Utility of Sputum Induction and Novel Technologies to Improve TB Diagnosis in a High HIV Prevalence Primary Care Setting
NCT ID: NCT01545661
Last Updated: 2012-12-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
517 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-08-31
2012-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sputum induction
Enrolled patients receive sputum induction (using ultrasonic nebulisation with hypertonic saline)
Sputum induction
Ultrasonic nebulisation 3% hypertonic saline nebulised for duration of 20 mins
No sputum induction
Enrolled patients randomised to this study arm will receive an observed expectorated sputum collection attempt. Research nurses train study patients on the method of producing sputum spontaneously.
standard routine expectorated sputum
Patients in the control group are trained by the research staff to produce sputum but no device is utilized. Sputum is spontaneously expectorated where possible
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sputum induction
Ultrasonic nebulisation 3% hypertonic saline nebulised for duration of 20 mins
standard routine expectorated sputum
Patients in the control group are trained by the research staff to produce sputum but no device is utilized. Sputum is spontaneously expectorated where possible
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Primary care patient (not referred by doctor)
3. Adult patients (\>18 years)
4. Able to provide informed consent
2. \<18 years
3. Unable to provide informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cape Town
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jonathan Peter
Dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jonathan G Peter, MBChB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cape Town
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Cape Town
Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Peter JG, Theron G, Pooran A, Thomas J, Pascoe M, Dheda K. Comparison of two methods for acquisition of sputum samples for diagnosis of suspected tuberculosis in smear-negative or sputum-scarce people: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Aug;1(6):471-8. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70120-6. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SINET study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id