Trial Outcomes & Findings for Characterize Patients With Moderately Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (NCT NCT01557322)
NCT ID: NCT01557322
Last Updated: 2013-10-31
Results Overview
ACR criteria: 1) Morning stiffness: in and around joints, lasting at least (\>=) 1 hour; 2) Arthritis/deformity of \>=3 joint areas: presence of soft tissue swelling or fluid (not bony overgrowth alone), 14 possible areas are right/left proximal interphalangeal (PIP), metacarpophalangeal (MCP), wrist, elbow, knee, ankle, metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints; 3) Arthritis of hand joints: \>=1 area swollen in wrist, MCP, PIP joint; 4) Symmetric arthritis: simultaneous involvement of same joint areas (as defined in 2) on both sides of body; 5): Rheumatoid nodules: subcutaneous nodules over bony prominences or extensor surfaces or in juxtaarticular regions; 6): Rheumatoid factor (RF): abnormal amounts of RF by any method for which result has been positive in \<5% of normal control participants; 7) Radiographic changes: typical of RA on posteroanterior hand and wrist radiographs, which must include erosions/unequivocal bony decalcification localized in or most marked adjacent to involved joints.
COMPLETED
1754 participants
Baseline
2013-10-31
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Etanercept
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
211
|
1543
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
211
|
1543
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Characterize Patients With Moderately Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=211 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1543 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
Total
n=1754 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
55.3 years
n=5 Participants
|
62.1 years
n=7 Participants
|
61.2 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
163 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1098 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1261 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
445 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
493 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
ACR criteria: 1) Morning stiffness: in and around joints, lasting at least (\>=) 1 hour; 2) Arthritis/deformity of \>=3 joint areas: presence of soft tissue swelling or fluid (not bony overgrowth alone), 14 possible areas are right/left proximal interphalangeal (PIP), metacarpophalangeal (MCP), wrist, elbow, knee, ankle, metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints; 3) Arthritis of hand joints: \>=1 area swollen in wrist, MCP, PIP joint; 4) Symmetric arthritis: simultaneous involvement of same joint areas (as defined in 2) on both sides of body; 5): Rheumatoid nodules: subcutaneous nodules over bony prominences or extensor surfaces or in juxtaarticular regions; 6): Rheumatoid factor (RF): abnormal amounts of RF by any method for which result has been positive in \<5% of normal control participants; 7) Radiographic changes: typical of RA on posteroanterior hand and wrist radiographs, which must include erosions/unequivocal bony decalcification localized in or most marked adjacent to involved joints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=211 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1541 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria
Morning Stiffness >1 Hour
|
194 participants
|
1316 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria
Arthritis/Deformity of >=3 Joint Areas
|
179 participants
|
1133 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria
Arthritis/Deformity of Hand/Joint
|
160 participants
|
1123 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria
Symmetry
|
175 participants
|
978 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria
Nodules
|
91 participants
|
470 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria
Rheumatoid Factor Positive
|
123 participants
|
927 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria
Erosions on Hand or Feet X-Ray
|
116 participants
|
730 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable for specified category for each treatment arm, respectively.
Systemic features included sicca syndrome, serosal involvement (pleurisy/pericarditis), eye involvement, systemic vasculitis, nailfold vasculitis, pulmonary fibrosis, and others (other than those specified).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=211 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1540 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Systemic Features
Sicca Syndrome (n= 211, 1540)
|
45 participants
|
166 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Systemic Features
Serosal Involvement (n= 211, 1540)
|
7 participants
|
18 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Systemic Features
Eye Involvement (n= 211, 1540)
|
17 participants
|
93 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Systemic Features
Systemic Vasculitis (n= 211, 1540)
|
6 participants
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Systemic Features
Nailfold Vasculitis (n= 211, 1540)
|
3 participants
|
17 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Systemic Features
Pulmonary Fibrosis (n= 211, 1540)
|
2 participants
|
37 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Systemic Features
Other (n= 211, 1537)
|
6 participants
|
34 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Participants who had prior total knee replacement, total hip replacement, total shoulder replacement, total elbow replacement, wrist/hand/ankle/foot surgery, and neck surgery are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=211 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1540 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or Surgery
Total Knee Replacement
|
31 participants
|
141 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or Surgery
Total Hip Replacement
|
29 participants
|
99 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or Surgery
Total Shoulder Replacement
|
21 participants
|
24 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or Surgery
Total Elbow Replacement
|
14 participants
|
31 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or Surgery
Wrist/Hand/Ankle/Foot Surgery
|
56 participants
|
262 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or Surgery
Neck Surgery
|
9 participants
|
9 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=194 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1441 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Chest X-Ray Prior to New Therapy
|
183 participants
|
742 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable for specified category for each treatment arm, respectively.
