Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study To Find Out How Fesoterodine Works In Children Aged 6 To 17 Years With Bladder Overactivity Caused By A Neurological Condition (NCT NCT01557244)
NCT ID: NCT01557244
Last Updated: 2021-02-02
Results Overview
Maximum cystometric bladder capacity (in milliliter) was defined as maximal tolerable cystometric capacity, until voiding or leaking begins or at a pressure of \>=40 centimeter (cm) water (H2O).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
181 participants
Baseline, Week 12
2021-02-02
Participant Flow
Study had 2 cohorts: cohort 1 had participants with body weight greater than (\>) 25 kilogram (kg) and cohort 2 had participants with body weight less than or equal to (\<=) 25 kg. There were 2 phases in each cohort: cohort 1- active comparator phase followed by safety extension phase; cohort 2- efficacy phase followed by safety extension phase.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 milligram (mg) prolonged release (PR) tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase. Active comparator phase was followed by safety extension phase, where participants continued to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 12 weeks.
|
Cohort 1: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week and if this dose was tolerated well, participants received fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study. Active comparator phase was followed by safety extension phase, where participants continued to receive fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 12 weeks.
|
Cohort 1: Oxybutynin
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive oxybutynin extended release (ER) tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice. Dose titration was done for first 4 weeks. After Week 4, participants remained on the optimized daily dose for next 8 weeks, in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2: Fesoterodine 2 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 2 mg beads-in-capsule (BIC) capsule orally once daily for 12 weeks in efficacy phase. Efficacy phase was followed by safety extension phase, where participants continued to receive fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for another 12 weeks.
|
Cohort 2: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for first 1 week and if this dose was tolerated well, participants received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for next 11 weeks in efficacy phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study. Efficacy phase was followed by safety extension phase, where participants continued to receive fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for another 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase:12Weeks
STARTED
|
42
|
42
|
40
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
29
|
|
Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase:12Weeks
Treated
|
42
|
42
|
40
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
29
|
|
Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase:12Weeks
COMPLETED
|
33
|
40
|
36
|
0
|
0
|
21
|
28
|
|
Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase:12Weeks
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
2
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
1
|
|
Safety Extension Phase: 12 Weeks
STARTED
|
33
|
40
|
0
|
16
|
20
|
21
|
28
|
|
Safety Extension Phase: 12 Weeks
Treated
|
30
|
37
|
0
|
16
|
20
|
20
|
28
|
|
Safety Extension Phase: 12 Weeks
COMPLETED
|
30
|
36
|
0
|
15
|
20
|
20
|
28
|
|
Safety Extension Phase: 12 Weeks
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
4
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 milligram (mg) prolonged release (PR) tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase. Active comparator phase was followed by safety extension phase, where participants continued to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 12 weeks.
|
Cohort 1: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week and if this dose was tolerated well, participants received fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study. Active comparator phase was followed by safety extension phase, where participants continued to receive fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 12 weeks.
|
Cohort 1: Oxybutynin
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive oxybutynin extended release (ER) tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice. Dose titration was done for first 4 weeks. After Week 4, participants remained on the optimized daily dose for next 8 weeks, in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2: Fesoterodine 2 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 2 mg beads-in-capsule (BIC) capsule orally once daily for 12 weeks in efficacy phase. Efficacy phase was followed by safety extension phase, where participants continued to receive fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for another 12 weeks.
|
Cohort 2: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for first 1 week and if this dose was tolerated well, participants received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for next 11 weeks in efficacy phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study. Efficacy phase was followed by safety extension phase, where participants continued to receive fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for another 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase:12Weeks
Adverse Event
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase:12Weeks
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase:12Weeks
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase:12Weeks
Withdrawal By Parent/Guardian
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
|
Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase:12Weeks
Medication Error Without Associated AEs
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase:12Weeks
Insufficient Clinical Response
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase:12Weeks
Failure to Meet Randomization Criteria
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase:12Weeks
Other
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Safety Extension Phase: 12 Weeks
Adverse Event
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Safety Extension Phase: 12 Weeks
Withdrawal By Parent/Guardian
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Safety Extension Phase: 12 Weeks
Medication Error Without Associated AEs
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Safety Extension Phase: 12 Weeks
Insufficient Clinical Response
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study To Find Out How Fesoterodine Works In Children Aged 6 To 17 Years With Bladder Overactivity Caused By A Neurological Condition
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase. Active comparator phase was followed by safety extension phase, where participants continued to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 12 weeks.
|
Cohort 1: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week and if this dose was tolerated well, participants received fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study. Active comparator phase was followed by safety extension phase, where participants continued to receive fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 12 weeks.
|
Cohort 1: Oxybutynin
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice. Dose titration was done for first 4 weeks. After Week 4, participants remained on the optimized daily dose for next 8 weeks, in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 2: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 2 mg beads-in-capsule (BIC) capsule orally once daily for 12 weeks in efficacy phase. Efficacy phase was followed by safety extension phase, where participants continued to receive fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for another 12 weeks.
|
Cohort 2: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for first 1 week and if this dose was tolerated well, participants received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for next 11 weeks in efficacy phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study. Efficacy phase was followed by safety extension phase, where participants continued to receive fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for another 12 weeks.
|
Total
n=181 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
>=6-9 Years
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
92 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=10-12 Years
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=13-17 Years
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
95 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
173 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data.
Maximum cystometric bladder capacity (in milliliter) was defined as maximal tolerable cystometric capacity, until voiding or leaking begins or at a pressure of \>=40 centimeter (cm) water (H2O).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=25 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=41 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=41 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Maximum Cystometric Bladder Capacity at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
|
87.17 milliliter
Interval 56.82 to 117.53
|
23.49 milliliter
Interval 3.03 to 43.95
|
40.17 milliliter
Interval 20.84 to 59.5
|
—
|
58.12 milliliter
Interval 28.84 to 87.39
|
83.36 milliliter
Interval 54.22 to 112.49
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Detrusor pressure (in cm H2O) at maximum urinary bladder capacity was measured using urodynamic testing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=25 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=41 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Bladder Capacity at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
|
-2.39 cm H2O
Interval -7.27 to 2.48
|
-2.74 cm H2O
Interval -10.62 to 5.15
|
-9.73 cm H2O
Interval -17.18 to -2.28
|
—
|
-2.86 cm H2O
Interval -7.6 to 1.87
|
-1.57 cm H2O
Interval -6.25 to 3.12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data.
