Trial Outcomes & Findings for Massive Iron Deposit Assessment (NCT NCT01572922)
NCT ID: NCT01572922
Last Updated: 2019-06-11
Results Overview
Hepatic iron content in the liver using liver biopsy
COMPLETED
NA
142 participants
up to 30 days after MRI
2019-06-11
Participant Flow
Patients within the St. Jude Network (St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, St. Jude Domestic Affiliates, and the adult Hematology and Oncology program at the University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center) who have history of 12 or more lifetime erythrocyte transfusions, and need for liver iron content assessment.
One arm study
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1
All eligible patients with history of 12 or more lifetime erythrocyte transfusions, and need for liver iron content assessment.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
142
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
139
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm 1
All eligible patients with history of 12 or more lifetime erythrocyte transfusions, and need for liver iron content assessment.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Massive Iron Deposit Assessment
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1
n=142 Participants
All eligible patients with history of 12 or more lifetime erythrocyte transfusions, and need for liver iron content assessment
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
85 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
57 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
15.9 years
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
79 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
63 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
131 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
85 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
40 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
142 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 30 days after MRIPopulation: Eligible iron-overloaded patients with both liver biopsy measurement and 1.5T R2\*-UTE measurement.
Hepatic iron content in the liver using liver biopsy
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Iron-overloaded Patients
n=41 Participants
Eligible iron-overloaded patients with both liver biopsy measurement and 1.5T R2\*-UTE measurement
|
|---|---|
|
Hepatic Iron Content in the Liver Using Liver Biopsy
|
19.8 mcg
Interval 0.1 to 45.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after MRIPopulation: Eligible iron-overloaded patients with both liver biopsy measurement and 1.5T R2\*-UTE measurement.
Hepatic iron content of the liver using MRI-derived 1.5T R2\*-UTE measurement, with results in Hz. R2\* is a measure obtained with MRI, i.e., MRI R2\*. It is measured in hertz (Hz). In lay terms, the MRI machine picks up a signal back from the tissue during the process of scanning the tissues. With every "picture taken", this signal is strong in the beginning and then wanes off. R2\* reflects how fast the signal wanes off. If there is too much iron in the tissue, the signal disappears faster, making the T2\* value low. T2\* is the reciprocal of R2\* (R2\*= 1/T2\*). So, if the signal drops fast, the T2\* is low and the R2\* is high. In this study, we are measuring the R2\* value. The higher the R2\*, the more iron in the liver tissue. We can compare the R2\* value with that of a liver biopsy to then use the R2\* value to tell us how much iron is in the liver without having to biopsy the liver.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Iron-overloaded Patients
n=41 Participants
Eligible iron-overloaded patients with both liver biopsy measurement and 1.5T R2\*-UTE measurement
|
|---|---|
|
MRI-derived R2* Values Using 1.5T UTE Technique
|
864.4 Hz
Interval 45.4 to 2245.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after MRIPopulation: Iron-overloaded patients had 1.5T R2\*-GRE measurements.
MRI-derived R2\* Using 1.5T GRE Technique in Hz. R2\* is a measure obtained with MRI, i.e., MRI R2\*. It is measured in hertz (Hz). In lay terms, the MRI machine picks up a signal back from the tissue during the process of scanning the tissues. With every "picture taken", this signal is strong in the beginning and then wanes off. R2\* reflects how fast the signal wanes off. If there is too much iron in the tissue, the signal disappears faster, making the T2\* value low. T2\* is the reciprocal of R2\* (R2\*= 1/T2\*). So, if the signal drops fast, the T2\* is low and the R2\* is high. In this study, we are measuring the R2\* value. The higher the R2\*, the more iron in the liver tissue. We can compare the R2\* value with that of a liver biopsy to then use the R2\* value to tell us how much iron is in the liver without having to biopsy the liver.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Iron-overloaded Patients
n=139 Participants
Eligible iron-overloaded patients with both liver biopsy measurement and 1.5T R2\*-UTE measurement
|
|---|---|
|
MRI-derived R2* Using 1.5T GRE Technique
|
333.8 Hz
Interval 33.6 to 2726.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 30 days after MRIPopulation: Iron-overloaded patients had 1.5T R2\*-UTE-measurement.
MRI-derived R2\* value using 1.5T R2\*-UTE in Hz. R2\* is a measure obtained with MRI, i.e., MRI R2\*. It is measured in hertz (Hz). In lay terms, the MRI machine picks up a signal back from the tissue during the process of scanning the tissues. With every "picture taken", this signal is strong in the beginning and then wanes off. R2\* reflects how fast the signal wanes off. If there is too much iron in the tissue, the signal disappears faster, making the T2\* value low. T2\* is the reciprocal of R2\* (R2\*= 1/T2\*). So, if the signal drops fast, the T2\* is low and the R2\* is high. In this study, we are measuring the R2\* value. The higher the R2\*, the more iron in the liver tissue. We can compare the R2\* value with that of a liver biopsy to then use the R2\* value to tell us how much iron is in the liver without having to biopsy the liver.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Iron-overloaded Patients
n=139 Participants
Eligible iron-overloaded patients with both liver biopsy measurement and 1.5T R2\*-UTE measurement
|
|---|---|
|
MRI Derived R2* Using 1.5T UTE Technique
|
319.2 HZ
Interval 45.2 to 2245.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after MRIPopulation: 1.5T R2\*-UTE from eligible patients who had 1.5T R2\*-UTE, serum iron, and transferrin saturation measurements.
MRI-derived R2\* value using 1.5T R2\*-UTE in Hz for patients who have had serum iron and transferrin saturation measurements. R2\* is a measure obtained with MRI, i.e., MRI R2\*. It is measured in hertz (Hz). In lay terms, the MRI machine picks up a signal back from the tissue during the process of scanning the tissues. With every "picture taken", this signal is strong in the beginning and then wanes off. R2\* reflects how fast the signal wanes off. If there is too much iron in the tissue, the signal disappears faster, making the T2\* value low. T2\* is the reciprocal of R2\* (R2\*= 1/T2\*). So, if the signal drops fast, the T2\* is low and the R2\* is high. In this study, we are measuring the R2\* value. The higher the R2\*, the more iron in the liver tissue. We can compare the R2\* value with that of a liver biopsy to then use the R2\* value to tell us how much iron is in the liver without having to biopsy the liver.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Iron-overloaded Patients
n=104 Participants
Eligible iron-overloaded patients with both liver biopsy measurement and 1.5T R2\*-UTE measurement
|
|---|---|
|
R2* Using 1.5T UTE Technique for Patients With Serum Iron and Transferrin Saturation Measurements
|
340.8 Hz
Interval 45.2 to 2245.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after MRIPopulation: Iron-overloaded patients had 1.5T R2\*-UTE and serum iron and transferrin saturation measurements.
Serum iron measurements from eligible patients had 1.5T R2\*-UTE and serum iron and transferrin saturation measurements.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Iron-overloaded Patients
n=104 Participants
Eligible iron-overloaded patients with both liver biopsy measurement and 1.5T R2\*-UTE measurement
|
|---|---|
|
Serum Iron Measurements Compared With 1.5T R2* UTE
|
156.5 ug/dL
Interval 35.0 to 311.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after MRIPopulation: Iron-overloaded patients had 1.5T R2\*-UTE and serum iron and transferrin saturation measurements.
Iron Transferrin Saturation in % measurements Transferrin Saturation measurements from eligible patients had 1.5T R2\*-UTE and serum iron and transferrin saturation measurements.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Iron-overloaded Patients
n=104 Participants
Eligible iron-overloaded patients with both liver biopsy measurement and 1.5T R2\*-UTE measurement
|
|---|---|
|
Transferrin Saturation Measurements
|
71 percentage
Interval 12.0 to 157.0
|
Adverse Events
Iron-overloaded Patients
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Iron-overloaded Patients
n=142 participants at risk
Eligible iron-overloaded patients with both liver biopsy measurement and 1.5T R2\*-UTE measurement
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Infections and infestations
|
0.70%
1/142 • Number of events 1 • Time frame for adverse event reporting is 10 days following the last study procedure for eligible patients.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Iron-overloaded Patients
n=142 participants at risk
Eligible iron-overloaded patients with both liver biopsy measurement and 1.5T R2\*-UTE measurement
|
|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.70%
1/142 • Number of events 1 • Time frame for adverse event reporting is 10 days following the last study procedure for eligible patients.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
abdominal pain
|
0.70%
1/142 • Number of events 1 • Time frame for adverse event reporting is 10 days following the last study procedure for eligible patients.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place