Comorbidities included: hypertension, moderate or severe heart failure, angina, stroke, epilepsy, asthma, chronic bronchitis/emphysema, peptic ulcer, tuberculosis, pre-existing or recent onset of central nervous system demyelinating disorders, chronic infectious disease such as chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection with bronchiectasis or sinusitis, active tuberculosis, renal, hepatic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurologic or cerebral disease, malignancy or history of malignancy, hyperthyroidism, depression and/or anxiety, recent substance abuse (drug or alcohol), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or active hepatitis B/C infection (including associated chronic active hepatitis). Participants suffering from any of the comorbidity are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=208 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1541 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
High Blood Pressure (n= 208, 1532)
|
60 participants
|
488 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Angina (n= 211, 1536)
|
5 participants
|
115 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Heart Attack (n= 210, 1535)
|
6 participants
|
73 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Stroke (n= 211, 1538)
|
3 participants
|
53 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Epilepsy (n= 211, 1541)
|
2 participants
|
19 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Asthma (n= 211, 1539)
|
24 participants
|
198 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Chronic Bronchitis/Emphysema (n= 211, 1537)
|
8 participants
|
124 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Peptic Ulcer (n= 208, 1537)
|
11 participants
|
97 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Liver Disease (n= 211, 1539)
|
11 participants
|
26 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Renal Disease (n= 211, 1540)
|
8 participants
|
46 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Tuberculosis (n= 207, 1538)
|
5 participants
|
34 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Demyelination (n= 210, 1536)
|
1 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Diabetes (n= 211, 1539)
|
16 participants
|
93 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Hyperthyroidism (n= 211, 1535)
|
3 participants
|
65 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Depression (n= 211, 1539)
|
40 participants
|
249 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Comorbidities
Cancer (n= 210, 1540)
|
6 participants
|
102 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared and measured as kilogram per square meter (kg/m\^2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=178 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1462 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
26.6 kg/m^2
Standard Error 0.4
|
27.2 kg/m^2
Standard Error 0.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable for specified category for each treatment arm, respectively.
BP is the pressure of the blood within the arteries. It is produced primarily by the contraction of the heart muscle. BP measurement is recorded by 2 numbers: systolic BP (SBP, BP when heart is contracting; it is the maximum arterial pressure during contraction of left ventricle) and diastolic BP (DBP, BP when heart is relaxing; it is the minimum arterial pressure during relaxation and dilation of ventricles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=199 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1483 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood Pressure (BP)
Systolic Blood Pressure (n= 199, 1477)
|
134.3 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 1.4
|
138.0 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 0.5
|
|
Blood Pressure (BP)
Diastolic Blood Pressure (n= 199, 1483)
|
79.4 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 0.8
|
80.2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 0.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 60Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "n" signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using the 28 joints count, acute phase reactants (erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR, millimeters per hour\] or C-reactive protein \[CRP, milligram per liter\]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 \<2.6: remission, DAS28 \<=3.2: low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1: moderate disease activity, DAS28 \>5.1: progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=211 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1543 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 60
Baseline (n= 211, 1543)
|
4.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
4.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 60
Change at Month 60 (n= 57, 131)
|
-1.67 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.55
|
-1.45 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.55
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 60Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=207 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1526 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Month 60
Baseline (n= 207, 1526)
|
6.1 tender joints
Standard Error 0.3
|
4.8 tender joints
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Month 60
Change at Month 60 (n= 55, 2)
|
NA tender joints
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as there was insufficient data to evaluate the effect in multivariate model.
