Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Phase 3 Comparative Study of TAP-144-SR(6M) in Postoperative and Hormone Therapy-naïve Patients With Premenopausal Breast Cancer (NCT NCT01546649)
NCT ID: NCT01546649
Last Updated: 2015-11-26
Results Overview
Comparison of both the treatment groups was done by assessing the suppressive effect on serum E2 concentration maintained at menopausal level (=\<30pg/mL). Suppression rate was calculated as proportion of participants maintained at menopausal level.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
167 participants
Week 4 up to Week 48
2015-11-26
Participant Flow
Participants took part in the study at 21 investigative sites in Japan from April 2012 to December 2014.
Participants with a historical diagnosis of premenopausal breast cancer were enrolled in 1 of 2 treatment groups as follows: TAP-144-SR(6M); TAP-144-SR(3M)
Participant milestones
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
83
|
84
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
75
|
75
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Recurrence
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Discovery of secondary cancer
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Phase 3 Comparative Study of TAP-144-SR(6M) in Postoperative and Hormone Therapy-naïve Patients With Premenopausal Breast Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
n=83 Participants
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
n=84 Participants
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
Total
n=167 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.90 • n=5 Participants
|
44.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.18 • n=7 Participants
|
44.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.03 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Less than (<) 40 years
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Greater than equal to (>=) 40 to <45 years
|
29 participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 participants
n=7 Participants
|
59 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=45 years
|
41 participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 participants
n=7 Participants
|
83 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
167 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Height
|
159.3 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.11 • n=5 Participants
|
158.1 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.00 • n=7 Participants
|
158.7 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.08 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Height, Customized
<150 cm
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Height, Customized
>=150 to <160 cm
|
40 participants
n=5 Participants
|
53 participants
n=7 Participants
|
93 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Height, Customized
>=160 cm
|
41 participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 participants
n=7 Participants
|
69 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
54.48 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.670 • n=5 Participants
|
53.57 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.498 • n=7 Participants
|
54.02 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.574 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight, Customized
<50 kg
|
25 participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 participants
n=7 Participants
|
54 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight, Customized
>=50 to <60 kg
|
40 participants
n=5 Participants
|
40 participants
n=7 Participants
|
80 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight, Customized
>=60 kg
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
21.50 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.042 • n=5 Participants
|
21.45 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.902 • n=7 Participants
|
21.48 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.964 • n=5 Participants
|
|
BMI, Customized
<18.5 kg/m^2
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
BMI, Customized
>=18.5 to <25.0 kg/m^2
|
63 participants
n=5 Participants
|
61 participants
n=7 Participants
|
124 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
BMI, Customized
>=25.0 to <30.0 kg/m^2
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
BMI, Customized
>=30.0 kg/m^2
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Surgical procedure, Customized
Breast-conserving surgery
|
53 participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 participants
n=7 Participants
|
111 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Surgical procedure, Customized
Mastectomy
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pathological diagnosis, Customized
Papillotubular carcinoma
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 participants
n=7 Participants
|
69 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pathological diagnosis, Customized
Solid-tubular carcinoma
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pathological diagnosis, Customized
Scirrhous carcinoma
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 participants
n=7 Participants
|
64 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pathological diagnosis, Customized
Mucinous carcinoma
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pathological diagnosis, Customized
Invasive lobular carcinoma
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pathological diagnosis, Customized
Tubular adenocarcinoma
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pathological diagnosis, Customized
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Pathological diagnosis, Customized
Specified neoplasms (other)
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
TNM classification: clinical tumor stage T, Customized
T1
|
63 participants
n=5 Participants
|
64 participants
n=7 Participants
|
127 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
TNM classification: clinical tumor stage T, Customized
T2
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
TNM classification: clinical tumor stage T, Customized
T3
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
TNM classification: regional lymph node stage N, Customized
N0
|
78 participants
n=5 Participants
|
81 participants
n=7 Participants
|
159 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
TNM classification: regional lymph node stage N, Customized
N1
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
TNM classification: M0
|
83 participants
n=5 Participants
|
84 participants
n=7 Participants
|
167 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
TNM staging (Stage), Customized
I
|
61 participants
n=5 Participants
|
61 participants
n=7 Participants
|
122 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
TNM staging (Stage), Customized
IIA
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
TNM staging (Stage), Customized
IIB
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
TNM staging (Stage), Customized
IIIA
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Histopathological tumor size
|
1.64 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.312 • n=5 Participants
|
1.55 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.023 • n=7 Participants
|
1.59 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.173 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Histopathological tumor size, Customized
Less than equal to (<=) 2.0 cm
|
65 participants
n=5 Participants
|
66 participants
n=7 Participants
|
131 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Histopathological tumor size, Customized
>2.0 cm
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Axillary lymph node metastases
|
