Duloxetine in Osteoarthritis (OA) Pain

NCT ID: NCT01558700

Last Updated: 2014-12-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to determine in people with knee Osteoarthritis (OA) if relief of pain after treatment with either duloxetine or placebo is associated with changes in brain anatomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study and the hypotheses to be tested arise from work done in our group evaluating brain cortical changes in people with chronic back pain. These studies demonstrated a loss of about 1.5 cc of neocortical gray matter per year of living with the condition, not including gray matter lost due to aging. Since this original publication, more than ten studies have replicated this basic result, showing that distinct chronic pain conditions are associated with specific brain anatomical reorganization, characterized by regional decreases in grey matter density. Recently, other studies have shown that when chronic pain is completely reversed, these anatomical changes seem to at least partially reverse within the time span of 4-12 months, providing evidence for a time window for reversal of grey matter abnormalities A fundamental question that arises from these recent studies is the extent of reversibility of the brain atrophy associated with chronic pain following continuous use of a pain-relieving drug. Apkarian's lab has generated strong evidence that the brain anatomy of subjects with osteoarthritis (OA) is dramatically different from that of healthy subjects. Given that recent data show that hip replacement OA reverses brain atrophy, the investigators can now hypothesize with greater confidence that an effective analgesic should also reverse at least some of the brain atrophy observed in OA. Thus, a study in patients with chronic knee OA treated with duloxetine provides a unique opportunity to answer this question. Since OA patients in this study will have a single new agent for four months, one can directly examine the effects of treatment in relation to progression or regression of brain atrophy. One can also examine whether or not a placebo, which is thought to reflect attentional and motivational states, affects changes in atrophy, and if so, to what extent.

The investigators consider the brain atrophy in chronic pain to be an overall marker of the extent of nervous system reorganization a subject has developed while living with the condition. Animal models of various chronic pain conditions repeatedly provide evidence for this idea, showing, for example, dramatic changes in the way pain is processed in the periphery, the spinal cord, and at the level of individual neurons. The investigators presume that these changes are the same ones contributing to atrophy in human chronic pain. However, most of underlying mechanisms remain to be uncovered. In addition, humans suffering from chronic pain exhibit a large number of cognitive and emotional deficits. The investigators presume that these deficits are directly related to the brain atrophies discovered in chronic pain conditions. Unfortunately, there are no direct studies linking brain regional atrophies to cognitive abilities in chronic pain, although such preliminary studies are underway in Apkarian's lab. Thus, in addition to the answering the previous questions, the present study will also allow us to investigate the extent to which reversing atrophy corresponds to reversing plasticity at multiple levels in the nervous system, as well as whether such reversal also corresponds to improvements in cognitive and emotional abilities.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

osteoarthritis pain brain gray matter

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Duloxetine

Duloxetine capsule 30mg once a day for one week, then 60mg once a day for 15 weeks, then 30mg once a day for one week.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Duloxetine

Intervention Type DRUG

Duloxetine capsule 30mg once a day for one week, then 60mg once a day for 15 weeks, then 30mg once a day for one week.

Sugar pill

Matching capsule given once a day for a total of 17 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Sugar pill

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching capsule given once a day for a total of 17 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Duloxetine

Duloxetine capsule 30mg once a day for one week, then 60mg once a day for 15 weeks, then 30mg once a day for one week.

Intervention Type DRUG

Sugar pill

Matching capsule given once a day for a total of 17 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cymbalta Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: 45-80 years
* ACR criteria for OA including Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic OA grades II-IV
* VAS pain score \>5/10 within 48 hrs of the phone screen and visit 1 (Screening)
* Knee OA for a minimum of 12 months
* Need for daily pain medication to manage symptoms of OA

Exclusion Criteria

Currently taking MAO inhibitors or any centrally acting drug for analgesia, depression

* Narrow angle glaucoma
* Uncontrolled hypertension
* Co-existing inflammatory arthritis, fibromyalgia or other chronic pain state.
* If a female, pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or lactating
* Major depressive disorder
* Substantial alcohol use or history of significant liver disease
* Use of MAO inhibitors, triptans, serotonin precursors (tryptophan)
* Use of potent CYP1A2 inhibitors, Thioridazine, and anti-depressants
* Diabetes, type 1 or type 2
* Condition in which the Investigator believes would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with study instructions, or might confound the interpretation of the study results or put the subject at undue risk
* MRI safety necessitates the exclusion of subjects having one or more of the following:

* Metal fragments in the eye or face, or having worked previously in the metal industry
* Implantation of any electronic devices such as (but not limited to) cardiac pacemakers, cardiac, defibrillators, and cochlear implants or nerve stimulators.
* Surgery on the blood vessels of the brain
* Claustrophobia (fear of enclosed places)
* Piercings or tattoos
* More than 250 lbs in weight
* Obvious brain abnormalities
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eli Lilly and Company

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Apkar Apkarian

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Schnitzer, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leaney AA, Lyttle JR, Segan J, Urquhart DM, Cicuttini FM, Chou L, Wluka AE. Antidepressants for hip and knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 21;10(10):CD012157. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012157.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36269595 (View on PubMed)

Tetreault P, Mansour A, Vachon-Presseau E, Schnitzer TJ, Apkarian AV, Baliki MN. Brain Connectivity Predicts Placebo Response across Chronic Pain Clinical Trials. PLoS Biol. 2016 Oct 27;14(10):e1002570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002570. eCollection 2016 Oct.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27788130 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU00039556

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id