In this outcome measure, shift data have been reported using 4 categories: (1) number of participants who did not have IDC at Baseline and at Week 12, (2) number of participants who did not have IDC at Baseline but had IDC at Week 12, (3) number of participants who had IDC at Baseline but no IDC at Week 12, and (4) number of participants who had IDC at Baseline and at Week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=25 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=41 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=41 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline at Week 12 in Involuntary Detrusor Contractions (IDC): Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Baseline IDC = Yes; Week 12 IDC = Yes
|
18 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
18 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline at Week 12 in Involuntary Detrusor Contractions (IDC): Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Baseline IDC = No; Week 12 IDC = No
|
6 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
12 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline at Week 12 in Involuntary Detrusor Contractions (IDC): Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Baseline IDC = No; Week 12 IDC = Yes
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline at Week 12 in Involuntary Detrusor Contractions (IDC): Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Baseline IDC = Yes; Week 12 IDC = No
|
14 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Bladder volume (in milliliter) at first IDC was measured using urodynamic testing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=32 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=25 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=27 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=36 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Bladder Volume at First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
|
41.31 milliliter
Interval 15.92 to 66.7
|
23.80 milliliter
Interval -1.6 to 49.19
|
31.26 milliliter
Interval 6.85 to 55.68
|
—
|
30.53 milliliter
Interval 2.42 to 58.64
|
26.06 milliliter
Interval 2.19 to 49.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Bladder compliance was defined as change in bladder volume in milliliter (mL) divided by change in bladder pressure in cm H2O (during the same time when change in bladder volume was estimated).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=25 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Bladder Compliance at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
|
11.36 mL per cm H2O
Interval 4.3 to 18.42
|
12.44 mL per cm H2O
Interval -0.64 to 25.53
|
16.44 mL per cm H2O
Interval 4.08 to 28.8
|
—
|
6.40 mL per cm H2O
Interval -0.48 to 13.28
|
5.41 mL per cm H2O
Interval -1.49 to 12.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment time point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed on, even if it was not a full 24 hour period. This outcome measure was only calculated for participants with \>0 micturitions at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=21 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
|
-0.97 micturitions per 24 hours
Interval -1.65 to -0.29
|
-0.37 micturitions per 24 hours
Interval -1.1 to 0.36
|
-0.70 micturitions per 24 hours
Interval -1.36 to -0.04
|
—
|
-1.07 micturitions per 24 hours
Interval -1.88 to -0.25
|
-0.68 micturitions per 24 hours
Interval -1.44 to 0.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The mean number of catheterizations per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of catheterizations divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment time point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed on; even if it was not a full 24 hours period. This outcome measure was only calculated for participants with \>0 catheterizations at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=31 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Catheterizations Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
|
-0.34 catheterizations per 24 hours
Interval -0.71 to 0.02
|
-0.10 catheterizations per 24 hours
Interval -0.5 to 0.29
|
-0.22 catheterizations per 24 hours
Interval -0.6 to 0.16
|
—
|
-0.30 catheterizations per 24 hours
Interval -0.63 to 0.04
|
-0.32 catheterizations per 24 hours
Interval -0.68 to 0.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The mean number of micturitions or catheterizations combined per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of micturitions and catheterizations combined divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed; even if it was not a full 24 hour (hrs) period. This outcome was evaluated in those participants who had micturitions or catheterizations \>0 at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=23 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=41 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions or Catheterizations Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
|
-0.75 micturitions and catheterizations/24 hrs
Interval -1.24 to -0.26
|
-0.24 micturitions and catheterizations/24 hrs
Interval -0.67 to 0.19
|
-0.28 micturitions and catheterizations/24 hrs
Interval -0.68 to 0.12
|
—
|
-0.61 micturitions and catheterizations/24 hrs
Interval -1.08 to -0.14
|
-0.60 micturitions and catheterizations/24 hrs
Interval -1.09 to -0.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of incontinence episodes divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment time point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed; even if it was not a full 24 hours period. This outcome measure was only calculated for participants with \>0 incontinence episodes at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=35 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
|
-1.01 incontinence episodes per 24 hours
Interval -1.46 to -0.56
|
-0.38 incontinence episodes per 24 hours
Interval -0.95 to 0.2
|
-0.69 incontinence episodes per 24 hours
Interval -1.29 to -0.08
|
—
|
-0.46 incontinence episodes per 24 hours
Interval -0.92 to 0.0
|
-0.89 incontinence episodes per 24 hours
Interval -1.35 to -0.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of urgency episodes divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment time point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed; even if it was not a full 24 hours period. Urgency episodes were defined as urgency marked as 'yes' in the diary. This outcome measure was only calculated for participants with \>0 urgency episodes at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
|
-0.14 urgency episodes per 24 hours
Interval -0.7 to 0.42
|
-0.23 urgency episodes per 24 hours
Interval -0.84 to 0.38
|
-0.62 urgency episodes per 24 hours
Interval -1.35 to 0.12
|
—
|
-0.62 urgency episodes per 24 hours
Interval -1.18 to -0.06
|
-0.50 urgency episodes per 24 hours
Interval -1.17 to 0.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The mean voided volume per micturition was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of micturition episodes with a recorded voided volume greater than 0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
|
4.15 milliliter per micturition
Interval -22.69 to 30.98
|
-12.72 milliliter per micturition
Interval -34.96 to 9.52
|
-8.41 milliliter per micturition
Interval -28.27 to 11.44
|
—
|
4.10 milliliter per micturition
Interval -28.05 to 36.24
|
19.21 milliliter per micturition
Interval -12.67 to 51.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The mean volume per catheterization was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of catheterization, with a recorded voided volume greater than 0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=23 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=25 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=36 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=32 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Catheterization at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
|
45.90 milliliter per catheterization
Interval 11.24 to 80.55
|
11.50 milliliter per catheterization
Interval -9.87 to 32.88
|
1.74 milliliter per catheterization
Interval -18.76 to 22.23
|
—
|
29.47 milliliter per catheterization
Interval -1.38 to 60.32
|
47.18 milliliter per catheterization
Interval 14.74 to 79.62
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and had provided baseline primary endpoint data. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The mean voided volume per micturition or catheterization was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of micturition or catheterization episodes with a recorded voided volume greater than 0. This outcome was evaluated in those participants who had micturitions or catheterizations \>0 at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=39 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition or Catheterization at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
|
36.69 mL per micturition or catheterization
Interval 6.95 to 66.43
|
7.12 mL per micturition or catheterization
Interval -11.87 to 26.11
|
-2.65 mL per micturition or catheterization
Interval -20.22 to 14.92
|
—
|
18.45 mL per micturition or catheterization
Interval -11.49 to 48.4
|
55.55 mL per micturition or catheterization
Interval 25.8 to 85.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase included all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both all serious and non-serious adverse events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Treatment Emergent AEs
|
30 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
26 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Treatment Emergent SAEs
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 up to Week 26 (including 2 weeks of follow up after last dose)Population: Safety analysis set population for safety extension phase included all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase of the study.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both all serious and non-serious adverse events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Safety Extension Phase
Treatment emergent AEs
|
9 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Safety Extension Phase
Treatment emergent SAEs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase included all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed using the Snellen method, where logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units were derived from the Snellen ratios. Participants had to read letters from the chart at a distance of 20 feet/6 meter or 4 meter. VA/Snellen ratio = distance between the chart and participant, divided by the distance at which participant was able to see or read chart without impairment; expressed as decimal. logMAR = log10 (1/decimal VA). In this outcome measure data have been reported for right and left eye separately.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Right Eye: Baseline
|
0.03 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.15 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
0.10 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
—
|
0.09 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
0.11 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Right Eye: Change at Week 12
|
0.02 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
0.03 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.00 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
—
|
0.01 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.01 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Left Eye: Baseline
|
0.02 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.16 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
0.14 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
—
|
0.08 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
0.10 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Left Eye: Change at Week 12
|
0.00 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.02 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.00 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
—
|
0.00 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.01 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for safety extension phase included all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.
VA was assessed using the Snellen method, where logMAR units were derived from the Snellen ratios. Participants had to read letters from the chart at a distance of 20 feet/6 meter or 4 meter. VA/Snellen ratio = distance between the chart and participant, divided by the distance at which participant was able to see or read chart without impairment; expressed as decimal. logMAR = log10 (1/decimal VA). In this outcome measure data have been reported for right and left eye separately.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Right Eye: Change at Week 24
|
-0.01 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.02 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.00 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.01 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.04 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
-0.02 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Left Eye: Change at Week 24
|
0.00 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.04 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.02 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.03 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.01 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
-0.01 logMAR unit
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase included all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.
The visual accommodation was the distance for each eye at which vision became blurred and was calculated as the mean of triplicate measurements. The participants focused on a single letter of the 20/40 line of an eye chart and chart was moved slowly towards the participant until letter was blurred. At this point, the distance from eye to letter was measured for each eye. In this outcome measure data have been reported for right and left eye separately.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Right Eye: Baseline
|
9.59 centimeter
Standard Deviation 5.05
|
9.67 centimeter
Standard Deviation 16.71
|
8.17 centimeter
Standard Deviation 6.89
|
—
|
11.88 centimeter
Standard Deviation 7.39
|
15.94 centimeter
Standard Deviation 18.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Right Eye: Change at Week 12
|
0.50 centimeter
Standard Deviation 4.64
|
-1.04 centimeter
Standard Deviation 6.79
|
1.02 centimeter
Standard Deviation 3.89
|
—
|
1.74 centimeter
Standard Deviation 7.45
|
7.77 centimeter
Standard Deviation 45.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Left Eye: Baseline
|
9.69 centimeter
Standard Deviation 5.13
|
8.81 centimeter
Standard Deviation 14.89
|
8.04 centimeter
Standard Deviation 7.17
|
—
|
12.31 centimeter
Standard Deviation 8.67
|
15.83 centimeter
Standard Deviation 17.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Left Eye: Change at Week 12
|
0.81 centimeter
Standard Deviation 4.78
|
-1.45 centimeter
Standard Deviation 9.60
|
0.90 centimeter
Standard Deviation 3.38
|
—
|
0.27 centimeter
Standard Deviation 4.29
|
5.79 centimeter
Standard Deviation 36.75
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for safety extension phase included all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.
The visual accommodation is the distance for each eye at which vision became blurred and was calculated as the mean of triplicate measurements. The participants focused on a single letter of the 20/40 line of an eye chart and chart was moved slowly towards the participant until letter was blurred. At this point, the distance from eye to letter was measured for each eye. In this outcome measure data have been reported for right and left eye separately.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Right Eye: Change at Week 24
|
1.50 centimeter
Standard Deviation 4.80
|
0.50 centimeter
Standard Deviation 4.30
|
-1.35 centimeter
Standard Deviation 13.03
|
0.96 centimeter
Standard Deviation 4.38
|
0.73 centimeter
Standard Deviation 5.47
|
4.33 centimeter
Standard Deviation 28.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Left Eye: Change at Week 24
|
1.66 centimeter
Standard Deviation 6.25
|
0.58 centimeter
Standard Deviation 4.53
|
0.43 centimeter
Standard Deviation 11.53
|
1.12 centimeter
Standard Deviation 4.20
|
0.90 centimeter
Standard Deviation 5.85
|
3.79 centimeter
Standard Deviation 29.81
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase included all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.
CBCL: 120 items questionnaire answered by parent/caregiver of child to assess a child's behavioral, emotional problems. Scale for each item: 0= not true, 1= somewhat/sometimes true, 2= very true/often true. Out of 120 items, 103 were categorized into 8 domains; aggressive behavior, anxious/depressed, attention problems, rule-breaking behavior, social problems, somatic complaints, thought problems, withdrawn. Summary scores: Internalizing problems=anxious/depressed + withdrawn + somatic complaints; Externalizing problems=rule-breaking + aggressive behavior. Total problems=8 domains + other 17 items. Raw scores for each domain, summary and total problems=sum of scores of related items. Using Assessment Data Manager (ADM) tool raw scores transformed/derived into standard T-scores, range: each domain=50 to 100, internalizing problems=34 to 100, externalizing problems=33 to 100, total problems=24 to 100. Lower T-score for each 8 domains, 2 summary and total problems scores=better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Somatic complaints: Change at Week 12
|
-0.87 T score
Standard Deviation 7.16
|
-0.38 T score
Standard Deviation 3.97
|
-1.69 T score
Standard Deviation 5.90
|
—
|
-0.46 T score
Standard Deviation 5.99
|
-1.28 T score
Standard Deviation 6.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Thought problems: Baseline
|
56.73 T score
Standard Deviation 7.64
|
51.9 T score
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
54.9 T score
Standard Deviation 5.60
|
—
|
55.00 T score
Standard Deviation 6.19
|
53.54 T score
Standard Deviation 5.93
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Thought problems: Change at Week 12
|
-1.59 T score
Standard Deviation 3.65
|
-0.42 T score
Standard Deviation 1.67
|
-1.38 T score
Standard Deviation 5.42
|
—
|
-0.92 T score
Standard Deviation 4.69
|
-0.48 T score
Standard Deviation 4.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Aggressive behavior: Baseline
|
54.58 T score
Standard Deviation 5.75
|
54.9 T score
Standard Deviation 5.25
|
52.8 T score
Standard Deviation 4.48
|
—
|
53.86 T score
Standard Deviation 5.67
|
54.32 T score
Standard Deviation 5.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Aggressive behavior: Change at Week 12
|
-1.28 T score
Standard Deviation 2.77
|
-1.29 T score
Standard Deviation 3.58
|
-0.03 T score
Standard Deviation 2.96
|
—
|
-1.03 T score
Standard Deviation 3.17
|
-0.95 T score
Standard Deviation 3.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Anxious/depressed: Baseline
|
56.75 T score
Standard Deviation 7.32
|
55.5 T score
Standard Deviation 6.58
|
56.3 T score
Standard Deviation 6.55
|
—
|
56.07 T score
Standard Deviation 6.99
|
57.00 T score
Standard Deviation 8.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Anxious/depressed: Change at Week 12
|
-1.92 T score
Standard Deviation 4.66
|
-0.79 T score
Standard Deviation 4.55
|
-3.21 T score
Standard Deviation 5.27
|
—
|
-1.73 T score
Standard Deviation 3.05
|
-1.38 T score
Standard Deviation 5.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Attention problems: Baseline
|
56.30 T score
Standard Deviation 5.68
|
55.4 T score
Standard Deviation 5.06
|
55.3 T score
Standard Deviation 5.74
|
—
|
56.29 T score
Standard Deviation 5.32
|
56.66 T score
Standard Deviation 7.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Attention problems: Change at week 12
|
-1.28 T score
Standard Deviation 3.69
|
-1.29 T score
Standard Deviation 3.61
|
-1.45 T score
Standard Deviation 3.41
|
—
|
-1.97 T score
Standard Deviation 3.79
|
-1.40 T score
Standard Deviation 4.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Rule-breaking behavior: Baseline
|
53.43 T score
Standard Deviation 4.96
|
54.5 T score
Standard Deviation 4.96
|
52.3 T score
Standard Deviation 3.74
|
—
|
53.26 T score
Standard Deviation 3.52
|
53.80 T score
Standard Deviation 5.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Rule-breaking behavior: Change at Week 12