0.2 number of metastases
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.46 • n=5 Participants
|
0.2 number of metastases
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.57 • n=7 Participants
|
0.2 number of metastases
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.52 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Axillary lymph node metastases, Customized
Present
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Axillary lymph node metastases, Customized
Absent
|
68 participants
n=5 Participants
|
70 participants
n=7 Participants
|
138 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Axillary lymph node metastases, Customized
0
|
68 participants
n=5 Participants
|
70 participants
n=7 Participants
|
138 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Axillary lymph node metastases, Customized
>=1 metastasis to <=3 metastases
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Axillary lymph node metastases, Customized
>=4 metastases
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from surgery or previous postoperative adjuvant therapy to administration of study drug
<=28 days
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from surgery or previous postoperative adjuvant therapy to administration of study drug
>=29 to <=56 days
|
42 participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 participants
n=7 Participants
|
85 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from surgery or previous postoperative adjuvant therapy to administration of study drug
>=57 days
|
35 participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 participants
n=7 Participants
|
67 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Primary tumor estrogen receptors (ER)/ progesterone receptors (PgR) status, Customized
ER -positive / PgR-positive
|
82 participants
n=5 Participants
|
82 participants
n=7 Participants
|
164 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Primary tumor estrogen receptors (ER)/ progesterone receptors (PgR) status, Customized
ER -positive / PgR -negative
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Primary tumor estrogen receptors (ER)/ progesterone receptors (PgR) status, Customized
ER -negative / PgR -positive
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (immunohistochemistry [IHC] scoring), Customized
0
|
37 participants
n=5 Participants
|
33 participants
n=7 Participants
|
70 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (immunohistochemistry [IHC] scoring), Customized
1+
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 participants
n=7 Participants
|
61 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (immunohistochemistry [IHC] scoring), Customized
2+
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (immunohistochemistry [IHC] scoring), Customized
3+
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (immunohistochemistry [IHC] scoring), Customized
Not performed
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HER2 (fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH] testing), Customized
Positive
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HER2 (fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH] testing), Customized
Negative
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HER2 (fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH] testing), Customized
Equivocal
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HER2 (fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH] testing), Customized
Not performed
|
70 participants
n=5 Participants
|
61 participants
n=7 Participants
|
131 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
The eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG P.S.), Customized
0
|
83 participants
n=5 Participants
|
84 participants
n=7 Participants
|
167 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
The eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG P.S.), Customized
1
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Menstruation (before the first dose), Customized
Present
|
82 participants
n=5 Participants
|
81 participants
n=7 Participants
|
163 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Menstruation (before the first dose), Customized
Absent
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from last menstruation to first dose
|
17.0 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.27 • n=5 Participants
|
15.9 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.28 • n=7 Participants
|
16.4 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from last menstruation to first dose, Customized
<=28 days
|
72 participants
n=5 Participants
|
73 participants
n=7 Participants
|
145 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from last menstruation to first dose, Customized
>=29 to <=56 days
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from last menstruation to first dose, Customized
>=57 days
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from last menstruation to first dose, Customized
Missing
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Serum Estradiol (E2) concentration (pretreatment)
|
168.0 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 162.99 • n=5 Participants
|
138.2 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 125.45 • n=7 Participants
|
153.0 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 145.66 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Serum E2 concentration (pretreatment), Customized
<=29 pg/mL
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Serum E2 concentration (pretreatment), Customized
>=30 pg/mL
|
76 participants
n=5 Participants
|
73 participants
n=7 Participants
|
149 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Radiation, Customized
Present
|
52 participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 participants
n=7 Participants
|
111 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Radiation, Customized
Absent
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy, Customized
Present
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy, Customized
Absent
|
83 participants
n=5 Participants
|
83 participants
n=7 Participants
|
166 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Previous breast cancer (other), Customized
Present
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Previous breast cancer (other), Customized
Absent
|
83 participants
n=5 Participants
|
84 participants
n=7 Participants
|
167 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Concomitant osteoporosis medication , Customized
Present
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Concomitant osteoporosis medication , Customized
Absent
|
77 participants
n=5 Participants
|
75 participants
n=7 Participants
|
152 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking Classification, Customized
Never Smoked
|
55 participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 participants
n=7 Participants
|
109 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking Classification, Customized
Current Smoker
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking Classification, Customized
Ex-smoker
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 participants
n=7 Participants
|
38 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from surgery or previous postoperative adjuvant therapy to administration of study drug
|
55.4 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.69 • n=5 Participants
|
51.8 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.01 • n=7 Participants
|
53.6 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.08 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4 up to Week 48Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who had received at least a single dose of study treatment.
