Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Non-interventional Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (NCT NCT01562327)
NCT ID: NCT01562327
Last Updated: 2016-11-29
Results Overview
COMPLETED
50 participants
6 months after treatment initiation
2016-11-29
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
Participants with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
50
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
42
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
Participants with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Participant drop-out
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Infusion not received at 6 month window
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Non-interventional Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=50 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months after treatment initiationPopulation: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=50 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at 6 Months After Treatment Initiation
|
84 percentage of participants
Interval 71.0 to 93.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab.
Systemic manifestations of RA included anemia, fatigue, conventional risk factors for cardiovascular disease, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) above upper limit of normal, rheumatoid nodules, rheumatoid vasculitis and interstitial lung disease. Participants were included if they experienced at least one of the conditions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=50 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Systemic Manifestations of RA at Baseline
|
40 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=50 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Stopped Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) Prior to Start of Tocilizumab
|
5 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=50 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
0 DMARDs
|
48.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
1 DMARD
|
24.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
2 DMARDs
|
14.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
3 DMARDs
|
10.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
4 DMARDs
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
5 DMARDs
|
1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
6 DMARDs
|
2.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
7 DMARDs
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
8 DMARDs
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
9 DMARDs
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
10 DMARDs
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
11 DMARDs
|
2.00 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Number of participants analyzed signifies the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=5 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Reason for DMARDs Withdrawal at Baseline
Adverse event
|
2 participants
|
|
Reason for DMARDs Withdrawal at Baseline
Unknown
|
2 participants
|
|
Reason for DMARDs Withdrawal at Baseline
Other - reason not specified
|
1 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=50 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Stopped Biologic Agents Prior to Start of Tocilizumab
|
19 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=50 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received Biologic Agents
0 Biologic Agents
|
62.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received Biologic Agents
1 Biologic Agent
|
16.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received Biologic Agents
2 Biologic Agents
|
16.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received Biologic Agents
3 Biologic Agents
|
4.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received Biologic Agents
4 Biologic Agents
|
2.00 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Number of participants analyzed signifies the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=19 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Reason for Biologic Agent Withdrawal at Baseline
Lack of efficacy
|
13 participants
|
|
Reason for Biologic Agent Withdrawal at Baseline
Adverse event
|
1 participants
|
|
Reason for Biologic Agent Withdrawal at Baseline
Other - reason not specified
|
2 participants
|
|
Reason for Biologic Agent Withdrawal at Baseline
Unknown
|
3 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 3 yearsPopulation: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=50 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Reasons for Dose Modifications
Adverse Event
|
1 participants
|
|
Reasons for Dose Modifications
Other
|
21 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Approximately 3 yearsPopulation: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=50 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued From Tocilizumab for Safety Versus Efficacy
Adverse Event
|
4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued From Tocilizumab for Safety Versus Efficacy
Lack of Efficacy
|
2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6Population: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab.
Percentage of participants on Tocilizumab as monotherapy or combination therapy (with DMARDs) were reported at start of treatment and at 6 months from the start of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=50 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy
Monotherapy at baseline
|
14 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy
With DMARDs at baseline
|
86 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy
Monotherapy at Month 6
|
14 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy
With DMARDs at Month 6
|
86 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Population: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Here, 'n' represents the number of participants with a measure at the specified time point.
The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1, for 28 joints and joints were classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 28. A decrease in score indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Month 3 and Month 6
Baseline (n=29)
|
12 units on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 28.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 3 (n=22)
|
-6 units on a scale
Interval -25.0 to 4.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 6 (n=22)
|
-9 units on a scale
Interval -22.0 to 4.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Population: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Here, 'n' represents the number of participants with a measure at the specified time point.