|
-0.72 T score
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
-1.71 T score
Standard Deviation 4.84
|
-0.10 T score
Standard Deviation 2.19
|
—
|
-0.92 T score
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
-0.88 T score
Standard Deviation 3.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Social problems : Baseline
|
57.95 T score
Standard Deviation 7.90
|
57.9 T score
Standard Deviation 6.66
|
55.8 T score
Standard Deviation 5.90
|
—
|
57.52 T score
Standard Deviation 5.42
|
58.54 T score
Standard Deviation 9.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Social problems : Change at Week 12
|
-0.67 T score
Standard Deviation 3.73
|
-2.21 T score
Standard Deviation 4.38
|
-1.10 T score
Standard Deviation 3.41
|
—
|
-1.35 T score
Standard Deviation 3.90
|
-2.55 T score
Standard Deviation 4.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Somatic complaints: Baseline
|
60.58 T score
Standard Deviation 8.44
|
57.1 T score
Standard Deviation 6.47
|
58.4 T score
Standard Deviation 6.55
|
—
|
61.14 T score
Standard Deviation 6.24
|
60.46 T score
Standard Deviation 8.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Withdrawn: Baseline
|
58.25 T score
Standard Deviation 7.93
|
55.7 T score
Standard Deviation 5.96
|
55.0 T score
Standard Deviation 7.11
|
—
|
54.60 T score
Standard Deviation 5.17
|
57.54 T score
Standard Deviation 8.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Withdrawn: Change at Week 12
|
-1.92 T score
Standard Deviation 5.08
|
-1.75 T score
Standard Deviation 3.97
|
-0.59 T score
Standard Deviation 4.48
|
—
|
0.35 T score
Standard Deviation 4.70
|
-1.25 T score
Standard Deviation 5.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Externalizing: Baseline
|
50.10 T score
Standard Deviation 9.73
|
51.1 T score
Standard Deviation 9.83
|
48.0 T score
Standard Deviation 7.84
|
—
|
49.48 T score
Standard Deviation 8.68
|
49.46 T score
Standard Deviation 10.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Externalizing: Change at Week 12
|
-1.95 T score
Standard Deviation 4.62
|
-2.63 T score
Standard Deviation 4.72
|
-1.45 T score
Standard Deviation 4.56
|
—
|
-2.08 T score
Standard Deviation 5.26
|
-2.33 T score
Standard Deviation 5.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Internalizing: Baseline
|
57.25 T score
Standard Deviation 11.00
|
53.9 T score
Standard Deviation 10.34
|
54.6 T score
Standard Deviation 10.14
|
—
|
56.45 T score
Standard Deviation 8.06
|
55.93 T score
Standard Deviation 12.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Internalizing: Change at Week 12
|
-3.05 T score
Standard Deviation 7.12
|
-1.96 T score
Standard Deviation 6.53
|
-3.52 T score
Standard Deviation 6.38
|
—
|
-2.14 T score
Standard Deviation 6.46
|
-2.35 T score
Standard Deviation 6.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Total Problems: Baseline
|
55.45 T score
Standard Deviation 10.28
|
53.4 T score
Standard Deviation 10.70
|
52.7 T score
Standard Deviation 9.37
|
—
|
55.05 T score
Standard Deviation 8.20
|
53.61 T score
Standard Deviation 11.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Total Problems: Change at Week 12
|
-2.36 T score
Standard Deviation 4.68
|
-2.17 T score
Standard Deviation 5.05
|
-3.38 T score
Standard Deviation 4.55
|
—
|
-2.51 T score
Standard Deviation 4.63
|
-3.23 T score
Standard Deviation 5.45
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for safety extension phase included all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.
CBCL: 120 items questionnaire answered by parent/caregiver of child to assess a child's behavioral, emotional problems. Scale for each item: 0= not true, 1= somewhat/sometimes true, 2= very true/often true. Out of 120 items, 103 were categorized into 8 domains; aggressive behavior, anxious/depressed, attention problems, rule-breaking behavior, social problems, somatic complaints, thought problems, withdrawn. Summary scores: Internalizing problems=anxious/depressed + withdrawn + somatic complaints; Externalizing problems=rule-breaking + aggressive behavior. Total problems=8 domains + other 17 items. Raw scores for each domain, summary and total problems=sum of scores of related items. Using Assessment Data Manager (ADM) tool raw scores transformed/derived into standard T-scores, range: each domain=50 to 100, internalizing problems=34 to 100, externalizing problems=33 to 100, total problems=24 to 100. Lower T-score for each 8 domains, 2 summary and total problems scores=better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Aggressive behavior: Change at Week 24
|
-1.25 T score
Standard Deviation 3.40
|
-2.40 T score
Standard Deviation 4.89
|
-1.70 T score
Standard Deviation 3.40
|
-1.86 T score
Standard Deviation 3.63
|
-1.59 T score
Standard Deviation 3.85
|
-1.31 T score
Standard Deviation 4.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Anxious/depressed: Change at Week 24
|
-1.50 T score
Standard Deviation 3.76
|
-3.25 T score
Standard Deviation 5.66
|
-2.60 T score
Standard Deviation 5.24
|
-3.89 T score
Standard Deviation 4.95
|
-3.45 T score
Standard Deviation 4.86
|
-2.31 T score
Standard Deviation 5.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Attention problems: Change at Week 24
|
-3.38 T score
Standard Deviation 4.65
|
-1.70 T score
Standard Deviation 3.01
|
-1.50 T score
Standard Deviation 3.15
|
-1.71 T score
Standard Deviation 3.29
|
-2.21 T score
Standard Deviation 3.99
|
-2.64 T score
Standard Deviation 5.72
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Rule-breaking behavior: Change at Week 24
|
-1.31 T score
Standard Deviation 4.01
|
-0.90 T score
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
-2.15 T score
Standard Deviation 3.17
|
-0.36 T score
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
-1.59 T score
Standard Deviation 3.62
|
-1.47 T score
Standard Deviation 5.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Social problems : Change at Week 24
|
-3.19 T score
Standard Deviation 5.79
|
-2.65 T score
Standard Deviation 3.28
|
-3.90 T score
Standard Deviation 4.35
|
-2.36 T score
Standard Deviation 4.17
|
-2.83 T score
Standard Deviation 4.12
|
-2.56 T score
Standard Deviation 4.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Somatic complaints: Change at Week 24
|
-1.69 T score
Standard Deviation 9.20
|
-1.50 T score
Standard Deviation 5.82
|
-0.60 T score
Standard Deviation 3.12
|
-1.96 T score
Standard Deviation 6.77
|
-4.38 T score
Standard Deviation 6.59
|
-2.64 T score
Standard Deviation 6.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Thought problems: Change at Week 24
|
-3.25 T score
Standard Deviation 6.62
|
-2.30 T score
Standard Deviation 3.50
|
-1.40 T score
Standard Deviation 3.00
|
-1.75 T score
Standard Deviation 3.99
|
-3.10 T score
Standard Deviation 5.45
|
-1.03 T score
Standard Deviation 4.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Withdrawn: Change at Week 24
|
-2.19 T score
Standard Deviation 3.90
|
-4.35 T score
Standard Deviation 5.24
|
-1.80 T score
Standard Deviation 5.43
|
-0.43 T score
Standard Deviation 3.75
|
-0.69 T score
Standard Deviation 4.33
|
-1.50 T score
Standard Deviation 5.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Externalizing: Change at Week 24
|
-1.81 T score
Standard Deviation 5.42
|
-4.15 T score
Standard Deviation 7.44
|
-4.20 T score
Standard Deviation 5.15
|
-4.21 T score
Standard Deviation 6.86
|
-5.21 T score
Standard Deviation 8.20
|
-2.89 T score
Standard Deviation 7.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Internalizing: Change at Week 24
|
-3.25 T score
Standard Deviation 8.10
|
-5.35 T score
Standard Deviation 7.21
|
-4.40 T score
Standard Deviation 6.21
|
-4.32 T score
Standard Deviation 6.70
|
-7.69 T score
Standard Deviation 7.46
|
-4.14 T score
Standard Deviation 7.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Total Problems: Change at Week 24
|
-3.69 T score
Standard Deviation 6.74
|
-4.90 T score
Standard Deviation 4.78
|
-5.20 T score
Standard Deviation 4.32
|
-5.25 T score
Standard Deviation 6.22
|
-7.03 T score
Standard Deviation 7.77
|
-4.44 T score
Standard Deviation 6.57
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase included all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.
CBCL: It consisted of 120 items on behavior and emotional problems. Parent/caregiver of child answered 120 items, each on scale: 0= not true, 1= somewhat/sometimes true, 2= very/often true. 103 items were classified in 8 domains: aggressive behavior: total score range (TSR)= 0 to 36, anxious/depressed: TSR= 0 to 26, attention problems: TSR= 0 to 20, rule-breaking behavior: TSR= 0 to 34, social problems: TSR= 0 to 22, somatic complaints: TSR= 0 to 22, thought problems: TSR= 0 to 30, withdrawn (TSR)= 0 to 16. Rule-breaking and aggressive behavior summarized to externalizing problems with a TSR= 0 to 70. Anxious/depressed, withdrawn, somatic complaints summarized to internalizing problems with a TSR= 0 to 64. All 103 items of 8 domains and other 17 remaining items were combined to give total problems TSR = 0 to 240. TSR for each domain, summary and total problems was sum of scores of related items respectively. Lower scores for each domain, summary and total problems= better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Aggressive behavior: Baseline
|
4.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.35
|
5.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.95
|
3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.37
|
—
|
4.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.39
|
4.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.46
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Aggressive behavior: Change at Week 12
|
-0.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
-0.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
-0.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
—
|
-0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.35
|
-0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Anxious/depressed: Baseline
|
4.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.53
|
3.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.15
|
4.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.35
|
—
|
3.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.33
|
4.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Anxious/depressed: Change at Week 12
|
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
-0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
-1.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.43
|
—
|
-0.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
-0.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Attention problems: Baseline
|
4.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.33
|
4.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.78
|
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.11
|
—
|
4.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.18
|
4.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Attention problems: Change at Week 12
|
-0.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.03
|
-0.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.90
|
-0.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
—
|
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.25
|
-0.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Rule-breaking behavior: Baseline
|
1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.87
|
1.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
1.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.30
|
—
|
1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.48
|
1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Rule-breaking behavior: Change at Week 12
|
-0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
0.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.45
|
—
|
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-0.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Social problems: Baseline
|
3.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.36
|
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
3.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
—
|
3.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.30
|
4.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Social problems: Change at Week 12
|
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.57
|
-0.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.86
|
-0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
—
|
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.54
|
-1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Somatic complaints: Baseline
|
3.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.23
|
2.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.93
|
2.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
—
|
3.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.18
|
3.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Somatic complaints: Change at Week 12
|
-0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
-0.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
-0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.03
|
—
|
-0.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
-0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Thought problems: Baseline
|
2.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.92
|
1.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
2.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.79
|
—
|
2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.23
|
1.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Thought problems: Change at Week 12
|
-0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.30
|
-0.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
-0.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
—
|
-0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.69
|
-0.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Withdrawn: Baseline
|
2.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.66
|
1.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.81
|
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
—
|
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
2.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Withdrawn: Change at Week 12
|
-0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
-0.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
—
|
0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
-0.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Externalizing: Baseline
|
6.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.87
|
6.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.16
|
4.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.32
|
—
|
5.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.23
|
6.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Externalizing: Change at Week 12
|
-1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.30
|
-1.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.50
|
-0.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.33
|
—
|
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.85
|
-1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Internalizing: Baseline
|
10.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.02
|
7.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.61
|
8.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.13
|
—
|
8.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.56
|
10.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Internalizing: Change at Week 12
|
-2.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.35
|
-1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.85
|
-2.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.91
|
—
|
-0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.62
|
-1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Total Problems: Baseline
|
34.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.16
|
29.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.41
|
27.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.59
|
—
|
31.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.84
|
31.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Total Problems: Change at Week 12
|
-5.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.77
|
-5.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.29
|
-5.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.41
|
—
|
-4.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.73
|
-5.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for safety extension phase: all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
CBCL: It consisted of 120 items on behavior and emotional problems. Parent/caregiver of child answered 120 items, each on scale: 0= not true, 1= somewhat/sometimes true, 2= very/often true. 103 items were classified in 8 domains: aggressive behavior: total score range (TSR)= 0 to 36, anxious/depressed: TSR= 0 to 26, attention problems: TSR= 0 to 20, rule-breaking behavior: TSR= 0 to 34, social problems: TSR= 0 to 22, somatic complaints: TSR= 0 to 22, thought problems: TSR= 0 to 30, withdrawn (TSR)= 0 to 16. Rule-breaking and aggressive behavior summarized to externalizing problems with a TSR= 0 to 70. Anxious/depressed, withdrawn, somatic complaints summarized to internalizing problems with a TSR= 0 to 64. All 103 items of 8 domains and other 17 remaining items were combined to give total problems TSR = 0 to 240. TSR for each domain, summary and total problems was sum of scores of related items respectively. Lower scores for each domain, summary and total problems= better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=36 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Aggressive behavior: Change at Week 24
|
-0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.43
|
-1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.58
|
-1.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.41
|
-1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.70
|
-1.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.92
|
-1.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Anxious/depressed: Change at Week 24
|
-1.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.88
|
-1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.48
|
-1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
-1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
-1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.22
|
-1.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Attention problems: Change at Week 24
|
-1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.35
|
-1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
-1.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.76
|
-0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.69
|
-1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.31
|
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Rule-breaking behavior: Change at Week 24
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
-0.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
-0.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
-0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Social problems: Change at Week 24
|
-1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.33
|
-1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
-1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.81
|
-1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.74
|
-1.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
-1.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Somatic complaints: Change at Week 24
|
-0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.32
|
-0.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
-0.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
-0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.04
|
-1.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.22
|
-0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Thought problems: Change at Week 24
|
-1.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.14
|
-0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
-1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.95
|
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Withdrawn: Change at Week 24
|
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
-1.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
-0.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
-0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-0.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.43
|
-0.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Externalizing: Change at Week 24
|
-1.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.23
|
-2.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.03
|
-2.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.84
|
-1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.28
|
-1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.50
|
-1.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Internalizing: Change at Week 24
|
-2.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.65
|
-3.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.68
|
-2.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.64
|
-2.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.63
|
-3.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.00
|
-2.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Total Problems: Change at Week 24
|
-9.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.45
|
-10.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.47
|
-9.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.93
|
-8.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.22
|
-10.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.98
|
-8.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.86
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase analyzed. 10-peg assessment was done only in participants below age of 9 years. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure, "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable for specified rows. There was 1 participant who inadvertently did the 10-peg test with non-dominant hand and 25-peg test with dominant hand. This participant was counted in both 10 peg and 25 peg assessment.
The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. In this outcome measure participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=21 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Dominant hand: Baseline
|
46.43 seconds
Standard Deviation 16.28
|
69.56 seconds
Standard Deviation 58.52
|
52.20 seconds
Standard Deviation 31.06
|
—
|
61.11 seconds
Standard Deviation 31.66
|
56.50 seconds
Standard Deviation 32.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Dominant hand: Change at Week 12
|
-5.33 seconds
Standard Deviation 6.15
|
-11.20 seconds
Standard Deviation 41.11
|
-10.26 seconds
Standard Deviation 27.21
|
—
|
-7.71 seconds
Standard Deviation 11.06
|
10.14 seconds
Standard Deviation 37.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Non-dominant hand: Baseline
|
48.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 15.14
|
91.29 seconds
Standard Deviation 110.76
|
76.29 seconds
Standard Deviation 76.71
|
—
|
80.44 seconds
Standard Deviation 41.45
|
114.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 89.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
|
-2.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 12.25
|
-19.36 seconds
Standard Deviation 81.03
|
-3.25 seconds
Standard Deviation 22.53
|
—
|
-21.71 seconds
Standard Deviation 25.44
|
15.33 seconds
Standard Deviation 49.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase analyzed. 10-peg assessment was done only in participants below age of 9 years. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable for specified rows.
The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. In this outcome measure participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=2 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=3 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=3 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Dominant hand: Change at Week 24
|
-2.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 8.49
|
-6.33 seconds
Standard Deviation 3.06
|
-7.07 seconds
Standard Deviation 6.80
|
-15.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 28.54
|
-11.33 seconds
Standard Deviation 9.07
|
-3.71 seconds
Standard Deviation 22.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 24
|
1.50 seconds
Standard Deviation 10.61
|
-11.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 5.00
|
-9.14 seconds
Standard Deviation 14.33
|
-18.47 seconds
Standard Deviation 38.13
|
-2.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 13.75
|
-4.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 29.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase analyzed. 10-peg assessment was done only in participants below age of 9 years. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure, "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable for specified rows. There was 1 participant who inadvertently did the 10-peg test with non-dominant hand and 25-peg test with dominant hand. This participant was counted in both 10 peg and 25 peg assessment.
The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. In this outcome measure participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=34 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Dominant hand: Baseline
|
82.64 seconds
Standard Deviation 24.32
|
106.7 seconds
Standard Deviation 64.07
|
124.7 seconds
Standard Deviation 71.99
|
—
|
88.85 seconds
Standard Deviation 24.22
|
92.15 seconds
Standard Deviation 40.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Dominant hand: Change at Week 12
|
1.21 seconds
Standard Deviation 11.87
|
-14.38 seconds
Standard Deviation 25.90
|
-18.44 seconds
Standard Deviation 32.23
|
—
|
-5.40 seconds
Standard Deviation 10.43
|
-8.88 seconds
Standard Deviation 20.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Non-dominant hand: Baseline
|
92.94 seconds
Standard Deviation 25.05
|
130.30 seconds
Standard Deviation 83.58
|
126.1 seconds
Standard Deviation 48.93
|
—
|
110.61 seconds
Standard Deviation 59.63
|
109.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 49.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
|
-1.97 seconds
Standard Deviation 14.00
|
-13.50 seconds
Standard Deviation 18.81
|
-12.50 seconds
Standard Deviation 20.30
|
—
|
-9.10 seconds
Standard Deviation 19.94
|
-4.10 seconds
Standard Deviation 10.79
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase analyzed. 25-peg assessment was done only in participants of age 9 years and above. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable for specified rows.
The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. In this outcome measure participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=5 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=25 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Dominant hand: Change at Week 24
|
-5.71 seconds
Standard Deviation 9.55
|
-7.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 13.25
|
-38.20 seconds
Standard Deviation 31.67
|
-17.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 33.16
|
-8.20 seconds
Standard Deviation 11.67
|
-12.27 seconds
Standard Deviation 18.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 24
|
-3.79 seconds
Standard Deviation 11.89
|
-11.87 seconds
Standard Deviation 14.15
|
-38.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 29.35
|
-15.50 seconds
Standard Deviation 29.11
|
-9.24 seconds
Standard Deviation 15.79
|
-8.46 seconds
Standard Deviation 10.42
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase analyzed. 10-peg assessment was done only in participants below age of 9 years. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure, "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable for specified rows. There was 1 participant who inadvertently did the 10-peg test with non-dominant hand and 25-peg test with dominant hand. This participant was counted in both 10 peg and 25 peg assessment.
The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=21 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Dominant hand: Baseline
|
0.29 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
0.39 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
0.10 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
—
|
0.11 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
0.75 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Dominant hand: Change at Week 12
|
-0.17 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
0.05 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
—
|
0.29 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
0.57 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Non-dominant hand: Baseline
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.35 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
0.76 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
—
|
0.44 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
1.22 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
|
0.17 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
0.60 pegs
Standard Deviation 3.45
|
—
|
0.43 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
1.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase analyzed. 10-peg assessment was done only in participants below age of 9 years. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable for specified rows.
The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=2 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=3 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=3 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Dominant hand: Change at week 24
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-0.33 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
-0.27 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
-0.06 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
0.33 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
0.43 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Non-dominant hand: Change at week 24
|
0.50 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-0.36 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
0.11 pegs
Standard Deviation 3.45
|
1.33 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.31
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase analyzed. 10-peg assessment was done only in participants below age of 9 years. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure, "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable for specified rows. There was 1 participant who inadvertently did the 10-peg test with non-dominant hand and 25-peg test with dominant hand. This participant was counted in both 10 peg and 25 peg assessment.
The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=34 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Dominant hand: Baseline
|
0.24 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
0.10 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
0.11 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
—
|
0.45 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
0.24 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Dominant hand: Change at Week 12
|
0.09 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
0.44 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
—
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-0.18 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Non-dominant hand: Baseline
|
0.36 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.78
|
0.40 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
0.13 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
—
|
0.91 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
0.28 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
|
0.21 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.78
|
0.13 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
-0.33 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
0.06 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase analyzed. 25-peg assessment was done only in participants of age 9 years and above. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable for specified rows.
The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=5 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=25 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Dominant hand: Change at Week 24
|
0.14 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
0.25 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.44 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
0.63 pegs
Standard Deviation 4.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 24
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
0.27 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.67
|
0.60 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
-0.13 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
-0.28 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.17
|
0.68 pegs
Standard Deviation 4.79
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase analyzed. 10-peg assessment was done only in participants below age of 9 years. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure, "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable for specified rows. There was 1 participant who inadvertently did the 10-peg test with non-dominant hand and 25-peg test with dominant hand. This participant was counted in both 10 peg and 25 peg assessment.
The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs placed correctly while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=21 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Dominant hand: Change at Week 12
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
-0.11 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
—
|
-0.29 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Non-dominant hand: Baseline
|
10.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
9.82 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
9.62 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
—
|
9.56 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
9.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-0.07 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
—
|
-0.57 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Dominant hand: Baseline
|
10.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
9.89 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
10.0 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
9.56 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
9.38 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase analyzed. 10-peg assessment was done only in participants below age of 9 years. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable for specified rows.
The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs placed correctly while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=2 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=3 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=3 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Dominant hand: Change at Week 24
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.07 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-0.33 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 24
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.14 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
0.21 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
-1.33 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.31
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase analyzed. 10-peg assessment was done only in participants below age of 9 years. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure, "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable for specified rows. There was 1 participant who inadvertently did the 10-peg test with non-dominant hand and 25-peg test with dominant hand. This participant was counted in both 10 peg and 25 peg assessment.
The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs placed correctly while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=33 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=34 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Dominant hand: Baseline
|
25.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
25.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
23.22 pegs
Standard Deviation 3.83
|
—
|
25.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
24.56 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Dominant hand: Change at Week 12
|
-0.12 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
-0.13 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
0.11 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
—
|
-0.07 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
0.42 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Non-dominant hand: Baseline
|
24.88 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.42
|
24.50 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.58
|
24.25 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.75
|
—
|
24.45 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
24.75 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
|
0.03 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
0.63 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
-0.63 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
—
|
0.53 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.19
|
0.26 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase analyzed. 25-peg assessment was done only in participants of age 9 years and above. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable for specified rows.
The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs placed correctly while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=5 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=25 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Dominant hand: Change at Week 24
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.11 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.50 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 24
|
0.14 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
0.00 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.60 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.61
|
-0.50 pegs
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
0.60 pegs
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
0.21 pegs
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12Population: Analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase: all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in relevant phase. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Pre-defined criteria for vital signs: 1) a) systolic blood pressure (SBP) of \<90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), b) change \>=30 mmHg increase, c) change \>=30 mmHg decrease; 2) a) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of \<50 mmHg, b) change \>=20 mmHg increase, c) change \>=20 mmHg decrease; 3) a) pulse rate value of \<40 beats per minute (bpm), b) pulse rate value \>120 bpm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=41 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
SBP: <90 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
SBP: Change >=30 mmHg increase
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
SBP: Change >=30 mmHg decrease
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
DBP: <50 mmHg
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
DBP: Change >=20 mmHg increase
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
DBP: Change >=20 mmHg decrease
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
Pulse rate: <40 bpm
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
Pulse rate: >120 bpm
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for safety extension phase included all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase of the study.
Pre-defined criteria for vital signs: 1) a) systolic blood pressure (SBP) of \<90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), b) change \>=30 mmHg increase, c) change \>=30 mmHg decrease; 2) a) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of \<50 mmHg, b) change \>=20 mmHg increase, c) change \>=20 mmHg decrease; 3) a) pulse rate value of \<40 beats per minute (bpm), b) pulse rate value \>120 bpm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
DBP: Change >=20 mmHg decrease
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Pulse rate: <40 bpm
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
Pulse rate: >120 bpm
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
SBP: <90 mmHg
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
SBP: Change >=30 mmHg increase
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
SBP: Change >=30 mmHg decrease
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
DBP: <50 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
DBP: Change >=20 mmHg increase
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1 up to Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase: all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in relevant phase of the study.
Clinically significant UTI, counted as an adverse event was defined as: positive urine culture with a uropathogen (defined as \>=10\^5 colony forming unit per milliliter \[CFU/mL\]) and the presence of symptoms, or pyuria (defined as \>50 white blood cells \[WBC\] per high-pass filter \[hpf\]) and the presence of symptoms, or positive urine culture with a uropathogen (defined as \>=10\^5 CFU/mL) with or without symptoms in a participant with a documented history of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Urinary Tract Infections (UTI): Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 up to Week 26Population: Safety analysis set population for safety extension phase included all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase of the study.
Clinically significant UTI, counted as an adverse event was defined as: positive urine culture with a uropathogen (defined as \>=10\^5 CFU/mL) and the presence of symptoms, or pyuria (defined as \>50 WBC per hpf and the presence of symptoms, or positive urine culture with a uropathogen (defined as \>=10\^5 CFU/mL) with or without symptoms in a participants with a documented history of VUR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Urinary Tract Infections (UTI): Safety Extension Phase
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1 up to Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase: all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in relevant phase. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Hematology: hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes \<0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN), platelets\<0.5\*LLN\>1.75\*upper limit of normal (ULN), leukocytes \<0.6\*LLN\>1.5\*ULN, lymphocytes, neutrophils, \<0.8\*LLN \>1.2\*ULN, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes monocytes/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN. Clinical chemistry: bilirubin, direct, bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase\>3.0\*ULN, protein, albumin, phosphate \<0.8\*LLN \>1.2\*ULN, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, urate \>1.2\*ULN, sodium\<0.95\*LLN\>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium bicarbonate\<0.9\*LLN\>1.1\*ULN, glucose\<0.6\*LLN\>1.5\*ULN, creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN. Urinalysis: specific gravity \<1.003\>1.030, pH \<4.5\>8, urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, urine bilirubin, nitrite, \>=1, urine erythrocytes, urine leukocytes \>=20, epithelial cells \>=6, bacteria \>20.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=39 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=39 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=41 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
|
27 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
30 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 up to Week 26Population: Safety analysis set population for safety extension phase: all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Hematology: hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes \<0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN), platelets\<0.5\*LLN\>1.75\*upper limit of normal (ULN), leukocytes \<0.6\*LLN\>1.5\*ULN, lymphocytes, neutrophils, \<0.8\*LLN \>1.2\*ULN, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes monocytes/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN. Clinical chemistry: bilirubin, direct, bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase\>3.0\*ULN, protein, albumin, phosphate \<0.8\*LLN \>1.2\*ULN, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, urate \>1.2\*ULN, sodium\<0.95\*LLN\>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium bicarbonate\<0.9\*LLN\>1.1\*ULN, glucose\<0.6\*LLN\>1.5\*ULN, creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN. Urinalysis: specific gravity \<1.003\>1.030, pH \<4.5\>8, urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, urine bilirubin, nitrite, \>=1, urine erythrocytes, urine leukocytes \>=20, epithelial cells \>=6, bacteria \>20.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=36 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities: Safety Extension Phase
|
7 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase: all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in relevant phase. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure; "Number Analyzed": participants evaluable at specified time points.
Post-void residual volume measurement was measured by an ultrasound. PVR volume was only assessed for participants who did not perform clean intermittent catheterization or in any participants who had \>1 UTI during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Weeks 4, 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Baseline
|
5.78 milliliter
Standard Deviation 7.98
|
14.7 milliliter
Standard Deviation 14.31
|
10.7 milliliter
Standard Deviation 7.94
|
—
|
7.00 milliliter
Standard Deviation 8.20
|
9.57 milliliter
Standard Deviation 12.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Weeks 4, 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Change at Week 4
|
19.11 milliliter
Standard Deviation 24.52
|
-2.00 milliliter
Standard Deviation 6.24
|
10.25 milliliter
Standard Deviation 34.40
|
—
|
5.40 milliliter
Standard Deviation 7.60
|
-7.33 milliliter
Standard Deviation 10.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Weeks 4, 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
Change at Week 12
|
12.86 milliliter
Standard Deviation 43.48
|
2.50 milliliter
Standard Deviation 16.05
|
0.75 milliliter
Standard Deviation 17.46
|
—
|
25.60 milliliter
Standard Deviation 53.42
|
-4.00 milliliter
Standard Deviation 8.41
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for safety extension phase: all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Post-void residual volume measurement was measured by an ultrasound. PVR volume was only assessed for participants who did not perform clean intermittent catheterization or in any participants who had \>1 UTI during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=5 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=3 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=3 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=4 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=4 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=5 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Void Residual Volume at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
|
18.00 milliliter
Standard Deviation 31.36
|
36.67 milliliter
Standard Deviation 59.23
|
21.67 milliliter
Standard Deviation 20.21
|
2.75 milliliter
Standard Deviation 14.50
|
11.50 milliliter
Standard Deviation 23.67
|
11.60 milliliter
Standard Deviation 29.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12Population: Safety analysis set population for active comparator phase and efficacy phase: all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in relevant phase of the study. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Physical examination included assessment of the general appearance and the skin, head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, throat, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and neurological systems. Clinically relevant changes in physical findings were assessed by the investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Physical Examination Findings From Baseline to Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24Population: Safety analysis set population for safety extension phase included all participants of respective cohorts who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the relevant phase of the study.
Physical examination included assessment of the general appearance and the skin, head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, throat, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and neurological systems. Clinically relevant changes in physical findings were assessed by the investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Physical Examination Findings From Baseline to Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, Day 1: pre-dose (when dose administered at clinic) or if dose taken at home up to 3 hours before coming to the clinic, sampling just after arrival at clinic, 5 hours post-dose, 8-10 hours post-dose (if participants remained at clinic)Population: The PK analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with fesoterodine and who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest during the study.
Absorption rate constant is used to determine rate at which drug is entering into body. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was not done separately for each dose of fesoterodine in respective cohorts and were combined for PK analysis using PK modelling approach.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=121 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Absorption Rate Constant (Ka) of Fesoterodine
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0.0897 per hour
Standard Error 5.99
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, Day 1: pre-dose (when dose administered at clinic) or if dose taken at home up to 3 hours before coming to the clinic, sampling just after arrival at clinic, 5 hours post-dose, 8-10 hours post-dose (if participants remained at clinic)Population: The PK analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with fesoterodine and who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest during the study.
Clearance determines the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. PK analysis was not done separately for each dose of fesoterodine in respective cohorts and were combined for PK analysis using PK modelling approach.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=121 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Fesoterodine
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
71.6 liter per hour
Standard Error 6.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, Day 1: pre-dose (when dose administered at clinic) or if dose taken at home up to 3 hours before coming to the clinic, sampling just after arrival at clinic, 5 hours post-dose, 8-10 hours post-dose (if participants remained at clinic)Population: The PK analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with fesoterodine and who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest during the study.
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. PK analysis was not done separately for each dose of fesoterodine in respective cohorts and were combined for PK analysis using PK modelling approach.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=121 Participants
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Fesoterodine
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
68.1 liter
Standard Error 29.7
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase (SEP): Fesoterodine 8 mg
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
Cohort 1,SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 8 mg
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
Cohort 2 Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=42 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=42 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin
n=40 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice. Dose titration was done for first 4 weeks. After Week 4, participants remained on the optimized daily dose for next 8 weeks, in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=30 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase (SEP): Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=37 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg received fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=16 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1,SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=20 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=28 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for 12 weeks in efficacy phase.
|
Cohort 2 Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=29 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 4 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for next 11 weeks in efficacy phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=20 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=28 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Complicated appendicitis
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Epididymitis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Dengue fever
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Animal bite
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Epiphysiolysis
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Decubitus ulcer
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=42 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg
n=42 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablets orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for next 11 weeks in active comparator phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin
n=40 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice. Dose titration was done for first 4 weeks. After Week 4, participants remained on the optimized daily dose for next 8 weeks, in active comparator phase.
|
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=30 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase (SEP): Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=37 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg received fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=16 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for 12 weeks in the safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 1,SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=20 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \>25 kg who were randomized to receive oxybutynin ER tablet, at a daily dose in accordance with approved pediatric labeling and accepted practice, in active comparator phase; were allocated by investigator to receive fesoterodine 4 mg PR tablet orally once daily for first 1 week followed by fesoterodine 8 mg PR tablet orally once daily for another 11 weeks (if the fesoterodine 4 mg dose was well tolerated) in the safety extension phase and if dose was not tolerated participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=28 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for 12 weeks in efficacy phase.
|
Cohort 2 Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=29 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg were randomized to receive fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for first 1 week and if dose was tolerated well, participants received 4 mg BIC capsule orally once daily for next 11 weeks in efficacy phase and if dose was not tolerated then participants were withdrawn from the study.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg
n=20 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 2 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=28 participants at risk
Participants with body weight \<=25 kg received fesoterodine 4 mg BIC capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks in safety extension phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Astigmatism
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular extrasystoles
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo positional
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Eye disorders
Myopia
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Eye disorders
Strabismus
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
4.8%
2/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
7.1%
3/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
7.1%
3/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
12.5%
5/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
11.9%
5/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
7.1%
3/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
7.1%
3/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
9.5%
4/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
27.5%
11/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Faeces soft
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip dry
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.8%
2/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site pain
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Mass
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
4.8%
2/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
12.5%
2/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Asymptomatic bacteriuria
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
14.3%
4/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
15.0%
3/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteriuria
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis bacterial
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Escherichia urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hand-foot-and-mouth disease
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Impetigo
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection parasitic
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
9.5%
4/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Mastitis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
11.9%
5/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
10.7%
3/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
7.1%
3/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
7.5%
3/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
12.5%
2/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
14.3%
4/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Varicella
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
9.5%
4/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Bacterial test positive
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Blood glucose decreased
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Eosinophil count increased
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Heart rate increased
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Investigation abnormal
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Residual urine volume increased
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Urine analysis abnormal
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
4.8%
2/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
4.8%
2/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
7.1%
3/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
12.5%
5/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Aggression
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Behaviour disorder
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hypertonic bladder
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Incontinence
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
4.8%
2/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary incontinence
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
10.0%
4/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urine odour abnormal
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Genital pain
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
4.8%
2/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract inflammation
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Decubitus ulcer
|
4.8%
2/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermal cyst
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis acneiform
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis atopic
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Seborrhoeic dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin odour abnormal
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal deformity
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Synovitis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory disorder
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Social circumstances
Wheelchair user
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Flushing
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Dermatitis infected
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear lobe infection
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin papilloma
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menstruation irregular
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Eye disorders
Accommodation disorder
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pruritus
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual impairment
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip erythema
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Adverse drug reaction
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Feeling cold
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Thirst
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis bacterial
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal skin infection
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hordeolum
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngotonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Scrotal infection
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Urine output increased
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cells urine positive
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Polydipsia
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint contracture
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive disorder
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Encopresis
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Restlessness
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral pain
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract disorder
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urine flow decreased
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dry throat
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash macular
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Temperature intolerance
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Eye infection
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Cystogram
|
0.00%
0/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 26 (includes 2 week of follow up)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER