number of High Glucose Correction Doses Administered.
Difference between SG and YSI dose calculated (SG-YSI dose) = +1 unit
|
3 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
0 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
3 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
|
Number of High Glucose Correction Doses Administered.
Difference between SG and YSI dose calculated (SG-YSI dose) = +2 units
|
0 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
0 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
0 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
|
Number of High Glucose Correction Doses Administered.
Difference between SG and YSI dose calculated (SG-YSI dose) = -2 units
|
0 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
2 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
2 sensor/plasma glucose-based insulin dose
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hoursMean sensor and plasma pre- and post-meal glucose concentrations for all dinner (n=8), bedtime snack (n=8), and breakfast (n=10) during the study period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Correction Doses Determined Using Sensor Glucose Readings
n=26 sensor/plasma glucose levels
The insulin doses in this arm were based on calculations using the sensor glucose value.
|
Insulin Correction Doses Determined Using YSI Glucose Readings
n=26 sensor/plasma glucose levels
The insulin doses in this arm were based on calculations using the YSI glucose value.
|
All Correction Doses Administered
Insulin correction doses determined using either the sensor or plasma glucose readings
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pre- and Post-meal (2-3 Hour) Glucose Levels
Pre-meal glucose, mean (SD)
|
157 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 9
|
163 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 11
|
—
|
|
Pre- and Post-meal (2-3 Hour) Glucose Levels
Post-meal glucose, mean (SD)
|
174 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 10
|
183 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 12
|
—
|
Adverse Events
CGM Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CGM Group
n=10 participants at risk
Adolescents using CGM during the CRC admission
|
|---|---|
|
Endocrine disorders
Mild hypoglycemia
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 5 • AEs were collected for each participant's admission to the CRC over 24 hrs.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place