The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form, no swelling = 0, swelling =1, for 28 joints and were classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 28. A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Month 3 and Month 6
Baseline (n=29)
|
8 units on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 17.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 3 (n=22)
|
-5 units on a scale
Interval -16.0 to 4.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 6 (n=22)
|
-7.50 units on a scale
Interval -17.0 to 6.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3, Month 6Population: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Number of participants analyzed signifies the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' represents the number of participants with a measure at the specified time point.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeter per hour \[mm/hr\]), and patient global assessment of disease activity (PGH) (measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 is a measurement of RA activity on a 0 to 10 scale: a score greater than (\>) 5.1 indicates high disease activity; a score between 3.2 and 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity; a score of less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity; a score of less than (\<) 2.6 is considered remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=4 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS 28) Response Classification at Month 3 and Moth 6
< 2.6 Clinical Remission at Month 3 (n=2)
|
0 participants
|
|
Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS 28) Response Classification at Month 3 and Moth 6
<2.6 Clinical Remission at Month 6 (n=4)
|
0 participants
|
|
Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS 28) Response Classification at Month 3 and Moth 6
>=2.6-<=3.2 Low Disease Activity at Month 3 (n=2)
|
0 participants
|
|
Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS 28) Response Classification at Month 3 and Moth 6
>=2.6-<=3.2 Low Disease Activity at Month 6 (n=4)
|
3 participants
|
|
Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS 28) Response Classification at Month 3 and Moth 6
>3.2-<=5.1 Moderate Disease at Month 3(n=2)
|
2 participants
|
|
Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS 28) Response Classification at Month 3 and Moth 6
>3.2-<=5.1 Moderate Disease at Month 6 (n=4)
|
1 participants
|
|
Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS 28) Response Classification at Month 3 and Moth 6
>5.1 High Disease Activity at Month 3 (n=2)
|
0 participants
|
|
Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS 28) Response Classification at Month 3 and Moth 6
>5.1 High Disease Activity at Month 6 (n=4)
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3, Month 6Population: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Number of participants analyzed signifies the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PGH and physician global assessment of disease activity (PhGH) assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=23 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Response Classification at Month 3 and Month 6
<= 2.8 Clinical remission at Month 3
|
1 participants
|
|
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Response Classification at Month 3 and Month 6
<= 2.8 Clinical remission at Month 6
|
2 participants
|
|
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Response Classification at Month 3 and Month 6
> 2.8 and <= 10.0 Low disease activity at Month 3
|
7 participants
|
|
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Response Classification at Month 3 and Month 6
> 2.8 and <= 10.0 Low disease activity at Month 6
|
7 participants
|
|
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Response Classification at Month 3 and Month 6
> 10.0 and <= 22.0 Moderate activity at Month 3
|
6 participants
|
|
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Response Classification at Month 3 and Month 6
> 10.0 and <= 22.0 Moderate activity at Month 6
|
9 participants
|
|
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Response Classification at Month 3 and Month 6
> 22.0 High disease activity at Month 3
|
9 participants
|
|
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Response Classification at Month 3 and Month 6
> 22.0 High disease activity at Month 6
|
5 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3, Month 6Population: Data was not collected, hence not reported.
The SDAI was a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA which reflected the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PGH and PhGH, assessed on 0-100 mm VAS where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = worst disease activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP). SDAI total score = 0-86. A SDAI score \</= 3.3 represented clinical remission, a score of between 3.4 and 11.0 represented low disease activity, a score between 11 and 26.0 represented moderate disease activity and a score \> 26.0 represented high (or severe) disease.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3, Month 6Population: Data was not collected, hence not reported.
Clinical response assessed as per EULAR categorical DAS28 response criteria was defined as clinically meaningful improvement at a particular time point. EULAR response was based on change from baseline (CFB) in the DAS28 score and also on the actual DAS28 score at the time point so was more reflective of the current status of the participant. The DAS28 score was a measure of the participant's disease activity, based on the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PGH, and ESR. DAS28 total scores ranged from 0 to approximately 10. Scores \<2.6 = best disease control and scores \>5.1 = worse disease control. A negative CFB indicated clinically meaningful improvement. EULAR Good response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and a CFB \<-1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 \>3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a CFB \< -0.6 to ≥ -1.2. EULAR No response: DAS28 ≤3.2 or CFB greater than or equal to (\>=) -0.6, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or CFB\>=-0.6 and DAS28 \>5.1 or CFB \>=-0.6.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3, Month 6Population: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Number of participants analyzed signifies the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' represents the number of participants with a measure at the specified time point.