Comparison of both the treatment groups was done by assessing the suppressive effect on serum E2 concentration maintained at menopausal level (=\<30pg/mL). Suppression rate was calculated as proportion of participants maintained at menopausal level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
n=83 Participants
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
n=84 Participants
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Suppressive Effect of Serum Estradiol (E2) to Menopausal Level (=<30 pg/mL) From Week 4 Through Week 48
|
97.6 percentage of participants
Interval 91.565 to 99.707
|
96.4 percentage of participants
Interval 89.916 to 99.257
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Hour (hr) 1, 3, 6 on Day 1, Day 2, 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 176, 183, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337, 421, 505, 589 and 673Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least a single dose of study treatment. Here 'N' represents evaluable baseline and post-baseline assessment population.
The measure indicates serum E2 concentration at baseline and post-baseline time points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
n=83 Participants
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
n=84 Participants
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Day2 [N=83;84]
|
146.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 693.0
|
115.5 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 333.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Day3 [N=83;84]
|
100.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 417.0
|
87.5 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 311.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 1 (Day8) [N=83;84]
|
56.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 904.0
|
112.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 981.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 2 (Day15) [N=83;84]
|
13.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 866.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 1220.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 3 (Day22) [N=83;84]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 196.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 722.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 4 (Day29) [N=83;84]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 14.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 8 (Day57) [N=83;84]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 12.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 158.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 12 (Day85) [N=83;83]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 12.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 11.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 16 (Day113) [N=82;82]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 69.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 16.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Baseline [N=83;84]
|
95 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 652.0
|
99 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 533.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Day1 (1hr) [N=82;84]
|
94.5 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 616.0
|
110.5 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 518.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Day1 (3hr) [N=24;21]
|
102.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 602.0
|
64.0 pg/mL
Interval 15.0 to 404.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Day1 (6hr) [N=24;21]
|
153.5 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 681.0
|
99.0 pg/mL
Interval 16.0 to 533.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Day4 [N=83;84]
|
108.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 543.0
|
110.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 453.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 20 (Day141) [N=81;82]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 15.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 15.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 24 (Day169) [N=80;81]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 27.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 20.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 25 (Day176) [N=79;80]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 18.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 15.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 26 (Day183) [N=79;80]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 14.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 19.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 28 (Day197) [N=75;77]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 14.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 16.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 32 (Day225) [N=78;80]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 17.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 18.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 36 (Day253) [N=79;80]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 18.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 17.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 40 (Day281) [N=78;80]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 184.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 12.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 44 (Day309) [N=77;80]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 16.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 15.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 48 (Day337) [N=77;80]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 15.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 19.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 60 (Day421) [N=77;79]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 25.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 21.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 72 (Day505) [N=77;78]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 14.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 18.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 84 (Day589) [N=76;77]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 15.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 14.0
|
|
Concentration of Serum E2
Week 96 (Day673) [N=75;75]
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 12.0
|
0.0 pg/mL
Interval 0.0 to 24.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Hour 1, 3, 6 on Day 1, Day 2, 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 176, 183, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337, 421, 505, 589 and 673Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least a single dose of study treatment. Here 'N' represents evaluable baseline and post-baseline assessment population.
This measure indicates serum LH concentration at baseline and post-baseline time points. It was measured in milli-international units per milliliter (mIU/mL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
n=83 Participants
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
n=84 Participants
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Baseline [N=83;84]
|
4.250 mIU/mL
Interval 0.69 to 65.33
|
4.490 mIU/mL
Interval 0.77 to 40.17
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Day1 (1hr) [N=82;84]
|
27.730 mIU/mL
Interval 8.12 to 250.0
|
30.585 mIU/mL
Interval 2.78 to 207.3
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Day3 [N=83;84]
|
7.310 mIU/mL
Interval 1.28 to 27.86
|
10.500 mIU/mL
Interval 1.73 to 59.52
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Day4 [N=83;84]
|
5.830 mIU/mL
Interval 1.13 to 41.16
|
9.375 mIU/mL
Interval 1.63 to 56.11
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 20 (Day141) [N=81;82]
|
0.240 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 2.26
|
0.405 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 2.93
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 24 (Day169) [N=80;81]
|
0.290 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 8.01
|
0.460 mIU/mL
Interval 0.11 to 2.96
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 25 (Day176) [N=79;80]
|
0.450 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 7.92
|
0.455 mIU/mL
Interval 0.15 to 1.47
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 26 (Day183) [N=79;80]
|
0.410 mIU/mL
Interval 0.12 to 2.46
|
0.405 mIU/mL
Interval 0.14 to 1.7
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 28 (Day197) [N=75;77]
|
0.270 mIU/mL
Interval 0.11 to 0.95
|
0.410 mIU/mL
Interval 0.11 to 1.68
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 32 (Day225) [N=78;80]
|
0.280 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 1.31
|
0.440 mIU/mL
Interval 0.14 to 2.45
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 36 (Day253) [N=79;80]
|
0.250 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 2.02
|
0.395 mIU/mL
Interval 0.11 to 2.01
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 40 (Day281) [N=78;80]
|
0.240 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 2.05
|
0.390 mIU/mL
Interval 0.12 to 1.75
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 44 (Day309) [N=77;80]
|
0.250 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 2.67
|
0.385 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 2.14
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Day1 (3hr) [N=24;21]
|
88.020 mIU/mL
Interval 24.64 to 250.0
|
63.260 mIU/mL
Interval 12.0 to 153.6
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Day1 (6hr) [N=24;21]
|
64.750 mIU/mL
Interval 32.54 to 198.9
|
61.210 mIU/mL
Interval 12.68 to 106.1
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Day2 [N=83;84]
|
14.990 mIU/mL
Interval 3.22 to 90.63
|
19.755 mIU/mL
Interval 1.84 to 154.3
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 1 (Day8) [N=83;84]
|
3.190 mIU/mL
Interval 0.75 to 25.08
|
4.475 mIU/mL
Interval 1.18 to 29.68
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 2 (Day15) [N=83;84]
|
2.460 mIU/mL
Interval 0.76 to 10.56
|
1.990 mIU/mL
Interval 0.75 to 9.65
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 3 (Day22) [N=83;84]
|
1.020 mIU/mL
Interval 0.24 to 4.39
|
1.085 mIU/mL
Interval 0.38 to 5.35
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 4 (Day29) [N=83;84]
|
0.540 mIU/mL
Interval 0.16 to 1.85
|
0.845 mIU/mL
Interval 0.33 to 2.73
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 8 (Day57) [N=83;84]
|
0.270 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 1.15
|
0.570 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 5.17
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 12 (Day85) [N=83;83]
|
0.220 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 1.84
|
0.520 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 2.7
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 16 (Day113) [N=82;82]
|
0.245 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 7.08
|
0.430 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 1.42
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 48 (Day337) [N=77;80]
|
0.250 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 2.12
|
0.415 mIU/mL
Interval 0.11 to 1.3
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 60 (Day421) [N=77;79]
|
0.250 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 1.52
|
0.440 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 2.57
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 72 (Day505) [N=77;78]
|
0.260 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 1.24
|
0.420 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 1.91
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 84 (Day589) [N=76;77]
|
0.230 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 1.3
|
0.410 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 1.34
|
|
Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Week 96 (Day673) [N=75;75]
|
0.210 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 1.48
|
0.360 mIU/mL
Interval 0.0 to 1.63
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Hour 1, 3, 6 on Day 1, Day 2, 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 176, 183, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337, 421, 505, 589 and 673Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least a single dose of study treatment. Here 'N' represents evaluable baseline and post-baseline assessment population.
