Phase III, Randomized, Double Blind Trial Low Dose Tamoxifen Versus Placebo in Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) Users

NCT ID: NCT01579734

Last Updated: 2023-06-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1884 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-03-31

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The propose of this trial is to assess the effect of low dose tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention in HRT (Hormone Replacement Therapy)users.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

While life expectancy has grown by approximately 30 years in the last century in western countries, the age at menopause has increased by 2-3 years only. Thus, women are exposed to postmenopausal symptoms and disorders related to estrogens drop for a considerable period of their lifetime. The management of these frequent disorders is an important public health issue. Although recent data from the WHI randomized trial have demonstrated that late postmenopausal women (mean age 63.3 years) taking oral conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate in a continuous combined regimen for prevention of coronary heart disease have an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease and breast cancer, there is no question that treatment of menopausal symptoms with HRT (Hormone Replacement Therapy) in younger women aged around 50 years is a clinically beneficial treatment. This is even truer for women who enter menopause earlier than 45 years. It is prudent not to extend the results of the WHI trial, as such, to other forms of HRT preparations, routes, dosages and regimens or to early postmenopausal women with no apparent risk factors for CVD. Recently data from a non-randomized study, the Million Women Study, have suggested that oral combined regimens are associated with an increased and that transdermal estradiol does not increase more than oral treatment, and in general may be less harmful: for instance, transdermal estradiol has no effect on vascular inflammatory markers in contrast to the increase observed with oral CEE (conjugated equine estrogens). Notably, more recent data on the estrogens-alone group of the WHI trial show a lower breast cancer risk than the combination, suggesting a important role of progestin in the risk, and a significant reduction in colon cancer.

The increased risk of developing breast cancer, mostly estrogens receptor positive, particularly with the combination of estrogens and progestin, has been associated with an increased expression of estrogens receptors in the healthy breast tissue, thus leading to an enhanced sensitivity to the estrogens signal. Moreover, reproductive factors such as early menarche and delayed pregnancy are also associated with a higher risk of estrogens receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. Thus, the addition of a SERM may reduce the hormone growth-promoting effect on the breast gland. Tamoxifen has been investigated in four large cooperative phase III trials for breast cancer prevention in at-risk women. While the preliminary results of the Italian Tamoxifen Prevention Study in hysterectomized women showed no difference between arms, a recent update after 7 years of follow-up suggests that the combination of HRT and tamoxifen has a favorable effect and might even be synergistic. At a mean observation time of 81 months, a 25% reduction of breast cancer was noted in the tamoxifen arm compared with placebo (45 versus 34 events, Hazard Ratio, HR= 0.75, 95% CI, 0.48-1.18). While there is no difference in the subset of women who never took HRT before or during the trial (HR=1.01, 95% CI, 0.60-1.70), women, who at some point before or during the study, had ever taken HRT (n=1584) had fewer breast cancers in the tamoxifen arm (6 on tamoxifen versus 17 on placebo, HR=0.35, 95% CI, 0.14-0.89). Among the women continuously on HRT during the trial (n= 754), breast cancer events were 3 for women on tamoxifen versus 11 for those on placebo, respectively (HR=0.30, 95% CI, 0.08-1.06). Notably, 76.9% of HRT users received transdermal unopposed ERT and further 6.5% took transdermal ERT combined with progestins. Importantly, recent result from the IBIS I trial indicate that there is no evidence that HRT use affects the tamoxifen benefit. Recent studies suggest that the standard dose of tamoxifen may be reduced to one quarter (5 mg day) without significant loss of its beneficial effects on circulating biomarkers, mostly reflecting cardiovascular risk. Moreover, the efficacy of doses as low as one twentieth of the standard 20 mg/day dose on breast cancer cell proliferation has been recently shown. Since the endometrial effect of tamoxifen is dependent on treatment duration and dose, a dose reduction might reduce the risk of endometrial malignancies, while retaining its preventive efficacy. On the other hand, the addition of HRT containing progestins could further minimize the risk of endometrial cancer associated with tamoxifen. Moreover, estrogen should reduce the incidence of vasomotor and uro-genital symptoms, which are a major reason for tamoxifen withdrawal in prevention studies. In the NSABP trial, women aged 50 or younger demonstrated no significantly increased incidence of severe adverse events, including endometrial cancer and, even more importantly, venous thromboembolic events (VTE). One possible explanation for the lack of severe toxicity in premenopausal women is the concomitant presence of adequate circulating estrogens levels which prevent tamoxifen from acting as an estrogens agonist on these target tissues. Notably, in the IBIS I trial, no significant excess of endometrial cancer and VTE was noted in the women on HRT who were allocated to tamoxifen compared to placebo.

The above background provides the rationale for a phase III chemoprevention trial in postmenopausal healthy women HRT users and Tamoxifen: the HOT Study (Hormone replacement therapy Opposed by low dose Tamoxifen).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

1 tablet day for 5 years

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

1 tablet day for 5 years

Tamoxifen

Tamoxifen 5 mg, (1 tablet) day for 5 years

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tamoxifen

Intervention Type DRUG

1 tablet, 5 mg / day for 5 years

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tamoxifen

1 tablet, 5 mg / day for 5 years

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

1 tablet day for 5 years

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Nolvadex, Istubal, Valodex

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Postmenopausal women candidates to HRT for control of menopausal symptoms or prevention of postmenopausal disorders. women currently undergoing HRT for any duration; (women off HRT for 1 year or longer are considered de novo users);
* negative bilateral mammography (within the last 6 months);
* written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

Any type of malignancy, with the exclusion of CIN and non-melanoma skin cancer;

* active proliferative disorders of the endometrium such as atypical hyperplasia, history of active endometriosis, unresected polyps, symptomatic myomata;
* alterations of metabolic, liver, renal and cardiac grade 2 function (NCI criteria grade 2 or higher);
* any type of retinal disorders, severe cataract and glaucoma;
* presence of significant risk factors for venous events, including immobilization within the last 3 months for longer than 2 weeks following surgery or trauma, history of estrogen-associated and "sine causa" superficial phlebitis, deep venous thrombophlebitis or other significant VTE (pulmonary embolism, stroke, etc.);
* use of tamoxifen, raloxifene or other SERMs within the last 4 weeks;
* anticoagulant therapy in progress (heparin or dicoumarol);
* active infections;
* severe psychiatric disorders or inability to comply to the protocol procedures; any other factor that at the investigator's discretion contraindicates the use of either tamoxifen or HRT.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Institute of Oncology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Umberto Veronesi, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

European Institute of Oncology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

European Institute of Oncology

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IEO S51/200

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.