|
NA tender joints
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as there was insufficient data to evaluate the effect in multivariate model.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 60Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=206 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1526 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Month 60
Baseline (n= 206, 1526)
|
6.0 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.4
|
3.8 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Month 60
Change at Month 60 (n= 55, 2)
|
NA swollen joints
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as there was insufficient data to evaluate the effect in multivariate model.
|
NA swollen joints
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as there was insufficient data to evaluate the effect in multivariate model.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 60Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultra-sensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is \<10 milligram/liter (mg/L). A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=80 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=431 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Month 60
Baseline (n= 80, 431)
|
28.3 mg/L
Standard Error 3.4
|
23.1 mg/L
Standard Error 1.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Month 60
Change at Month 60 (n= 15, 0)
|
NA mg/L
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as there was insufficient data to evaluate the effect in multivariate model.
|
NA mg/L
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 60Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter/hour (mm/hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=200 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=134 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Month 60
Baseline (n= 200, 1344)
|
24.0 mm/hour
Standard Error 1.3
|
26.3 mm/hour
Standard Error 0.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Month 60
Change at Month 60 (n= 53, 7)
|
NA mm/hour
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as there was insufficient data to evaluate the effect in multivariate model.
|
NA mm/hour
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as there was insufficient data to evaluate the effect in multivariate model.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 60Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=205 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1525 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Month 60
Baseline (n= 205, 1525)
|
49.0 mm
Standard Error 1.7
|
46.7 mm
Standard Error 0.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Month 60
Change at Month 60 (n= 53, 2)
|
NA mm
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as there was insufficient data to evaluate the effect in multivariate model.
|
NA mm
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as there was insufficient data to evaluate the effect in multivariate model.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=208 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1529 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Disease (Rheumatoid Arthritis)
|
14.1 years
Standard Error 0.7
|
10.2 years
Standard Error 0.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=204 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1501 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time Since First Rheumatologist Visit
|
13.1 years
Standard Error 0.7
|
9.7 years
Standard Error 0.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Results not reported as this outcome was not evaluated due to lack availability of information on the outcome in BSRBR used for analysis.
RA symptoms include joint pain, stiffness, and swelling.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline.
Number of participants who previously received DMARDs or were currently on DMARDs at baseline is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=211 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1543 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Previous DMARDs: Methotrexate
|
198 participants
|
1158 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Current DMARDs: Methotrexate
|
65 participants
|
963 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Current DMARDs: Azathioprine
|
7 participants
|
32 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Current DMARDs: Cyclophosphamide
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Current DMARDs: Cyclosporine
|
0 participants
|
27 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Current DMARDs: Leflunomide
|
14 participants
|
158 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Current DMARDs: Sulphasalazine
|
20 participants
|
370 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Previous DMARDs: Azathioprine
|
61 participants
|
118 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Previous DMARDs: Cyclophosphamide
|
10 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Previous DMARDs: Cyclosporine
|
40 participants
|
70 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Previous DMARDs: Leflunomide
|
111 participants
|
209 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 60Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0 = no difficulty; 1 = some difficulty; 2 = much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=195 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1294 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 60
Baseline (n= 195, 1294)
|
1.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 60
Change at Month 60 (n= 0, 0)
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 60Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.
The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). Total of 3 variables were analyzed (2 composite subscales and vitality score). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=186 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1272 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60
Baseline: PCS (n= 171, 1202)
|
27.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
29.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60
Baseline: MCS (n= 171, 1202)
|
49.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
|
49.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60
Baseline: Vitality Score (n= 186, 1272)
|
49.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
49.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60
Change at Month 60: PCS (n= 0, 0)
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60
Change at Month 60: MCS (n= 0, 0)
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60
Change at Month 60: Vitality Score (n= 0, 0)
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 60Population: Data not analyzed due to low number of participants available for this measure in BSRBR used for analysis.