This measure indicates serum FSH concentration at baseline and post-baseline time points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
n=83 Participants
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
n=84 Participants
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Day1 (6hr) [N=24;21]
|
27.460 mIU/mL
Interval 11.19 to 147.78
|
25.340 mIU/mL
Interval 10.85 to 107.69
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Day2 [N=83;84]
|
10.080 mIU/mL
Interval 2.78 to 93.7
|
12.515 mIU/mL
Interval 3.23 to 115.42
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 3 (Day22) [N=83;84]
|
1.220 mIU/mL
Interval 0.49 to 3.22
|
1.570 mIU/mL
Interval 0.49 to 4.68
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 4 (Day29) [N=83;84]
|
1.200 mIU/mL
Interval 0.39 to 2.48
|
2.015 mIU/mL
Interval 0.68 to 7.37
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 24 (Day169) [N=80;81]
|
2.060 mIU/mL
Interval 0.42 to 6.24
|
2.000 mIU/mL
Interval 0.59 to 6.52
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 25 (Day176) [N=79;80]
|
1.940 mIU/mL
Interval 0.71 to 5.22
|
1.600 mIU/mL
Interval 0.51 to 4.25
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Baseline [N=83;84]
|
5.070 mIU/mL
Interval 1.97 to 57.33
|
5.605 mIU/mL
Interval 2.03 to 66.13
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Day1 (1hr) [N=82;84]
|
9.520 mIU/mL
Interval 4.01 to 102.42
|
10.000 mIU/mL
Interval 4.02 to 99.71
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Day1 (3hr) [N=24;21]
|
23.325 mIU/mL
Interval 8.39 to 110.28
|
19.950 mIU/mL
Interval 10.06 to 74.66
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Day3 [N=83;84]
|
6.180 mIU/mL
Interval 2.86 to 45.56
|
6.780 mIU/mL
Interval 3.09 to 55.25
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Day4 [N=83;84]
|
6.100 mIU/mL
Interval 2.84 to 37.79
|
5.585 mIU/mL
Interval 2.75 to 36.28
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 1 (Day8) [N=83;84]
|
3.920 mIU/mL
Interval 0.99 to 14.09
|
3.035 mIU/mL
Interval 1.19 to 11.62
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 2 (Day15) [N=83;84]
|
1.820 mIU/mL
Interval 0.58 to 7.49
|
1.705 mIU/mL
Interval 0.47 to 4.63
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 8 (Day57) [N=83;84]
|
1.390 mIU/mL
Interval 0.36 to 5.15
|
2.345 mIU/mL
Interval 0.87 to 7.75
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 12 (Day85) [N=83;83]
|
1.490 mIU/mL
Interval 0.37 to 5.72
|
2.240 mIU/mL
Interval 0.76 to 7.06
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 16 (Day113) [N=82;82]
|
1.635 mIU/mL
Interval 0.59 to 11.04
|
1.830 mIU/mL
Interval 0.69 to 4.82
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 20 (Day141) [N=81;82]
|
1.780 mIU/mL
Interval 0.53 to 7.28
|
1.905 mIU/mL
Interval 0.87 to 8.76
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 26 (Day183) [N=79;80]
|
1.560 mIU/mL
Interval 0.53 to 3.4
|
1.700 mIU/mL
Interval 0.64 to 3.71
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 28 (Day197) [N=75;77]
|
1.310 mIU/mL
Interval 0.52 to 2.81
|
1.690 mIU/mL
Interval 0.59 to 5.91
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 32 (Day225) [N=78;80]
|
1.595 mIU/mL
Interval 0.52 to 4.81
|
1.980 mIU/mL
Interval 0.57 to 4.69
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 36 (Day253) [N=79;80]
|
1.660 mIU/mL
Interval 0.73 to 6.12
|
2.035 mIU/mL
Interval 0.67 to 5.49
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 40 (Day281) [N=78;80]
|
1.735 mIU/mL
Interval 0.75 to 4.09
|
1.710 mIU/mL
Interval 0.71 to 7.62
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 44 (Day309) [N=77;80]
|
1.930 mIU/mL
Interval 0.72 to 5.01
|
1.825 mIU/mL
Interval 0.7 to 6.39
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 48 (Day337) [N=77;80]
|
1.920 mIU/mL
Interval 0.69 to 8.37
|
1.885 mIU/mL
Interval 0.72 to 4.09
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 60 (Day421) [N=77;79]
|
1.530 mIU/mL
Interval 0.74 to 4.71
|
1.910 mIU/mL
Interval 0.64 to 4.75
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 72 (Day505) [N=77;78]
|
1.730 mIU/mL
Interval 0.92 to 5.89
|
1.920 mIU/mL
Interval 0.63 to 4.3
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 84 (Day589) [N=76;77]
|
1.500 mIU/mL
Interval 0.77 to 3.23
|
1.840 mIU/mL
Interval 0.66 to 3.74
|
|
Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Week 96 (Day673) [N=75;75]
|
1.620 mIU/mL
Interval 0.76 to 4.57
|
1.740 mIU/mL
Interval 0.59 to 7.01
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 96Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least a single dose of study treatment.
DFS is defined as time from randomization to earliest day of onset the events, recurrence \[including recurrence in the ipsilateral breast\], secondary cancer \[including breast cancer in the contralateral breast\] and death. DFS at Week 96 was defined as the percentage, calculated with Kaplan-Meier method, of participants did not experience any events at Week 96 since the randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
n=83 Participants
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
n=84 Participants
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Disease Free Survival (DFS) Rate at Week 96
|
97.3 percentage of participants
|
97.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 96Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least a single dose of study treatment.
DDFS is defined as time from randomization to earliest day of onset the events, distant recurrence, secondary cancer \[including breast cancer in the contralateral breast\] and death. DDFS at week 96 was defined as the percentage calculated with Kaplan-Meier method, of participants did not experience any events at week 96 since the randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
n=83 Participants
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
n=84 Participants
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Distant Disease Free Survival (DDFS) Rate at Week 96
|
98.5 percentage of participants
|
98.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Hour 1, 3, 6 on Day 1, Day 2, 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 176, 183, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309 and 337Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least a single dose of study treatment. Here 'N' represents evaluable baseline and post-baseline assessment population.
This measure indicates the unchanged TAP-144 level in serum.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
n=83 Participants
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
n=84 Participants
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Day1 (1hr) [N=82;84]
|
5.293 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 1.0684 • Interval 8.12 to 250.0
|
28.45 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 9.7398 • Interval 2.78 to 207.3
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Day1 (3hr) [N=24;19]
|
2.538 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.46023 • Interval 24.64 to 250.0
|
20.27 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 3.9535 • Interval 12.0 to 153.6
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Day1 (6hr) [N=24;21]
|
1.039 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.23264 • Interval 32.54 to 198.9
|
8.037 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 1.7408 • Interval 12.68 to 106.1
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Day2 [N=83;84]
|
0.1401 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.066137 • Interval 3.22 to 90.63
|
0.4749 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.17801 • Interval 1.84 to 154.3
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 4 (Day29) [N=83;83]
|
0.3442 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.19814 • Interval 0.16 to 1.85
|
0.04971 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.032917 • Interval 0.33 to 2.73
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 8 (Day57) [N=83;83]
|
0.1146 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.053068 • Interval 0.0 to 1.15
|
0.04744 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.032379 • Interval 0.0 to 5.17
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 12 (Day85) [N=83;83]
|
0.08051 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.041881 • Interval 0.0 to 1.84
|
0.06028 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.031104 • Interval 0.0 to 2.7
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 16 (Day113) [N=82;82]
|
0.05775 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.037098 • Interval 0.0 to 7.08
|
0.09347 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.077284 • Interval 0.0 to 1.42
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 20 (Day141) [N=81;82]
|
0.03941 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.037082 • Interval 0.0 to 2.26
|
0.07165 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.062739 • Interval 0.0 to 2.93
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 24 (Day169) [N=80;81]
|
0.02931 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.019785 • Interval 0.0 to 8.01
|
0.07634 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.064118 • Interval 0.11 to 2.96
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Baseline [N=83;84]
|
0.000 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.0000 • Interval 0.69 to 65.33
|
0.000 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.0000 • Interval 0.77 to 40.17
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Day3 [N=83;84]
|
0.02889 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.026108 • Interval 1.28 to 27.86
|
0.2492 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.097054 • Interval 1.73 to 59.52
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Day4 [N=83;84]
|
0.02380 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.022645 • Interval 1.13 to 41.16
|
0.2273 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.080794 • Interval 1.63 to 56.11
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 1 (Day8) [N=82;83]
|
0.09115 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.22637 • Interval 0.75 to 25.08
|
0.1050 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.049062 • Interval 1.18 to 29.68
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 2 (Day15) [N=82;84]
|
0.3702 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.25134 • Interval 0.76 to 10.56
|
0.08867 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.077142 • Interval 0.75 to 9.65
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 3 (Day22) [N=83;84]
|
0.7285 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.35639 • Interval 0.24 to 4.39
|
0.06471 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.092279 • Interval 0.38 to 5.35
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 25 (Day176) [N=79;80]
|
0.1128 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.16751 • Interval 0.0 to 7.92
|
0.1583 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.089299 • Interval 0.15 to 1.47
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 26 (Day183) [N=79;80]
|
0.3327 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.36474 • Interval 0.12 to 2.46
|
0.1109 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.065133 • Interval 0.14 to 1.7
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 28 (Day197) [N=80;80]
|
0.4687 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.36083 • Interval 0.11 to 0.95
|
0.08468 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.040820 • Interval 0.11 to 1.68
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 32 (Day225) [N=78;80]
|
0.1377 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.093340 • Interval 0.0 to 1.31
|
0.06881 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.037607 • Interval 0.14 to 2.45
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 36 (Day253) [N=79;80]
|
0.08521 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.040324 • Interval 0.0 to 2.02
|
0.06259 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.036687 • Interval 0.11 to 2.01
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 40 (Day281) [N=79;80]
|
0.06073 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.032232 • Interval 0.0 to 2.05
|
0.08163 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.031631 • Interval 0.12 to 1.75
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 44 (Day309) [N=77;80]
|
0.4339 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.026552 • Interval 0.0 to 2.67
|
0.06479 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.028540 • Interval 0.0 to 2.14
|
|
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Week 48 (Day337) [N=77;80]
|
0.02957 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.017147 • Interval 0.0 to 2.12
|
0.06313 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.032149 • Interval 0.11 to 1.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Hour 1, 3, 6 on Day 1, Day 29, 85, 169 and 337Population: Safety evaluation was conducted in the safety analysis set (SAS). Here 'N' represents evaluable baseline and post-baseline assessment population.
12-lead electrocardiography measurement was performed in supine position after 5 minutes at rest. Each measurement was recorded continuously for 10 seconds at the recording speed of 25 millimeter/second (mm/second).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
n=83 Participants
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
n=84 Participants
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
QT Interval Measured by 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Day1 (6hr) [N=24;21]
|
415.8 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 18.68 • Interval 32.54 to 198.9
|
424.1 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 13.76 • Interval 12.68 to 106.1
|
|
QT Interval Measured by 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 4 (Day29) [N=83;84]
|
431.2 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 19.30 • Interval 0.16 to 1.85
|
432.3 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 16.90 • Interval 0.33 to 2.73
|
|
QT Interval Measured by 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 12 (Day85) [N=83;84]
|
433.3 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 19.44 • Interval 0.0 to 1.84
|
432.3 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 20.01 • Interval 0.0 to 2.7
|
|
QT Interval Measured by 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 24 (Day169) [N=81;82]
|
431.0 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 21.22 • Interval 0.0 to 8.01
|
429.0 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 20.28 • Interval 0.11 to 2.96
|
|
QT Interval Measured by 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 48 (Day337) [N=77;80]
|
430.0 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 17.31 • Interval 0.0 to 2.12
|
431.4 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 18.89 • Interval 0.11 to 1.3
|
|
QT Interval Measured by 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Baseline [N=83;84]
|
421.5 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 16.05 • Interval 0.69 to 65.33
|
420.9 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 16.53 • Interval 0.77 to 40.17
|
|
QT Interval Measured by 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Day1 (1hr) [N=83;84]
|
417.8 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 15.37 • Interval 8.12 to 250.0
|
417.1 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 17.83 • Interval 2.78 to 207.3
|
|
QT Interval Measured by 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Day1 (3hr) [N=24;21]
|
416.8 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 11.34 • Interval 24.64 to 250.0
|
423.7 millisecond (msec)
Standard Deviation 18.90 • Interval 12.0 to 153.6
|
Adverse Events
TAP-144-SR (6M)
TAP-144-SR (3M)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
n=83 participants at risk
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
n=84 participants at risk
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Eyelid ptosis
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fistula
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infectious mononucleosis
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Occult blood positive
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cervix carcinoma stage 0
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Multiple sclerosis
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
VIIth nerve paralysis
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
1.2%
1/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Behcet's syndrome
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.2%
1/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
TAP-144-SR (6M)
n=83 participants at risk
TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneous, once in 24 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
TAP-144-SR (3M)
n=84 participants at risk
TAP-144-SR (3M) 11.25 mg, injection, subcutaneous, once in 12 weeks along with tamoxifen 20 mg, tablet, orally, once daily for up to 96 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
8.4%
7/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
3.6%
3/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
|
6.0%
5/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
3.6%
3/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
8.4%
7/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
10.7%
9/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
15.7%
13/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.4%
2/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
7.2%
6/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
4.8%
4/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
7.2%
6/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
3.6%
3/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
6.0%
5/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.4%
2/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
8.3%
7/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site induration
|
43.4%
36/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
39.3%
33/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
28.9%
24/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
31.0%
26/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
15.7%
13/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
15.5%
13/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
15.7%
13/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
9.5%
8/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site swelling
|
14.5%
12/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
6.0%
5/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site bruising
|
6.0%
5/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
8.3%
7/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
4.8%
4/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
6.0%
5/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic steatosis
|
7.2%
6/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
9.5%
8/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
56.6%
47/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
50.0%
42/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
9.6%
8/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
4.8%
4/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
6.0%
5/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
3.6%
3/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radiation skin injury
|
37.3%
31/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
46.4%
39/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radiation pneumonitis
|
8.4%
7/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
3.6%
3/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
3.6%
3/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
7.1%
6/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound complication
|
2.4%
2/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
6.0%
5/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
32.5%
27/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
22.6%
19/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
14.5%
12/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
9.5%
8/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
3.6%
3/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
14.3%
12/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
8.4%
7/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
4.8%
4/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
6.0%
5/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
3.6%
3/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Bone density decreased
|
3.6%
3/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
6.0%
5/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
21.7%
18/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
23.8%
20/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
|
13.3%
11/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
10.7%
9/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
15.7%
13/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
7.1%
6/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoporosis
|
6.0%
5/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
3.6%
3/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
25.3%
21/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
22.6%
19/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
7.2%
6/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
10.7%
9/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
7.1%
6/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
12.0%
10/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
10.7%
9/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menopausal symptoms
|
6.0%
5/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
7.1%
6/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
6.0%
5/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
7.1%
6/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
10.8%
9/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
8.3%
7/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
10.8%
9/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
7.1%
6/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
3.6%
3/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
10.7%
9/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
|
51.8%
43/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
57.1%
48/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
6.0%
5/83 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
4.8%
4/84 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER