Optimization of Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction: A Non-inferiority Trial

NCT ID: NCT01573650

Last Updated: 2021-11-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

37 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-07-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. To analyse the outcome of different treatment options of peripheral nerve repair with no gap (group 1) and with a critical sized (\>5mm) defect (group 2) in order to optimize peripheral nerve repair
2. To reduce morbidity with the same outcome

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients planned to undergo peripheral nerve repair after traumatic nerve injury with either no gap (group 1) or with a critical sized defect (\>5mm, group 2) of the finger providing written informed consent to this investigation will be randomised in two groups:.

Group 1: nerve repair with no gap Group 1a (standard): Epineural Suture Group 1b (experimental): Epineural Suture and Fibrin Wrap Group 2: Nerve repair with a critical sized (\>5mm) defect Group 2a (standard): Epineural suture and autologous nerve transplantation from lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN) Group 2b (experimental): Epineural suture and Fibrin Conduit

In all groups an epineural suture will be performed (suture enhancement). The outcome of fibrin enwrapment and fibrin conduit will be compared to the standard treatment option to date (direct nerve repair and autologous nerve graft, respectively). Randomization will be performed using a computer-base algorithm (www.randomizer.at). Ambulatory follow up of patients is carried out by the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Handsurgery, University Hospital Basel. The outcome-assessor as well as the patient will be blinded for analysis and the outcome-assessor will have no access to the surgery report.

The investigator's aim is to analyse 48 patients within 12 months. Since 100 patients undergo peripheral nerve repair annually in the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Handsurgery at the University Hospital Basel, patient accrual appears unproblematic.

After completion, statistical analysis focusing on the comparison of the different types of surgery concerning the clinical parameters 2-Point Discrimination (PD), Semmes Weinstein test, and electroneurography will be conducted.

After six months, no difference will be expected between group 1a and 1b or 2a and 2b, respectively. In the investigator's experience there will be no confounders which may influence nerve regeneration. A similar patient satisfaction will be expected between the groups. The investigator expect a higher patient satisfaction in group 2b than in group 2a due to nerve tissue harvest. Between group 1a and 1b no difference is expected regarding MHQ.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Nerve Injury Digital Nerve Hand Left

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group 1

Group 1a (standard): Epineural Suture Group 1b (experimental): Epineural suture and Fibrin Wrap

No interventions assigned to this group

group 2

Group 2a (standard): Epineural suture and autologous nerve transplantation from lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN) Group 2b (experimental): Epineural suture and Fibrin Conduit

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with traumatic peripheral nerve injury of the finger(s) who are to be treated with peripheral nerve repair at the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Handsurgery, University Hospital of Basel
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years
* Age \> 90 years
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniel Kalbermatten, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Basel

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Version 2, 01/04/2012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id