Trial Outcomes & Findings for Open-label Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of DUEXIS® (Ibuprofen and Famotidine) Tablets in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (NCT NCT01563185)
NCT ID: NCT01563185
Last Updated: 2024-12-16
Results Overview
Safety assessments included AE monitoring, concomitant medication review, physical examinations (including vital signs and weight), and clinical laboratory assessments, including pregnancy testing for female patients. The outcome measure data table below describes the TEAEs experienced by patients.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
12 participants
Day 0 through Week 26/ET (adverse event data was collected at every visit, including telephone visits)
2024-12-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
DUEXIS
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
DUEXIS
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Non-Compliance with study drug
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Open-label Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of DUEXIS® (Ibuprofen and Famotidine) Tablets in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=12 Participants
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
13.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.71 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0 through Week 26/ET (adverse event data was collected at every visit, including telephone visits)Safety assessments included AE monitoring, concomitant medication review, physical examinations (including vital signs and weight), and clinical laboratory assessments, including pregnancy testing for female patients. The outcome measure data table below describes the TEAEs experienced by patients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=12 Participants
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAE: Nervous system disorders
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Any patient with at least 1 TEAE
|
12 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Any patient with at least 1 mild TEAE
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
At least 1 moderate TEAE
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
At least 1 severe TEAE
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
A possibly related TEAE
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
SAE
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
A TEAE leading to study drug discontinuation
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
A TEAE leading to death
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAE: Gastrointestinal Disorders
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAE: General disorders
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAE: Infections and infestations
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAE: Injury, poisoning & procedural complications
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAE: Muscoskeletal & connective tissue disorders
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAE:Respiratory, thoracic & mediastinal disorders
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAE: Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
|
2 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (Endpoint is the last post-baseline value obtained, as two subjects did not complete the study up until week 24).To assess patient quality of life while on study medication, the CHQ was administered to the patients' parent or guardian on Day 0 and at the Week 24/ET visit. The raw scale scores were transformed into scores on a 0 to 100 scale, 100 indicating best health and 0 indicating worst health. The algorithm is: Transformed Score = ((Actual Raw Score - Lowest Possible Raw Score)/(Possible Raw Score Range)) x100. The actual raw score is the mean of the item responses in a scale (sum of item responses/number of completed items). The possible raw score range is the highest possible raw score minus the lowest possible raw score. The outcome measure data table shows the average change in the CHQ concepts from Baseline to the week 24 visit. The average change in the CHQ concepts is on a -100 to 100 scale, -100 representing a negative change in health and 100 indicating a positive change in health.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=12 Participants
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Global Health
|
2.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.16
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Physical Functioning
|
19.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.29
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Role/Social Limitations: Emotional/Behavioral
|
14.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.86
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Role/Social Limitations: Physical
|
20.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.68
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Bodily Pain/Discomfort
|
15.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.12
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Behavior
|
8.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.29
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Global Behavior Item
|
6.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.30
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Mental Health
|
3.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.37
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Self Esteem
|
5.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.47
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
General Health Perceptions
|
1.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.40
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Change in Health
|
14.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 39.11
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Parental Impact: Emotional
|
20.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.51
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Parental Impact:Time
|
22.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.92
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Family Activities
|
14.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.80
|
|
Childhood Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) Scores
Family Cohesion
|
4.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (Endpoint is the last post-baseline value obtained, as two subjects did not complete the study up until week 24).The following 2 ACR pediatric Core Measures of JIA activity and the parent's assessment of discomfort were quantitatively assessed at baseline and each study visit: the physician's global assessment of disease activity and the parent's global assessment of overall well-being. These ACR values represent the average change in the physician's global assessment of disease activity and the parent's global assessment of overall well-being from the baseline visit to the week 24/ET visit. The ACR pediatric core measure: Physician's global assessment of disease activity and parent's assessment of overall well being was measured on a scale of 0-100 mm (0 = very good, 100=very poor).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=12 Participants
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric Core Measures: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Parent's Assessment of Overall Well-being
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
|
-9.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 28.34
|
|
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric Core Measures: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Parent's Assessment of Overall Well-being
Parent's Global Assessment of Overall Well-Being
|
-8.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 34.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (Endpoint is the last post-baseline value obtained, as two subjects did not complete the study up until week 24).The following ACR pediatric Core Measure of JIA activity and the parent's assessment of discomfort were quantitatively assessed at baseline and each study visit: CHAQ - Disability Index. This ACR measurement represents the average change in the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) - Disability Index from the baseline visit to the week 24/ET visit. The CHAQ disability index is measured on a scale of 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=12 Participants
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric Core Measures: CHAQ - Disability Index
|
-0.146 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.3235
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (Endpoint is the last post-baseline value obtained, as two subjects did not complete the study up until week 24).The following 2 ACR pediatric Core Measures of JIA activity and the parent's assessment of discomfort were quantitatively assessed at baseline and each study visit: number of joints with active arthritis and the number of joints with limited range of motion. These ACR values represent the average change in number of joints with active arthritis and the number of joints with limited range of motion from the baseline visit to the week 24/ET visit. The joints that were assessed include the right and left temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, arcomiclavicular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, MCP - 1. MCP - 2, MCP - 3, MCP - 4, MCP - 5, PIP - 1, PIP - 2, PIP - 3, PIP - 4, PIP - 5, DIP - 1, DIP - 2, DIP - 3, DIP - 4, and DIP - 5.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=12 Participants
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
ACR Pediatric Components by Time Point: Number of Joints With Active Arthritis and the Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion Number of Joints With Active Arthritis
Number of joints with active arthritis
|
-4.3 Number of joints
Standard Error 6.97
|
|
ACR Pediatric Components by Time Point: Number of Joints With Active Arthritis and the Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion Number of Joints With Active Arthritis
Number of joints with limited range of motion
|
-1.7 Number of joints
Standard Error 5.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (Endpoint is the last post-baseline value obtained, as two subjects did not complete the study up until week 24).The following ACR pediatric Core Measure of JIA activity and the parent's assessment of discomfort were quantitatively assessed at baseline and each study visit: CRP Concentration. This ACR value represents the average change in Serum C Reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration from the baseline visit to the week 24/ET visit. The normal range referenced was 0 mg/L - 4.99 mg/L.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=12 Participants
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric Core Measures: Serum C Reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration
|
1.019 mg/L
Standard Error 3.9742
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post-dosePopulation: The initial 9 patients met the PK objective of the study (4 were in the single dose pharmacokinietic group, however, 1 of the patients was not evaluable, and all 9 were in the multiple dose pharmacokinetic group).
Tmax was estimated for ibuprofen and famotidine.The PK parameters for ibuprofen and famotidine represent average Tmax values following a single oral dose of DUEXIS. Samples were collected pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 to 10 hours following study drug administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=3 Participants
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
Single Dose Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of DUEXIS in JIA Patients: Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)
Tmax: Ibuprofen
|
1.75 hours
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
|
Single Dose Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of DUEXIS in JIA Patients: Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)
Tmax: Famotidine
|
2.1 hours
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post-dosePopulation: The initial 9 patients met the PK objective of the study (4 were in the single dose pharmacokinietic group, however, 1 of the patients was not evaluable, and all 9 were in the multiple dose pharmacokinetic group).
Cmax was estimated for ibuprofen and famotidine. The PK parameters for ibuprofen and famotidine represent average Cmax values following a single oral dose of DUEXIS. Samples were collected pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 to 10 hours following study drug administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=3 Participants
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
Single Dose Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of DUEXIS in JIA Patients: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)
Cmax: Ibuprofen
|
49.8 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 13.7
|
|
Single Dose Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of DUEXIS in JIA Patients: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)
Cmax: Famotidine
|
55.0 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 11.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post-dosePopulation: The initial 9 patients met the PK objective of the study (4 were in the single dose pharmacokinietic group, however, 1 patient was not evaluable, and all 9 were in the multiple dose pharmacokinetic group).
AUC(0-t) was estimated for ibuprofen and famotidine. The PK parameters for ibuprofen and famotidine represent average AUC values following a single oral dose of DUEXIS. Samples were collected pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 to 10 hours following study drug administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=3 Participants
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
Single Dose Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of DUEXIS in JIA Patients: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC(0-t))
AUC(0-t): Ibuprofen
|
196.5 ug*h/mL
Standard Deviation 27.4
|
|
Single Dose Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of DUEXIS in JIA Patients: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC(0-t))
AUC(0-t): Famotidine
|
267.6 ug*h/mL
Standard Deviation 27.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose in the single dose group; sparse samples at random times in the multiple dose groupPopulation: The initial 9 patients met the PK objective of the study (4 were in the single dose pharmacokinietic group, however, 1 of the patients was not evaluable and all 9 were in the multiple dose pharmacokinetic group).
CL/F was estimated in ibuprofen and famotidine.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=9 Participants
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of DUEXIS in JIA Patients: Individual Oral Clearance (CL/F)
CL/F: Ibuprofen
|
2.8 L/h/70 kg
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
|
Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of DUEXIS in JIA Patients: Individual Oral Clearance (CL/F)
CL/F: Famotidine
|
61.5 L/h/70 kg
Standard Deviation 15.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose in the single dose group; sparse samples at random times in the multiple dose groupV/F were estimated in ibuprofen and famotidine.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=9 Participants
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of DUEXIS in JIA Patients: Volume Distribution (V/F)
V/F: Ibuprofen
|
16.7 L/70 kg
Standard Deviation 4.6
|
|
Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of DUEXIS in JIA Patients: Volume Distribution (V/F)
V/F: Famotidine
|
564.4 L/70 kg
Standard Deviation 154.6
|
Adverse Events
DUEXIS
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
DUEXIS
n=12 participants at risk
800 mg ibuprofen/26.6 mg famotidine: Oral tablet taken three time per day
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
16.7%
2/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tooth impacted
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
General disorders
Gait disturbance
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral viral infection
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea pedis
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hand fracture
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint dislocation
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Temporomandibular joint syndrome
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngeal ulceration
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ingrowing nail
|
16.7%
2/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermal cyst
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from the Day 0 visit up until the Follow-up visit (Week 26). Adverse events were collected at the following time points: Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 26.
|
Additional Information
Julie Ball, Senior Director of Clinical Development & Operations
Horizon Pharma
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60