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 60Population: Data not analyzed due to low number of participants available for this measure in BSRBR used for analysis.
Disease worsening (severe RA diagnosis) was defined as DAS28 score \>5.1.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 60Population: Data not analyzed due to low number of participants available for this measure in BSRBR used for analysis.
Therapeutic goal achievement was based on physician's discretion.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 60Population: Data not analyzed due to low number of participants available for this measure in BSRBR used for analysis.
The pain VAS is a horizontal line; 100 millimeter (mm) in length, self-administered by the participant to rate pain from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 60Population: Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joints count (TJC); \>= 20% improvement in swollen joints count (SJC); and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 60Population: Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.
ACR50 response: \>= 50% improvement in TJC or SJC and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 60Population: Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.
ACR70 response: \>=70% improvement in TJC or SJC and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Results not reported as this outcome was not evaluated due to lack of availability of information on the outcome in BSRBR used for analysis.
Number of RA-related visits to doctor/healthcare professional in previous 3 months was to be reported.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Results not reported as this outcome was not evaluated due to lack of availability of information on the outcome in BSRBR used for analysis.
Direct costs included: outpatient costs, physician visits, outpatient surgery, emergency room visits, visits to healthcare professionals other than physicians, medications, diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures, medical devices, inpatient costs, admission to acute-care nonsurgical departments, admission to acute-care surgical departments, admission to extended-care facilities, and other direct costs (travel expenses, home care, home remodeling, medical devices, non-physician healthcare professionals, alternative medicine practitioner, participant time). Indirect cost (related to lost productivity through morbidity and death) included: lost productivity in employed participants (disability, sick-leaves), lost opportunities (lost productivity in family members caring for the patient, disability requiring changes to everyday activities), and lost wages.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Month 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Number of participants with AEs is reported by each follow-up time point up to Month 60.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=211 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1543 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Month 6
|
22 participants
|
101 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Month 12
|
10 participants
|
100 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Month 18
|
12 participants
|
111 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Month 24
|
10 participants
|
102 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Month 30
|
12 participants
|
80 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Month 36
|
6 participants
|
91 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Month 48
|
3 participants
|
63 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Month 60
|
7 participants
|
44 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Month 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable for specified category for each treatment arm, respectively.
Malignancy included lymphoproliferative tumors, Hodgkins lymphoma, myeloma, leukaemia, non-melanoma skin cancer, and solid tumor. Number of participants with each of these malignancies is reported by each follow-up time point up to Month 60.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=191 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1457 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Solid Tumor: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)
|
2 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Lymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Lymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Lymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Lymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Lymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Lymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Lymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 48 (n=114, 815)
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Lymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 60 (n=108, 516)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Hodgkins Lymphoma: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Hodgkins Lymphoma: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Hodgkins Lymphoma: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Hodgkins Lymphoma: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Hodgkins Lymphoma: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Hodgkins Lymphoma: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Hodgkins Lymphoma: Month 48 (n=114, 815)
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Hodgkins Lymphoma: Month 60 (n=108, 516)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Myeloma: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Myeloma: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Myeloma: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Myeloma: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Myeloma: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Myeloma: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Myeloma: Month 48 (n=114, 815)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Myeloma: Month 60 (n=108, 516)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Leukaemia: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Leukaemia: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Leukaemia: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Leukaemia: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Leukaemia: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Leukaemia: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Leukaemia: Month 48 (n=114, 815)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Leukaemia: Month 60 (n=108, 516)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)
|
0 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)
|
0 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)
|
1 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 48 (n=114, 815)
|
0 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 60 (n=108, 516)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Solid Tumor: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)
|
2 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Solid Tumor: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Solid Tumor: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)
|
0 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Solid Tumor: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Solid Tumor: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)
|
0 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Solid Tumor: Month 48 (n=114, 815)
|
2 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Malignancy
Solid Tumor: Month 60 (n=108, 516)
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Month 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable for specified category for each treatment arm, respectively.
Number of participants who died or hospitalized due to AEs is reported by each follow-up time point up to Month 60.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=22 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=111 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Death Due to AE: Month 6 (n=22, 101)
|
1 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Death Due to AE: Month 12 (n=10, 100)
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Death Due to AE: Month 18 (n=12, 111)
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Death Due to AE: Month 24 (n=10, 102)
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Death Due to AE: Month 30 (n=12, 80)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Death Due to AE: Month 36 (n=6, 91)
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Death Due to AE: Month 48 (n=3, 63)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Death Due to AE: Month 60 (n=7, 44)
|
1 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Hospitalization Due to AE: Month 6 (n= 18, 85)
|
16 participants
|
73 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Hospitalization Due to AE: Month 12 (n= 8, 81)
|
6 participants
|
70 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Hospitalization Due to AE: Month 18 (n= 11, 77)
|
10 participants
|
63 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Hospitalization Due to AE: Month 24 (n= 5, 70)
|
5 participants
|
62 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Hospitalization Due to AE: Month 30 (n= 8, 64)
|
6 participants
|
59 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Hospitalization Due to AE: Month 36 (n= 4, 69)
|
4 participants
|
59 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Hospitalization Due to AE: Month 48 (n= 1, 38)
|
1 participants
|
31 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events
Hospitalization Due to AE: Month 60 (n= 4, 24)
|
4 participants
|
22 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
DAS28 calculated from the SJC and PJC using the 28 joints count, acute phase reactants (ESR, millimeters per hour or CRP, milligram per liter) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 \<2.6: remission, DAS28 \<=3.2: low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1: moderate disease activity, DAS28 \>5.1: progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=130 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=437 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 6
|
-0.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.41
|
0.08 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.39
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0 = no difficulty; 1 = some difficulty; 2 = much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=104 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=676 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 6
|
-0.14 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
0.08 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and "n" signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.
The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). Total of 3 variables were analyzed (2 composite subscales and vitality score). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=104 Participants
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=711 Participants
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6
PCS (n= 87, 633)
|
0.49 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.40
|
-0.34 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6
MCS (n= 87, 633)
|
-0.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.42
|
-1.21 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6
Vitality Score (n= 104, 711)
|
1.84 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.39
|
1.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.33
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6Population: Data not analyzed due to low number of participants available for this measure in BSRBR used for analysis.
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Etanercept
nbDMARDs
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=211 participants at risk
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1543 participants at risk
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Pneumonia
|
1.4%
3/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
4.1%
63/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Septicaemia
|
0.00%
0/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.32%
5/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Bone/Joint Infection
|
0.95%
2/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.32%
5/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Other Infection
|
7.6%
16/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
7.1%
109/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Congestive Heart Failure
|
0.47%
1/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.45%
7/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
1.4%
3/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
1.2%
19/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Other Cardiac Events
|
0.95%
2/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
2.0%
31/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Central Demyelination
|
0.00%
0/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.06%
1/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Optic Neuritis
|
0.47%
1/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.00%
0/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral Neuropathy
|
0.00%
0/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.32%
5/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Other CNS Events
|
3.8%
8/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
1.9%
30/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Pancytopaenia
|
0.00%
0/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.13%
2/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Leukopaenia
|
0.00%
0/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.13%
2/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Other Dyscrasia
|
0.00%
0/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
1.0%
16/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Lymphoproliferative Tumors
|
2.4%
5/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.39%
6/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Hodgkin's Lymphoma
|
1.9%
4/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.26%
4/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Myeloma
|
0.00%
0/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.13%
2/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Leukaemia
|
0.47%
1/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.00%
0/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer
|
0.47%
1/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
1.9%
30/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Solid Tumor
|
2.8%
6/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
3.0%
46/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Tuberculosis (TB)
|
0.00%
0/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.06%
1/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Pregnancy
|
2.4%
5/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
0.39%
6/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
|
General disorders
Other Serious Events
|
14.2%
30/211
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
27.3%
422/1543
This study was a retrospective registry analysis of de-identified participants' data and only serious adverse events were available in the registry.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER