Trial Outcomes & Findings for Does Ultrasound Improve Procedural Time in the Lateral Popliteal Approach to the Sciatic Nerve in Obese Patients (NCT NCT01579747)
NCT ID: NCT01579747
Last Updated: 2014-01-24
Results Overview
Time taken to complete a sciatic nerve block via the lateral popliteal approach using ultrasound vs nerve stimulation technique
COMPLETED
PHASE4
25 participants
less than 30 minutes
2014-01-24
Participant Flow
Patients recruited in UNMH and outpatient's surgical center
1 excluded because not meeting inclusion criteria. Patient lost weight prior to surgery
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Nerve Stimulation Sciatic Nerve Block
Sciatic nerve block performed with nerve stimulation
|
Ultrasound Guided Sciatic Nerve Block
Sciatic nerve block performed with ultrasound guidance
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
12
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
12
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Does Ultrasound Improve Procedural Time in the Lateral Popliteal Approach to the Sciatic Nerve in Obese Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Nerve Stimulation Sciatic Nerve Block
n=12 Participants
Sciatic nerve block performed with nerve stimulation
|
Ultrasound Guided Sciatic Nerve Block
n=12 Participants
Sciatic nerve block performed with ultrasound guidance
|
Total
n=24 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
49.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=5 Participants
|
58.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=7 Participants
|
53.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.85 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: less than 30 minutesTime taken to complete a sciatic nerve block via the lateral popliteal approach using ultrasound vs nerve stimulation technique
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Nerve Stimulation Sciatic Nerve Block
n=12 Participants
Sciatic nerve block performed with nerve stimulation
|
Ultrasound Guided Sciatic Nerve Block
n=12 Participants
Sciatic nerve block performed with ultrasound guidance
|
|---|---|---|
|
Procedural Time
|
577 seconds
Standard Deviation 57
|
206 seconds
Standard Deviation 40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsNumber of needle redirections defined as needle withdrawal followed by advancement as an intentional movement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Nerve Stimulation Sciatic Nerve Block
n=12 Participants
Sciatic nerve block performed with nerve stimulation
|
Ultrasound Guided Sciatic Nerve Block
n=12 Participants
Sciatic nerve block performed with ultrasound guidance
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Redirections
|
20 passes
Interval 20.0 to 20.0
|
3.5 passes
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
|
Adverse Events
Nerve Stimulation Sciatic Nerve Block
Ultrasound Guided Sciatic Nerve Block
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place