Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effect of Mirror Therapy on Lower Extremity Motor Control and Gait in Patients With Stroke (NCT NCT01574079)
NCT ID: NCT01574079
Last Updated: 2014-09-11
Results Overview
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM)assesses level of disability and measures progress toward independence with rehabilitational intervention. The tool consists of 18 items. Only the the locomotor score was used to assess gait ability in this study. The locomotor score ranges from 1 - 7 with a higher score indicating a higher level of functional independence.
COMPLETED
NA
33 participants
measured at admission and discharge from rehab estimated length of stay 14 days
2014-09-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Traditional Physical Therapy
The control group will receive traditional physical therapy which includes, but is not limited to, therapeutic exercise, functional mobility training, pre-gait and gait activities, electrotherapeutic modalities, and education.
|
Physical Therapy Plus Mirror Therapy
The treatment group will receive traditional physical therapy with the addition of 15 minutes of mirror therapy consisting of lower extremity ankle dorsiflexion, knee flexion, and hip flexion. The participant will attempt to perform the exercises with both lower extremities. The patient will be blinded to the affected lower extremity with a mirror, and will be looking at the image of the unaffected lower extremity superimposed on the affected lower extremity as he or she performs the activities.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
18
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
17
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Traditional Physical Therapy
The control group will receive traditional physical therapy which includes, but is not limited to, therapeutic exercise, functional mobility training, pre-gait and gait activities, electrotherapeutic modalities, and education.
|
Physical Therapy Plus Mirror Therapy
The treatment group will receive traditional physical therapy with the addition of 15 minutes of mirror therapy consisting of lower extremity ankle dorsiflexion, knee flexion, and hip flexion. The participant will attempt to perform the exercises with both lower extremities. The patient will be blinded to the affected lower extremity with a mirror, and will be looking at the image of the unaffected lower extremity superimposed on the affected lower extremity as he or she performs the activities.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Effect of Mirror Therapy on Lower Extremity Motor Control and Gait in Patients With Stroke
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Traditional Physical Therapy
n=18 Participants
The control group received traditional physical therapy which included, but was not limited to, therapeutic exercise, functional mobility training, pre-gait and gait activities, electrotherapeutic modalities, and education.
|
Physical Therapy Plus Mirror Therapy
n=15 Participants
The treatment group received traditional physical therapy with the addition of mirror therapy. The mirror therapy consisted of 15 minutes of exercises for the lower extremities focusing on ankle dorsiflexion, knee flexion, and hip flexion. The participant attempted to perform the exercises with both lower extremities. The participant was blinded to the affected lower extremity with a mirror, and was looking at the image of the unaffected lower extremity superimposed on the affected lower extremity as he or she performed the activities.
|
Total
n=33 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.94 • n=5 Participants
|
48.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.53 • n=7 Participants
|
51.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.56 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: measured at admission and discharge from rehab estimated length of stay 14 daysPopulation: Thirty-three participants enrolled in the study with 3 dropping out before completion. Two of these were due to medical issues, and one was discharged unexpectedly
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM)assesses level of disability and measures progress toward independence with rehabilitational intervention. The tool consists of 18 items. Only the the locomotor score was used to assess gait ability in this study. The locomotor score ranges from 1 - 7 with a higher score indicating a higher level of functional independence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=17 Participants
The control group received traditional physical therapy which included, but was not limited to, therapeutic exercise, functional mobility training, pre-gait and gait activities, electrotherapeutic modalities, and education.
|
Treatment Group
n=13 Participants
The treatment group received traditional physical therapy with the addition of mirror therapy. The mirror therapy consisted of 15 minutes of exercises for the lower extremities focusing on ankle dorsiflexion, knee flexion, and hip flexion. The participant attempted to perform the exercises with both lower extremities. The participant was blinded to the affected lower extremity with a mirror, and was looking at the image of the unaffected lower extremity superimposed on the affected lower extremity as he or she performed the activities.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Independence Measure - Locomotor Score
FIM locomotor score on admission
|
1.65 outcome score
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.33 outcome score
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
|
Functional Independence Measure - Locomotor Score
FIM locomotor score at discharge
|
3.82 outcome score
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
4.25 outcome score
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured at admission and discharge with estimated length of stay 14 daysThe Timed Up and Go (TUG) is used to assess balance and gait, and to estimate fall risks in patients with deficits. The participant rises from a seated position in a chair, walks 3 meters, turns around, returns to the chair, and sits down. The test is measured in seconds, with a lower number indicating a higher level of independence and the least risk for falls.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=17 Participants
The control group received traditional physical therapy which included, but was not limited to, therapeutic exercise, functional mobility training, pre-gait and gait activities, electrotherapeutic modalities, and education.
|
Treatment Group
n=13 Participants
The treatment group received traditional physical therapy with the addition of mirror therapy. The mirror therapy consisted of 15 minutes of exercises for the lower extremities focusing on ankle dorsiflexion, knee flexion, and hip flexion. The participant attempted to perform the exercises with both lower extremities. The participant was blinded to the affected lower extremity with a mirror, and was looking at the image of the unaffected lower extremity superimposed on the affected lower extremity as he or she performed the activities.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Timed Up and Go
TUG on admission (in seconds)
|
100.69 seconds
Standard Deviation 53.42
|
97.75 seconds
Standard Deviation 47.69
|
|
Timed Up and Go
TUG at discharge (in seconds)
|
50.6 seconds
Standard Deviation 34.88
|
49.25 seconds
Standard Deviation 15.96
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: measured at admission and discharge with estimated length of stay 14 daysThe Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM)is designed to measure mobility and motor ability after stroke. There are three subscales with 10 items each assessing the upper extremity, lower extremity, and basic mobility. Only the lower extremity and basic mobility items were used in this study. The lower extremity scores ranged from 0 - 18 with higher scores indicating a higher level of motor control. The basic mobility scores ranged from 0 - 30 with high numbers indicating a higher level of functional mobility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=17 Participants
The control group received traditional physical therapy which included, but was not limited to, therapeutic exercise, functional mobility training, pre-gait and gait activities, electrotherapeutic modalities, and education.
|
Treatment Group
n=13 Participants
The treatment group received traditional physical therapy with the addition of mirror therapy. The mirror therapy consisted of 15 minutes of exercises for the lower extremities focusing on ankle dorsiflexion, knee flexion, and hip flexion. The participant attempted to perform the exercises with both lower extremities. The participant was blinded to the affected lower extremity with a mirror, and was looking at the image of the unaffected lower extremity superimposed on the affected lower extremity as he or she performed the activities.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement
STREAM LE admission
|
8.18 outcome score
Standard Deviation 4.97
|
5.33 outcome score
Standard Deviation 1.92
|
|
Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement
STREAM LE discharge
|
12.41 outcome score
Standard Deviation 5.33
|
8.58 outcome score
Standard Deviation 2.61
|
|
Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement
STREAM mobility on admission
|
6.29 outcome score
Standard Deviation 7.65
|
5.92 outcome score
Standard Deviation 4.42
|
|
Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement
STREAM mobility at discharge
|
16.47 outcome score
Standard Deviation 9.86
|
14.67 outcome score
Standard Deviation 6.02
|
Adverse Events
Control Group
Treatment Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Principle investigator
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place