Impaired Decision Making in Pedophilic Offenders

NCT ID: NCT01541150

Last Updated: 2014-12-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pedophilic behaviors represent a public health problem with serious consequences. The investigators hypothesize a disruption in the decision-making strategies among sex offenders pedophiles. Highlight this type of abnormality would offer a specific treatment of a possible neuropsychological deficit (with cognitive remediation for instance) and perhaps avoid recurrences of this type of behavior.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cross-sectional study, comparing a group of 64 pedophilic offenders inmates condamned with a group of 64 volunteers non-pedophiles matched by age and level of study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pedophilia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Pedophilia Impaired Decision making Insight Cognitive Distorsions Impulsiveness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

patient suffering pedophilia

This group is the active comparator because patients suffering pedophilia with neuropsychological questionnaires

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

neuropsychological questionnaires

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Due to this study population (inmates), the investigators have decided to classify the protocol as and interventionnal study.

control group

This group is the placebo comparator

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

neuropsychological questionnaires

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Due to this study population (inmates), the investigators have decided to classify the protocol as and interventionnal study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

neuropsychological questionnaires

Due to this study population (inmates), the investigators have decided to classify the protocol as and interventionnal study.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* For the controls, lack of diagnosis of disorders of sexual behavior (paraphilias) current or past (DSM IV)
* For the pedophilic offenders:

* Placement and conviction for rape or sexual assault of a minor under 15 years
* Recognition of the facts
* Existence of a current or past diagnosis of pedophilia (according to the DSM IV).

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of a current major depressive episode (DSM IV - MINI)
* History of cerebral neurological disorder or a cranial trauma with loss of consciousness current
* IGT test already done
* Schizophrenia or Other current psychotic disorders(according to the criteria DSM IV of MINI test).
* taking psychoactive drug
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lacambre Mathieu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU de Montpellier

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Lacambre Mathieu, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 04 67 33 85 77

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Lacambre Mathieu, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-A00402-39

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

8673

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id