ACR response was calculated based on total joint count evaluation (28 or 66/68 joint count) and other clinical and laboratory assessments. A positive ACR20 response required at least a 20% improvement (reduction) compared to baseline in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and at least 3 of the following 5 assessments: patient's global assessment of pain, PGH, PhGH (all 3 assessed at 0 \[good\] to 100 mm \[worst\] VAS scale), participant assessment of disability measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (assessed on a 0 to 3 scale, where higher scores represented higher disease activity), Acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR). A reduction in the level of and acute phase reactants was considered an improvement. ACR50, ACR70, ACR90 require a 50%, 70%, 90% improvement from baseline respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=22 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
ACR 20 at Month 3 (n=21)
|
38.10 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
ACR 20 at Month 6 (n=22)
|
68.18 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
ACR 50 at Month 3 (n=21)
|
23.81 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
ACR 50 at Month 6 (n=22)
|
40.91 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
ACR 70 at Month 3 (n=21)
|
14.29 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
ACR 70 at Month 6 (n=22)
|
13.64 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
ACR 90 at Month 3 (n=21)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
ACR 90 at Month 6 (n=22)
|
9.09 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Population: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Here, 'n' represents the number of participants with a measurement at the specified time point.
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=35 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6
Baseline (n=35)
|
51 units on a scale
Interval 5.0 to 90.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 3 (n=29)
|
-10 units on a scale
Interval -85.0 to 31.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 6 (n=27)
|
-20 units on a scale
Interval -87.0 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Population: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Here, 'n' represents the number of participants with a measurement at the specified time point.
The Patient Global Assessment of disease activity provides an overall assessment of how RA affects the participant using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates they are managing very well and 100 indicates they are managing very poorly. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=39 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6
Baseline (n=39)
|
65 units on a scale
Interval 5.0 to 100.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 3 (n=31)
|
-10 units on a scale
Interval -85.0 to 40.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 6 (n=30)
|
-15 units on a scale
Interval -86.0 to 20.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Population: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Here, 'n' represents the number of participants with a measure at the specified time point.
The HAQ-DI was a participant self-reported questionnaire for assessing the extent of a participant's functional ability. It consisted of 20 questions in 8 categories (dressing and grooming, rising, eating, walking, reach, grip, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities). Each question had 4 response options, ranging from 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. The HAQ-DI scale was an average of all the scores and ranged from 0 to 3, where higher scores represented higher disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=33 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
< 0.5 Clinical Remission at Baseline (n=33)
|
6.06 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
>= 0.5 No remission at Baseline (n=33)
|
93.94 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
< 0.5 Clinical Remission at Month 3 (n=25)
|
40.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
>= 0.5 No remission at Month 3 (n=25)
|
60.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
< 0.5 Clinical Remission at Month 6 (n=26)
|
26.92 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
>= 0.5 No remission at Month 6 (n=26)
|
73.08 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Population: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Here, 'n' represents the number of participants with a measurement at the specified time point.
The Patient Global Assessment of fatigue provides an overall assessment of the level of fatigue that the participant is experiencing using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates no fatigue and 100 indicates extreme fatigue. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=28 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Fatigue at Month 3 and Month 6
Baseline (n=28)
|
70 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Fatigue at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 3 (n=23)
|
-35 units on a scale
Interval -100.0 to 38.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Fatigue at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 6 (n=22)
|
-30 units on a scale
Interval -90.0 to 70.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Population: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Here, 'n' represents the number of participants with a measurement at the specified time point.
The Patient Global Assessment of pain provides an overall assessment of the severity of pain that the participant is experiencing using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates unbearable pain. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=37 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Month 3 and Month 6
Baseline (n=37)
|
80 units on a scale
Interval 15.0 to 100.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 3 (n=30)
|
-23 units on a scale
Interval -100.0 to 27.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 6 (n=29)
|
-25 units on a scale
Interval -95.0 to 24.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Population: FAS was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab. Here, 'n' represents the number of participants with a measurement at the specified time point.
Morning stiffness was defined by the time elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the participant was as limber as he/she would be during a day involving typical activities. Morning stiffness was assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0= none and 100= very severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=21 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Severity of Morning Stiffness at Month 3 and Month 6
Baseline (n=21)
|
60 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Severity of Morning Stiffness at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 3 (n=16)
|
-50 units on a scale
Interval -100.0 to 60.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Severity of Morning Stiffness at Month 3 and Month 6
Change at Month 6 (n=14)
|
-25 units on a scale
Interval -87.0 to 10.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 3 yearsPopulation: Safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Tocilizumab.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=50 Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)
|
56.00 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Tocilizumab
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=50 participants at risk
Participants with moderate to severe RA received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
|
|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
2.0%
1/50 • Approximately 3 years
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
2.0%
1/50 • Approximately 3 years
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER