Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-04-30
2013-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators hypothesize that patient and staff acceptance will be better with once daily dosing and that improvements in psychopathology will be similar across once daily and twice daily dosing
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
To Determine Long Term Efficacy and Safety of Asenapine in Schizophrenic Patient Population (A7501012)(COMPLETED)(P05770)
NCT00150176
Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of AZD8529 in Adult Schizophrenia Patients
NCT00921804
One Year Drug Treatment in First-Episode Schizophrenia
NCT00159081
Observe Real-life Allocation of Atypical Antipsychotics in the Acute Inpatient Management of Schizophrenia
NCT01544608
A Study of RO4917838 in Participants With Persistent, Predominant Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (NN25310)
NCT01192867
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators will assess patient and staff acceptance on day 14. The investigators will assess staff acceptance on day 14. The investigators will assess changes in psychopathology (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale) from baseline to day 14.
The investigators propose to achieve the following specific aims:
1. To compare the patient acceptance of once daily versus twice daily asenapine; The investigators hypothesize that patient acceptance will be better for asenapine 10 mg QHS than for asenapine 5 mg BID at day 14
2. To compare the staff (medication nurses) acceptance of once daily versus twice daily asenapine; the investigators hypothesize that staff acceptance will be better for asenapine 10 mg QHS than for asenapine 5 mg BID at day 14
3. To compare the changes in psychopathology with once daily versus twice daily asenapine; the investigators hypothesize that changes in psychopathology from baseline to day 14 will be similar for the two dosing strategies
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
asenapine 10 mg daily in the evening
Patients will receive their entire daily dose of asenapine as a single dose in the evening
Asenapine 10 mg daily in the evening
The total daily dose of Asenapine will be given once daily in the evening
asenapine 5 mg twice daily
Patients will receive asenapine 5 mg daily in the morning and 5 mg daily in the evening
Asenapine 5 mg twice daily
Asenapine will be given in two doses, 5 mg in the morning and 5 mg in the evening, daily
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Asenapine 10 mg daily in the evening
The total daily dose of Asenapine will be given once daily in the evening
Asenapine 5 mg twice daily
Asenapine will be given in two doses, 5 mg in the morning and 5 mg in the evening, daily
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18-65 years of age,
* who meet DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder,
* who are newly admitted to Central Regional Hospital for treatment of an acute psychotic exacerbation,
* who provide signed informed consent to participate, will be included.
Exclusion Criteria
* individuals with a prior history of poor therapeutic response or sensitivity to asenapine, will be excluded
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Beyer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Central Regional Hospital
Butner, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00029068
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.